3. The blazon should be elegant, euphonious. The blazon should be beautiful, as everything about heraldryshould be beautiful. This is less important than the other two rules: if we must sacrifice elegance forprecision, so be it. But if a blazon can be both accurate and elegant, so much the better.Everyone has his own standards of elegance, of course. Yours probably differ from my own. But since I’mthe one writing this article, let me end it with some of my own preferences:• A blazon should avoid tautology, if possible. Sometimes it isn’t possible; in that case, repetition is betterthan inaccuracy.• The blazon should be simple and concise. Bloodcurdling overprecision is worse than unnecessary: it isactively distracting, and the effect is non-medieval. Medieval blazons gave no more details than wereneeded; SCA blazons should do the same. Blazoning a certain sword as “a Turkish cavalry sword from theAbbisid dynasty” is not nearly as elegant as blazoning it, simply, as a “shamshir.”In like manner, the exact anatomical details of animals should be omitted. “Armed,” “langued,” “orbed,”“crined,” “pizzled” and all the rest are mere superfluities. Artistic details should be left to the license of theartist.• Defaults should be used when convenient. They help keep the blazon short, and help reinforce perioddesign.• I’m of two minds regarding the use of medieval terms in SCA blazon. On the one hand, we are amedievalist group, and should at least try to use the medieval terms: coney rather than rabbit, reremouserather than bat, camelopard rather than giraffe. On the other hand, sometimes a medieval term can be soobscure that its meaning is lost: Party per graft seems to have been a medieval term for Per chevron, anden l’un de l’autre (one into the other) was the medieval form of counterchanged. Such terms are tooobscure for our purposes, especially as well-known alternatives exist. (On occasion, a term is invented by aheraldic writer and is used by no one else. The effect is the same.)The exception to this is for canting arms. Cants were so commonly used in medieval armory that theyshould be encouraged in SCA armory—even if it means using an obscure term for a charge. A submitternamed Iain Scrogie may be forgiven for blazoning a tree branch as a “scrog.”• Anglicized terms seem better to me than their French originals. Why use gouttée when goutty will do aswell? (Better, in fact, if one doesn’t have access to diacritical marks ) I simply prefer affronty rather thanaffronté, bretessed rather than bretessé, checky rather than checqué, etc. That’s just me, of course.• A great many blazons can be simplified by using active, rather than passive terms. A ship, sail unfurled andfacing sinister is passive; a ship sailing to sinister is active, with the same picture in fewer words. A savagemaintaining over his head a club bendwise inverted is passive and awkward; a savage brandishing a clubis active, concise, and avoids over-blazoning the club.The best sources for good blazon are the blazons of medieval armory. If you can get a copy of the Rous Roll,for instance, it lists a great many period blazons. Gerald Brault’s Early Blazon: Heraldic Terminology in theTwelfth and Thirteenth Centuries is a definitive reference; but be prepared to learn Old French, you’ll need itwith this book. Most heraldry texts (e.g. Boutell, Fox-Davies) have primers on the grammar of blazon, and giveenough examples to let you see how it’s used. Most important is practice. Like any foreign language, practice isessential. Good blazon is not beyond anyone’s capability. Good luck!Original printed in the Proceedings of the Calontir Heraldic Symposium, 1988.78 <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>Pursuivants</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Edition</strong> - 2002
Efficient Conflict ResearchKeridwen ferch Morgan Glasfryn[Note: This article was originally written in 1990 when the Rules for Submissions were drastically rewritten,so it contains a number of references to the “new” rules. A few minor changes have been made to reflectchanges in the rules.]This article describes a system for quick but thorough conflict research under the new Rules for Submission.I deal primarily with research in the SCA Ordinary, although some of the techniques can be adapted for usewith Papworth and other mundane ordinaries. The article is handicapped by being written very early in theimplementation period of the new rules. There are many details that have yet to be worked out or clarified. Themajor one will be described below under the heading “group theory.” The general approach and logic, however,stand apart from the details of any particular set of rules and are essentially the same as in my “User’s Guide tothe New Ordinary” printed in the 1987 edition of the SCA O&A. I will be reusing the examples from that guideand you may compare them for yourselves.To begin with—a summary of the new difference requirements and how to meet them:Difference Requirements:• Two “clear visual differences” (hereafter referred to as CVDs) are required between all protected armory(with a couple of specified exceptions, see below) but a “difference” can be smaller than the old “majorpoint.”