MSA’s Equity Trading Department sends equity holdings lists to ISS on a weekly basis and ISS ensuresthat meeting notices and proxy voting materials are reviewed against the Guidelines for these holdings.Following this review, ISS generates a voting recommendation for MSA. MSA’s Equity TradingDepartment in turn forwards each portfolio manager a weekly report from ISS which summarizes allupcoming proxy votes and current ISS recommendations for their consideration. To assist in their votingdeterminations, portfolio managers can request copies of the proxy statements on a particular vote, as wellas summary reports (e.g., list of recommendations to vote “against management” or list of votes bycountry or issue). In addition, portfolio managers have on-line view access to ISS’s database to furtherreview upcoming proxy votes in client accounts.In situations in which MSA appoints a sub-adviser to be responsible for the day-to-day investmentmanagement for a client, and subject to the approval of the client, portfolio securities may be voted by,and in accordance with, the proxy voting procedures of the sub-adviser.B. Voting DeterminationsMSA’s portfolio managers are responsible for proxy voting decisions on securities held in the clientaccounts they manage. Generally, portfolio managers vote their proxies based on the recommendationsgenerated through ISS’s application of the Guidelines. As such, MSA’s Equity Trading Department isinstructed to vote all proxies in accordance with ISS’s recommendations, unless the portfolio managerindicates otherwise. MSA’s portfolio managers are responsible for monitoring proxy proposals inportfolios which they manage and notifying Equity Trading of circumstances where the interests ofMSA’s clients may warrant a vote contrary to the Guidelines. In such instances, the portfolio managerwill submit a written recommendation to the Head of MSA Equity Investments, who will review therecommendation to determine whether a conflict of interest exists. If no conflict of interest exists, theportfolio manager will be permitted to vote contrary to the Guidelines. A summary of such votes will bereviewed by the Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.In many cases, a security may be held by multiple portfolio managers for different client accounts, or bythe same portfolio manager in different client accounts. Because the interests of various clients maydiffer, separate portfolio managers are not required to cast consistent votes, nor is a single portfoliomanager required to cast the same votes on behalf of separate clients.MSA reserves the right to request a client to vote their shares themselves. For example, such requests maybe made in situations where the client has informed MSA that their position on a particular issue differsfrom MSA’s position.C. Resolving Conflicts of InterestFrom time to time, the interests of MSA, or certain of its personnel charged with making decisions onbehalf of MSA’s clients with respect to voting proxies, may conflict with those of MSA’s clients. As amatter of policy, neither MSA nor its portfolio managers, Committee members, or other MSA officers,directors or employees will be influenced by outside sources whose interests conflict with the interests ofclients. Any MSA officer, director or employee who becomes aware of a conflict of interest relating to aparticular proxy vote shall immediately disclose that conflict to the Head of MSA Equity Investments or,if the conflict involves the Head of MSA Equity Investments, to the Committee.Examples of potential conflicts of interest include:‣ Business Relationships. A proxy voting proposal relating to a company or other persons thatMSA, or an affiliate, has a material business relationship with may cause a conflict if failure to votein manner favorable to such company or other persons could harm MSA’s relationship with them.For example, a proxy proposal relating to a director of MSA or Northwestern Mutual 2 , who alsoserves as a director of a public company or a member of the company’s management.2The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, MSA’s parent company.B-96
‣ Personal or Familial Relationships. A proxy voting proposal relating to a company or otherpersons that MSA, an officer director or employee of MSA, or an affiliate of MSA may have apersonal or familial relationship. For example, a proxy proposal relating to a spouse, relative orfriend who serves as a director of a public company or a member of the company’s management.In the event a portfolio manager or other MSA officer, director or employee identifies a conflict ofinterest relating to a particular proxy proposal, the portfolio manager will be required to recuse himself orherself from the proxy voting process and the Committee will be responsible for reviewing the proposaland determining the vote. Unless the conflict of interest directly involves the applicable portfoliomanager, the portfolio manager will be required to provide the Committee with a written recommendationas to how the proxy should be voted and the rationale for such recommendation. In addition, the portfoliomanager will disclose to the Committee any contact he or she has had with persons outside of MSAregarding the proxy issue.The Committee will review the portfolio manager’s voting recommendation (if any) and all relevant factsand circumstances and determine how the proxy should be voted. Application of the Guidelines to voteclient proxies should, in most cases, adequately address any possible conflicts of interest since theGuidelines are pre-determined. However, if the Committee believes the application of the Guidelines isnot in the best interests of the applicable client, the Committee may vote contrary to the Guidelines andwill document its voting rationale.D. Decisions to Not VoteMSA will attempt to process every proxy vote it receives. However, there are situations in which MSAmay not vote proxies if the costs, resources or resulting restrictions required to vote such proxiesoutweigh the expected benefit to the applicable client of casting