13.07.2015 Views

Parenting in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit - Carlos Haya

Parenting in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit - Carlos Haya

Parenting in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit - Carlos Haya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JOGNN I N R EVIEW<strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong><strong>Unit</strong>Lisa M. ClevelandCorrespondenceLisa M. Cleveland, RN, MN,CPNP, IBCLC, University ofTexas Health Science CenterSan Antonio, School ofNurs<strong>in</strong>g, Department ofFamily Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 7703 FloydCurl Drive, San Antonio, TX78229-3900.clevelandl@uthscsa.eduKeywordsparentsparent<strong>in</strong>gneonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unitneonatal nurs<strong>in</strong>gfamily centered careABSTRACTObjective: A systematic review of <strong>the</strong> literature was conducted to answer <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g 2 questions: (a) What are <strong>the</strong>needs of parents who have <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit? (b) What behaviors support parents with an<strong>in</strong>fant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit?Data Sources: Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> search terms ‘‘parents or parent<strong>in</strong>g’’ and <strong>the</strong> ‘‘neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit,’’ computer librarydatabases <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Medl<strong>in</strong>e and CINAHL were searched for qualitative and quantitative studies. Only researchpublished <strong>in</strong> English between 1998 and 2008 was <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> review.Study Selection: Based on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion criteria, 60 studies were selected.Data Extraction: Study contents were analyzed with <strong>the</strong> 2 research questions <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d.Data Syn<strong>the</strong>sis: Exist<strong>in</strong>g research was organized <strong>in</strong>to 1of 3 tables based on <strong>the</strong> question answered. N<strong>in</strong>eteenarticles addressed <strong>the</strong> first question, 24 addressed <strong>the</strong> second, and 17 addressed both.Conclusions: Six needs were identified for parents who had an <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit: (a) accurate<strong>in</strong>formation and <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’s care, (b) vigilant watch<strong>in</strong>g-over and protect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant, (c) contact with <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fant, (d) be<strong>in</strong>g positively perceived by <strong>the</strong> nursery staff, (e) <strong>in</strong>dividualized care, and (f) a <strong>the</strong>rapeutic relationship with<strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g staff. Four nurs<strong>in</strong>g behaviors were identified to assist parents <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se needs: (a) emotionalsupport, (b) parent empowerment, (c) a welcom<strong>in</strong>g environment with supportive unit policies, and (d) parent educationwith an opportunity to practice new skills through guided participation.JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.xAccepted August 2008Lisa M. Cleveland, RN,MN, CPNP, IBCLC is acl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>in</strong>structor at <strong>the</strong>University of Texas HealthScience Center SanAntonio, School of Nurs<strong>in</strong>gand a doctoral student at <strong>the</strong>University of Texas, Aust<strong>in</strong>.Infants are admitted to <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive careunit (NICU) for a variety of reasons <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gprematurity, sepsis, and respiratory di⁄culty. Thisexperience can be particularly distress<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong>families of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>fants. When faced with a NICUadmission, parents struggle with <strong>the</strong> unknown <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> unfamiliar and potentially threaten<strong>in</strong>g environmentof an <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. These parents oftenencounter challenges to <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong>irparent<strong>in</strong>g roles (Fenwick, Barclay, & Schmied,2001a, 2001b; Heerman, Wilson, & Wilhelm, 2005;Hurst, 2001a, 2001b; Lupton & Fenwick, 2001).These challenges may have long last<strong>in</strong>g e¡ects onfamily function<strong>in</strong>g (Talmi & Harmon, 2003). Somelongitud<strong>in</strong>al studies of NICU families suggest thatfor at least a time period follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’sdischarge, families may go on to experience di⁄culties<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir day to day lives and ability to cope(Rautava, Lehtonen, Helenius, & Sillanpaa, 2003;Talmi & Harmon). Issues stem from stress causedby <strong>the</strong> hospitalization itself and may lead to symptomsof acute stress disorder (ASD), a precursor toposttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Holditch-Davis,Bartlett, Blickman, & Miles, 2003; Shaw et al.,2006). Analysis of speci¢c sources of stress <strong>in</strong>dicatedthat alteration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parental role was moststrongly associated with <strong>the</strong> symptoms of ASD. Parentsreported that an <strong>in</strong>ability to help, hold, care for<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant, protect <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant from pa<strong>in</strong>, and share<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant with o<strong>the</strong>r family members were primarysources of stress (Shaw et al.).Nurses have <strong>the</strong> unique opportunity to assist familiesdur<strong>in</strong>g this potentially di⁄cult experience.However, before nurses can do this, <strong>the</strong>y must possessa good understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> needs of parents<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU and how to address <strong>the</strong>m. Cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>gresearch <strong>in</strong> this area is <strong>the</strong> key to do<strong>in</strong>g this successfully.With this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, it is essential for nursesto rema<strong>in</strong> active <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> agenda for neonatalresearch and for protect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> rights of this vulnerablepopulation (Franck, 2005). The Association ofWomen’s Health, Obstetric, and <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurses(AWHONN) has made <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g research goals666 & 2008 AWHONN, <strong>the</strong> Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurses http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWa priority: preterm and near-term <strong>in</strong>fants, reductionof disparities <strong>in</strong> low birth weight, <strong>the</strong> impact of technology<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU, and parent education(AWHONN, 2007). In addition, Harrison and colleaguessuggest numerous topics for neonatalresearch and pose <strong>the</strong> important questions: ‘‘Whatnurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventions help to reduce stressorsexperienced by families who have <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>NICU?’’ (p. 65) and ‘‘What <strong>in</strong>terventions help to promoteattachment and adaptive parent<strong>in</strong>g betweenparents and preterm <strong>in</strong>fants and between parentsand <strong>in</strong>fants with serious health problems?’’(Harrison,Lucas, & Franck, 2003, p. 65).Ano<strong>the</strong>r researcher <strong>in</strong> this area of study, Franck,claims that numerous topics <strong>in</strong> neonatal care, suchas parental stress <strong>in</strong> response to a NICU admission,have been well described <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature, but few of<strong>the</strong>se studies have been followed up with <strong>in</strong>terventionalmethods or cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials. Some areas ofneonatal care have been over-researched, such as<strong>the</strong> development of numerous neonatal pa<strong>in</strong> assessmenttools, while o<strong>the</strong>r important areas havebeen neglected (Franck, 2002). For example, studiesfocus<strong>in</strong>g on parental visitation and <strong>in</strong>volvement<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU were well researched dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1980s,but little research on this topic has been conductedmore recently (Franck & Spencer, 2003). Therefore,<strong>the</strong> purpose of this literature review was to conductan <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> current research on parent<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU with a particular emphasis onresearch methodology and design. All articles werecritically analyzed with two primary questions <strong>in</strong>m<strong>in</strong>d: (a) What are <strong>the</strong> needs of parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>NICU? (b) What nurs<strong>in</strong>g behaviors support parents<strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se needs?MethodsA systematic review of both qualitative and quantitativeresearch was conducted to identify what isknown about <strong>the</strong> needs of NICU parents and whatbehaviors support <strong>the</strong>se parents. Both methods ofresearch were <strong>in</strong>cluded because of <strong>the</strong> potential foreach to contribute to a more complete understand<strong>in</strong>gof this topic. A systematic review was employedbecause it results <strong>in</strong> a scienti¢c, reproducible, summaryof orig<strong>in</strong>al research ¢nd<strong>in</strong>gs with clearlystated <strong>in</strong>clusion and exclusion criteria. This methodof review limits personal bias from <strong>the</strong> reviewer andcontributes to evidence-based nurs<strong>in</strong>g practice(Stevens, 2001; Whittemore & Kna£, 2005).The computer library databases Medl<strong>in</strong>e andCINAHL were searched for research studies publishedbetween 1998 and 2008. This time framewas selected due to <strong>the</strong> rapid advances <strong>in</strong> technologyand <strong>the</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g environment of <strong>the</strong> NICU overthis time period. A review of <strong>the</strong> most current researchon parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU was <strong>the</strong> aim of thisreview.To be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this review, <strong>the</strong> studies had to beresearch, pr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> English, speci¢c to parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> NICU, and speci¢c to <strong>the</strong> two research questionsthat were <strong>the</strong> focus of this review. Thecomb<strong>in</strong>ed search terms were ‘‘parents or parent<strong>in</strong>g’’and ‘‘neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit.’’ Two hundredand sixteen studies were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from Medl<strong>in</strong>eand ano<strong>the</strong>r 168 from CINAHL. Titles and abstractswere reviewed to determ<strong>in</strong>e if <strong>the</strong> studies met <strong>the</strong>stated criteria. If a determ<strong>in</strong>ation could not bemade <strong>in</strong> this manner, <strong>the</strong> article was retrieved andread before mak<strong>in</strong>g a decision. Thirty-seven studies(5 doctoral dissertations) meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> searchcriteria were selected from CINAHL and 16 wereselected from Medl<strong>in</strong>e. An additional 7 articlesmeet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> criteria were selected from <strong>the</strong> referencelists of articles already <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> review(Fenwick et al., 2001a, 2001b; Hurst, 2001a, 2001b;Pearson & Anderson, 2001; Peterson, Cohen, &Parsons, 2004; Schroeder & Pridham, 2006). Thesestudies were <strong>in</strong>cluded because <strong>the</strong>y met <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusioncriteria and were determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be relevant toanswer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> research questions. A total of 60studies were selected for review based on <strong>the</strong>search criteria.ResultsAfter carefully review<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ¢nd<strong>in</strong>gs of each study,<strong>the</strong> author determ<strong>in</strong>ed that 19 studies addressedparent<strong>in</strong>g needs (see Table 1), 24 addressed supportivebehaviors (see Table 2), and 17 addressedboth (see Table 3). The studies were <strong>the</strong>n organizedaccord<strong>in</strong>g to research methodology. Of <strong>the</strong> 19with a focus on parent<strong>in</strong>g needs, 5 of <strong>the</strong> studies utilizedquantitative methods and 14 were qualitative.Of <strong>the</strong> studies address<strong>in</strong>g parent support <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>NICU, 19 were quantitative, 2 were mixed methods,and 3 were qualitative. The 17 studies address<strong>in</strong>gboth research questions <strong>in</strong>cluded 6 quantitativeand 11 qualitative studies (see Table 4). Also noteworthy,4 of <strong>the</strong> studies reviewed were written us<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> same research data (Fenwick et al., 2001a,2001b; Fenwick, Barclay, & Schmied, 2002; Lupton& Fenwick, 2001). In a di¡erent <strong>in</strong>stance, Hurst(2001a, 2001b) utilized <strong>the</strong> same data baseto write both of her articles. Although <strong>the</strong> focusof each article was slightly di¡erent, what <strong>in</strong>itiallyappeared to be 6 separate studies was actuallyonly 2.JOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 667