• Except when considering tertiaries, changes that are not, in and of themselves, a CVD may not add to makeone.• Devices and badges with fields are now treated equally for the purposes of conflict. Fieldless badges areencourage by allowing them an automatic CVD for being fieldless.• Mundane and SCA armory are now treated equally for the purposes of conflict.How to Obtain Sufficient Difference:The numbering system used here refers to specific rules in Part X (“Conflicting Armory”) of the Rules forSubmission.The two exceptions to the requirement for two CVDs are:1. Addition of Primary Charge is sufficient difference, e.g., Or, a fess between two mullets sable versus Or,three mullets sable.2. Difference of Primary Charge is sufficient for simple devices, such as a single group of charges with acharged chief or bordure.The “invisible laurel wreath” rule has been retained:3. Required Charges Transparent. This rule is useful only for applying number 2 between two groups’arms.The required CVDs may be taken from the following list:Field Differences4.a. Field Difference—You can get one CVD for changing at least half of the tincture, the line of division, orthe treatment of the field. You may not get more than one CVD for multiple field changes except asprovided for in section 4.a.ii below. (Whoops, all this technical stuff brings out the latent lawyer.)i. Fieldless Difference—Fieldlessness counts as one CVD, even against other fieldless armory.ii. Field Only Difference—When comparing two pieces of “field only” armory, the above changes may becounted separately. E.g., Gyronny vert and argent versus Per pale sable and argent.<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>Pursuivants</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong> 79<strong>2nd</strong> <strong>Edition</strong> - 2002
- Page 2:
Middle Kingdom Pursuivants Handbook
- Page 5 and 6:
INTRODUCTION.......................
- Page 7 and 8:
Saracens: Early to Mid-Medieval Mus
- Page 9 and 10:
IntroductionOsric of FayrehopeWhat
- Page 11 and 12:
AcknowledgementsMistress Elena de V
- Page 13 and 14:
The Middle KingdomCollege of Herald
- Page 15 and 16:
Regional HeraldsConstellation Heral
- Page 17 and 18:
Pursuivant DutiesDuties of the Bran
- Page 19 and 20:
All submissions should be sent to t
- Page 21 and 22:
What to Report?First of all, your r
- Page 23 and 24:
esponsibility now. It wouldn’t hu
- Page 25 and 26:
simply too pervasive. Chilly weathe
- Page 27 and 28:
switched into the losers’ bracket
- Page 29 and 30:
prevent accusations of a rigged lis
- Page 31 and 32:
the green fabric), a larger spool o
- Page 33 and 34:
Precedence and CourtesyCourtly Beha
- Page 35 and 36:
Territorial Barons and Baronesses m
- Page 37 and 38:
c. Once all presentations appear to
- Page 39 and 40: i. Oaths of Fealty and Acknowledgem
- Page 41 and 42: herald is the voice of the Crown an
- Page 43 and 44: Award of the Dragon's FlightOP Abbr
- Page 45 and 46: Award of ArmsOP Abbreviation - AoAL
- Page 47 and 48: Order of the Red CompanyOP Abbrevia
- Page 49 and 50: Order of the WillowOP Abbreviation
- Page 51 and 52: Order of the Gold MaceOP Abbreviati
- Page 53 and 54: Master of ArmsOP Abbreviation - MSC
- Page 55 and 56: Prince and Princess of NorthshieldO
- Page 57 and 58: - The Consort of Northshield bears
- Page 59 and 60: The Submission ProcessWorking with
- Page 61 and 62: A good consultant will have these e
- Page 63 and 64: submit it anyway (“I may be wrong
- Page 65 and 66: Internal Letter Of Acceptance And R
- Page 67 and 68: NamesOn Names and Name Documentatio
- Page 69 and 70: Choosing a CultureJehan de la March
- Page 71 and 72: Clothing: For the Slavic groups, pr
- Page 73 and 74: Politics: The entire Islamic world
- Page 75 and 76: Although in the earlier Middle Ages
- Page 77 and 78: character in Household’s Arabesqu
- Page 79 and 80: An Extremely Brief BibliographyWest
- Page 81 and 82: ArmoryThe Philosophical Roots of He
- Page 83 and 84: Even if your natural instinct for a
- Page 85 and 86: 5. Peripheral secondary charges.6.
