SOCIAL ANXIETYInternet group were also found to be lessdistressed, but more disabled by the disorder.As a result, the authors suggested that theInternet group was more representative of thegeneral population of SAD sufferers, implyingIBTs do reach a more diverse population thanin-person treatments.Limitations and Future <strong>Direct</strong>ionsThere are a number of limitations ofIBTs that must be noted. For example, Velting,Setzer, and Albano (2004) caution that exposurehierarchies created without therapist directionmay not be developed properly. This may resultin the client facing fears before he or she isready or dropping out of therapy altogether(Velting, Setzer, & Albano, 2004).Furthermore, Tillfors et al. (2013) assessed theeffectiveness of a CBT self-help manual thathad been adapted for use on the Internet andfound that participants only completed anaverage of 2.9 out of nine modules. Hence,researchers have focused on developing ways toincrease adherence to IBTs. For example, anassessment of a computer-based CBT programdesigned for adolescents experiencing anxietyrevealed that using a wide range of media, suchas “text, music, illustrations, audio voice-overs,cartoons, animated flow charts, interactiveforms, and live video” (Cunningham &Wuthrich, 2008, p. 13), can enhance the interestof the clients. Hudson & Kendall (2002) havealso made several other suggestions that mayimprove drop-out rates, such as not using theterm “homework”, ordering tasks from easy todifficult, and having a reward system.Implementing these and other strategies couldbolster the effectiveness of IBTs, making them avaluable alternative to in-person therapies.They are more cost-effective than in-persontreatments, more readily available, andeliminate or reduce the anxiety associated withmeeting with therapists or doctors. Internetbasedtherapies therefore appear to be apromising solution for the 80% of SADsufferers (Grant et al., 2005) who remainuntreated. Future endeavors should thereforecontinue to focus on increasing publicawareness of the availability of IBTs andcontributing to the expanding body of literatureon this important topic, as IBTs offerindividuals who would not normally seektreatment an alternative strategy for recovery.First Received: 4/22/2013Final Revision Received: 6/23/2013ConclusionDespite the aforementioned limitationsof IBTs, the benefits are profound. Numerousstudies have demonstrated that IBTs canproduce moderate to large effect sizes, makingthem as effective as other treatment strategies.Internet-based therapies also possess numerousqualities that appeal to individuals with SAD.
SOCIAL ANXIETYReferencesAcarturk, C., Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & deGraaf, R. (2009). Psychologicaltreatment of social anxiety disorder: Ameta-analysis. Psychological Medicine,39, 241-254.Acarturk, C., Smit, F., de Graaf, R., van Straten,A., ten Have, M., & Cuijpers, P. (2009).Economic costs of social phobia: apopulation-based study. Journal ofAffective Disorders, 115, 421-429.American Psychiatric <strong>Association</strong>. (2000).Diagnostic and statistical manual ofmental disorders (4th Ed., Revised).Retrieved fromhttp://online.statref.com.proxy2.lib.uwo.caAnderson, P.L., Rothbaum, B.O., & Hodges,L.F. (2003) Virtual reality exposure inthe treatment of social anxiety. Cognitiveand Behavioral Practice, 10, 240-247.Anderson, P.L., Zimand, E., Hodges, L.F., &Rothbaum, B.O. (2005). Cognitivebehavioral therapy for public speakinganxiety using virtual reality forexposure. Depression and Anxiety, 22,156-158.Andersson, G., Carlbring, P., & Furmark, T.(2012). Therapist experience andknowledge acquisition in internetdeliveredCBT for social anxietydisorder: A randomized controlled trial.PLosOne, 7, 1-10.Andersson, G., Paxling, B., Wiwe, M.,Vernmark, K., Felix, C.B., Lundborg, L.,Furmark, T., Cuijpers, P., & Carlbring,P. (2012). Therapeutic alliance in guidedinternet-delivered cognitive behavioraltreatment of depression, generalizedanxiety disorder and social anxietydisorder. Behavior Research andTherapy, 50, 544-550.Berger, T., Hohl, E., & Caspar, F. (2009).Internet-based treatment of socialphobia: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Clinical <strong>Psychology</strong>, 65,1021–1035.Botella, C., Gallego, M.J., Garcia-Palacios, A.,Baños, R.M., Quero, S., & Alcañiz, M.(2009). The acceptability of an internetbasedself-help treatment for fear ofpublic speaking. British Journal ofGuidance and Counselling, 37, 297-311.Bruch, M.A., Fallon, M. & Heimberg, R.G.(2003). Social phobia and difficulties inoccupational adjustment. Journal ofCounselling <strong>Psychology</strong>, 50, 109-117.Butcher, J.N., Rouse, S.V., & Perry, J.N.(1998). Assessing resistance topsychological treatment. Measurementand Evaluation in Counseling andDevelopment, 31, 95-108.Cairney, J., McCabe, L., Veldhuizen, S., Corna,L.M., Streiner, D., & Herrmann, N.