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Table 1: Parental Needs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUStudy and Year Purpose of Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsQuantitative Descriptive StudiesBialoskurskiet al. (2002)Explore <strong>the</strong> organization ofmaternal needs andpriorities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUPurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g of 209 mo<strong>the</strong>rsage 18-45<strong>Unit</strong>edK<strong>in</strong>gdomQuestionnaire with 2 self-assessmentsurveys: critical care maternal needs<strong>in</strong>ventory and a rank<strong>in</strong>g scale93% of mo<strong>the</strong>rs ranked receiv<strong>in</strong>g accurate<strong>in</strong>formation as a priority. Good communicationwith sta¡ was also important while self-relatedneeds were considered less importantJoseph et al.(2007)Identify perceived stress <strong>in</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>rs of surgical <strong>in</strong>fants22 fa<strong>the</strong>rs 18 years and older. Infantscategorized by condition: cardiac,respiratory, neurological anomaliesMid Atlantic<strong>Unit</strong>ed States22 item Parental Stressor Scale: InfantHospitalizationFa<strong>the</strong>rs’ stress was highest for Parental RoleAtta<strong>in</strong>ment and Infant Appearance and Behavior.Infant pa<strong>in</strong>, separation from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant, andbreath<strong>in</strong>g problems were most stressfulLam et al.(2007)Explore parents’ stress andperceptions of supportrelated to nurs<strong>in</strong>g behaviors63 parents, 76% mo<strong>the</strong>rs. (English,Arabic, and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese speak<strong>in</strong>g)<strong>in</strong>fants with cardiac or surgicalproblemsAustralia NICU nurs<strong>in</strong>g sta¡ behavior andcommunication subscale of <strong>the</strong> ParentalStress Scale and <strong>the</strong> Nurse Parent SupportToolSources of stress <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>adequate <strong>in</strong>formationconcern<strong>in</strong>g tests and treatment and uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty if<strong>the</strong> nurse would call parents if <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’scondition changed. Stress and perceived supportwere moderatePunthmathari<strong>the</strong>t al. (2007)Compare <strong>the</strong> needs, needresponses, and needresponse satisfaction ofmo<strong>the</strong>rsPurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g of 420 mo<strong>the</strong>rs(140 from each hospital); mean agesof <strong>the</strong> 3 groups ranged from 25-28years3 hospitals <strong>in</strong>sou<strong>the</strong>rnThailand3 questionnaires developed by <strong>the</strong>researcherSigni¢cant di¡erences were identi¢ed betweengroups for needs, need responses, and needresponse satisfactionWard (2001) Identify <strong>the</strong> perceived needsof parentsConvenience sample of 52 parents (42mo<strong>the</strong>rs,10 fa<strong>the</strong>rs) mean age 25years, 56% White, 65% of <strong>in</strong>fantswith primary diagnosis ofprematurityMidwestern<strong>Unit</strong>ed StatesNICU Family Needs Inventory (NFNI)derived from <strong>the</strong> Critical <strong>Care</strong> FamilyNeeds Inventory (CCFNI)Assurance was most important and support wasleast important. Fa<strong>the</strong>rs ranked support,assurance and <strong>in</strong>formation needs signi¢cantlylower than mo<strong>the</strong>rs. Comfort and proximityneeds did not di¡er between mo<strong>the</strong>rs andfa<strong>the</strong>rs668 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWTable 1. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy and Year Purpose of Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsQualitative StudiesArockiasamyet al. (2008)Understand <strong>the</strong> experiencesof fa<strong>the</strong>rs with seriously ill<strong>in</strong>fantsPurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g of fa<strong>the</strong>rs; 12White, 3 East Indian, and 1 AsianCanada Semi-structured <strong>in</strong>terview conducted by amale physician. Constant comparativecontent analysisLack of control with ¢ve sub<strong>the</strong>mes: world view,<strong>in</strong>formation, communication, roles and externalactivitiesBroeder (2003) Exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> process ofbecom<strong>in</strong>g a mo<strong>the</strong>r dur<strong>in</strong>ghospitalization anddischarge homePurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g; 8 mo<strong>the</strong>rs(White), 25-41 years old, no <strong>in</strong>fantanamoliesMidwestern<strong>Unit</strong>ed StatesSemi-structured <strong>in</strong>terviews every twoweeks dur<strong>in</strong>g hospitalization and monthlyfor 4 months follow<strong>in</strong>g discharge.Interpretive data analysisMo<strong>the</strong>rs wanted to rema<strong>in</strong> connected dur<strong>in</strong>gseparation from <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant while be<strong>in</strong>g preventedfrom hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m. Gett<strong>in</strong>g to know<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant while <strong>the</strong> nurse was <strong>the</strong> primarycaretaker was a challengeErlandssonandFagerberg(2005)Describe how mo<strong>the</strong>rsexperienced <strong>the</strong> care and<strong>the</strong>ir own healthConvenience sample; 6 mo<strong>the</strong>rs ofNICU <strong>in</strong>fants approximately 2months after birth and afterdischarge from <strong>the</strong> hospitalSweden Semi-structured, open-ended, <strong>in</strong>terviewsfocus<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ experience <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> co-care ward. Description, reduction,and higher level <strong>in</strong>variant mean<strong>in</strong>gsanalysisMo<strong>the</strong>rs wanted to be close to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants, be seen,and be part of a functional team. Theorganization/sta¡ prolonged <strong>the</strong> separation. Evenafter return<strong>in</strong>g home, mo<strong>the</strong>rs had di⁄cultydeal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> separationHeerman et al.(2005)Explore and describemo<strong>the</strong>rs’ experiences15 upper middle class, White mo<strong>the</strong>rs Midwestern<strong>Unit</strong>ed StatesInterviews of open-ended questions.Spradley’s doma<strong>in</strong> analysisMo<strong>the</strong>rs progressed from outsider to partnerthrough 4 major doma<strong>in</strong>s: focus, ownership,care giv<strong>in</strong>g, and voice. Mo<strong>the</strong>rs progress atdi¡erent rates and nurses can facilitate thisprocessHigg<strong>in</strong>s andDullow(2003)Explore <strong>the</strong> experiences ofparentsConvenience sample of parents 20-40years old with <strong>in</strong>fants of goodprognosisSou<strong>the</strong>asternAustraliaInterviews conducted post discharge Ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of parent<strong>in</strong>g from a distance.Three sub<strong>the</strong>mesof watchfulness, need<strong>in</strong>g to be near <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fant, and feel<strong>in</strong>g useful <strong>in</strong>stead of uselessHolditch-Davisand Miles(1999)Determ<strong>in</strong>e how well mo<strong>the</strong>rs’experiences ¢t <strong>the</strong> PretermParental Distress Model31 mo<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>in</strong>fant o1,500 g,mechanically ventilated or both.Average maternal age 5 29 years,86% were married,19 White,11African American, and 1 Asian<strong>Unit</strong>ed States Interviews at 6 months corrected gestationalage. Data analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oreticalframework as a guideMo<strong>the</strong>rs’ experiences were consistent with <strong>the</strong> 6sources of stress outl<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oreticalmodel; (a) pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g and concurrent personalfactors, (b) prenatal and per<strong>in</strong>atal experiences,(c) <strong>in</strong>fant illness, treatment, and appearance, (d)concern about <strong>in</strong>fant’s outcome, (e) loss of <strong>the</strong>parental role, and (f) healthcare providersJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 669


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Table 1. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy and Year Purpose of Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsHurst (2003) Exam<strong>in</strong>e how resources toensure family centered carea¡ected <strong>the</strong> experience ofa Mexican Americanmo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUOne bil<strong>in</strong>gual Mexican Americanmo<strong>the</strong>r (case study)Western <strong>Unit</strong>edStatesAudiotaped <strong>in</strong>terviews and ¢eld notes about<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s experience analyzed us<strong>in</strong>gnarrative and content analysisInadequate resources <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU createdsituations where responsibilities such as<strong>in</strong>terpretation and transportation for o<strong>the</strong>rmo<strong>the</strong>rs were shifted to <strong>the</strong> participantHurst (2001a) Ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to mo<strong>the</strong>rs’perceived needs andexplanation for <strong>the</strong>ir actionsPurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g; 12 Englishspeak<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>rs 20-43 years (7White, 4 Lat<strong>in</strong>a,1African American)Nor<strong>the</strong>rnCaliforniaBedside observation, audio-recordedconversations, and privately conducted<strong>in</strong>terviews. Thematic content analysis,constant comparative cod<strong>in</strong>g/classi¢cation, and narrative analysisMo<strong>the</strong>rs had <strong>in</strong>formational, <strong>in</strong>teractional, andemotional safety needs, <strong>the</strong>y negotiated actionswith healthcare providers, cautiously challengedauthority, and ga<strong>the</strong>red support from o<strong>the</strong>rmo<strong>the</strong>rs, friends and family. Fear of be<strong>in</strong>glabeled ‘‘di⁄cult’’ and ‘‘vigilance’’ were keyconceptsHurst (2001b) Explore mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ descriptionand <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong>irexperienceSame data base as Hurst (2001a) Nor<strong>the</strong>rnCaliforniaSame as Hurst (2001a) Underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mes of mo<strong>the</strong>rs ‘‘vigilantly watch<strong>in</strong>gover’’ <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants. Mo<strong>the</strong>rs were alert to issues ofsafety that might signal danger for <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant.Feared be<strong>in</strong>g labeled di⁄cult, and expressedconcerns over <strong>the</strong> lack of complete and accurate<strong>in</strong>formation provided, <strong>in</strong>adequate sta⁄ng andlack of cont<strong>in</strong>uity of careJamsa andJamsa (1998)Describe parents’experiences of <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>gcare of critically ill <strong>in</strong>fantsPurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g; 7 mo<strong>the</strong>rs and 4fa<strong>the</strong>rs of full-term ill <strong>in</strong>fantsF<strong>in</strong>land Informal <strong>in</strong>terviews with preplanned openendedquestions. Inductive, contentanalysisParents found <strong>the</strong> NICU environment ‘‘shock<strong>in</strong>g’’and <strong>the</strong> technological environment made <strong>the</strong>mfeel like outsiders <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> care of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fantsOrapiriyakulet al. (2007)Explore maternal attachment<strong>in</strong>Thai mo<strong>the</strong>rsPurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g of 15 mo<strong>the</strong>rsaged 16-42. Infants o37 weeksgestation, had no anomalies, andwere or had been mechanicallyventilatedThailand Interviews and observations. Constantcomparative method analysisMo<strong>the</strong>rs were ‘‘struggl<strong>in</strong>g to get connected’’composed of 4 phases: (a) establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>connections, (b) disrupt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> connections, (c)resum<strong>in</strong>g to get connected, and (d) becom<strong>in</strong>gconnected670 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWTable 1. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy and Year Purpose of Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsTaylor-Huber(1998)Determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>experience of parent dyadswith <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU9 parent dyads, age 22-53 years, 8 of<strong>the</strong> 9 dyads were married. Nofur<strong>the</strong>r demographics wereprovided2levelIIINICUs<strong>in</strong> UtahThree parent dyads, unstructured,<strong>in</strong>terviews. Data analyzed for <strong>the</strong>mesAn overall <strong>the</strong>me of stress was identi¢ed with 4sub<strong>the</strong>mes: issues of trust, family roles andrelationships, parental role and authority, andparent-nurse relationships <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUTaylor-Johnson(1999)Explore <strong>the</strong> perceivedlearn<strong>in</strong>g needs of mo<strong>the</strong>rs<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU and afterdischargePurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g of 30 mo<strong>the</strong>rs,18-41 years (17 African American, 7White, and 6 Lat<strong>in</strong>a)Hospital andhomeUnstructured <strong>in</strong>terviews with ¢eld notes(no audiotapes)Learn<strong>in</strong>g needs <strong>in</strong>cluded baby basic care,breath<strong>in</strong>g, heart rate, medications, and monitorsWhitlow (2003) Explore <strong>in</strong>teractions andattachment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUPurposive sampl<strong>in</strong>g of 13 mo<strong>the</strong>rs with<strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU 1-17 years prior.(12 White,1 African American) 21-49yearsAL,TN, andGAQualitative <strong>in</strong>terview; heuristic analysis Mo<strong>the</strong>rs were <strong>in</strong>itially overwhelmed by <strong>the</strong> NICU.Adaptation was essential to <strong>in</strong>teraction with <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fant. Mo<strong>the</strong>rs desired to hold <strong>in</strong>fants, acquireknowledge, and learn how to <strong>in</strong>teract with <strong>in</strong>fantsJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 671


