ERISA ClientsIn the case of client accounts subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, asamended (“ERISA”), MSA will consider in voting proxies those factors that may affect the value of itsclient’s accounts, and shall not subordinate the interests of participants and beneficiaries to unrelatedobjectives. MSA shall act with the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances thenprevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in theconduct of an enterprise of like character and with like aims.Fixed Income and Non-Voting SecuritiesTo the extent applicable and not otherwise required in this section, these Proxy Voting Policies andProcedures will also be used by MSA for exercising voting rights which may arise upon conversion of, orin connection with certain other situations with respect to, fixed income or other securities which do notordinarily carry voting rights. These limited circumstances include extraordinary corporate actions, plansof reorganization, or liquidation or similar matters, however the procedural requirements contained inthese Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures shall not apply in the case of ordinary course requests foramendments, consent solicitations or directions with respect to the exercise of remedies for fixed incomeor other traditionally non-voting securities. In both instances however, it is the policy of MSA to castthese votes in a manner consistent with the best interests of its advisory clients and in so doing not tosubrogate its client’s interests to its own.Northwestern Mutual’s Treasury & Investment Operations personnel (as service providers to MSA) areresponsible for coordinating with the clients’ custodians to ensure that all voting materials received by thecustodians relating to the clients’ portfolio from issuers, trustees or other third parties are processed in atimely fashion and delivered to the applicable portfolio managers and MSA’s Chief Compliance Officer,and for maintaining voting records. As is the case with equity securities, MSA’s portfolio managers areresponsible for voting decisions on fixed income or other non-equity securities held in the client accountsthey manage. However, because no recommendations are generated by ISS, in the limited circumstancesdescribed above, the portfolio manager will submit a written recommendation as to how the clientsecurities should be voted and the rationale for such recommendation to the Head of MSA Fixed IncomeInvestments who will review the recommendation to determine whether a conflict of interest exists. 3 Inaddition, the portfolio manager will disclose any contact he or she has had with persons outside of MSAregarding the voting issue. In the event that no conflict of interest exists, the Head of MSA Fixed IncomeInvestments (or the Committee, as the case may be) will permit the portfolio manager to vote the clientsecurities as recommended. A summary of such votes will be reviewed by the Committee at its nextregularly scheduled meeting. In the event the portfolio manager or other MSA officer, director oremployee identifies a conflict of interest relating to a particular proposal, the Committee will review theproposal and determine the vote based on the portfolio manager’s voting recommendation (if any) and allrelevant facts and circumstances.EXHIBIT AMSA Proxy Voting GuidelinesSpecific voting guidelines have been established by MSA for voting proxies. The following is a summaryof some of the more significant policies. MSA has engaged Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), anunaffiliated proxy voting and research service, to assist in the voting of proxies. ISS makes proxy votingrecommendations to MSA based on these Guidelines. A complete copy of the Guidelines is available toclients upon request.3Any MSA officer, director or employee who becomes aware of a conflict of interest relating to a particular voteregarding fixed income or other non-voting securities shall immediately disclose that conflict to the Head of MSAFixed Income Investing or, if the conflict involves the Head of MSA Fixed Income Investing, to the Committee.B-98
US Proxy Voting Guidelines Summary1. AuditorsVote CASE-BY-CASE on shareholder proposals on auditor rotation, taking into account these factors:• Tenure of the audit firm• Establishment and disclosure of a renewal process whereby the auditor is regularly evaluated for bothaudit quality and competitive price• Length of the rotation period advocated in the proposal• Significant audit-related issues• Number of audit committee meetings held each year• Number of financial experts serving on the committee2. Board of DirectorsVoting on Director Nominees in Uncontested ElectionsGenerally, vote CASE-BY-CASE. But WITHHOLD votes from:• Insiders and affiliated outsiders on boards that are not at least majority independent• Directors who sit on more than six boards, or on more than two public boards in addition to their ownif they are CEOs of public companies• Directors who adopt a poison pill without shareholder approval since the company’s last annualmeeting and there is no requirement to put the pill to shareholder vote within 12 months of itsadoption• Directors who