17.07.2015 Views

understanding and applying tools to identiFy and ... - Lominger

understanding and applying tools to identiFy and ... - Lominger

understanding and applying tools to identiFy and ... - Lominger

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sample Participant 9/26/08Fac<strong>to</strong>r SummaryCHOICES® ARCHITECTMulti-Rater ReportRANKNot At All LikeThisLess Often ThanMostAbout Like MostPeopleBetter / MoreOften Than MostFACTORS MEAN 1 2 3 4 5The ClearestExample of ThisUnratedItems<strong>Lominger</strong>NormAverageNormPercentile1.0 Fac<strong>to</strong>r IV: Results Agility 4.252% 3.50 902.0 Fac<strong>to</strong>r I: Mental Agility 3.875% 3.33 84-863.0 Fac<strong>to</strong>r III: Change Agility 3.855% 3.33 78-814.0 Fac<strong>to</strong>r II: People Agility 3.792% 3.36 81Excluding self as a rater is strongly recommended for two reasons:1. Our best practices support keeping the succession planningprocess a private one, at least until the organization hasestablished a highly refined <strong>and</strong> successful talent review process.Transparency, while well-intentioned, can lead <strong>to</strong> difficulties,particularly when individuals feel excluded or passed over.The long report format isideal when the organizationwants <strong>to</strong> rate someone’slearning agility purely fordevelopmental purposes.2. Research consistently shows that individuals are not effective atrating themselves on Choices Architect ® — individuals rated lowby others typically overrate themselves, while the opposite istrue of individuals rated high by others in learning agility. Thesediscrepancies can lead <strong>to</strong> awkwardness, even conflict, especiallywhen individuals perceive their learning agility <strong>to</strong> be much higherthan others see it.© Copyright 2007 LOMINGER INTERNATIONAL: A KORN/FERRY COMPANY. All Rights Reserved.Page 11 of 57The eChoices Online Survey “Long Report” Format. The longreport format is ideal when the organization wants <strong>to</strong> rate someone’slearning agility purely for developmental purposes. This may occur at thepoint where someone has already been confirmed by the organizationas a high potential or when the individual is working in a role that has ahigh dem<strong>and</strong> for learning agility in order <strong>to</strong> be successful.Rater selection for the long report differs from the short report. Typically,the rater list is exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> include not only the boss <strong>and</strong> other seniorlevelraters, but also peers <strong>and</strong> direct reports. In this case, the individual4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!