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Parents felt excluded from <strong>the</strong> care of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants.After categoriz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> articles, conventional contentanalysis was used to more closely exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong>¢nd<strong>in</strong>gs of each study. This type of analysis allowedcategories to emerge from <strong>the</strong> data with <strong>the</strong> goal ofanswer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two research questions (Hsieh &Shannon, 2005). Based on <strong>the</strong> literature, six primaryneeds of parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU were identi¢ed. These<strong>in</strong>cluded: (a) accurate <strong>in</strong>formation and <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’s care and decision mak<strong>in</strong>g, (b) vigilantwatch<strong>in</strong>g-over and protect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant, (c) contactwith <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant, (d) be<strong>in</strong>g positively perceived by <strong>the</strong>nursery sta¡, (e) <strong>in</strong>dividualized care, and (f) reassuranceand a <strong>the</strong>rapeutic relationship with <strong>the</strong>nurs<strong>in</strong>g sta¡. Four supportive behaviors for assist<strong>in</strong>gparents that meet <strong>the</strong>se needs were alsoidenti¢ed. These <strong>in</strong>cluded: (a) emotional support,(b) parent empowerment, (c) a welcom<strong>in</strong>g environmentwith supportive unit policies, and (d) parenteducation with an opportunity to practice new skillsthrough guided participation. In <strong>the</strong> paragraphsthat follow, <strong>the</strong>se parent<strong>in</strong>g needs and supportivebehaviors will be discussed <strong>in</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r detail.What are <strong>the</strong> Needs of Parents WhoHave Infants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU?A Need for Accurate Information and Inclusion<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Infant’s <strong>Care</strong> and Decision Mak<strong>in</strong>gParents expressed a desire to receive accurate,understandable, <strong>in</strong>formation and wanted to participate<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g process (Alderson,Hawthorne, & Killen, 2006; Arockiasamy, Holsti, &Abersheim, 2008; Bialoskurski, Cox, & Wigg<strong>in</strong>s,2002; Gardner, Barrett, Coonan, Cox, & Roberson,2002; Hurst, 2001a, 2001b, 2003; Lam, Spence, &Halliday, 2007; Lubbe, 2005; Mok & Leung, 2006;Taylor-Huber,1998; Taylor-Johnson,1999; van Rooyen,Nomgqokwana, Kotze, & Carlson, 2006;Whitlow, 2003). They also wanted to be actively<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> care of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants (Erlandsson &Fagerberg, 2005; Fenwick et al., 2001a; Heermanet al., 2005; Higg<strong>in</strong>s & Dullow, 2003; Holditch-Davis& Miles, 2000; Jamsa & Jamsa,1998; Lupton & Fenwick,2001; Orapiriyakul, Jirapaet, & Rodcumdee,2007; Pohlman, 2005;van Rooyen et al.; Wigert,Johansson, Berg, & Hellstrom, 2006). They voiceddistress over receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>accurate and/or <strong>in</strong>complete<strong>in</strong>formation perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant’scondition (Hurst, 2001b). They felt as though <strong>the</strong>ywere parent<strong>in</strong>g from a distance and struggled withfeel<strong>in</strong>gs of uselessness while yearn<strong>in</strong>g to be useful<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant care (Higg<strong>in</strong>s & Dullow). Be<strong>in</strong>g able to providebasic care for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant was identi¢ed ascritical (Heerman et al.). Some mo<strong>the</strong>rs stated thatbe<strong>in</strong>g able to provide care was a major turn<strong>in</strong>gpo<strong>in</strong>t, especially when <strong>the</strong>y began to feel that <strong>the</strong>yknew <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants better than <strong>the</strong> nurses did (Lupton& Fenwick).Unfortunately, some parents identi¢ed a sense ofbe<strong>in</strong>g excluded from <strong>the</strong> care of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants. In alongitud<strong>in</strong>al study, Wigert et al. (2006) found thatmo<strong>the</strong>rs often felt like ‘‘<strong>in</strong>truders’’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. Theyfelt that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant belonged to <strong>the</strong> caregiver. Thisexclusion from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’s care was associated withnegative maternal feel<strong>in</strong>gs that could last for severalyears follow<strong>in</strong>g discharge. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand,approaches that <strong>in</strong>volved encourag<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>rs toparticipate <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’s care, treat<strong>in</strong>g each mo<strong>the</strong>ras an <strong>in</strong>dividual, and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g e¡ective dialoguewith <strong>the</strong> nurses were found to be associated withmore positive maternal feel<strong>in</strong>gs (Wigert et al.).A Need to be Vigilant and to Watch Over andProtect <strong>the</strong> InfantAn underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>me of vigilance or watch<strong>in</strong>g over<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant was identi¢ed <strong>in</strong> several studies (Higg<strong>in</strong>s& Dullow, 2003; Hurst, 2001a, 2001b). Vigilance wasdescribed as a heightened level of watchfulness,<strong>in</strong>formation ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g, and re£ection on maternalfeel<strong>in</strong>gs (Hurst, 2001a). Mo<strong>the</strong>rs were alert for situationsthat signaled danger such as poor cont<strong>in</strong>uityof care, lack of attention to <strong>the</strong> baby, or suspect<strong>in</strong>gthat contra<strong>in</strong>dicated care was be<strong>in</strong>g provided(Hurst, 2001b). Parents felt as though <strong>the</strong>y neededto protect <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants from danger by oversee<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants’ care. As <strong>the</strong>y started to form trust<strong>in</strong>grelationships with <strong>the</strong> nurses, this watchfulness beganto relax (Higg<strong>in</strong>s & Dullow). Frequent phonecalls to <strong>the</strong> NICU and <strong>the</strong> parent’s presence at <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fant’s bedside were techniques parents used to‘‘safe guard’’ <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant (Hurst, 2001b).A Need for Contact With <strong>the</strong> InfantA need to be near <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant and to have physicalcontact was identi¢ed as important to parents(Broeder, 2003; Erlandsson & Fagerberg, 2005;Higg<strong>in</strong>s & Dullow, 2003; Joseph, Mackley, Davis,Spear, & Locke, 2007; Lupton & Fenwick, 2001; Orapiriyakulet al., 2007; Ward, 2001; Whitlow, 2003).Mo<strong>the</strong>rs yearned to hold <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants, but when thiswas not possible due to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’s fragile condition,<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs found comfort <strong>in</strong> sitt<strong>in</strong>g next to<strong>the</strong> bed touch<strong>in</strong>g and strok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants. Provid<strong>in</strong>gbreast milk was viewed as a form of contact andwas desirable to mo<strong>the</strong>rs because <strong>the</strong>y felt this wassometh<strong>in</strong>g only <strong>the</strong>y could do for <strong>the</strong>ir babies.672 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWTable 2: Parental Support <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUStudy andYear Purpose of <strong>the</strong> Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Intervention Design/Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsQuantitativeBrowneand Talmi(2005)Determ<strong>in</strong>e if a family based<strong>in</strong>tervention might a¡ectparent<strong>in</strong>g knowledge,behavior, and stressConvenience sample; 84mo<strong>the</strong>rs; mean age 5 24years;75% White,15%African American; 77% onpublic assistanceOklahoma Group I: demonstration and<strong>in</strong>teraction; Group II:education; Group III: controlQuasi-experimental. Subjectsrandomly assigned to one of 3groups; 2 experimental, onecontrol The Knowledge ofPreterm Infant Behavior Scale;Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Child AssessmentFeed<strong>in</strong>g Scale; <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong>Stress Index; Severity of IllnessScoreMo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> both experimentalgroups demonstrated greaterparent<strong>in</strong>g knowledge and<strong>in</strong>teractional behavior anddecreased stress whencompared to <strong>the</strong> control groupChristopheret al.(2000)Explore <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>£uence of socialsupport and perceived stresson a¡ectionate behavior107 mo<strong>the</strong>rs,13-21; 44%White non-Hispanic, 47%Black, 7% Native AmericanNorthCarol<strong>in</strong>aNone Descriptive, correlational. A 7item perceived stress scale,10item social support scale, and<strong>the</strong> A¡ectionate BehaviorsScale developed for this studyNei<strong>the</strong>r social support norperceived stress were relatedto a¡ectionate behaviors, andno statistical <strong>in</strong>teractionsbetween <strong>the</strong> three variableswere foundCorreiaet al.(2008)Characterize verbal contentsexpressed by <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs ofpreterm <strong>in</strong>fants attend<strong>in</strong>g apsychological support<strong>in</strong>terventionPurposive sample of 10mo<strong>the</strong>rs with cl<strong>in</strong>icalsymptoms of depressionsand anxiety and 10 without.Ages 14-39Brazil Weekly psychological<strong>in</strong>tervention sessionsdesigned to support mo<strong>the</strong>rsdur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants’hospitalizationsQuantitative, <strong>in</strong>terpretive.Structured cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>in</strong>terview-DSM-III-R, Beck DepressionInventory, State-Trait Anxiety<strong>in</strong>ventoryDepressed/anxious mo<strong>the</strong>rsexpressed more negativefeel<strong>in</strong>gs or reactions thanmo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparisongroupGlazebrooket al.(2007)Evaluate <strong>the</strong> e¡ect of aparent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervention onmo<strong>the</strong>rs’ responsiveness and<strong>in</strong>fants’ neurobehavioraldevelopment <strong>in</strong> preterm<strong>in</strong>fants o32 weeks gestation233 mo<strong>the</strong>rs and <strong>in</strong>fants; 112<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention group,121 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> control group.Mo<strong>the</strong>rs predom<strong>in</strong>antlyWhite, 24-35 years<strong>Unit</strong>edK<strong>in</strong>gdomA nurse delivered <strong>in</strong>terventionconsist<strong>in</strong>g of tactile and verbalactivities, observation, anddiscussionCluster, randomized, controlledtrial. <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Stress Indexshort-form; NeurobehavioralAssessment of <strong>the</strong> PretermInfant; Nurs<strong>in</strong>g ChildAssessment Teach<strong>in</strong>g Scale(NCATS); Home Observationfor Measurement of <strong>the</strong>Environment (HOME)No statistical di¡erence between<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention and controlgroups for stress, <strong>in</strong>fantneurobehavioral development,or NCATS and HOME scores at3 months post dischargeJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 673


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Table 2. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of <strong>the</strong> Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Intervention Design/Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsHurst(2006)Indentify parent utilization andevaluation of parent supportservices (PSS)Convenience sample of 303families that used <strong>the</strong> PSS.90% mo<strong>the</strong>rs with meanage of 33.6 yearsWest Coast<strong>Unit</strong>edStatesNone Quantitative descriptive.Retrospective hospital recordsreviewed to identify familiesthat used PSS. An <strong>in</strong>vestigatordeveloped mailed survey toevaluate PSS e¡ectiveness.The <strong>in</strong>tervention improvedparents’ ability to criticallyappraise <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant’s behaviorand to respond appropriately78% utilized one form of supportexclusively while 18% used 2forms at <strong>the</strong> same time.Cont<strong>in</strong>uity was critical; groupsupport was more bene¢cialfor assist<strong>in</strong>g familiesJones et al.(2007)Explore mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ and fa<strong>the</strong>rs’perceptions of e¡ective and<strong>in</strong>e¡ective nursecommunicationConvenience sample of 20mo<strong>the</strong>rs and 13 fa<strong>the</strong>rsaged 28-41 yearsAustralia None Semi-structured <strong>in</strong>terviewsask<strong>in</strong>g parents about <strong>the</strong>irperceptions of e¡ective and<strong>in</strong>e¡ective communicationE¡ective communication wasaccommodat<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>cludednurses ask<strong>in</strong>g questions,encourag<strong>in</strong>g parents to askquestions, <strong>in</strong>formal chatt<strong>in</strong>gand conversation about <strong>the</strong>baby. It was also emotional,warm and empa<strong>the</strong>tic.Ine¡ective communication wasunder or over-accommodat<strong>in</strong>g,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>consistent<strong>in</strong>formation and nurses fail<strong>in</strong>gto check parents’understand<strong>in</strong>g674 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWTable 2. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of <strong>the</strong> Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Intervention Design/Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsKowalskiet al.(2006)Determ<strong>in</strong>e what sources andexpectations parents haveconcern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation71 mo<strong>the</strong>rs and 30 fa<strong>the</strong>rs,ages 18-55<strong>Unit</strong>edStatesNone Qualitative questionnaire Parents received most<strong>in</strong>formation from nurse andexpectation was to receive<strong>in</strong>formation from <strong>the</strong>neonatologistLawhon(2002)Evaluation of an <strong>in</strong>dividualizednurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervention based onparental/<strong>in</strong>fant competenceConvenience sample of 10<strong>in</strong>fants and <strong>the</strong>ir 10mo<strong>the</strong>rs/8 fa<strong>the</strong>rs ages 19-35 (median age 5 25.5years/26.5 years); (15 White,3Black)<strong>Unit</strong>edStatesIndividualized <strong>in</strong>tervention withnurses guid<strong>in</strong>g parentsthrough appraisal of <strong>in</strong>fant’sbehavior and appropriateresponsesQualitative. Enhanced parent/<strong>in</strong>fant competence wasmeasured with <strong>the</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>gChild Assessment Feed<strong>in</strong>gScale and <strong>the</strong> Assessment ofPreterm Infant Behavior at 3timesThe <strong>in</strong>tervention improvedparents’ ability to criticallyappraise <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant’s behaviorand to respond appropriatelyMaguireet al.(2007)Exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> e¡ects of a shortterm<strong>in</strong>tervention on parents’knowledge of <strong>in</strong>fantbehavioral cues and caregiv<strong>in</strong>g con¢dence10 sets of NICU parents,<strong>in</strong>fants o32 weeksgestation with noanomalies and notrequir<strong>in</strong>g surgeryTheNe<strong>the</strong>rlands4 sessions on preterm <strong>in</strong>fantbehavior over a 2 week period.Control group received no<strong>in</strong>structionsQuantitative trial. Lack ofCon¢dence <strong>in</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Giv<strong>in</strong>g andGlobal Con¢dence Scales.Questionnaire concern<strong>in</strong>gnurs<strong>in</strong>g support <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUNo signi¢cant di¡erences <strong>in</strong> caregiv<strong>in</strong>g con¢dence betweengroups. Intervention group hadsigni¢cantly higher nurs<strong>in</strong>gsupport scoresMelnyket al.(2001)Evaluate <strong>the</strong> e¡ectiveness of <strong>the</strong>creat<strong>in</strong>g opportunities forparent empowerment (COPE)program42 English speak<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>rs(18^38 years) of low birthweight, premature,hospitalized <strong>in</strong>fants; (64%White, 2.4% Hispanic)New York 4 sessions of (a) appearanceand behavior of preterm<strong>in</strong>fants and parent<strong>in</strong>gstrategies (b) workbook forparent activities to implementskills. Control group received 4sessions focused on hospitaland discharge proceduresPilot study, randomized cl<strong>in</strong>icaltrial. Infant mental developmentmeasured at 3 and 6 months.Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s anxiety, mood,stressors, social support,cop<strong>in</strong>g, and ability to feed<strong>in</strong>fantCOPE <strong>in</strong>fants had higher mentaldevelopment scores at 3 and 6months. COPE mo<strong>the</strong>rs hadless stress from sights andsounds of <strong>the</strong> NICU <strong>in</strong>itially andoverall stronger parent<strong>in</strong>gbeliefsJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 675


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Table 2. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of <strong>the</strong> Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Intervention Design/Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsMelnyket al.(2006)Determ<strong>in</strong>e if <strong>the</strong> COPE<strong>in</strong>tervention could improve<strong>in</strong>fant behavioral anddevelopmental outcomes258 mo<strong>the</strong>rs/158 fa<strong>the</strong>rs/signi¢cant o<strong>the</strong>rs withpreterm <strong>in</strong>fants o2,500 g,26-34 weeks Englishspeak<strong>in</strong>g, 64%-77% White,83%-91% high schooleducation or greater. Meanparent age 5 28North East<strong>Unit</strong>edStates4 sessions on appearance andbehavioral characteristics ofpreterm <strong>in</strong>fants and parent<strong>in</strong>g;practice time for skills. Controlgroup received 4 sessions onhospital policies and servicesRandomized controlled trial.Parent anxiety, stress,depression, beliefs, <strong>in</strong>fantparent<strong>in</strong>teraction, and lengthof NICU and hospital stay. Dataafter <strong>in</strong>terventions,1 week. and2 months. after dischargeMo<strong>the</strong>rs (not fa<strong>the</strong>rs) reportedless stress <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU and lessdepression and anxiety at 2months Both parentsdemonstrated more positiveparent-<strong>in</strong>fant <strong>in</strong>teraction andbeliefs. COPE <strong>in</strong>fants had a 3.8day shorter NICU stayNottage(2005)Exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> relationshipbetween perceived socialsupport and parental use ofhospital non-medical supportservicesConvenience sample; 25mo<strong>the</strong>rs,19 fa<strong>the</strong>rs, ages24-54 years 75% White,23% African American,and 2% Lat<strong>in</strong>oEast coast<strong>Unit</strong>edStatesNone Quantitative; correlational.Perceived Social SupportScale for Family and Friends,and <strong>the</strong> Utilization of SocialSupport (created for this study)Nei<strong>the</strong>r perceived social supportfrom family nor friends wassigni¢cantly correlated withuse of hospital supportservicesPearsonandAnderson(2001)Evaluate <strong>the</strong> e¡ectiveness of aparent education <strong>in</strong>terventionon parent<strong>in</strong>g59 mo<strong>the</strong>rs, 45 fa<strong>the</strong>rs; 44NICU or special carenursery sta¡M<strong>in</strong>nesota Parent <strong>in</strong>tervention consist<strong>in</strong>g ofa facilitator and educationalsupportQuestionnaire focused oncontent and areas for futureprogram improvements. Sta¡survey of parental behaviorsAttend<strong>in</strong>g Parent’s Circle assistedparents to overcome obstacles<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU and <strong>in</strong>creasepositive parent<strong>in</strong>g behaviorsPetersonet al.(2004)Identify nurses’ perception andpractices of family-centeredcare (FCC)Convenience sample of 37NICU and 25 PICU nurses;54 were registered nurses,52% had 410 yearsexperience, 53% had aBachelor’s degree orhigherAcute carehospitalNone Quantitative. Family Centered<strong>Care</strong> Questionnaire (FCCQ)focused on both FCC necessityand current practiceThe number of nurses<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g FCC <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>irpractice was signi¢cantly lowerthan those who stated it wasnecessary. Nurses with 410years experience practicedFCC less than thosewitho10 years. NICU nursespracticed FCC less than PICUnurses676 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWTable 2. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of <strong>the</strong> Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Intervention Design/Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsSchroeder(1998)Exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> e¡ects of guidedlearn<strong>in</strong>g on mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ care of<strong>the</strong>ir premature <strong>in</strong>fant16 mo<strong>the</strong>rs of NICU <strong>in</strong>fants;ages 20-42; 12 White,1African American,1 Lat<strong>in</strong>a,1 Native American,1 AsianWiscons<strong>in</strong> Standardized parent learn<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>tervention focused on 6di¡erent aspects of guidedlearn<strong>in</strong>gMo<strong>the</strong>r’s Work<strong>in</strong>g Model ofPreterm Infant <strong>Care</strong>giv<strong>in</strong>g(Relationship) InterviewProtocol; RelationshipCompetencies Assessment;Parent Child Early RelationalAssessment rat<strong>in</strong>g scale;Family Provider RelationshipsInstrumentEngag<strong>in</strong>g with mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> guidedparticipation can positively<strong>in</strong>£uence <strong>the</strong> relationshipbetween mo<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>in</strong>fantSchroederandPridham(2006)Determ<strong>in</strong>e if ‘‘guidedparticipation’’ improvesmo<strong>the</strong>rs’ relationshipcompetency with <strong>the</strong>ir NICUbabies16 mo<strong>the</strong>rs, 22-26 years, oflow birth weight <strong>in</strong>fant’s 28weeks gestational age orlessMidwest<strong>Unit</strong>edStatesMo<strong>the</strong>rs practiced parent<strong>in</strong>gthrough guided participationled by <strong>the</strong> research nurseRandomized trial. InternalWork<strong>in</strong>g Model of Relat<strong>in</strong>g to<strong>the</strong> Baby and <strong>the</strong> RelationshipCompetencies AssessmentMo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention grouphad higher relationshipcompetencies with <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fantthan mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> controlgroupvan der Palet al.(2007)Compare <strong>the</strong> e¡ects of basic<strong>in</strong>fant developmental care and<strong>the</strong> Newborn IndividualizedDevelopmental <strong>Care</strong> andAssessment Program(NIDCAP) on parental stress,con¢dence, and perceivednurs<strong>in</strong>g support192 <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> RCT 1 and 168 <strong>in</strong>RCT 2; all o32 weeksgestation, no anomalies ordrug addictionTheNe<strong>the</strong>rlandsBasic developmental care andNIDCAP2 consecutive randomized trials.Data collected us<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>the</strong>Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Risk Index for Babies,2 scales of <strong>the</strong> Mo<strong>the</strong>rs andBaby Scale, Nurse ParentSupport Tool, Parental StressorScale: NICUNo signi¢cant di¡erences werefound <strong>in</strong> parental stress,con¢dence, or perceivednurs<strong>in</strong>g supportWalker(1998)Identi¢cation of nurses’ views onbarriers to parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>NICU298 NICU nurses Australia None 53-item questionnaire Nurses believed environmentalbarriers and parental attitudescontributed to parent<strong>in</strong>gdi⁄culties. Did not recognizethat nurs<strong>in</strong>g practices and unitprotocols could be barriersJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 677


