13.07.2015 Views

India - Income Tax Act 2010 - Saarc

India - Income Tax Act 2010 - Saarc

India - Income Tax Act 2010 - Saarc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S. 251 I.T. ACT, 1961 1.856(4) The 83 [* * *] 84 [Commissioner (Appeals)] may, before disposing of any appeal,make such further inquiry as he thinks fit, or may direct the 85 [Assessing] Officerto make further inquiry and report the result of the same to the 83 [* * *]84[Commissioner (Appeals)].(5) The 86 [* * *] 87 [Commissioner (Appeals)] may, at the hearing of an appeal, allowthe appellant to go into any ground of appeal not specified in the grounds ofappeal, if the 86 [* * *] 87 [Commissioner (Appeals)] is satisfied that the omission ofthat ground from the form of appeal was not wilful or unreasonable.(6) The order of the 86 [* * *] 87 [Commissioner (Appeals)] disposing of the appealshall be in writing and shall state the points for determination, the decisionthereon and the reason for the decision.88[(6A) In every appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals), where it is possible, may hearand decide such appeal within a period of one year from the end of the financialyear in which such appeal is filed before him under sub-section (1) of section246A.](7) On the disposal of the appeal, the 86 [* * *] 87 [Commissioner (Appeals)] shallcommunicate the order passed by him to the assessee and to the 89 [ChiefCommissioner or Commissioner].Powers of the 86 [* * *] 87 [Commissioner (Appeals)].251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the 86 [* * *] 87 [Commissioner (Appeals)] shallhave the following powers—(a) in an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,enhance or annul the assessment 90 91 [* * *];83. Words “Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) or, as the case may be, the” omitted by theFinance (No. 2) <strong>Act</strong>, 1998, w.e.f. 1-10-1998. Earlier “Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)” wassubstituted for “Appellate Assistant Commissioner” by the Direct <strong>Tax</strong> Laws (Amendment)<strong>Act</strong>, 1987, w.e.f. 1-4-1988 and “or, as the case may be, the” was inserted by the Finance(No. 2) <strong>Act</strong>, 1977, w.e.f. 10-7-1978.84. Inserted by the Finance (No. 2) <strong>Act</strong>, 1977, w.e.f. 10-7-1978.85. Substituted for “<strong>Income</strong>-tax” by the Direct <strong>Tax</strong> Laws (Amendment) <strong>Act</strong>, 1987, w.e.f.1-4-1988.86. Words “Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) or, as the case may be, the” omitted by theFinance (No. 2) <strong>Act</strong>, 1998, w.e.f. 1-10-1998. Earlier “Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)” wassubstituted for “Appellate Assistant Commissioner” by the Direct <strong>Tax</strong> Laws (Amendment)<strong>Act</strong>, 1987, w.e.f. 1-4-1988 and “or, as the case may be, the” was inserted by the Finance(No. 2) <strong>Act</strong>, 1977, w.e.f. 10-7-1978.87. Inserted by the Finance (No. 2) <strong>Act</strong>, 1977, w.e.f. 10-7-1978.88. Inserted by the Finance <strong>Act</strong>, 1999, w.e.f. 1-6-1999.89. Substituted for “Commissioner” by the Direct <strong>Tax</strong> Laws (Amendment) <strong>Act</strong>, 1987, w.e.f.1-4-1988.90. For the meaning of the expression “annul the assessment”, see <strong>Tax</strong>mann’s Direct <strong>Tax</strong>esManual, Vol. 3.91. The portion beginning with the words “or he may set aside” and ending with the words “onthe basis of such fresh assessment;” omitted by the Finance <strong>Act</strong>, 2001, w.e.f. 1-6-2001. Priorto its omission, the quoted portion was amended by the Finance (No. 2) <strong>Act</strong>, 1977, w.e.f.10-7-1978, the Direct <strong>Tax</strong> Laws (Amendment) <strong>Act</strong>, 1987, w.e.f. 1-4-1988 and the Finance(No. 2) <strong>Act</strong>, 1998, w.e.f. 1-10-1998.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!