Forming Binary Near-Earth Asteroids From Tidal Disruptions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

P., Cotrez, V., Brunetto, L., & Kober, G. 2006, Icarus, 181, 63Pravec, P., Šarounová, L., Rabinowitz, D. L., Hicks, M. D., Wolf, M., Krugly, Y. N.,Velichko, F. P., Shevchenko, V. G., Chiorny, V. G., Gaftonyuk, N. M., & Genevier, G.2000b, Icarus, 146, 190Pravec, P., Wolf, M., & Šarounová, L. 1998, Icarus, 136, 124Pravec, P., Wolf, M., & Šarounová, L. 1999, in IAU Colloq. 173: Evolution and SourceRegions of Asteroids and Comets, 159Pravec, P., Wolf, M., Varady, M., & Barta, P. 1995, Earth Moon and Planets, 71, 177Rabinowitz, D. L. 1994, Icarus, 111, 364—. 1997a, Icarus, 127, 33—. 1997b, Icarus, 130, 287Rauch, K. P. & Hamilton, D. P. in preparation, AJReddy, V., Dyvig, R., Pravec, P., & Kušnirák, P. 2005, IAU Circ., 8483Richardson, D. C., Bottke, Jr., W. F., & Love, S. G. 1998, Icarus, 134, 47Richardson, D. C., Elankumaran, P., & Sanderson, R. E. 2005, Icarus, 173, 349Richardson, D. C., Leinhardt, Z. M., Melosh, H. J., Bottke, Jr., W. F., & Asphaug, E.2002, in Bottke Jr., W .F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R. P. (Eds.), Asteroids III.Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 501–515Richardson, D. C., Quinn, T., Stadel, J., & Lake, G. 2000, Icarus, 143, 45Richardson, D. C. & Walsh, K. J. 2006, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences,34, 47Roche, E. A. 1847, Acad. Sci. Lett. Montpelier. Mem. Section Sci., 1, 243Ryan, W. H., Ryan, E. V., & Martinez, C. T. 2004, Planet. Space Sci., 52, 1093Ryan, W. H., Ryan, E. V., Martinez, C. T., & Stewart, L. 2003, IAU Circ., 8128Scheeres, D. J. 2002, Icarus, 159, 271Scheeres, D. J., Marzari, F., & Rossi, A. 2004, Icarus, 170, 312129
Shepard, M. K., Schlieder, J., Nolan, M. C., Hine, A. A., Benner, L. A. M., Ostro, S. J.,& Giorgini, J. D. 2004, IAU Circ., 8397Sheppard, S. S. & Jewitt, D. 2004, AJ, 127, 3023, arXiv:astro-ph/0402277Solem, J. C. 1994, Nature, 370, 349Solem, J. C. & Hills, J. G. 1996, Astron. J., 111, 1382Sridhar, S. & Tremaine, S. 1992, Icarus, 95, 86Stadel, J. G. 2001, Ph.D. Thesis, 126 pStanzel, R. 1978, A&AS, 34, 373Stellingwerf, R. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 953Storrs, A., Vilas, F., Landis, R., Wells, E., Woods, C., Zellner, B., & Gaffney, M. 2001,IAU Circ., 7599Tamblyn, P. M., Merline, W. J., Chapman, C. R., Nesvorny, D., Durda, D. D., Dumas, C.,Storrs, A. D., Close, L. M., & Menard, F. 2004, IAU Circ., 8293, 3van Flandern, T. C., Tedesco, E. F., & Binzel, R. P. 1979, in Gehrels, T. (Eds.), Asteroids.Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 443–465Vokrouhlický, D., Nesvorný, D., & Bottke, Jr., W. F. 2003, Nature, 425, 147Walsh, K. J. & Richardson, D. C. 2006, Icarus, 180, 201Walsh, K. J., Richardson, D. C., & Rettig, T. W. 2003, in ASP Conf. Ser. 291: Hubble’sScience Legacy: Future Optical/Ultraviolet Astronomy from Space, 415–418Warner, B., Pravec, P., Harris, A. W., Galád, A., & Kušnirák, P. 2005a, Asteroids, Comets,and Meteors: ACM 2005, in preparationWarner, B., Pravec, P., Kušnirák, P., Pray, D., Galád, A., Gajdoš, S., Brown, P., &Krzeminski, Z. 2005b, IAU Circ., 8511Warner, B. D. 2004, The Minor Planet ObserverWeidenschilling, S. J., Paolicchi, P., & Zappala, V. 1989, in Binzel, R. P., Gehrels, T.,Matthews, M. S. (Eds.), Asteroids II. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, 643–658130
Page 1 and 2:
AbstractTitle of Dissertation:Formi
Page 3 and 4:
Forming Binary Near-Earth Asteroids
Page 5 and 6:
PrefaceMuch of the work in this dis
Page 7 and 8:
AcknowledgementsI would not have ma
Page 9 and 10:
2.3 Results and Discussion . . . .
Page 11 and 12:
List of Tables1.1 Binary NEA proper
Page 13 and 14:
4.8 Percentage of migrated binaries
Page 15 and 16:
of the system mass M by way of Kepl
Page 17 and 18:
the largest lightcurve amplitudes o
Page 19 and 20:
1.1.3 Binary Main-Belt asteroidsRec
Page 21 and 22:
Lightcurve discoveriesA lightcurve
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 1.1: (Top) The primary rotat
Page 25 and 26:
1.2.1 CaptureIn this scenario two a
Page 27 and 28:
ever, understanding the mechanism i
Page 29 and 30:
off the equator or off one end of a
Page 31 and 32:
3 Denotes a secure result with no a
Page 33 and 34:
nostic.Recent results have demonstr
Page 35 and 36:
another intermediate source of NEAs
Page 37 and 38:
1.5.2 Rubble pilesThe evidence for
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 2Formation of Binary Astero
Page 41 and 42:
∼ 60%, making a bulk density of
Page 43 and 44:
shedding mass and distorting prior
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2.3: Snapshots of a tidal di
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2.4: Normalized probability
Page 49 and 50:
Figure 2.5: Normalized probability
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2.6: (a) Satellite eccentric
Page 53 and 54:
various complications of measuring
Page 55 and 56:
etween ω pri and L bin ), with clo
Page 57 and 58:
prolate-like), the oblate-like bodi
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 2.9: Plots comparing T-PROS
Page 61 and 62:
Figure 2.10: Comparison of S-class
Page 63 and 64:
2.3.5 Triples and hierarchical syst
Page 65 and 66:
a/R pri based on a simple conversio
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 2.13: The eccentricity dampi
Page 69 and 70:
Main Belt. Work by Chauvineau & Far
Page 71 and 72:
(1992), with a target range of slig
Page 73 and 74:
The observations were made from the
Page 75 and 76:
peaked period, with a lower signifi
Page 77 and 78:
and suggests that it is possibly a
Page 79 and 80:
fit for the period of the lightcurv
Page 81 and 82:
Table 3.2.Orbital, physical and lig
Page 83 and 84:
Figure 3.2: Asteroid lightcurves.70
Page 85 and 86:
Figure 3.4: Asteroid lightcurves.72
Page 87 and 88:
3.4.4 Spin and shape properties amo
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 3.7: The lightcurve amplitud
Page 91 and 92: Typically observations of eclipse o
Page 93 and 94: Chapter 4Steady-State Model of the
Page 95 and 96: values between 0.2-0.6. There is on
Page 97 and 98: asteroids in the Main Belt is suffi
Page 99 and 100: Figure 4.2: Percent of surviving NE
Page 101 and 102: 4.1.3 Binary evolutionBasic stabili
Page 103 and 104: Table 4.1.Lifetimes for binary NEAs
Page 105 and 106: which means it should have a critic
Page 107 and 108: Figure 4.4: The total number of bin
Page 109 and 110: the original eccentricity distribut
Page 111 and 112: Figure 4.6: Properties of the binar
Page 113 and 114: Figure 4.8: Binary percentage for m
Page 115 and 116: Figure 4.9: Effects of tidal evolut
Page 117 and 118: quickly altered, or involved in bin
Page 119 and 120: tidal disruption. However, the impl
Page 121 and 122: Chapter 5ConclusionsA general concl
Page 123 and 124: small additions to the angular mome
Page 125 and 126: cently this large pool of observers
Page 127 and 128: differences in results when a lower
Page 129 and 130: Table A.1.Number of binaries produc
Page 131 and 132: Thus the reaccumulated bodies in th
Page 133 and 134: of 2.2 h observed is significantly
Page 135 and 136: Benner, L. A. M., Nolan, M. C., Ost
Page 137 and 138: V7.0:LCREF TAB, 35, 4Harris, A. W.,
Page 139 and 140: Storrs, A. D., Close, L. M., & Mena
Page 141: 122Pravec, P., Kušnirá, P., Hicks
show all

Forming Binary Near-Earth Asteroids From Tidal Disruptions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?