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Table 2. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of <strong>the</strong> Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Intervention Design/Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsWielengaet al.(2006)Determ<strong>in</strong>e if provid<strong>in</strong>g careaccord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> NewbornIndividualized Developmental<strong>Care</strong> and AssessmentProgram (NIDCAP) pr<strong>in</strong>cipalswould <strong>in</strong>crease parentsatisfaction50 parents age 516-40years, (25 <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention/25<strong>in</strong> control group) of <strong>in</strong>fants30 weeks gestation or less;English or Dutch speak<strong>in</strong>g.No <strong>in</strong>fant anomaliesTheNe<strong>the</strong>rlandsNIDCAP <strong>in</strong>terventions areguided by <strong>in</strong>fant’s response,developmental level, andphysical condition. Familycentered with goal ofempower<strong>in</strong>g parents to bemembers of healthcare teamQuasi-experimental. Controlgroup received traditional care,<strong>in</strong>terventional group receivedcare guided by NIDCAP.Outcomes measured by <strong>the</strong>NICU Parent Satisfaction Formand Nurse Parent Support ToolParents were signi¢cantly moresatis¢ed with care provided byNIDCAP pr<strong>in</strong>ciplesMixed MethodBruns andMcCollum(2002)Exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> perspectives ofmo<strong>the</strong>rs, nurses, andneonatologists concern<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> importance andimplementation of caregiv<strong>in</strong>g,<strong>in</strong>formation exchange, andrelationships <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context offamily centered care55 mo<strong>the</strong>rs 18-42 years 75%Anglo and married.18neonatologists, and 123nurses; mostly female andAngloMidwestern<strong>Unit</strong>edStatesNone PARTNERS questionnaire.Qualitative content analysisMo<strong>the</strong>rs and nurses had higherrat<strong>in</strong>gs than neonatologists onimplementation of caregiv<strong>in</strong>g.Mo<strong>the</strong>rs and nurses ratedimportance higher thanimplementation for <strong>in</strong>formationexchange and relationshipsMacnabet al.(1998)To assess <strong>the</strong> potential forpromot<strong>in</strong>g journal writ<strong>in</strong>g forparents receiv<strong>in</strong>g socialsupport <strong>in</strong> a special carenursery73 parents, English as aprimary language,m<strong>in</strong>imum of a 12th gradeeducationBritishColumbiaAn <strong>in</strong>structional pamphlet onjournal writ<strong>in</strong>g was provided to<strong>the</strong> participantsFollow-up phone <strong>in</strong>terview 6weeks after enrollment todeterm<strong>in</strong>e if a journal was kept32%of parents kept a journal,73% of <strong>the</strong>se felt it helpedreduce stress. The #1 journalentry topic was see<strong>in</strong>g yourchild attached to mach<strong>in</strong>esfollowed by <strong>in</strong>teractions withnurs<strong>in</strong>g sta¡QualitativeBuarqueet al.(2006)Investigate <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>£uence ofsupport groups on families ofat-risk newborns and on NICUsta¡13 mo<strong>the</strong>rs, 6 fa<strong>the</strong>rs, 2grandmo<strong>the</strong>rs, and 16 sta¡membersBrazil None Observation of support groupmeet<strong>in</strong>gs and open-ended<strong>in</strong>terviewsSupport groups provided familieswith <strong>in</strong>formation, emotionalsupport and strength. Parentto-parentsupport wasessential678 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWTable 2. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of <strong>the</strong> Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Intervention Design/Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsCescutti-Butler andGalv<strong>in</strong>(2003)Explore and describe parents’perception of sta¡competencies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU8 parents South-westEnglandNone Grounded <strong>the</strong>ory. Unstructured<strong>in</strong>terview.Parent perception of competencywas based more on car<strong>in</strong>gbehaviors than skills. Parentswanted (a) to be <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> NICU, (b) control, (c) achoice to stay dur<strong>in</strong>gprocedures, and (d)communication with <strong>the</strong>healthcare team andappropriate <strong>in</strong>formationWigert et al.(2008)Explore conditions for parentparticipation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant care <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> NICU10 parents,14 nurses and 15managersSweden None Observations and <strong>in</strong>terviews withrepresentatives from sta¡,management, and parentsConditions for parentparticipation were driven by<strong>the</strong> sta¡, budgetaryconstra<strong>in</strong>ts and unit rout<strong>in</strong>esJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 679


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>A ‘‘power struggle’’ between <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’s nurse and mo<strong>the</strong>roften occurred.Mo<strong>the</strong>rs felt that provid<strong>in</strong>g breast milk was a methodfor establish<strong>in</strong>g a relationship and a connectionto <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants (Lupton & Fenwick).Lupton and Fenwick (2001) discovered that <strong>in</strong> somecases nurses were found to <strong>in</strong>appropriately limit <strong>the</strong>parent’s contact with <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants. They reported an<strong>in</strong>cident where <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r of a stable, 34 week gestation<strong>in</strong>fant asked <strong>the</strong> nurse if she could hold her<strong>in</strong>fant and was told, ‘‘No, you’ve had your cuddle today’’(p. 1016). Mo<strong>the</strong>rs also reported that whenarriv<strong>in</strong>g on time to provide care for <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant, <strong>the</strong>ywere sometimes <strong>in</strong>formed by <strong>the</strong> nurse that <strong>the</strong> carehad already been adm<strong>in</strong>istered. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> study,<strong>the</strong>re were additional claims of several mo<strong>the</strong>rs arriv<strong>in</strong>gto <strong>the</strong> nursery to visit <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants and be<strong>in</strong>gtold ‘‘bluntly and loudly’’ (p. 1017) that <strong>the</strong> nurserywas closed. Some nurses stated <strong>the</strong>y felt as though<strong>the</strong>y were personally responsible for how <strong>the</strong> parentsparented, and <strong>the</strong>y took <strong>the</strong>ir role as teachersvery seriously. As a result, mo<strong>the</strong>rs claimed thatnurses often hovered over <strong>the</strong>m and warned ofoverhandl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants. These actions resulted<strong>in</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>gs of anger and frustration on <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’spart.A Need to be Positively Perceived by <strong>the</strong> NurserySta¡Mo<strong>the</strong>rs of NICU <strong>in</strong>fants desired to be perceivedpositively by <strong>the</strong> nursery sta¡ (Fenwick et al.,2001a, 2002). They feared that voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir op<strong>in</strong>ionwould <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant’s vulnerability. Threestudies described <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s fear of becom<strong>in</strong>glabeled by <strong>the</strong> nurses as ‘‘di⁄cult’’ (Hurst, 2001a,2001b; Lupton & Fenwick, 2001). They were concernedabout be<strong>in</strong>g seen as pushy and felt <strong>the</strong>yneeded to be ‘‘nice’’ to <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g sta¡ to facilitatea good relationship (Fenwick et al., 2002). They alsofelt <strong>the</strong>y needed to conform to <strong>the</strong> ‘‘good mo<strong>the</strong>r’’role as constructed by <strong>the</strong> nurses. The nurses admittedto hav<strong>in</strong>g speci¢c criteria for who quali¢edas <strong>the</strong> ‘‘good mo<strong>the</strong>r.’’ These women ‘‘asked lots ofquestions, appeared eager to learn everyth<strong>in</strong>g,and could be reasoned with’’ (Lupton & Fenwick,p. 1018).Mo<strong>the</strong>rs withheld or guarded feel<strong>in</strong>gs for fear of los<strong>in</strong>gaccess to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant. Fenwick et al. (2001a)discovered that fa<strong>the</strong>rs were often <strong>the</strong> ones to <strong>in</strong>itiateany compla<strong>in</strong>ts about nurs<strong>in</strong>g sta¡, andmo<strong>the</strong>rs seemed to rely on this. Con£icts between<strong>the</strong> nurse and <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r were rarely resolved, andgenerally <strong>the</strong> nurse would discont<strong>in</strong>ue car<strong>in</strong>g forthat <strong>in</strong>fant and a di¡erent nurse would be assigned.Mo<strong>the</strong>rs who were labeled ‘‘troublemakers’’ oftendiscovered that <strong>the</strong> outcome was passive-aggressivebehaviors from <strong>the</strong> nurses. If <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r-nurserelationship could not be negotiated, mo<strong>the</strong>rs became‘‘disenfranchised,’’ which fur<strong>the</strong>r contributedto <strong>the</strong>ir stress levels, and <strong>the</strong>se women respondedby distanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves. These researchers concludedthat this model of care was traditionallycentered on <strong>the</strong> provider and not <strong>the</strong> family.A Need for Individualized <strong>Care</strong>While <strong>the</strong> need to receive <strong>in</strong>dividualized care mayseem obvious, researchers suggest that this needmay be overlooked <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU (Hurst, 2001b; Punthmatharith,Buddharat, & Kamlangdee, 2007;Wielenga, Smit, & Unk, 2006). This is most apparentwhen address<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> needs of fa<strong>the</strong>rs. Of <strong>the</strong> 60studies reviewed for this paper, 23 <strong>in</strong>cluded fa<strong>the</strong>rs<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sample; however, <strong>the</strong> number of mo<strong>the</strong>rsand fa<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> each study were not typically equal(Alderson et al., 2006; Arockiasamy et al., 2008;Buarque, de Carvalho Lima, Parry Scott, &Vasconcelos, 2006; Denney, 2003; Gardner et al.,2002; Herbst & Maree, 2006; Higg<strong>in</strong>s & Dullow,2003; Jamsa & Jamsa,1998; Jones, Woodhouse, &Rowe, 2007; Joseph et al., 2007; Kowalski, Leef,Mackley, Spear, & Paul, 2006; Lam et al., 2007; Lawhon,2002; Lee, Lee, Rank<strong>in</strong>, Alkon, & Weiss, 2003;L<strong>in</strong>dberg, Axelsson, & Ohrl<strong>in</strong>g, 2007; Macguire,Bruil, Wit, & Walhter, 2007; Melnyk et al., 2006; Nottage,2005; Pearson & Anderson, 2001; P<strong>in</strong>elli, 2000;Pohlman, 2005; Taylor-Huber, 1998; Ward, 2001). Inone of <strong>the</strong>se studies, researchers found that <strong>the</strong>needs of mo<strong>the</strong>rs and fa<strong>the</strong>rs were di¡erent.In <strong>the</strong>ir study of an <strong>in</strong>tervention to improve mentalhealth outcomes <strong>in</strong> parents with <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU,Melnyk et al. (2006) found that <strong>the</strong> response ofmo<strong>the</strong>rs and fa<strong>the</strong>rs to <strong>in</strong>terventions was not <strong>the</strong>same. After implementation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention, <strong>the</strong>yfound that <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research group hadless anxiety and stronger parental beliefs. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly,<strong>the</strong>y found no di¡erence <strong>in</strong> stress level <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>rs and no di¡erence <strong>in</strong> state anxiety and depressivesymptoms at 2 months postdischarge. Theauthors concluded that <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>rs needed to befollowed for a longer period of time (Melnyk et al.).Ward (2001) also found di¡erences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> needs ofmo<strong>the</strong>rs and fa<strong>the</strong>rs. She discovered that whileboth thought assurance needs were most importantand support needs were least important, <strong>the</strong>680 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWTable 3: <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Needs and Support <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUStudy andYear Purpose of Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsQuantitativeDenney(2003)Measure <strong>the</strong> occurrence of stress <strong>in</strong>Lat<strong>in</strong>o NICU parents and <strong>the</strong>relation of parental stress, nurs<strong>in</strong>gsupport, and parent<strong>in</strong>g e⁄cacy32 Lat<strong>in</strong>a mo<strong>the</strong>rs and 16fa<strong>the</strong>rs, mean age 5 29yearsSou<strong>the</strong>rnCaliforniaParental Stressor Scale:NICU, <strong>the</strong> NICU<strong>Care</strong>giv<strong>in</strong>g and Communication Scale, <strong>the</strong>Nurse Parent Support Tool, Maternal E⁄cacyQuestionnaire, and Family DemographicQuestionnaire<strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> stress was not signi¢cantly related toparent<strong>in</strong>g e⁄cacy. <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> e⁄cacy wassigni¢cantly related to nurs<strong>in</strong>g support.Sources of stress were di¡erent for Lat<strong>in</strong>aparents than previous studies with WhiteparentsGardneret al.(2002)Investigate <strong>the</strong> experiences ofparents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU to design afamily support programRetrospective purposivesampl<strong>in</strong>g of parents with<strong>in</strong>fants discharged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>past year.119 participants(114 mo<strong>the</strong>rs, 5 fa<strong>the</strong>rs)Regionaltertiaryreferral center39 item questionnaire designed for this study.250 questionnaires sent out by mail with a48% response rateParents were satis¢ed with <strong>the</strong>ir care but desiredto do more hands on care of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant.Parents wanted a more active role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>decision to discharge <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fantLee et al.(2003)Describe <strong>the</strong> stressful events ofCh<strong>in</strong>ese American NICU parentsand assess <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>£uence ofacculturation, parentcharacteristic, and social supportson parent stress30 Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American families(30 mo<strong>the</strong>rs, 25 fa<strong>the</strong>rs) 18-43 yearsSan Francisco Infant health data from <strong>the</strong> medical record,Parental Stressor Scale: InfantHospitalization, Su<strong>in</strong>n-Lew Asian Self-IdentityAcculturation Scale, Family Support ScaleThe comb<strong>in</strong>ed e¡ects of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fant’s condition and future, a strong belief <strong>in</strong>Asian family values, and lack of support fromhealth care providers accounted for 26% of<strong>the</strong> variance <strong>in</strong> parental stress for mo<strong>the</strong>rs and55% for fa<strong>the</strong>rsMok andLeung(2006)Explore <strong>the</strong> supportive behaviors ofnurses <strong>in</strong> a Hong Kong NICU37 NICU mo<strong>the</strong>rs; 26-38 yearsoldHong Kong Nurses Parent Support Tool Mo<strong>the</strong>rs rated nurs<strong>in</strong>g support as highlyimportant. Parents desired more nurs<strong>in</strong>gsupport than <strong>the</strong>y received <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of<strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g and supportivecommunicationJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 681