- Page 87 and 88: Brisures (marks of cadency) and aug
- Page 89: Still found in mundane blazons are
- Page 93 and 94: 1. Is there a peripheral charge (a
- Page 95 and 96: checking under the old rules, the s
- Page 97 and 98: 2. Yes, the peripheral is charged.
- Page 99 and 100: Many authors state that dancetty is
- Page 101 and 102: Charges may be placed on either sid
- Page 103 and 104: It’s a bit more complicated to ke
- Page 105 and 106: This page shows properly drawn exam
- Page 107 and 108: This page shows a number of common
- Page 109 and 110: Postures of Animals (cont’d)Posit
- Page 111 and 112: Postures of BirdsPosition & Comment
- Page 113 and 114: Postures of Fish and DolphinsPositi
- Page 115 and 116: Barony of Caer Anterth MawrAzure, a
- Page 117 and 118: Barony of the North WoodsAzure, a w
- Page 119 and 120: Shire of AfonlynAzure, on a bend ar
- Page 121 and 122: Shire of Rivenwood TowerErmine, on
- Page 123 and 124: Reference BooksThe Basic HeraldBron
- Page 125 and 126: Bardsley, Charles Wareing. English
- Page 127 and 128: Kaganoff, Benzion C. A Dictionary o
- Page 129 and 130: Sims, Clifford Stanley. The Origin
- Page 131 and 132: Moncreiffe, Iain, and Don Pottinger
- Page 133 and 134: Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme and
- Page 135 and 136: Rules and RegulationsRules for Subm
- Page 137 and 138: Although China, Random and Starhawk
- Page 139 and 140: iii. Heraldic Titles - Heraldic tit
- Page 141 and 142:
ii. Number of Name Phrases - A pers
- Page 143 and 144:
PART VII - COMPATIBLE ARMORIAL CONT
- Page 145 and 146:
i. A metal and a color;ii. An eleme
- Page 147 and 148:
PART IX - OFFENSIVE ARMORYOffensive
- Page 149 and 150:
ii. Field-Primary Armory - If neith
- Page 151 and 152:
j. Changes to Charges on Charges -
- Page 153 and 154:
3. Marshalling. - Armory that appea
- Page 155 and 156:
directly by individuals, but may be
- Page 157 and 158:
the Laurel Office from the registra
- Page 159 and 160:
charge or augmentation is transferr
- Page 161 and 162:
so that ð is alphabetized as dh,
- Page 163 and 164:
1. Failure to Comment. Failure to c
- Page 165 and 166:
B. Content of Letters of Acceptance
- Page 167 and 168:
1. Principal Heralds - The Principa
- Page 169 and 170:
1. Financial Reports - Financial re
- Page 171 and 172:
Appendix B - Standard Designations
- Page 173 and 174:
Appendix D - Suggested Standard For
- Page 175 and 176:
Appendix G - Role of the Deputy Sov
- Page 177 and 178:
Glossary of TermsThis glossary was
- Page 179 and 180:
Complement, In Her*—Describes the
- Page 181 and 182:
Fur—Some furs, like Vair, Potent
- Page 183 and 184:
Mon—Japanese armorial insignia†
- Page 185 and 186:
Registration—Acceptance by Laurel
- Page 187 and 188:
AppendicesSources for Heraldic Publ
- Page 189 and 190:
• Send the four copies in and kee
- Page 191 and 192:
“Major” or “minor” changes?
- Page 193 and 194:
See the General section at the begi