Element 7Support supervisors in their roles as unit leaders <strong>and</strong> changeagents.The emerging model <strong>for</strong> child welfare supervision also empowers supervisors to influence theagency as leaders <strong>and</strong> change agents (Cearly 2004; <strong>Child</strong>ren’s Rights & NCYL 2007; Dawson1998; NRCOI 2007; Shanock & Eisenberger 2006). When an organization’s practices <strong>and</strong>/orpolicies exclude supervisors from such activities, it clearly conveys a de-valuing of their pivotal rolein the organization, their expertise, <strong>and</strong> their firsth<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of frontline practice issues <strong>and</strong>practitioners’ <strong>and</strong> clients’ needs <strong>and</strong> concerns. There<strong>for</strong>e, the model necessarily incorporates• systematically including them in quality assurance activities, program evaluation, <strong>and</strong>redesign of in<strong>for</strong>mation systems, <strong>for</strong>ms, <strong>and</strong> procedures;• training supervisors first <strong>for</strong> all policy <strong>and</strong> practice changes;• involving supervisors in the recruitment, selection, <strong>and</strong> training of new frontlinepractitioners (NRCOI 2007; CO DHS 1994; Str<strong>and</strong> 2008; Dickinson 2007); <strong>and</strong>• frequently recognizing supervisors’ own <strong>and</strong> their units’ accomplishments.The nature <strong>and</strong> degree of supervisors’ involvement in the activities Supervisors have theiridentified above will vary among organizations, ranging, <strong>for</strong> example, thumbs on the pulse offrom having supervisors directly provide training to frontlinepractice. Supervisors havepractitioners to having supervisors create <strong>and</strong> implement a trainingto take a leadership role—plan with each practitioner in their unit (CO DHS 1994). However,through supervisors’ experiences with frontline practitioners, they they have a key role inhave a front row view of practice situations in which agency policy is shaping <strong>and</strong> developingnot having the desired effects as well as situations <strong>for</strong> whichpolicies <strong>and</strong> practices. –appropriate policy has not yet been developed. There<strong>for</strong>e,Administratororganizationally, supervisors are in a critical position to identifypolicy issues <strong>and</strong> needs <strong>and</strong> propose <strong>and</strong> advocate <strong>for</strong> relevant changes. Similarly, supervisorsdirectly observe the degree to which agency systems, such as in<strong>for</strong>mation systems, <strong>and</strong> tools, suchas <strong>for</strong>ms, either facilitate or undermine efficient <strong>and</strong> effective service delivery.Agency administrators <strong>and</strong> managers must recognize that supervisors’ observations, knowledge,<strong>and</strong> expertise are valuable resources upon which child welfare agencies can systematically draw inevaluating programs, policies, <strong>and</strong> infrastructure <strong>and</strong> in developing <strong>and</strong> implementing necessarychanges. Kadushin <strong>and</strong> Harkness stress, “The supervisor is in a strategic position to act as a changeagent. St<strong>and</strong>ing between administration <strong>and</strong> the workers, he or she can actively influenceadministration to make changes <strong>and</strong> influence workers to accept them” (2002:75)22
SECTION IIComponents of an Organizational <strong>Framework</strong>That Supports Effective <strong>Supervision</strong> in <strong>Child</strong><strong>Welfare</strong>A Roadmap to Support Effective <strong>Supervision</strong>Given the complex, rapidly changing environment in which child welfare supervisors practice,evolving federal <strong>and</strong> state requirements regarding service delivery <strong>and</strong> desired outcomes <strong>for</strong>children <strong>and</strong> families, <strong>and</strong> the pivotal role supervisors play in incorporating such changes into dayto day practice, agency leadership must provide supervisors with the systemic organizationalsupport they need to be effective in their work. Designing <strong>and</strong> delivering this support to supervisorsis a leadership activity, one that can be supported by other organizational units such as training,human resources, <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation technology, but one that must be lead by top administrators.