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Table 3. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsP<strong>in</strong>elli(2000)Determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> relationship betweenfamily cop<strong>in</strong>g and resources andfamily adjustment and parentalstress <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU124 couples, mean age 5 31years mo<strong>the</strong>rs/32 yearsfa<strong>the</strong>rsOntaria,CanadaBased o n <strong>the</strong> Resiliency Model of Family Stress,Adjustment, and Adaptation. Instruments<strong>in</strong>cluded: State Anxiety Scale, FamilyInventory of Resources for Management,Family Crisis Oriented Personal Evaluationscale, and <strong>the</strong> McMaster Family AssessmentDeviceResources were more strongly correlated withpositive adjustment and decreased stressthan cop<strong>in</strong>g or be<strong>in</strong>g a ¢rst time parent.F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were similar between mo<strong>the</strong>rs andfa<strong>the</strong>rs; however, mo<strong>the</strong>rs used more cop<strong>in</strong>gstrategies than fa<strong>the</strong>rsVanRiper(2001)Describe maternal perceptionsabout family provider relationshipsand <strong>the</strong> correlation with familywell-be<strong>in</strong>g55 NICU mo<strong>the</strong>rs; 69% White,29% African American,and 2% Lat<strong>in</strong>o; meanage 5 29 range 17-40 yearsMidwestern<strong>Unit</strong>ed StatesFamily Provider Relationships Instrument-NICU,18 item version of Ry¡’s measure ofpsychological well-be<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>the</strong> GeneralScale of <strong>the</strong> Family Assessment MeasureMo<strong>the</strong>rs had greater family satisfaction and weremore satis¢ed with <strong>the</strong>ir care and reportedgreater psychological well-be<strong>in</strong>g when <strong>the</strong>yviewed <strong>the</strong>ir provider relationship as positiveQualitativeAldersonet al.(2006)Explore <strong>the</strong> views of parents and sta¡concern<strong>in</strong>g shar<strong>in</strong>g of knowledgeand care of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fantParents of 80 NICU <strong>in</strong>fantswith con¢rmed or potentialneurological problems. Allmo<strong>the</strong>rs participated,16fa<strong>the</strong>rs and 40 senior sta¡Sou<strong>the</strong>rnEnglandObservations over an 18 month period; semistructured<strong>in</strong>terviewsParents described <strong>the</strong>ir views on two-waydecision mak<strong>in</strong>g and a practical need to know.Physicians preferred a distanc<strong>in</strong>g aspect of<strong>in</strong>formed consent. Parents preferred ‘‘draw<strong>in</strong>gtoge<strong>the</strong>r’’Fenwicket al.(2001a)Describe and expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> experienceof mo<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU from <strong>the</strong>woman’s po<strong>in</strong>t of view28 mostly Australian bornwomen 19-41 years and 20nursesAustralia Mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong>terviewed prior to <strong>in</strong>fant dischargeand 8-12 weeks after. Interviews with 20nurses, <strong>in</strong>formal conversations with parents,and bedside nurse/parent <strong>in</strong>teractionsInhibitive or authoritative styles of nurs<strong>in</strong>g careled to <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ feel<strong>in</strong>gs of struggl<strong>in</strong>g tomo<strong>the</strong>r, feel<strong>in</strong>g disa¡ected, guard<strong>in</strong>g offeel<strong>in</strong>gs, attempts to speak up and out, fear ofearn<strong>in</strong>g a reputation or recrim<strong>in</strong>ation, and¢nally a disenfranchised mo<strong>the</strong>r682 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWTable 3. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsFenwicket al.(2001b)Explore <strong>the</strong> use of ‘‘chat’’ as a methodof establish<strong>in</strong>g family-centeredcare <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUSame data base as Fenwicket al. 2001aAustralia Same as Fenwick et al. 2001a The use of ‘‘chat’’ or an <strong>in</strong>formal communicationstyle between parents and nurses wasidenti¢ed as critical to <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs. Only 12%of <strong>the</strong> bedside record<strong>in</strong>gs revealed <strong>the</strong> nurses’use of this technique.Fenwicket al.(2002)Ga<strong>in</strong> an understand<strong>in</strong>g of howwomen perceive early mo<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> NICUSame data base as Fenwicket al. 2001aAustralia Same as Fenwick et al. 2001a The category ‘‘learn<strong>in</strong>g and play<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> game’’was accomplished through: ‘‘suss<strong>in</strong>g’’ th<strong>in</strong>gsout (identify<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> groundrules), be<strong>in</strong>g nice, and prov<strong>in</strong>g one’scapabilitiesHerbst andMaree(2006)Describe parents’ needs andrecommendations forempowerment from <strong>the</strong>irperspective20 Master’s prepared nurses South Africa Parent focus groups. Data were presented tonurses with discussion of solutions to meet<strong>the</strong>se needsTen empowerment guidel<strong>in</strong>es were suggestedby <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g focus groupL<strong>in</strong>dberget al.(2007)Describe <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r’s perspective ofhav<strong>in</strong>g a premature <strong>in</strong>fant8 fa<strong>the</strong>rs of premature <strong>in</strong>fants Nor<strong>the</strong>rnSwedenNarrative <strong>in</strong>terviews Three <strong>the</strong>mes were identi¢ed: suddenly be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>a situation never re£ected on, putt<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>rand <strong>in</strong>fant ¢rst, and need<strong>in</strong>g to be understoodLubbe(2005)Develop an <strong>in</strong>tervention careprogram for NICU parentsAll parents with an <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>in</strong>one of <strong>the</strong> two selectedNICUsSouth Africa Open-ended questions <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> needs <strong>in</strong>cluded: <strong>in</strong>formation,emotional support, communication, learn<strong>in</strong>g,and preparation for discharge. The EarlyIntervention <strong>Care</strong> Progamme was <strong>the</strong>ndesigned to meet <strong>the</strong>se needsJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 683


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Table 3. Cont<strong>in</strong>uedStudy andYear Purpose of Study Participants Sett<strong>in</strong>g Methods Major F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsLupton andFenwick(2001)Investigate how mo<strong>the</strong>rs withhospitalized <strong>in</strong>fants construct andpractice mo<strong>the</strong>rhoodSame data base as Fenwicket al. 2001a2 neonatalnurseries <strong>in</strong>Sydney,AustraliaSame as Fenwick et al. 2001a Physical contact with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant andbreastfeed<strong>in</strong>g were important. Powerstruggles occurred between mo<strong>the</strong>rs andnurses. Maternal frustration and anger wascommon. The nurse’s approach was <strong>in</strong>tegral to<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s establishment of a relationshipwith <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fantPohlman(2005)Improve understand<strong>in</strong>g of fa<strong>the</strong>rs ofpremature <strong>in</strong>fants and <strong>the</strong> role ofwork <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transition to fa<strong>the</strong>rhood9 fa<strong>the</strong>rs, all English speak<strong>in</strong>gand White, 26-39 yearsMidwestern<strong>Unit</strong>ed StatesFa<strong>the</strong>rs participated <strong>in</strong> 8 <strong>in</strong>terviews over 15months. period. Interpretive phenomenologyPrimacy of work <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lives of <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>rsemerged as a <strong>the</strong>me with 3 sub<strong>the</strong>mes: workafter birth-a renewed fervor, from expert tonovice, and juggl<strong>in</strong>g work and <strong>the</strong> outsideworldvanRooyenet al.(2006)Describe mo<strong>the</strong>r’s experience <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>NICU and develop guidel<strong>in</strong>es forregistered nurses to assist <strong>the</strong>semo<strong>the</strong>rsNot identi¢ed Not identi¢ed Phenomenological <strong>in</strong>terview Mo<strong>the</strong>rs experienced shock, fear, anger, guilt,grief, helplessness and a desire to care for <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fant. They needed support from <strong>the</strong> nurses,personal knowledge, and accurate<strong>in</strong>formation expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> understandableterms. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for nurses <strong>in</strong>cluded:establish<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a <strong>the</strong>rapeuticrelationship and milieuWigertet al.(2006)Describe mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ experienceshav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir full-term <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong>NICU10 mo<strong>the</strong>rs ages 27-45 <strong>in</strong>fants37 weeks or 4, nodeformitiesSweden Interviews were conducted at 6 mos. 6yearsfollow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> experience. Phenomenologicalhermeneutic text analysisTwo concepts were identi¢ed. Exclusion withnegative e¡ect on maternal feel<strong>in</strong>gs andparticipation with positive maternal feel<strong>in</strong>gs684 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWrank<strong>in</strong>g of various needs di¡ered. Fa<strong>the</strong>rs rankedassurance and <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>in</strong>formation signi¢cantlylower than did <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs.The majority of studies <strong>in</strong>volved only mo<strong>the</strong>rs, withjust 4 focus<strong>in</strong>g speci¢cally on fa<strong>the</strong>rs (Arockiasamyet al., 2008; Joseph et al., 2007; L<strong>in</strong>dberg et al.,2007; Pohlman, 2005). Researchers, who studiedfa<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU discovered that <strong>the</strong> experiencemay be unique for <strong>the</strong>se men. Pohlman (2005)found that work was critically important to fa<strong>the</strong>rsas a means of cop<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> situation. Loss of controlwas a major hurdle for some NICU fa<strong>the</strong>rs(Arockiasamy et al.). Several fa<strong>the</strong>rs of premature<strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU found <strong>the</strong>mselves ‘‘gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> midst of someth<strong>in</strong>g never previously re£ectedon’’ (L<strong>in</strong>dberg et al., p.142). This condition consistedof shock and not be<strong>in</strong>g able to completely graspwhat had happened along with a dire need to understand.Fa<strong>the</strong>rs also described certa<strong>in</strong> aspectsof <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant’s conditions as stressful, particularlypa<strong>in</strong>, breath<strong>in</strong>g di⁄culties, and separation (Josephet al.).A Need for a Therapeutic Relationship With <strong>the</strong>Nurs<strong>in</strong>g Sta¡Seventeen studies addressed <strong>the</strong> parent’s need todevelop a <strong>the</strong>rapeutic relationship with <strong>the</strong> nurse(Bialoskurski et al., 2002; Erlandsson & Fagerberg,2005; Fenwick et al., 2001a, 2001b; Heerman et al.,2005; Holditch-Davis & Miles, 2000; Hurst, 2001a,2001b; Lam et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2003; Lupton &Fenwick, 2001; Mok & Leung, 2006; Taylor-Huber,1998; van Riper, 2001; van Rooyen, Nomgqokwana,Kotze, & Carlson, 2006; Ward, 2001; Wigert et al.,2006). The researchers identi¢ed <strong>the</strong> nurse’s abilityto ei<strong>the</strong>r positively or negatively <strong>in</strong>£uence <strong>the</strong> developmentof <strong>the</strong> parent-<strong>in</strong>fant relationship. Severalresearchers described a ‘‘power struggle’’ thatdeveloped between <strong>the</strong> parents of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant, particularly<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r, and <strong>the</strong> nurse (Fenwick et al.,2001a;Lupton & Fenwick). This power struggle wasoften a result of <strong>in</strong>hibitive nurs<strong>in</strong>g practices that<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> nurse ‘‘protect<strong>in</strong>g’’ <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant and direct<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r. This approach allowed <strong>the</strong>nurse to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> his or her role as <strong>the</strong> expert andoften alienated <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r (Fenwick et al., 2001a).Mo<strong>the</strong>rs were found to be acutely aware of <strong>the</strong>power di¡erentials between <strong>the</strong>mselves and <strong>the</strong>NICU personnel (Hurst, 2001b). This is unfortunatebecause researchers suggest that parents possessa strong desire to collaborate with care providers,especially nurses (Bialoskurski et al.; Erlandsson &Fagerberg; Hurst, 2001a; Lee et al.; Mok & Leung;Taylor-Huber; van Riper; van Rooyen et al.; Ward).In a study of Australian mo<strong>the</strong>rs, Lupton and Fenwick(2001) described how mo<strong>the</strong>rs of NICU <strong>in</strong>fantssaw nurses as ‘‘gatekeepers’’ between <strong>the</strong>mselvesand <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants. These mo<strong>the</strong>rs felt <strong>the</strong>y had toga<strong>in</strong> permission from <strong>the</strong> nurse to <strong>in</strong>teract with <strong>the</strong>irbabies and that <strong>the</strong>y were be<strong>in</strong>g constantly super-Table 4: Summary TableParent Needs Supportive Behaviors Needs and Supportive BehaviorsQuantitative 5 19 65 not speci¢ed 12 <strong>in</strong>terventional 3 correlational7 non-<strong>in</strong>terventional 2 descriptive1 descriptive/correlationalQualitative 14 3 114 phenomenology 1 ethnography 3 grounded <strong>the</strong>ory2 ethnography 1 phenomenology 3 phenomenology1 grounded <strong>the</strong>ory 1 not speci¢ed 1 ethnography1 qualitative description 1 descriptive1 descriptive case study 1 qualitative, contextual1 Moustakas’ heuristic methodology 2 not speci¢ed4 not speci¢edMixed Method 0 2 0Both quantitative and qualitative methodsJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 685