(2007). Epidemiology of social phobia inlater life. The American Journal ofGeriatric Psychiatry, 15, 224-233.Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet useand psychosocial well-being:Development of a theory-basedcognitive-behavioural measurementinstrument. Computers in HumanBehavior, 18, 553-575.Carlbring, P., Nordgren, L.B., Furmark, T., &Andersson, G. (2009). Long-termoutcome of Internet-delivered cognitivebehaviouraltherapy for social phobia: A30-month follow-up. BehaviourResearch and Therapy, 47, 848-850.Cunningham, M., & Wuthrich, V. (2008).Examination of barriers to treatment anduser preferences with computer-basedtherapy using The Cool Teens CD foradolescent anxiety. E-Journal of Applied<strong>Psychology</strong>, 4, 12-17.Erwin, B.A., Turk, C.L., Heimberg, R.G.,Fresco, D.M., & Hantula, D.A. (2004).The Internet: Home to a severepopulation of individuals with socialanxiety disorder? Anxiety Disorders, 18,629-646.Fedoroff, I. C., & Taylor, S. (2001).Psychological and pharmacologicaltreatments of social phobia: A meta-
- Page 1 and 2: WESTERN UNDERGRADUATEψPSYCHOLOGY J
- Page 3 and 4: http://westernpsychclub.com/ Septem
- Page 5 and 6: http://westernpsychclub.com/ Septem
- Page 7 and 8: http://westernpsychclub.com/ Septem
- Page 9 and 10: DECONSTRUCTING A DSM DIAGNOSISpersp
- Page 11 and 12: DECONSTRUCTING A DSM DIAGNOSISCrite
- Page 13 and 14: DECONSTRUCTING A DSM DIAGNOSISnoted
- Page 15 and 16: DECONSTRUCTING A DSM DIAGNOSISGaraf
- Page 17 and 18: © 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 19 and 20: ODD.CD.APDthat early patterns of in
- Page 21 and 22: ODD.CD.APDachieving higher interper
- Page 23 and 24: ODD.CD.APDReferencesAmerican Psychi
- Page 25 and 26: © 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 27 and 28: SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS ON THE MENTAL
- Page 29 and 30: SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS ON THE MENTAL
- Page 31 and 32: SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS ON THE MENTAL
- Page 33 and 34: SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS ON THE MENTAL
- Page 35 and 36: SOCIAL ANXIETYthe high prevalence r
- Page 37: SOCIAL ANXIETYwill benefit from tre
- Page 41 and 42: SOCIAL ANXIETYStatistics Canada. (2
- Page 43 and 44: FACTORS PREVENTING NONTRADITIONAL R
- Page 45 and 46: FACTORS PREVENTING NONTRADITIONAL R
- Page 47 and 48: FACTORS PREVENTING NONTRADITIONAL R
- Page 49 and 50: FACTORS PREVENTING NONTRADITIONAL R
- Page 51 and 52: HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY REMEMBERdurin
- Page 53 and 54: HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY REMEMBERbetwe
- Page 55 and 56: HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY REMEMBERHaman
- Page 57 and 58: INTERLINGUAL HOMOPHONE EFFECTSirrel
- Page 59 and 60: INTERLINGUAL HOMOPHONE EFFECTSortho
- Page 61 and 62: INTERLINGUAL HOMOPHONE EFFECTSwhere
- Page 63 and 64: INTERLINGUAL HOMOPHONE EFFECTSor le
- Page 65 and 66: INTERLINGUAL HOMOPHONE EFFECTSRefer
- Page 67 and 68: INTERLINGUAL HOMOPHONE EFFECTSAppen
- Page 69 and 70: INTERLINGUAL HOMOPHONE EFFECTSAppen
- Page 71 and 72: © 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 73 and 74: GRASPING AND MANUAL ESTIMATION OF T
- Page 75 and 76: GRASPING AND MANUAL ESTIMATION OF T
- Page 77 and 78: GRASPING AND MANUAL ESTIMATION OF T
- Page 79 and 80: GRASPING AND MANUAL ESTIMATION OF T
- Page 81 and 82: © 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 83 and 84: A DOWNSIDE TO ENGAGEMENTthe negativ
- Page 85 and 86: © 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 87 and 88: THE A1 ALLELE IN ASSOCIATION WITH A
- Page 89 and 90:
THE A1 ALLELE IN ASSOCIATION WITH A
- Page 91 and 92:
THE A1 ALLELE IN ASSOCIATION WITH A
- Page 93 and 94:
© 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 95 and 96:
EVIDENCE FOR EFFORT JUSTIFICATIONpr
- Page 97 and 98:
EVIDENCE FOR EFFORT JUSTIFICATIONdi
- Page 99 and 100:
© 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 101 and 102:
MATE POACHINGconnection with the id
- Page 103 and 104:
MATE POACHINGindividual who receive
- Page 105 and 106:
MATE POACHINGpoaching experience to
- Page 107 and 108:
© 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 109 and 110:
PRESSURE, SELF-MONITORING AND CONFO
- Page 111 and 112:
PRESSURE, SELF-MONITORING AND CONFO
- Page 113 and 114:
PRESSURE, SELF-MONITORING AND CONFO
- Page 115 and 116:
RELIGIOSITY AND ORGAN DONATION VIEW
- Page 117 and 118:
RELIGIOSITY AND ORGAN DONATION VIEW
- Page 119 and 120:
RELIGIOSITY AND ORGAN DONATION VIEW
- Page 121 and 122:
RELIGIOSITY AND ORGAN DONATION VIEW
- Page 123 and 124:
© 2013 WUPJ, September 2013, Volum
- Page 125 and 126:
UNDERSTANDING OTHERS BY EMBODIMENTS
- Page 127 and 128:
UNDERSTANDING OTHERS BY EMBODIMENTi
- Page 129 and 130:
UNDERSTANDING OTHERS BY EMBODIMENTc
- Page 131 and 132:
UNDERSTANDING OTHERS BY EMBODIMENTF
- Page 133:
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and t