The Proxy Voting Service will refer proxy questions to the Proxy Administrator for instructions undercircumstances where: (1) the application of the Guidelines is unclear; (2) the proxy question relates to acompany and/or issue in which the Proxy Voting Services does not have research, analysis and/or arecommendation available, or (3) the Guidelines call for Janus portfolio manager input. The ProxyAdministrator solicits feedback from the Portfolio Manager or the Committee as required. Janus alsoutilizes research services relating to proxy questions provided by the Proxy Voting Service.Procedures for Proxy Issues Outside the Guidelines. In situations where the Proxy Voting Servicerefers a proxy question to the Proxy Administrator, the Proxy Administrator will consult with theportfolio manager regarding how the shares will be voted. The Proxy Administrator will refer suchquestions, through a written request, to the portfolio manager(s) who hold(s) the security for a votingrecommendation. The Proxy Administrator may also refer such questions, through a written request toany member of the Committee, but the Committee cannot direct the Proxy Administrator how to vote. Ifthe proxy issue raises a conflict of interest (see Conflict of Interest discussion below), the portfoliomanager will document how the proxy should be voted and the rationale for such recommendation. If theportfolio manager has had any contact with persons outside of Janus (excluding routine communicationswith proxy solicitors) regarding the proxy issue, the portfolio manager will disclose that contact to theCommittee. The Committee will review the portfolio manager’s voting recommendation. If theCommittee believes a conflict exists and that the portfolio manager’s voting recommendation is not in thebest interests of the shareholders, the Committee will refer the issue to the Janus Chief InvestmentOfficer(s) (or the Director of Research in his/her absence) to determine how to vote.Procedures for Voting Janus “Fund of Funds”. Janus advises certain portfolios or “fund of funds” thatinvest in other Janus funds. From time to time, a fund of funds may be required to vote proxies for theunderlying Janus funds in which it is invested. Accordingly, if an underlying Janus fund submits a matterto a vote of its shareholders, votes for and against such matters on behalf of the owner fund of funds willbe cast in the same proportion as the votes of the other shareholders in the underlying fund (also known as“echo-voting”).Conflicts of Interest. The Committee is responsible for monitoring and resolving possible materialconflicts with respect to proxy voting. Because the Guidelines are pre-determined and designed to be inthe best interests of shareholders, application of the Guidelines to vote client proxies should, in mostcases, adequately address any possible conflicts of interest. In instances where a portfolio managerproposes to vote a proxy inconsistent with the Guidelines, the Committee will review the proxy votes todetermine whether the portfolio manager’s voting rationale appears reasonable and no material conflictexists.A conflict of interest may exist, for example, if Janus has a business relationship with (or is activelysoliciting business from) either the company soliciting the proxy or a third party that has a materialinterest in the outcome of a proxy vote or that is actively lobbying for a particular outcome of a proxyvote. In addition, any portfolio manager with knowledge of a personal conflict of interest (i.e., a familymember in a company’s management) relating to a particular referral item shall disclose that conflict tothe Committee and may be required to recuse himself or herself from the proxy voting process. Issuesraising possible conflicts of interest are referred by the Proxy Administrator to the Committee forresolution. If the Committee does not agree that the portfolio manager’s rationale is reasonable, theCommittee will refer the matter to the Chief Investment Officer(s) (or the Director of Research) to votethe proxy.If a matter is referred to the Chief Investment Officer(s) (or the Director of Research) the decision madeand basis for the decision will be documented by the Committee.Reporting and Record Retention. Upon request, on an annual basis, Janus will provide its non-mutualfund clients with the proxy voting record for that client’s account. On an annual basis, Janus will provideits proxy voting record for each proprietary mutual fund for the one-year period ending on June 30 th onJanus’ website.B-132
Janus retains proxy statements received regarding client securities, records of votes cast on behalf ofclients, records of client requests for proxy voting information and all documents prepared by Janusregarding votes cast in contradiction to the Janus Guidelines. In addition, any document prepared byJanus that is material to a proxy voting decision such as the Guidelines, Proxy Voting Committeematerials and other internal research relating to voting decisions will be kept. Proxy statements receivedfrom issuers are either available on the SEC’s EDGAR database or are kept by a third party voting serviceand are available on request. All proxy voting materials and supporting documentation are retained for aminimum of 6 years.February 2009Janus Capital Management LLCProxy Voting GuidelinesThe Janus Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) below summarize Janus Capital ManagementLLC’s (“Janus”) positions on various issues of concern to investors and give a general indication of howportfolio securities will be voted on proposals dealing with particular issues. The Guidelines, togetherwith the Janus Proxy Voting Procedures (the “Procedures”), will be used for voting proxies on behalf ofall Janus clients (including mutual funds) for which Janus has voting authority. Janus will only acceptdirection from a client to vote proxies for that client’s account pursuant to: 1) the Guidelines; 2) therecommendations of Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (also known as the ISS Governance Servicesunit of RiskMetrics Group) (the “Proxy Voting Service”); or 3) the recommendations of the Proxy VotingService under their Proxy Voter Services program.Janus has retained the services of the Proxy Voting Service, an industry