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>The nurse’s communication style was found to be acritical factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> establishment of <strong>the</strong> nurse-parentrelationship.vised. This resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r feel<strong>in</strong>g frustratedand resentful. As a means of cop<strong>in</strong>g with this, <strong>the</strong>mo<strong>the</strong>rs attempted to rega<strong>in</strong> control of <strong>the</strong> situationby acquir<strong>in</strong>g knowledge about <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants’ condition.What Behaviors Support Parents <strong>in</strong>Meet<strong>in</strong>g These Needs?Emotional SupportThe results of several studies <strong>in</strong>dicated that emotionalsupport was highly important for parentsexperienc<strong>in</strong>g a NICU admission (Buarque et al.,2006; Correia, Carvalho, & L<strong>in</strong>hares, 2008; Denney,2003; Hurst, 2006; Jones et al., 2007; Lee et al.,2003; Mok & Leung, 2006; Nottage, 2005; Pearson& Anderson, 2001; P<strong>in</strong>elli, 2000; van Riper, 2001;van Rooyen et al., 2006). Mo<strong>the</strong>rs had greater familysatisfaction when <strong>the</strong>y viewed <strong>the</strong>ir providerrelationship as positive (van Riper), and parent<strong>in</strong>ge⁄cacy <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong>o parents was signi¢cantly relatedto nurs<strong>in</strong>g support (Denney). Lack of nurs<strong>in</strong>g supportmay be a source of stress for both mo<strong>the</strong>rsand fa<strong>the</strong>rs (Lee et al.). Speci¢c areas whereparents desired more nurs<strong>in</strong>g support <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>formationshar<strong>in</strong>g and supportive communication(Mok & Leung).Three studies <strong>in</strong> this review focused on parents support<strong>in</strong>geach o<strong>the</strong>r (Hurst, 2006; Nottage, 2005;Pearson & Anderson, 2001). The results of this typeof <strong>in</strong>tervention were quite positive and this seemedto be an e¡ective technique for provid<strong>in</strong>g additionalsupport to parents. In <strong>the</strong>ir study, Pearson andAnderson implemented a ‘‘parents’ circle’’ that consistedof a facilitator provid<strong>in</strong>g parents wi<strong>the</strong>ducational <strong>in</strong>formation along with parent-to-parentsupport. These researchers found that parentswho attended parents’ circle overcame obstacles<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU more easily and experienced an<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> positive parent<strong>in</strong>g behaviors. Hurst discoveredthat parents rated group support as <strong>the</strong>most bene¢cial type of support <strong>the</strong>y received dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> hospitalization of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants.Parent EmpowermentThe ability to empower parents is considered crucial<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU (Alderson et al., 2006; Bruns &McCollum, 2002; Cescutti-Butler & Galv<strong>in</strong>, 2003;Fenwick et al., 2001a, 2001b; Gardner et al., 2002;Herbst & Maree, 2006; Lawhon, 2002; L<strong>in</strong>dberget al., 2007; Lubbe, 2005; Lupton & Fenwick, 2001;Macnab, Beckett, Park, & Scheckter,1998; Petersonet al., 2004; Pohlman, 2005; Schroeder & Pridham,2006; Wielenga et al., 2006; Wigert et al., 2006; Wigert,Hellstrom, & Berg, 2008). However, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir study,Herbst and Maree discovered that <strong>the</strong>re was noconsensus among nurses about how to actuallysupport this process and turn over as much primarycare to <strong>the</strong> parents as possible. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>reare no agreed upon guidel<strong>in</strong>es for nurses, this twopartstudy asked parents to identify nurs<strong>in</strong>g actionsthat would be helpful <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir process of becom<strong>in</strong>gempowered. This <strong>in</strong>formation was <strong>the</strong>n presentedto <strong>the</strong> nurses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of a workshop wherenurses developed guidel<strong>in</strong>es to implement.These guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g: (a) parentsshould be <strong>in</strong>troduced to <strong>the</strong> NICU dur<strong>in</strong>g prenatalpreparation; (b) parents should receive a one-ononeorientation to <strong>the</strong> NICU upon admission of <strong>the</strong>ir<strong>in</strong>fant; (c) parents should be <strong>in</strong>formed of any <strong>in</strong>formation<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant and should be actively<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g process; (d)parents should be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’s carewhenever possible; (e) parents emotions should beaccommodated; (f) sta¡ should be car<strong>in</strong>g, knowledgeable,and approachable; (g) developmentalcare of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant should be implemented; (h) start<strong>in</strong>gupon admission, parent should be prepared fordischarge; (i) <strong>the</strong> highest quality of nurs<strong>in</strong>g shouldbe a priority; and (j) aspects of parent empowermentand family-centered care should be a part of<strong>the</strong> hospital vision and mission statements. The authorsof this article stated that follow-up researchafter <strong>the</strong>se guidel<strong>in</strong>es had been implemented wasnecessary. These guidel<strong>in</strong>es may serve as a templatefor <strong>the</strong> development of standards of care forNICU families <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hospitals as well.A Welcom<strong>in</strong>g Environment with Supportive<strong>Unit</strong> Policies<strong>Unit</strong> environment and <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g approach arecrucial to assist<strong>in</strong>g parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. Restrictivehospital and unit policies can create signi¢cantroad blocks for parents (Bruns & McCollum, 2002;Fenwick et al., 2001a, 2001b; Heerman et al., 2005;Herbst & Maree, 2006; Jones et al., 2007; Macquireet al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2004; P<strong>in</strong>elli, 2000;Schroeder, 1998; Schroeder & Pridham, 2006; vander Pal et al., 2007; Walker,1998; Wigert et al., 2008;Wielenga et al., 2006). Even though <strong>the</strong>se obstaclesmay be un<strong>in</strong>tentional, <strong>the</strong>ir consequences can beprofound. If parents are anxious, subtle factors suchas <strong>the</strong> nurse’s tone of voice and body language canbe critical <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m cope.686 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWThe communication style of <strong>the</strong> nurse was found tobe a critical factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> establishment of <strong>the</strong> nurseparentrelationship. Fenwick et al. (2001b) identi¢edthat <strong>the</strong> nurse’s ability to ‘‘engage’’ <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r anddevelop a supportive relationship relied on <strong>the</strong> useof language. Shar<strong>in</strong>g of personal <strong>in</strong>formation wasfound to occur through ‘‘chatt<strong>in</strong>g’’ with <strong>the</strong> nurse.All <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> this study identi¢ed this skill asbe<strong>in</strong>g associated with <strong>the</strong> ‘‘good nurse.’’ The nurse’s<strong>in</strong>itiation of chatt<strong>in</strong>g often <strong>in</strong>volved conversationabout life outside <strong>the</strong> nursery <strong>in</strong>terspersed with<strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r’s baby. When surveyed,only a m<strong>in</strong>ority of nurses identi¢ed that <strong>the</strong>yutilized chatt<strong>in</strong>g as a strategy for establish<strong>in</strong>g trustand a <strong>the</strong>rapeutic relationship with <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r. Itwas <strong>the</strong>se same few nurses that were labeled ‘‘goodnurses’’ by numerous di¡erent mo<strong>the</strong>rs repeatedly.This occurred <strong>in</strong> spite of <strong>the</strong> fact that those nurseslack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ability to chat attributed a positivenurse-parent relationship to noth<strong>in</strong>g more than <strong>the</strong>mesh<strong>in</strong>g of personality types.In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> nurses that had <strong>the</strong> ability toengage mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> chat knew <strong>the</strong>y possessed thisability. The nurses lack<strong>in</strong>g it were unsure of what itwas. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, even though mo<strong>the</strong>rs identi¢edchatt<strong>in</strong>g to be important to <strong>the</strong>m, bedside record<strong>in</strong>gsof nurse-parent <strong>in</strong>teractions showed that only12% of <strong>the</strong> conversations ¢t <strong>the</strong> criteria for chatt<strong>in</strong>g.The researcher concluded that through thistype of verbal <strong>in</strong>teraction, nurses were able to rel<strong>in</strong>quishsome of <strong>the</strong>ir power thus level<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>relationship (Fenwick et al., 2001b). Similar to <strong>the</strong>se¢nd<strong>in</strong>gs, o<strong>the</strong>r researchers found that <strong>in</strong>formalconversation was important to parents (Herbst &Maree, 2006; Jones et al., 2007) and that some parentsactually preferred to be addressed by <strong>the</strong> NICUpersonnel on a ¢rst name basis (Herbst & Maree).Heerman et al. (2005) found that supportive nurs<strong>in</strong>gcare could facilitate forward movement througha predictable trajectory as mo<strong>the</strong>rs moved from outsiders<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU to engaged mo<strong>the</strong>rs. As <strong>the</strong>ybecame engaged, <strong>the</strong>y were more likely to becomeactive participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants’ care.With this forwardmovement, <strong>the</strong> potential for <strong>the</strong>se mo<strong>the</strong>rs tobeg<strong>in</strong> partner<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g sta¡ <strong>in</strong>creased.However, some mo<strong>the</strong>rs who desired to become <strong>in</strong>volved<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants’ care held back and waited tobe <strong>in</strong>vited by <strong>the</strong> nurse. One mo<strong>the</strong>r recalled that<strong>the</strong> nurse came <strong>in</strong> and provided all of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’scare without ever ask<strong>in</strong>g her to be <strong>in</strong>volved. Somemo<strong>the</strong>rs were so <strong>in</strong>timidated by <strong>the</strong> NICU environmentthat <strong>the</strong>y were afraid to provide care. Nurseswere found to be very helpful <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se situations.One mo<strong>the</strong>r recalled that she wanted to hold her <strong>in</strong>fantso badly, but <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant was on a ventilator andshe was too afraid. The nurse said to <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r,‘‘You’re mom and you need to hold her and sheneeds to be held by you’’ (p.179). The mo<strong>the</strong>r recalls<strong>the</strong> nurse’s response giv<strong>in</strong>g her more con¢denceand <strong>the</strong> experience of hold<strong>in</strong>g her <strong>in</strong>fant was verymean<strong>in</strong>gful.Family centered care (FCC) is a well accepted concept<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> care of <strong>in</strong>fants and many NICU’s havealready adopted FCC and put <strong>in</strong>to place policiesthat support <strong>the</strong> implementation of it. Unfortunately,<strong>the</strong>re seems to be some <strong>in</strong>consistencies about whatexactly FCC means and how to go about implement<strong>in</strong>git. In one study, nurses identi¢ed <strong>the</strong>elements of FCC as important; however, it was notalways <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>ir practice (Petersonet al., 2004). Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, nurses with less than 10years of experience <strong>in</strong>corporated more FCC elements<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>ir practice than did nurses withgreater than 10 years. The researcher speculatedthat because FCC was ¢rst <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970sperhaps those nurses more recently educated hadreceived more <strong>in</strong>formation about its implementation.Additionally, pediatric nurses rated FCC asmore important than did NICU nurses. Here <strong>the</strong> researchers<strong>the</strong>orized that unlike children, <strong>in</strong>fants areadmitted directly to <strong>the</strong> NICU before <strong>the</strong>y have been<strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> family structure.Parent Education With an Opportunity to PracticeNew SkillsThrough Guided ParticipationHav<strong>in</strong>g an opportunity to practice new skills withassistance from <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g sta¡ was identi¢ed asimportant by NICU parents. Ten studies <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>the</strong> successful <strong>in</strong>troduction of an <strong>in</strong>tervention withsome degree of hands-on opportunity for parents(Browne & Talmi, 2005; Bruns & McCollum, 2002;Kowalski et al., 2006; Lawhon, 2002; Melnyk et al.,2001, 2006; Peterson et al., 2004; Schroeder, 1998;Schroeder & Pridham, 2006; Wielenga et al., 2006).Of <strong>the</strong> articles reviewed, only 2 studies that <strong>in</strong>cludedpractice opportunities showed nonsigni¢cant¢nd<strong>in</strong>gs (Glazebrook et al., 2007; van der Palet al., 2007). Glazebrook et al.’s nurse delivered parent<strong>in</strong>tervention had no e¡ect on short-term <strong>in</strong>fantneurobehavioral function, mo<strong>the</strong>r-child <strong>in</strong>teraction,or parent<strong>in</strong>g stress. Several o<strong>the</strong>r researchers hadsimilar ¢nd<strong>in</strong>gs (van der Pal et al., 2007). In <strong>the</strong>ircl<strong>in</strong>ical trial compar<strong>in</strong>g standard care, developmentalcare, and <strong>the</strong> Newborn IndividualizedDevelopmental <strong>Care</strong> and Assessment Program(NIDCAP), <strong>the</strong>y discovered that <strong>the</strong>re were nonsigni¢cantdi¡erences between groups for parentalstress, con¢dence, or perceived nurs<strong>in</strong>g support.JOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 687


