05.12.2012 Views

chapter 3 inventory of local food systems

chapter 3 inventory of local food systems

chapter 3 inventory of local food systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Project CP/59 - “Instruments and institutions to develop <strong>local</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>systems</strong>”<br />

2.7. Conclusions<br />

We described and tested eight indicators that capture the economic, social and<br />

ecological impacts <strong>of</strong> different <strong>food</strong> <strong>systems</strong>. In general, it is very difficult to obtain the<br />

data that are needed for the calculation <strong>of</strong> these indicators. This is due to the small size<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>local</strong> <strong>food</strong> system sector, but also the disaggregated nature <strong>of</strong> the required data<br />

what makes it very time consuming for respondents to retrieve such data.<br />

As the importance <strong>of</strong> LFS compared to MFS is small, one should be in search <strong>of</strong> a mean<br />

to introduce the benefits <strong>of</strong> the LFS in the MFS, without losing the values <strong>of</strong> the LFS. No<br />

point is made when both <strong>systems</strong> are only competing one another, while they are<br />

grounded in different philosophies, both with their sympathizers. The differences in<br />

LM3, product value in the consumer price and absolute price differences both to<br />

producer and consumer all point the conclusions in favour for the LFS, when results in<br />

relative values are taken into account. However, when one includes the market share <strong>of</strong><br />

both <strong>systems</strong>, the absolute conclusions on country level turn out differently. This<br />

grounds the following remark: the real challenge is not necessarily to be found in a way<br />

to turn the entire <strong>food</strong> market in LFS, but an even bigger challenge is to find the way to<br />

introduce the positive values and impacts <strong>of</strong> the LFS in the MFS and vice versa. A very<br />

important aspect in the latter is communication on product-properties, including<br />

producer, processor and price information.<br />

On a social level, the modalities <strong>of</strong> social networks may on the one hand influence the<br />

amount and the nature <strong>of</strong> appreciation a farmer gets. However, on the other hand the<br />

difference between long and short supply chain farmers is not necessarily reflected in<br />

their surrounding social networks where knowledge is exchanged, communities are<br />

built, problems are shared and farmers back up for one another. In this respect it is more<br />

important to support personal attitude from farmers towards any network, rather then<br />

exclusively support <strong>local</strong> networks.<br />

SPSD II - Part I - Sustainable production and consumption patterns - Agro-Food 58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!