such a vote. For example, if voting aforeign security requires hiring a translator or traveling to a foreign country to vote, MSA may refrainfrom voting the security due to these inordinate costs. Additionally, many foreign markets restrict tradingin a company’s stock within a given period of time on or around the shareholder meeting date ifshareholders vote proxies of the company. This practice is known as “share blocking.” In countries whereshare blocking is practiced, MSA will only vote proxies if the portfolio manager determines that thebenefit of voting the proxies outweighs the risk of not being able to sell the securities.Some of MSA’s clients participate in securities lending programs under which shares of an issuer couldbe on loan while that issuer is conducting a proxy solicitation. As part of the securities lending program,if the securities stay on loan during the proxy solicitation, the client account lending the security cannotvote that proxy. In this situation, MSA will only request the client to call back the loan and vote the proxyif the portfolio manager determines that the benefit to the applicable client of voting the proxy outweighsthe benefits derived by leaving the securities on loan.Although the MSA Equity Trading Department and ISS seek to obtain all proxy materials on a timelybasis, there may also be instances where MSA may not be given enough time to process a proxy vote. Forexample, MSA, through no fault of its own, may receive a meeting notice too late or may be unable toobtain a timely translation. In these circumstances, MSA may fail to vote the applicable proxiesRecordkeepingMSA retains proxy statements received regarding client securities, records of votes cast on behalf ofclients, records of client requests for proxy voting information and all documents prepared by MSAregarding votes cast in contradiction to the Guidelines. In addition, any document prepared by MSA thatis material to a proxy voting decision such as the Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, Proxy VotingGuidelines, Proxy Voting Committee materials and other internal research relating to voting decisionswill be retained. Proxy statements received from issuers are either available on the SEC’s EDGARdatabase or are kept by ISS and are available to clients on request. All proxy voting materials andsupporting documentation are retained for a minimum of 6 years.B-97
- Page 4:
APPENDIX F - Proxy Voting Policies
- Page 9 and 10:
stocks that make up that index. Str
- Page 11 and 12:
Interest rate swaps do not involve
- Page 13 and 14:
the Adviser or Sub-Adviser will not
- Page 17 and 18:
Forward Contracts. The Portfolios m
- Page 19 and 20:
principal amount as the call writte
- Page 21 and 22:
Options on Foreign Currencies. The
- Page 23 and 24:
securities. The issuers of the unde
- Page 25 and 26:
the former pools. However, timely p
- Page 27 and 28:
CMO residuals are generally purchas
- Page 29:
utilize the underlying assets may r
- Page 32 and 33:
include range floaters which are a
- Page 34 and 35:
par unless the price of the underly
- Page 36 and 37:
to changes in interest rates genera
- Page 38 and 39:
corresponding floaters. The underly
- Page 40 and 41:
A Portfolio will not enter into suc
- Page 42 and 43:
egulations. The presence of an issu
- Page 44 and 45:
Portfolio TurnoverPortfolio turnove
- Page 46 and 47: The ability of the Portfolio to ach
- Page 48 and 49: Advisors, LLC, in accordance with t
- Page 50 and 51: OWNERSHIP OF SHARES OF THE FUNDAll
- Page 52 and 53: on the next $50 million, 0.50% on t
- Page 54 and 55: Independent Registered Public Accou
- Page 56 and 57: Name of Portfolio 2008 2007 2006Int
- Page 58 and 59: Broker High Yield Bond BalancedAsse
- Page 60 and 61: and cost of trade execution of Port
- Page 62 and 63: Effective April 30, 2008, the Fund
- Page 64 and 65: TAXES AND DIVIDENDSEach Portfolio i
- Page 66 and 67: APPENDIX A - Credit RatingsDescript
- Page 68 and 69: F2Good credit quality. A satisfacto
- Page 70 and 71: . Moody’s Commercial Paper (short
- Page 72 and 73: Plus (+) or minus (-)The ratings fr
- Page 74 and 75: APPENDIX B - Directors and Officers
- Page 76 and 77: Name, Address, andYear of BirthDavi
- Page 78 and 79: APPENDIX C - Ownership of Shares of
- Page 80 and 81: SMALL CAP VALUE PORTFOLIOGeneral Ac
- Page 82 and 83: APPENDIX D - Portfolio ManagersOthe
- Page 84 and 85: PortfolioManager(s)FundRegisteredIn
- Page 86 and 87: Compensation of Portfolio ManagersM
- Page 88 and 89: management firms. Performance is pr
- Page 90 and 91: Portfolio managers are eligible for
- Page 92 and 93: PortfolioPortfolio Manager(s)Dollar
- Page 94 and 95: On August 25, 2005, the Court enter
- Page 98 and 99: ERISA ClientsIn the case of client
- Page 100 and 101: Shareholder Ability to Call Special
- Page 102 and 103: • Exercise price• Participation
- Page 104 and 105: Amend Quorum RequirementsVote propo
- Page 106 and 107: Vote proposals to increase blank ch
- Page 108 and 109: employees of Investment Manager and
- Page 110 and 111: will not support the position of a
- Page 112 and 113: company specifies the voting, divid
- Page 114 and 115: egarding whether Investment Manager
- Page 116 and 117: 3. The issuer is an entity particip
- Page 118 and 119: manager(s) are responsible for maki
- Page 120 and 121: Global Corporate Governance: Invest
- Page 122 and 123: 13. The Proxy Group will review the
- Page 124 and 125: determined by those investment comm
- Page 126 and 127: T. Rowe Price has adopted these Pro
- Page 128 and 129: shareholders and the effect on shar
- Page 130 and 131: portfolio company could have influe
- Page 132 and 133: The Proxy Voting Service will refer
- Page 134 and 135: that substantially differs from dom
- Page 136 and 137: 15. Janus will generally vote in fa
- Page 138 and 139: 46. For shareholder proposals outsi
- Page 140 and 141: 2. Staggered BoardIf a company has
- Page 142 and 143: proposed for a legitimate business
- Page 144 and 145: APPENDIX G - Portfolio Holdings Dis
- Page 146:
ICP Securities LLCIntermonte Securi