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Only one study was found that o¡ered parent educationwith no practice. Researchers found that parentsshowed a signi¢cant improvement <strong>in</strong> knowledge,but no improvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir con¢dence level(Macguire et al., 2007). Therefore, it appears that <strong>in</strong>general an opportunity for parents to practice newskills is an important factor <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g change.Melnyk et al. (2006) had impressive ¢nd<strong>in</strong>gs withthis type of <strong>in</strong>tervention when <strong>the</strong>y conducteda cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial of <strong>the</strong>ir Creat<strong>in</strong>g Opportunitiesfor Parent Empowerment (COPE) <strong>in</strong>tervention. This<strong>in</strong>tervention consisted of four sessions designed toeducate parents about <strong>the</strong> appearance and behaviorsof preterm <strong>in</strong>fants. The sessions were followedup with speci¢c activities for parents to practicewhile at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’s bedside. These <strong>in</strong>teractionswere observed and rated by specially tra<strong>in</strong>ednurses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. The control group also receivedfour educational sessions but <strong>the</strong>irs were focusedon hospital policies only. The ¢nd<strong>in</strong>g of this trialshowed that parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention group demonstratedmore positive parent-<strong>in</strong>fant <strong>in</strong>teractionand parent<strong>in</strong>g beliefs. In addition, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>tervention group had a 3.8 day shorter NICU stay.Lawhon (2002) also encouraged parents to <strong>in</strong>tegratenew knowledge <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant care. Thepurpose of this descriptive research study was toevaluate <strong>the</strong> e¡ectiveness of an <strong>in</strong>dividualizednurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervention. The purpose of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terventionwas to improve parent/<strong>in</strong>fant competence andoutcomes. This researcher found that parents improved<strong>the</strong>ir ability to feed <strong>the</strong>ir premature <strong>in</strong>fant,critically appraise <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant’s behaviors, and <strong>in</strong>corporatethis appraisal <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> provision ofsupportive care for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant.DiscussionThe results of this literature review need to be consideredwhen sett<strong>in</strong>g priorities for nurs<strong>in</strong>g care <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> NICU and a compilation of recommendations isprovided (seeTable 5). Student nurses as well as experiencednurses must cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be educatedabout <strong>the</strong> needs of parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. If notalready set <strong>in</strong> place, unit policies can be adoptedthat assure <strong>the</strong> parent’s need to receive completeand accurate <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant is met.E¡ective collaboration between nurses, physicians,and o<strong>the</strong>r sta¡ can assist parents to becomeactive participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g of decisions thatconcern <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant.Establish<strong>in</strong>g an emotionally safe and supportiveNICU where a trust<strong>in</strong>g bond exists between parentsTable 5: Recommendations for Nurs<strong>in</strong>gPractice1. Support sta¡ and student education on <strong>the</strong> needs of parents<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU2. Provide parents with clear and accurate <strong>in</strong>formationconcern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant’s condition3. Collaborate e¡ectively with parents and o<strong>the</strong>r member of <strong>the</strong>healthcare team when mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>fant’s care4. Establish an emotionally safe and supportive NICUenvironment to help build trust5. Provide unlimited parent access to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant and an openvisitation policy whenever possible6. Provide <strong>in</strong>dividualized family centered care7. Assist parents to provide care for <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fants throughguided participation whenever appropriate8. Provide nurs<strong>in</strong>g support and facilitate <strong>the</strong> establishment ofparent-to-parent support groupsand nurses may help decrease parents’ stress leveland <strong>the</strong>ir need to rema<strong>in</strong> vigilant for <strong>the</strong> safety of<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant. In addition, unlimited access and openvisitation policies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU are necessary to assurethat parents are able to be near <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fantand to obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact that both parents and<strong>in</strong>fants require. Whenever medically appropriate, allow<strong>in</strong>gparents to hold <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fant and <strong>the</strong> use ofkangaroo care is recommended.Mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> development of a <strong>the</strong>rapeutic relationshipbetween parents and nurses a priority <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>NICU is essential. Nurses need to cont<strong>in</strong>ue striv<strong>in</strong>gto provide a supportive and nonjudgmental environmentfor parents to develop <strong>the</strong>ir role asparents. Creat<strong>in</strong>g an environment where <strong>the</strong> provisionof care is <strong>in</strong>dividualized to each parent’sparticular needs and designed to nurture parents<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir quest to become empowered is important.Parents must also be made to feel welcome andcomfortable <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU so that parent educationand <strong>the</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g and practic<strong>in</strong>g of new skills will besuccessful. Encourag<strong>in</strong>g parents to care for <strong>the</strong>ir<strong>in</strong>fant and assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m through guided participationmay make <strong>the</strong>ir experience a less <strong>in</strong>timidat<strong>in</strong>gone. From <strong>the</strong> time of admission, all care needs tobe focused on <strong>the</strong> successful discharge of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fantfrom <strong>the</strong> hospital.F<strong>in</strong>ally, provid<strong>in</strong>g support for NICU parents rema<strong>in</strong>sessential. If not already <strong>in</strong>stituted, nurses can assist688 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWwith organiz<strong>in</strong>g parent-to-parent support groups.Nurses have always served as patient advocates;<strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong>y are ideal for serv<strong>in</strong>g as leaders <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation and re<strong>in</strong>forcement of new hospitaland unit-based policies that support parents.Nurses rema<strong>in</strong> at <strong>the</strong> forefront of patient and familycare and have traditionally strived to provideoutstand<strong>in</strong>g care. As technology and <strong>the</strong> NICUenvironment cont<strong>in</strong>ue to evolve, we need to rema<strong>in</strong>cognizant of <strong>the</strong> human needs of <strong>the</strong>se smallpatients and <strong>the</strong>ir families.Recommendations for FutureResearchAlthough <strong>the</strong>re has been signi¢cant research <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>area of parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU over <strong>the</strong> past 10 years,several study populations have been consistentlyexcluded. Most of what is known on this topic hasbeen studied with a primarily White, middle class,female, population (Broeder, 2003; Browne & Talmi,2005; Bruns & McCollum, 2002; Fenwick et al.,2001a, 2001b, 2002; Glazebrook et al., 2007; Heermanet al., 2005; Hurst, 2001a, 2001b, 2006; Lupton& Fenwick, 2001; Melnyk et al., 2001; Schroeder,1998; van Riper, 2001; Whitlow, 2003; Wigert et al.,2006). There is a sound body of knowledge onresponse to an NICU admission <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Euro-American/Euro-Canadian population, however, littleis known about o<strong>the</strong>r cultures (Bracht et al.,2002).In <strong>the</strong>ir study <strong>in</strong> 2006, Melnyk et al. studied only parents18 years or older who spoke and read English.Their sample consisted of 258 mo<strong>the</strong>rs and 154 fa<strong>the</strong>rs.Only 10 of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>dividuals were Lat<strong>in</strong>a, 8were Asian, and 1 was Native American. This lack ofethnic diversity is problematic because Blackwomen have <strong>the</strong> highest rate (13.6%) of low birthweight <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. This is almost twice<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cidence observed <strong>in</strong> White women (7%)(March of Dimes, 2007).Only 3 studies meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> review criteria focusedspeci¢cally on ethnic parents (Denney, 2003; Hurst,2003; Lee et al., 2003). Denney studied Lat<strong>in</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rsand fa<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. Greater than half of herparticipants stated that Spanish was <strong>the</strong>ir primarylanguage. She discovered that sources of stress <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> NICU were di¡erent for Spanish versus Englishspeak<strong>in</strong>g parents. In a case study <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a bil<strong>in</strong>gual,Mexican American mo<strong>the</strong>r, Hurst discoveredthat <strong>in</strong>adequate resources <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU caused responsibilitiesto be shifted down to <strong>the</strong> case studyparticipant. This mo<strong>the</strong>r was asked to translatefor non-English speak<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>rs and on severaloccasions to assist <strong>the</strong>m with transportation to <strong>the</strong>hospital.Lee et al. studied Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American parents<strong>in</strong> San Francisco. She found that <strong>the</strong>comb<strong>in</strong>ed e¡ects of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty about <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant’scondition, belief <strong>in</strong> Asian family values, and lack ofsupport from healthcare providers was a signi¢cantsource of stress for <strong>the</strong>se parents.In addition to <strong>the</strong> limited research on ethnically diverseparents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU, o<strong>the</strong>r populations ofparents are also poorly represented. Of <strong>the</strong> 60 studiesreviewed for this paper, only 2 <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>fantswith anomalies (Joseph et al., 2007; P<strong>in</strong>elli, 2000).Joseph et al. studied fa<strong>the</strong>rs of surgical neonateswith cardiac, respiratory, or neurological conditions.In her study, P<strong>in</strong>elli reported that 8% of<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong>cluded had some form of congenitalanomaly. Adolescent mo<strong>the</strong>rs also tend to be excludedfrom studies. This may be due to di⁄cultiesobta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g consent of a m<strong>in</strong>or to participate <strong>in</strong> researchor <strong>the</strong> lower birth rate <strong>in</strong> this population.Only 5 of <strong>the</strong> studies meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion criteria<strong>in</strong>cluded adolescent mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sample(Christopher, Bauman, & Vaness-Meehan, 2000;Correia et al., 2008; Orapiriyakul et al., 2007; van Riper,2001; Wielenga et al., 2006). This is concern<strong>in</strong>gdue to <strong>the</strong> high <strong>in</strong>cidence (14.3%) of preterm birth <strong>in</strong>this population (March of Dimes, 2007).ConclusionWhile great strides have been made <strong>in</strong> researchperta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU, <strong>the</strong>re is a needfor cont<strong>in</strong>ued study of this topic. Therefore, parentalneeds <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU as well as nurs<strong>in</strong>g behaviors toaddress <strong>the</strong>se needs should rema<strong>in</strong> a priority fornurse researchers. Nurses have a responsibility toprovide evidence-based care that is e¡ective andmeets <strong>the</strong> needs of this vulnerable population ofpatients. The focus of nurs<strong>in</strong>g is ‘‘<strong>the</strong> alleviation ofsu¡er<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> diagnosis and treatment ofhuman response, and advocacy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> care of <strong>in</strong>dividuals,families, communities, and populations’’(ANA Nurs<strong>in</strong>g World, 2007).With this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, nursesplay a key role <strong>in</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICUand <strong>in</strong>£uenc<strong>in</strong>g better outcomes for NICU <strong>in</strong>fantsand <strong>the</strong>ir families.REFERENCESAlderson, P., Hawthorne, J., & Killen, M. (2006). Parents’ experiences ofshar<strong>in</strong>g neonatal <strong>in</strong>formation and decisions: Consent, cost, andrisk. Social Science and Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 62,1319-1329.ANA Nurs<strong>in</strong>g World (2007). Retrieved April 24, 2007, from http://www.nurs<strong>in</strong>gworld.org/Ma<strong>in</strong>MenuCategories/Certi¢cationandAccreditation/AboutNurs<strong>in</strong>g.aspxJOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 689


