Margot, J., Hine, A. A., Benner, L. A. M., & Chamberlin, A. B. 2003, Science, 302,1739Conway, J. H. & Sloane, N. J. 1993, Sphere Packings, Lattices, and Groups, 2nd ed.(Springer-Verlag), 3–9Cuk, M. & Burns, J. A. 2004, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 36, 1184 (abstract)Degewij, J., Tedesco, E. F., & Zellner, B. 1979, Icarus, 40, 364Donnison, J. R. & Wiper, M. P. 1999, MNRAS, 302, 75Durda, D. D. 1996, Icarus, 120, 212Durda, D. D., Bottke, Jr., W. F., Enke, B. L., Merline, W. J., Asphaug, E., Richardson,D. C., & Leinhardt, Z. M. 2004, Icarus, 170, 243Gladman, B., Michel, P., & Froeschlé, C. 2000, Icarus, 146, 176Goldreich, R. 1963, MNRAS, 126, 257Grieve, R. A. F. & Shoemaker, E. M. Hazards Due to Comets and <strong>Asteroids</strong>, ed. ,T. GehrelsM. S. Matthews & A. M. Schumann, 417Guibout, V. & Scheeres, D. J. 2003, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 87,263Gültekin, K., Miller, M. C., & Hamilton, D. P. 2004, ApJ, 616, 221Gültekin, K. G. 2006, Ph.D. ThesisHales, T. C. 2005, Ann. Math., 162, 1065Hamilton, D. P. & Burns, J. A. 1991, Icarus, 92, 118Harris, A. W. 1996, in Lunar and Planetary Institute Conference Abstracts, 493–+Harris, A. W. & Pravec, P. 2006, AAS/Division for Dynamical Astronomy Meeting Abstracts,37Harris, A. W., Warner, B. D., & Pravec, P. 2005a, NASA Planetary Data System, EAR-A-5-DDR-DERIVED-LIGHTCURVE-V7.0:LCREF TAB, 35, 4—. 2005b, NASA Planetary Data System, EAR-A-5-DDR-DERIVED-LIGHTCURVE-123
V7.0:LCREF TAB, 35, 4Harris, A. W., Young, J. W., Dockweiler, T., Gibson, J., Poutanen, M., & Bowell, E. 1992,Icarus, 95, 115Holsapple, K. A. 2001, Icarus, 154, 432Howell, S. B. 1989, PASP, 101, 616Ivezić, Ž., Tabachnik, S., Rafikov, R., Lupton, R. H., Quinn, T., Hammergren, M., Eyer,L., Chu, J., Armstrong, J. C., Fan, X., Finlator, K., Geballe, T. R., Gunn, J. E., Hennessy,G. S., Knapp, G. R., Leggett, S. K., Munn, J. A., Pier, J. R., Rockosi, C. M.,Schneider, D. P., Strauss, M. A., Yanny, B., Brinkmann, J., Csabai, I., Hindsley, R. B.,Kent, S., Lamb, D. Q., Margon, B., McKay, T. A., Smith, J. A., Waddel, P., York, D. G.,& the SDSS Collaboration. 2001, AJ, 122, 2749, arXiv:astro-ph/0105511Jeffreys, H. 1947, MNRAS, 107, 260Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340Leinhardt, Z. M. & Richardson, D. C. 2002, Icarus, 159, 306—. 2005, Icarus, 176, 432Leinhardt, Z. M., Richardson, D. C., & Quinn, T. 2000, Icarus, 146, 133Leone, G., Paolicchi, P., Farinella, P., & Zappala, V. 1984, A&A, 140, 265Magnusson, P. 1990, Icarus, 85, 229Marchis, F., Berthier, J., Clergeon, C., Descamps, P., & Hestroffer, D. 2005a, <strong>Asteroids</strong>,Comets, and Meteors: ACM 2005, in preparationMarchis, F., Descamps, P., Hestroffer, D., & Berthier, J. 2005b, Nature, 436, 822Marchis, F., Descamps, P., Hestroffer, D., Berthier, J., & de Pater, I. 2004a, AAS/Divisionfor Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, 36Marchis, F., Descamps, P., Hestroffer, D., Berthier, J., Vachier, F., Boccaletti, A., de Pater,I., & Gavel, D. 2003, Icarus, 165, 112Marchis, F., Laver, C., Berthier, J., Descamps, P., Hestroffer, D., de Pater, I., Behrend,124
- Page 1 and 2:
AbstractTitle of Dissertation:Formi
- Page 3 and 4:
Forming Binary Near-Earth Asteroids
- Page 5 and 6:
PrefaceMuch of the work in this dis
- Page 7 and 8:
AcknowledgementsI would not have ma
- Page 9 and 10:
2.3 Results and Discussion . . . .
- Page 11 and 12:
List of Tables1.1 Binary NEA proper
- Page 13 and 14:
4.8 Percentage of migrated binaries
- Page 15 and 16:
of the system mass M by way of Kepl
- Page 17 and 18:
the largest lightcurve amplitudes o
- Page 19 and 20:
1.1.3 Binary Main-Belt asteroidsRec
- Page 21 and 22:
Lightcurve discoveriesA lightcurve
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 1.1: (Top) The primary rotat
- Page 25 and 26:
1.2.1 CaptureIn this scenario two a
- Page 27 and 28:
ever, understanding the mechanism i
- Page 29 and 30:
off the equator or off one end of a
- Page 31 and 32:
3 Denotes a secure result with no a
- Page 33 and 34:
nostic.Recent results have demonstr
- Page 35 and 36:
another intermediate source of NEAs
- Page 37 and 38:
1.5.2 Rubble pilesThe evidence for
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 2Formation of Binary Astero
- Page 41 and 42:
∼ 60%, making a bulk density of
- Page 43 and 44:
shedding mass and distorting prior
- Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2.3: Snapshots of a tidal di
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2.4: Normalized probability
- Page 49 and 50:
Figure 2.5: Normalized probability
- Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2.6: (a) Satellite eccentric
- Page 53 and 54:
various complications of measuring
- Page 55 and 56:
etween ω pri and L bin ), with clo
- Page 57 and 58:
prolate-like), the oblate-like bodi
- Page 59 and 60:
Figure 2.9: Plots comparing T-PROS
- Page 61 and 62:
Figure 2.10: Comparison of S-class
- Page 63 and 64:
2.3.5 Triples and hierarchical syst
- Page 65 and 66:
a/R pri based on a simple conversio
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 2.13: The eccentricity dampi
- Page 69 and 70:
Main Belt. Work by Chauvineau & Far
- Page 71 and 72:
(1992), with a target range of slig
- Page 73 and 74:
The observations were made from the
- Page 75 and 76:
peaked period, with a lower signifi
- Page 77 and 78:
and suggests that it is possibly a
- Page 79 and 80:
fit for the period of the lightcurv
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 3.2.Orbital, physical and lig
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure 3.2: Asteroid lightcurves.70
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 3.4: Asteroid lightcurves.72
- Page 87 and 88: 3.4.4 Spin and shape properties amo
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 3.7: The lightcurve amplitud
- Page 91 and 92: Typically observations of eclipse o
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 4Steady-State Model of the
- Page 95 and 96: values between 0.2-0.6. There is on
- Page 97 and 98: asteroids in the Main Belt is suffi
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 4.2: Percent of surviving NE
- Page 101 and 102: 4.1.3 Binary evolutionBasic stabili
- Page 103 and 104: Table 4.1.Lifetimes for binary NEAs
- Page 105 and 106: which means it should have a critic
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.4: The total number of bin
- Page 109 and 110: the original eccentricity distribut
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 4.6: Properties of the binar
- Page 113 and 114: Figure 4.8: Binary percentage for m
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 4.9: Effects of tidal evolut
- Page 117 and 118: quickly altered, or involved in bin
- Page 119 and 120: tidal disruption. However, the impl
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 5ConclusionsA general concl
- Page 123 and 124: small additions to the angular mome
- Page 125 and 126: cently this large pool of observers
- Page 127 and 128: differences in results when a lower
- Page 129 and 130: Table A.1.Number of binaries produc
- Page 131 and 132: Thus the reaccumulated bodies in th
- Page 133 and 134: of 2.2 h observed is significantly
- Page 135: Benner, L. A. M., Nolan, M. C., Ost
- Page 139 and 140: Storrs, A. D., Close, L. M., & Mena
- Page 141 and 142: 122Pravec, P., Kušnirá, P., Hicks
- Page 143 and 144: Shepard, M. K., Schlieder, J., Nola