13.07.2015 Views

RENDICONTI DEL SEMINARIO MATEMATICO

RENDICONTI DEL SEMINARIO MATEMATICO

RENDICONTI DEL SEMINARIO MATEMATICO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72 M. Francadynamical system of the form (8) through (4) with l = q = p ∗ . In this section we willalways set l = q = p ∗ in (4) so we will leave the subscript unsaid, to simplify the notation.Since (8) is C 1 and uniformly continuous in the t variable, O admits local unstableand stable manifolds, denoted respectively by Wǫ,loc u (τ) and W ǫ,loc s (τ), see [30], [14].From Proposition 3 we know that, if Q u ∈ Wǫ,loc u (τ), then lim t→−∞x τ (Q u , t) = O andthe corresponding solution u(r) of (3) is a regular solution, while if Q s ∈ Wǫ,loc s (τ),then lim t→∞ x τ (Q s , t) = O and the corresponding solution v(r) of (3) is a solutionwith fast decay. Using the flow it is possible to extend the local manifolds to globalmanifolds Wǫ u(τ) and W ǫ s (τ). As usual we commit the following abuse of notation:we denote by Wǫ u(τ) and W ǫ s (τ) just the branches of the manifolds that depart fromthe origin and get into R 2 + . From [30] we also know that the leaves are C1 and varycontinuously in the C 1 topology with respect to τ and ǫ. Observe that for ǫ = 0, bothin the regular and in the singular perturbation case, the manifold Wǫ u(τ) and W ǫ s(τ)coincide and are the image of the homoclinic trajectory. We fix a segment L which istransversal to W0 u(τ) ≡ W 0 s (τ) and which intersects it in a point, say U. Using a continuityargument, we deduce that, for ǫ > 0 small enough, Wǫ u(τ) and W ǫ s (τ) continueto cross L transversally in points ξ s (τ,ǫ) and ξ u (τ,ǫ) close to U. We want to find intersectionsQ between Wǫ u(τ) and W ǫ s(τ); then the trajectory xτ (Q, t) corresponds toa regular solution u(r) having fast decay. Then it is easily proved that x τ (Q, t) ∈ R 2 +for any t so it is a monotone decreasing G.S. with fast decay.Let us rewrite (8) as ẋ = f(x,τ + t,ǫ). From now on we restrict our attentionto the singularly perturbed system since the other can be treated similarly, see [30] and[14]. We define a Melnikov function which measures the distance with sign betweenξ s (τ,ǫ) and ξ u (τ,ǫ) along L.M(τ) = d dǫ[ξ − (τ,ǫ) − ξ + (τ,ǫ) ] ⌊ ǫ=0 ∧f(U,τ)where “∧” denotes the standard wedge product in R 2 . Then define{M(τ) for ǫ = 0h(τ,ǫ) =ξ − (τ,ǫ)−ξ + (τ,ǫ)ǫ∧ f(U,τ) for ǫ ̸= 0.We point out that the vector ξ − (τ,ǫ) − ξ + (τ,ǫ) belongs to the transversal segment L,so we have h(τ,ǫ) = 0 ⇐⇒ ξ − (τ,ǫ) − ξ + (τ,ǫ) = 0 for ǫ ̸= 0.Suppose M(τ 0 ) = 0 and M ′ (τ 0 ) ̸= 0, then, using the implicit function theorem,we construct a C 1 function ǫ → τ(ǫ) defined on a neighborhood of ǫ = 0, suchthat τ(0) = τ 0 , for which we have ξ − (τ(ǫ),ǫ) = ξ + (τ(ǫ),ǫ). Therefore we have ahomoclinic solution of the system (8).Following [30] and [14] we find that(20) M(τ) = −φ ′ (τ)φ(τ) − n p∫ +∞−∞|x 1 (t)| σdt = −Cφ ′ (τ)φ(τ) − n pσwhere x 1 (t) = (x 1 (t), y 1 (t)) is a homoclinic trajectory of (8) where φ ≡ 1, so C > 0 isa computable positive constant. Note that M(τ) is closely related to the first term in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!