I N R EVIEW <strong>Parent<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Intensive</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>Arockiasamy, V., Holsti, L., & Abersheim, S. (2008). Fa<strong>the</strong>rs’ experiences <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit: A search for control. Pediatrics,121(2), 215-222.Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric, and <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurses (AWHONN)(2007). Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.awhonn.org /awhonn/content.do? name =03_JournalsPubsResearch/3D_ResearchPriorities.htmBialoskurski, M., Cox, C., & Wigg<strong>in</strong>s, R. (2002). The relationship betweenmaternal needs and priorities <strong>in</strong> a neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit.Journal of Advanced Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 37(1), 62-69.Bracht, M., Kandankery, A., Nodwell, S., & Stade, B. (2002). Cultural di¡erencesand parental responses to <strong>the</strong> preterm <strong>in</strong>fant at risk:Strategies for support<strong>in</strong>g families. <strong>Neonatal</strong> Network, 21(6), 31-38.Broeder, J. (2003). Mo<strong>the</strong>rhood too soon: Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong>neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. Doctoral dissertation, Sa<strong>in</strong>t LouisUniversity, ProQuest Information and Lean<strong>in</strong>g Company.Browne, J. V., & Talmi, A. (2005). Family based <strong>in</strong>tervention to enhanceparent-<strong>in</strong>fant relationships <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit.Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 30(8), 667-677.Bruns, D., & McCollum, J. (2002). Partnerships between mo<strong>the</strong>rs and professionals<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU: <strong>Care</strong>giv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>formation exchange, andrelationships. <strong>Neonatal</strong> Network, 21(7),15-23.Buarque, V., de Carvalho Lima, M., Parry Scott, R., & Vasconcelos, M.(2006). The <strong>in</strong>£uence of support groups on <strong>the</strong> family of risk newbornsand on neonatal unit workers. Jornal de Pediatria, 82(4),295-301.Cescutti-Butler, L., & Galv<strong>in</strong>, K. (2003). Parent’s perceptions of sta¡ competency<strong>in</strong> a neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. Journal of Cl<strong>in</strong>icalNurs<strong>in</strong>g, 12, 752-761.Christopher, S., Bauman, K., & Vaness-Meehan, K. (2000). Perceivedstress, social support, and a¡ectionate behaviors of adolescentmo<strong>the</strong>rs with <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. The Journalof Pediatric Health <strong>Care</strong>, 14, 288-296.Correia, L., Carvalho, A., & L<strong>in</strong>hares, M. (2008). Verbal consent expressedby mo<strong>the</strong>rs of preterm <strong>in</strong>fants with cl<strong>in</strong>ical emotional symptoms.Lat<strong>in</strong>o-am Enfermagen, 16(1), 64-70.Denney, M. (2003). Psychological distress and nurs<strong>in</strong>g support for Lat<strong>in</strong>oparents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit: The contribut<strong>in</strong>g effectson parent<strong>in</strong>g e⁄cacy. Doctoral dissertation, University ofCalifornia-Santa Barbara, ProQuest Information and Lean<strong>in</strong>gCompany.Erlandsson, K., & Fagerberg, I. (2005). Mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ lived experiences of cocareand part-care after birth, and <strong>the</strong>ir strong desire to be closeto <strong>the</strong>ir baby. Midwifery, 21,131-138.Fenwick, J., Barclay, L., & Schmied, V. (2001a). Struggl<strong>in</strong>g to mo<strong>the</strong>r: Aconsequence of <strong>in</strong>hibitive nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatalnursery. Journal of Per<strong>in</strong>atal and <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 15(2), 49-64.Fenwick, J., Barclay, L., & Schmied, V. (2001b). ‘‘Chatt<strong>in</strong>g’’: An importanttool for facilitat<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal nursery. Journal ofAdvanced Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 33(5), 583-593.Fenwick, J., Barclay, L., & Schmied, V. (2002). Learn<strong>in</strong>g and play<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>game: Women’s experiences of mo<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> level II nursery.Journal of <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 8(2), 58-64.Franck, L. (2002). Some pa<strong>in</strong>, some ga<strong>in</strong>: Re£ections on <strong>the</strong> past twodecades of neonatal pa<strong>in</strong> research and treatment. <strong>Neonatal</strong>Network, 21(5), 37-41.Franck, L. (2005). Research with newborn participants, do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> right researchand do<strong>in</strong>g it right. Journal of Per<strong>in</strong>atal and <strong>Neonatal</strong>Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 19(2),177-186.Franck, L., & Spencer, C. (2003). Parent visit<strong>in</strong>g and participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fantcaregiv<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>in</strong> a neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. Birth, 30(1),31-35.Gardner, G., Barrett,T., Coonan, K., Cox, H., & Roberson, B. (2002). Parentssupport programme <strong>in</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care: Research<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>issues. <strong>Neonatal</strong>, Paediatric, and Child Health Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 5(1),20-25.Glazebrook, C., Marlow, N., Israel, C., Croudace, T., Johnson, S., & White, I.R., et al. (2007). Randomised trial of a parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervention dur<strong>in</strong>gneonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care. Archive of Disease <strong>in</strong> Childhood-Fetal and <strong>Neonatal</strong> Edition, 1-16.Harrison, H., Lucas, D., & Franck, L. S. (2003). Collaborative research <strong>in</strong>neonatal nurs<strong>in</strong>g. In C. Kenner & J. Wright Lott (Eds.), Comprehensiveneonatal nurs<strong>in</strong>g: A physiological perspective (pp. 39-42).St. Louis: Saunders.Heerman, J. A., Wilson, M. E., & Wilhelm, P. A. (2005). Mo<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU:Outsiders to partners. Pediatric Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 31(3),176-200.Herbst, A., & Maree, C. (2006). Empowerment of parents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal<strong>in</strong>tensive care unit by nurses neonatal. Health SA Gesondheid,11(3),1-13.Higg<strong>in</strong>s, I., & Dullow, A. (2003). Parental perceptions of hav<strong>in</strong>g a baby <strong>in</strong> aneonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. <strong>Neonatal</strong>, Paediatric, and ChildHealth Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 6(3),15-20.Holditch-Davis, D., Bartlett,T. R., Blickman, A. L., & Miles, M. L. (2003). Posttraumatic stress symptoms <strong>in</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>rs of premature <strong>in</strong>fants. Journalof Obstetric, Gynecology & <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 32(2),161-171.Holditch-Davis, D., & Miles, M. (2000). Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s stories about <strong>the</strong>ir experiences<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. <strong>Neonatal</strong> Network, 19(3),13-21.Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative contentanalysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9),1277-1288.Hurst, I. (2001a). Mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ strategies to meet <strong>the</strong>ir needs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. Journalof Per<strong>in</strong>atal and <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurses, 15(2), 65-82.Hurst, I. (2001b). Vigilant watch<strong>in</strong>g over: Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s actions to safeguard<strong>the</strong>ir premature baby <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. Journal of Per<strong>in</strong>atal and <strong>Neonatal</strong>Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 15(3), 39-57.Hurst, I. (2003). Imposed burdens: A Mexican American mo<strong>the</strong>r’s experienceof family resources <strong>in</strong> a newborn <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. Journalof Obstetrical, Gynecological, & <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 33(2),156-163.Hurst, I. (2006). One size does not ¢t all: Parents evaluation of a supportprogram <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care nursery. Journal of Per<strong>in</strong>ataland <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 20(3), 252-261.Jamsa, K., & Jamsa, T. (1998). Technology <strong>in</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care-astudy on parents’ experiences. Technology and Health <strong>Care</strong>, 6,225-230.Jones, L., Woodhouse, D., & Rowe, J. (2007). E¡ective nurse parentcommunications: A study of parents’ perceptions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>NICU environment. Patient Education and Counsel<strong>in</strong>g, 69,206-212.Joseph, R., Mackley, A., Davis, C., Spear, M., & Locke, R. (2007). Stress <strong>in</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>rs of surgical neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit babies. Advances<strong>in</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Care</strong>, 7(6), 321-325.Kowalski, W., Leef, K., Mackley, L., Spear, M., & Paul, D. (2006). Communicat<strong>in</strong>gwith parents of premature <strong>in</strong>fants: How is <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formant.Journal of Per<strong>in</strong>atology, 26,44-48.Lam, J., Spence, K., & Halliday, R. (2007). Parents’ perception of nurs<strong>in</strong>gsupport <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit (NICU). <strong>Neonatal</strong>,Paediatric and Child Health, 10(3),19-25.Lawhon, G. (2002). Facilitation of parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> premature <strong>in</strong>fant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. Journal of Per<strong>in</strong>atal and <strong>Neonatal</strong>Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 16(1), 71-82.Lee, S., Lee, K., Rank<strong>in</strong>, S., Alkon, A., & Weiss, S. (2003). Acculturation andstress <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese-American parents of <strong>in</strong>fants cared for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensivecare unit. Advances <strong>in</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Care</strong>, 5(6), 315-328.L<strong>in</strong>dberg, B., Axelsson, K., & Ohrl<strong>in</strong>g, K. (2007). The birth of premature<strong>in</strong>fants: Experiences from <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>rs’ perspective. Journal of <strong>Neonatal</strong>Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 13,142-149.Lubbe, W. (2005). Early <strong>in</strong>tervention care programme for parents of neonates.Curationis, 28(3), 54-63.690 JOGNN, 37, 666-691; 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00288.x http://jognn.awhonn.org


Cleveland, L. M. I N R EVIEWLupton, D., & Fenwick, J. (2001). ‘‘They’ve forgotten that I’m <strong>the</strong> mum’’ construct<strong>in</strong>gand practic<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>rhood <strong>in</strong> special care nurseries.Social Science and Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 53,1011-1021.Macguire, C., Bruil, J., Wit, J., & Walhter, F. (2007). Read<strong>in</strong>g preterm <strong>in</strong>fants’behavioral cues: An <strong>in</strong>tervention study with parents of premature<strong>in</strong>fants borno32 weeks. Early Human Development, 83, 419-424.Macnab, N., Beckett, L., Park, C., & Scheckter, L. (1998). Journal writ<strong>in</strong>g asa social support strategy for parents of premature <strong>in</strong>fants: A pilotstudy. Patient Education and Counsel<strong>in</strong>g, 33,149-159.March of Dimes (2007). Retrieved September 26, 2008, from http://www.marchofdimes.com/peristats/level1.aspx?reg=99&slev=1&top=3&stop=61&obj=1&lev=1&dv=cgMelnyk, B. M., Alpert-Gillis, L., Fe<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>, N. F., Fairbank, E., Schultz-Czarniak,J., & Hust, D., et al. (2001). Improv<strong>in</strong>g cognitive development oflow birth weight, premature <strong>in</strong>fants with <strong>the</strong> (COPE) randomized,controlled study program: A pilot study of <strong>the</strong> bene¢t of early NICU<strong>in</strong>tervention with mo<strong>the</strong>rs. Research <strong>in</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g and Health, 24,373-389.Melnyk, B. M., Fe<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>, N. F., Alpert-Gillis, L., Fairbank, E., Crean, H. F.,S<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>, R. A., et al. (2006). Reduc<strong>in</strong>g premature <strong>in</strong>fant’s length ofstay and improv<strong>in</strong>g parent’s mental health outcomes with <strong>the</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>gopportunities for parent empowerment COPE neonatal<strong>in</strong>tensive care unit program randomized, controlled study program:A randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics, 118,1414-1427.Mok, E., & Leung, S. (2006). Nurses as providers of support for mo<strong>the</strong>rs ofpremature <strong>in</strong>fants. Children and Families, 15, 726-734.Nottage, S. (2005). Parents’ use of nonmedical support services <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. Issues <strong>in</strong> Comprehensive PediatricNurs<strong>in</strong>g, 28,257-273.Orapiriyakul, R., Jirapaet, V., & Rodcumdee, D. (2007). Struggl<strong>in</strong>g to getconnected: The process of maternal attachment to <strong>the</strong> preterm <strong>in</strong>fant<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. Thai Journal of Nurs<strong>in</strong>gResearch, 11(4), 251-264.Pearson, J., & Anderson, K. (2001). Evaluation of a program to promotepositive parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. <strong>Neonatal</strong> Network, 20(4), 43-48.Peterson, M., Cohen, J., & Parsons, V. (2004). Family-centered care: Do wepractice what we preach? Journal of Obstetrical, Gynecological, &<strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 33(4), 421-427.P<strong>in</strong>elli, J. (2000). E¡ects of family cop<strong>in</strong>g and resources on family adjustmentand parental stress <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> acute phase of <strong>the</strong> NICUexperience. <strong>Neonatal</strong> Network, 19(6), 27-37.Pohlman, S. (2005). The primacy of work and fa<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g preterm <strong>in</strong>fants:F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from an <strong>in</strong>terpretive phenomenological study. Advances<strong>in</strong> <strong>Neonatal</strong> <strong>Care</strong>, 5(4), 204-216.Punthmatharith, B., Buddharat, U., & Kamlangdee,T. (2007). Comparisonsof needs, needs responses, and needs response satisfaction ofmo<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> neonatal nurs<strong>in</strong>g. Journal of Pediatric Nurs<strong>in</strong>g,22(6), 498-506.Rautava, P., Lehtonen, L., Helenius, H., & Sillanpaa, M. (2003). E¡ect ofnewborn hospitalization on family and child behavior: A 12-yearfollow-up study. Pediatrics, 111,277-283.Schroeder, M. (1998). Guid<strong>in</strong>g mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ learn<strong>in</strong>g of preterm <strong>in</strong>fant caregiv<strong>in</strong>g.Doctoral dissertation, University of Wiscons<strong>in</strong>-Madison.Schroeder, M., & Pridham, K. (2006). Development of relationship competenciesthrough guided participation for mo<strong>the</strong>r’s of preterm<strong>in</strong>fants. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecology & <strong>Neonatal</strong> Nurs<strong>in</strong>g,35(3), 358-368.Shaw, R. J., Deblois, T., Ikuta, L., G<strong>in</strong>zburg, K., Fleisher, B., & Koopman, C.(2006). Acute stress disorder among parents of <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal<strong>in</strong>tensive care nursery. Psychosomatics, 47(3), 206-212.Stevens, K. (2001). Systematic reviews: The heart of evidence-basedpractice. AACN Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Issues, 12(4), 529-538.Talmi, A., & Harmon, R. J. (2003). Relationships between preterm <strong>in</strong>fantsand <strong>the</strong>ir parent: Disruption and development. Zero to Three,24(2),13-20.Taylor-Huber, D. (1998). Parents’ lived experience with <strong>the</strong> admission of<strong>the</strong>ir newborn <strong>in</strong>to a newborn <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit: A phenomenologicalstudy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utah,. ProQuestInformation and Lean<strong>in</strong>g Company.Taylor-Johnson, M. (1999). Parent education <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit.Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1999. ProQuest Informationand Lean<strong>in</strong>g Company.van der Pal, S., Macguire, C., Cessie, S., Wit, J., Wal<strong>the</strong>r, F., & Bruil, J. (2007).Parental experiences dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ¢rst phase at <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensivecare unit after two developmental care <strong>in</strong>terventions. ActaPaediatrica, 96,1611-1616.van Riper, M. (2001). Family-provider relationships and well-be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> familieswith preterm <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NICU. Heart and Lung, 30(1), 74-84.van Rooyen, D., Nomgqokwana, Z., Kotze, W., & Carlson, S. (2006). Guidel<strong>in</strong>esto facilitate <strong>the</strong> nurs<strong>in</strong>g accompaniment of mo<strong>the</strong>rs and<strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> a neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit. Health SA Gesondheid,10,3.Walker, S. (1998). <strong>Neonatal</strong> nurses’ views on <strong>the</strong> barriers to parent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive care nurseryçA national study. Australian Critical<strong>Care</strong>, 11(3), 86-91.Ward, K. (2001). Perceived needs of parents of critically ill <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> a neonatal<strong>in</strong>tensive care unit (NICU). Pediatric Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 27(3), 281-286.Whitlow, J. (2003). Maternal perceptions of <strong>in</strong>teraction and attachmentto preterm <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit, Doctoraldissertation, University of Alabama-Birm<strong>in</strong>gham. ProQuest Informationand Lean<strong>in</strong>g Company.Whittemore, R., & Kna£, K. (2005). The <strong>in</strong>tegrative review: Updated methodology.Journal of Advanced Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 52(5), 546-553.Wielenga, J., Smit, B., & Unk, L. (2006). How satis¢ed are parents supportedby nurses with <strong>the</strong> NIDCAP model of care for <strong>the</strong>ir preterm<strong>in</strong>fant? Journal of Nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Care</strong> Quality, 21(1), 41-48.Wigert, H., Hellstrom, A., & Berg, M. (2008). Conditions for parents’ participation<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> care of <strong>the</strong>ir child <strong>in</strong> neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive care unit.BioMed Central Pediatrics, 8(3),1-9.Wigert, H., Johansson, R., Berg, M., & Hellstrom, H. (2006). Mo<strong>the</strong>rs’ experienceshav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir newborn child <strong>in</strong> a neonatal <strong>in</strong>tensive careunit. Scand<strong>in</strong>avian Journal of Car<strong>in</strong>g Sciences, 20,35-41.JOGNN 2008; Vol. 37, Issue 6 691

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!