<strong>Child</strong> welfare supervisors face many serious obstacles to effectively carrying out their jobresponsibilities. While insufficient time <strong>and</strong> resources were mentioned frequently during interviews,many other obstacles have been identified <strong>and</strong> must be addressed by agency leadership.In this section we present an integrated organizational framework to support effective child welfaresupervision that can serve as a roadmap <strong>for</strong> agency leadership as they think through ways to build<strong>and</strong> sustain effective child welfare supervision in their agencies. This framework builds on previouswork conducted by the National Resource Center <strong>for</strong> Family-Centered Practice <strong>and</strong> PermanencyPlanning <strong>and</strong> National <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Welfare</strong> Resource Center <strong>for</strong> Organizational Improvement as well asin<strong>for</strong>mation we gathered from our literature search, interviews, <strong>and</strong> survey. The framework:• addresses the perceived obstacles to effective child welfare supervision identified by childwelfare agency supervisors, administrators, <strong>and</strong> caseworkers, experts in the field, <strong>and</strong> currentliterature;• takes into account the essential functions <strong>and</strong> job responsibilities of child welfare supervisorsidentified in Section I; <strong>and</strong>• incorporates key current supervisory principles.The framework identifies the following four organizational components required to empower childwelfare supervisors to effectively carry out their administrative, educational, <strong>and</strong> supportivefunctions:• an organizational culture that values <strong>and</strong> demonstrates support <strong>for</strong> the vital role supervisors playin ensuring positive outcomes <strong>for</strong> children, youth <strong>and</strong> families;• a model of supervisory practice that reflects how the organization views the roles,responsibilities, <strong>and</strong> expectations of supervisors <strong>and</strong> includes accurate, written job descriptions;• systematic recruitment <strong>and</strong> retention of individuals who are a “good fit” as frontlinepractitioners <strong>and</strong> supervisors;• a continuum of professional development opportunities <strong>for</strong> new <strong>and</strong> experienced supervisorsthat includes initial <strong>and</strong> ongoing training, peer support, mentors, <strong>and</strong> clinical consultation.23
- Page 3 and 4: AcknowledgementsThis report, Buildi
- Page 5 and 6: Executive SummaryA Call to Action f
- Page 7 and 8: IntroductionWhy is a Model of Child
- Page 9 and 10: • a continuum of professional dev
- Page 11: • providing knowledge and securit
- Page 14 and 15: necessary, and providing permanency
- Page 16 and 17: Table 1. Job Responsibilities Ranke
- Page 18: Manage caseloads in the supervisor
- Page 22 and 23: Supportive Supervision Responsibili
- Page 24 and 25: Element 4Mandate explicit, manageab
- Page 28 and 29: Several activities are included to
- Page 30 and 31: Table 2. Job Responsibility Data Co
- Page 32 and 33: include "acknowledging effective pe
- Page 34 and 35: Component 2A model of supervisory p
- Page 36 and 37: • assigning ongoing cases to an e
- Page 38 and 39: • Develop an internal process to
- Page 40 and 41: A Continuum of Initial and Ongoing
- Page 42 and 43: Helpful Child Welfare and Training
- Page 44 and 45: Sources CitedAllnoch, A. (1998, Feb
- Page 46 and 47: welfare practice serving Indian com
- Page 48 and 49: Whittaker, J. & Maluccio, A. (2002)
- Page 50 and 51: The project team contacted potentia
- Page 52 and 53: Appendix BLiterature ReviewThe foll
- Page 54 and 55: Providing leadership within organiz
- Page 56 and 57: Ensure manageable staff/supervisor
- Page 58 and 59: prepared to move into permanent pos
- Page 60 and 61: • Place ASPIRE (TANF welfare to w
- Page 62 and 63: Facilitating Communication and Coll
- Page 64 and 65: • Document worker performance rel
- Page 66 and 67: • Hiring diverse staff• Trainin
- Page 68 and 69: Bernotavicz, F. (1997). Retention o
- Page 70 and 71: O’Connor, M. (1997). Building Sup
- Page 72 and 73: 5h. If there is a discrepancy betwe
- Page 74 and 75: Job Responsibilityissues, confident
- Page 76 and 77:
13a. Does your supervisor effective
- Page 78 and 79:
SUPERVISOR JOB RESPONSIBILITIES6. I
- Page 80 and 81:
Job ResponsibilityMost importantto
- Page 82 and 83:
11. Are there written resources (tr
- Page 84 and 85:
esponsibilities as “most importan
- Page 86 and 87:
Job responsibilityMost importantto
- Page 88 and 89:
Appendix DSample Job DescriptionJOB
- Page 90:
Data Conception: Requires the abili