serve on the compensation committee when there is a negative correlation betweenchief executive pay and company performance (fiscal year end basis)• Directors who have failed to address the issue(s) that resulted in any of the directors receiving morethan 50% withhold votes out of those cast at the previous board electionClassification/Declassification of the BoardVote AGAINST proposals to classify the board.Vote FOR proposals to repeal classified boards and to elect all directors annually.Independent Chairman (Separate Chairman/CEO)Vote FOR shareholder proposals asking that the chairman and CEO positions be separated (independentchairman), unless the company has a strong countervailing governance structure, including a leaddirector, two-thirds independent board, all independent key committees, and established governanceguidelines. Additionally, the company should not have underperformed its peers.Majority of Independent Directors/Establishment of CommitteesVote FOR shareholder proposals asking that a majority or more of directors be independent unless theboard composition already meets the ISS definition of independence.Open Access (shareholder resolution)Vote CASE-BY-CASE basis, taking into account the ownership threshold proposed in the resolution andthe proponent’s rationale.3. Shareholder RightsShareholder Ability to Act by Written ConsentVote AGAINST proposals to restrict or prohibit shareholder ability to take action by written consent.Vote FOR proposals to allow or make easier shareholder action by written consent.B-99
- Page 4:
APPENDIX F - Proxy Voting Policies
- Page 9 and 10:
stocks that make up that index. Str
- Page 11 and 12:
Interest rate swaps do not involve
- Page 13 and 14:
the Adviser or Sub-Adviser will not
- Page 17 and 18:
Forward Contracts. The Portfolios m
- Page 19 and 20:
principal amount as the call writte
- Page 21 and 22:
Options on Foreign Currencies. The
- Page 23 and 24:
securities. The issuers of the unde
- Page 25 and 26:
the former pools. However, timely p
- Page 27 and 28:
CMO residuals are generally purchas
- Page 29:
utilize the underlying assets may r
- Page 32 and 33:
include range floaters which are a
- Page 34 and 35:
par unless the price of the underly
- Page 36 and 37:
to changes in interest rates genera
- Page 38 and 39:
corresponding floaters. The underly
- Page 40 and 41:
A Portfolio will not enter into suc
- Page 42 and 43:
egulations. The presence of an issu
- Page 44 and 45:
Portfolio TurnoverPortfolio turnove
- Page 46 and 47:
The ability of the Portfolio to ach
- Page 48 and 49: Advisors, LLC, in accordance with t
- Page 50 and 51: OWNERSHIP OF SHARES OF THE FUNDAll
- Page 52 and 53: on the next $50 million, 0.50% on t
- Page 54 and 55: Independent Registered Public Accou
- Page 56 and 57: Name of Portfolio 2008 2007 2006Int
- Page 58 and 59: Broker High Yield Bond BalancedAsse
- Page 60 and 61: and cost of trade execution of Port
- Page 62 and 63: Effective April 30, 2008, the Fund
- Page 64 and 65: TAXES AND DIVIDENDSEach Portfolio i
- Page 66 and 67: APPENDIX A - Credit RatingsDescript
- Page 68 and 69: F2Good credit quality. A satisfacto
- Page 70 and 71: . Moody’s Commercial Paper (short
- Page 72 and 73: Plus (+) or minus (-)The ratings fr
- Page 74 and 75: APPENDIX B - Directors and Officers
- Page 76 and 77: Name, Address, andYear of BirthDavi
- Page 78 and 79: APPENDIX C - Ownership of Shares of
- Page 80 and 81: SMALL CAP VALUE PORTFOLIOGeneral Ac
- Page 82 and 83: APPENDIX D - Portfolio ManagersOthe
- Page 84 and 85: PortfolioManager(s)FundRegisteredIn
- Page 86 and 87: Compensation of Portfolio ManagersM
- Page 88 and 89: management firms. Performance is pr
- Page 90 and 91: Portfolio managers are eligible for
- Page 92 and 93: PortfolioPortfolio Manager(s)Dollar
- Page 94 and 95: On August 25, 2005, the Court enter
- Page 96 and 97: MSA’s Equity Trading Department s
- Page 100 and 101: Shareholder Ability to Call Special
- Page 102 and 103: • Exercise price• Participation
- Page 104 and 105: Amend Quorum RequirementsVote propo
- Page 106 and 107: Vote proposals to increase blank ch
- Page 108 and 109: employees of Investment Manager and
- Page 110 and 111: will not support the position of a
- Page 112 and 113: company specifies the voting, divid
- Page 114 and 115: egarding whether Investment Manager
- Page 116 and 117: 3. The issuer is an entity particip
- Page 118 and 119: manager(s) are responsible for maki
- Page 120 and 121: Global Corporate Governance: Invest
- Page 122 and 123: 13. The Proxy Group will review the
- Page 124 and 125: determined by those investment comm
- Page 126 and 127: T. Rowe Price has adopted these Pro
- Page 128 and 129: shareholders and the effect on shar
- Page 130 and 131: portfolio company could have influe
- Page 132 and 133: The Proxy Voting Service will refer
- Page 134 and 135: that substantially differs from dom
- Page 136 and 137: 15. Janus will generally vote in fa
- Page 138 and 139: 46. For shareholder proposals outsi
- Page 140 and 141: 2. Staggered BoardIf a company has
- Page 142 and 143: proposed for a legitimate business
- Page 144 and 145: APPENDIX G - Portfolio Holdings Dis
- Page 146: ICP Securities LLCIntermonte Securi