expert in proxy issues andcorporate governance matters. The Proxy Voting Service provides Janus with in-depth analysis andrecommendations on complex proxy issues. While Janus attempts to apply the following Guidelines toproxy proposals, Janus reserves the right to use the Proxy Voting Service’s expertise andrecommendations on more complex issues, including: executive compensation, foreign issuer proxies, andproposals that may not otherwise be addressed by the Guidelines. The Proxy Voting Service is instructedto vote all proxies relating to portfolio securities in accordance with these Guidelines, except as otherwiseinstructed by Janus. The Proxy Voting Service, may not, in all instances, have or provide research,analysis and recommendations on proxy issues. For example, the Proxy Voting Service may not providesuch analysis and research for privately held companies. In such instances, the Proxy Administrator shallrefer such proxy proposal to the portfolio manager.The Guidelines are not exhaustive and do not include all potential voting issues. Because proxy issuesand the circumstances of individual companies are so varied, there may be instances when Janus may notvote in strict adherence to the Guidelines. In addition, Janus portfolio managers and assistant portfoliomanagers are responsible for monitoring significant corporate developments, including proxy proposalssubmitted to shareholders and notifying the Proxy Administrator in the Investment Accounting Group ofcircumstances where the interests of Janus’ clients may warrant a vote contrary to the Guidelines. In suchinstances, the portfolio manager or assistant portfolio manager will submit a written rationale to the ProxyVoting Committee. The Proxy Voting Committee reviews the rationale to determine: i) whether therationale appears reasonable; and ii) whether any business relationship with the issuer of the proxy couldhave created a conflict of interest influencing the vote (see Procedures for additional Conflicts of Interestdetails).In many foreign markets, shareholders who vote proxies for shares of a foreign issuer are not able to tradein that company’s stock within a given period of time on or around the shareholder meeting date. Thispractice is known as “share blocking.” In countries where share blocking is practiced, Janus will onlyvote proxies if the portfolio manager or assistant portfolio manager determines that the shareholderbenefit of voting the proxies outweighs the risk of not being able to sell the securities. In addition,international issuers may be subject to corporate governance standards and a proxy solicitation processB-133
- Page 4:
APPENDIX F - Proxy Voting Policies
- Page 9 and 10:
stocks that make up that index. Str
- Page 11 and 12:
Interest rate swaps do not involve
- Page 13 and 14:
the Adviser or Sub-Adviser will not
- Page 17 and 18:
Forward Contracts. The Portfolios m
- Page 19 and 20:
principal amount as the call writte
- Page 21 and 22:
Options on Foreign Currencies. The
- Page 23 and 24:
securities. The issuers of the unde
- Page 25 and 26:
the former pools. However, timely p
- Page 27 and 28:
CMO residuals are generally purchas
- Page 29:
utilize the underlying assets may r
- Page 32 and 33:
include range floaters which are a
- Page 34 and 35:
par unless the price of the underly
- Page 36 and 37:
to changes in interest rates genera
- Page 38 and 39:
corresponding floaters. The underly
- Page 40 and 41:
A Portfolio will not enter into suc
- Page 42 and 43:
egulations. The presence of an issu
- Page 44 and 45:
Portfolio TurnoverPortfolio turnove
- Page 46 and 47:
The ability of the Portfolio to ach
- Page 48 and 49:
Advisors, LLC, in accordance with t
- Page 50 and 51:
OWNERSHIP OF SHARES OF THE FUNDAll
- Page 52 and 53:
on the next $50 million, 0.50% on t
- Page 54 and 55:
Independent Registered Public Accou
- Page 56 and 57:
Name of Portfolio 2008 2007 2006Int
- Page 58 and 59:
Broker High Yield Bond BalancedAsse
- Page 60 and 61:
and cost of trade execution of Port
- Page 62 and 63:
Effective April 30, 2008, the Fund
- Page 64 and 65:
TAXES AND DIVIDENDSEach Portfolio i
- Page 66 and 67:
APPENDIX A - Credit RatingsDescript
- Page 68 and 69:
F2Good credit quality. A satisfacto
- Page 70 and 71:
. Moody’s Commercial Paper (short
- Page 72 and 73:
Plus (+) or minus (-)The ratings fr
- Page 74 and 75:
APPENDIX B - Directors and Officers
- Page 76 and 77:
Name, Address, andYear of BirthDavi
- Page 78 and 79:
APPENDIX C - Ownership of Shares of
- Page 80 and 81:
SMALL CAP VALUE PORTFOLIOGeneral Ac
- Page 82 and 83: APPENDIX D - Portfolio ManagersOthe
- Page 84 and 85: PortfolioManager(s)FundRegisteredIn
- Page 86 and 87: Compensation of Portfolio ManagersM
- Page 88 and 89: management firms. Performance is pr
- Page 90 and 91: Portfolio managers are eligible for
- Page 92 and 93: PortfolioPortfolio Manager(s)Dollar
- Page 94 and 95: On August 25, 2005, the Court enter
- Page 96 and 97: MSA’s Equity Trading Department s
- Page 98 and 99: ERISA ClientsIn the case of client
- Page 100 and 101: Shareholder Ability to Call Special
- Page 102 and 103: • Exercise price• Participation
- Page 104 and 105: Amend Quorum RequirementsVote propo
- Page 106 and 107: Vote proposals to increase blank ch
- Page 108 and 109: employees of Investment Manager and
- Page 110 and 111: will not support the position of a
- Page 112 and 113: company specifies the voting, divid
- Page 114 and 115: egarding whether Investment Manager
- Page 116 and 117: 3. The issuer is an entity particip
- Page 118 and 119: manager(s) are responsible for maki
- Page 120 and 121: Global Corporate Governance: Invest
- Page 122 and 123: 13. The Proxy Group will review the
- Page 124 and 125: determined by those investment comm
- Page 126 and 127: T. Rowe Price has adopted these Pro
- Page 128 and 129: shareholders and the effect on shar
- Page 130 and 131: portfolio company could have influe
- Page 134 and 135: that substantially differs from dom
- Page 136 and 137: 15. Janus will generally vote in fa
- Page 138 and 139: 46. For shareholder proposals outsi
- Page 140 and 141: 2. Staggered BoardIf a company has
- Page 142 and 143: proposed for a legitimate business
- Page 144 and 145: APPENDIX G - Portfolio Holdings Dis
- Page 146: ICP Securities LLCIntermonte Securi