MichiganBut Going To War With Iran Would Hardly Provide The Greater Stability CriticsOf The Deal Purport To Seek. The U.S. Has Long Held — And Should ContinueTo Maintain — Close Ties With Israel, And That Nation Opposes This Deal. YetAt This Time, We See No Other Viable Path“Obama now must seek approval from the U.S. Congress, where Republican lawmakershave already vowed to scuttle the deal. Some are genuinely concerned that it doestoo little to contain Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Others are spoiling for a militaryconfrontation with Iran, and seem disappointed that this week’s nuclear pact maypostpone, or even avert, such a showdown. But going to war with Iran would hardlyprovide the greater stability critics of the deal purport to seek. The U.S. has long held— and should continue to maintain — close ties with Israel, and that nation opposesthis deal. Yet at this time, we see no other viable path. Iran is a sprawling nation witha large economy; marginalizing it is not a sustainable option, and provoking a militaryconflict with its incumbent rulers would be reckless. U.S. efforts at regime change inIraq mired us, and that country, in more than a decade of strife, with no end in sight.War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy, British politician Tony Benn once said. Rightnow, diplomacy holds the greatest promise of success.”– Detroit Free Press, 7/16/15MinnesotaGlobal Leaders Recognized The Threat That A Weaponized Iran Posed, AndThrough Strict Sanctions The P5+1 Brought Iran Into A Multilateral NegotiatingProcess That Resulted In An Accord. So A Major Global Challenge WasAddressed, However Imperfectly, Without War. Diplomacy Produced Results.“Opinions will vary on the deal announced Tuesday between Iran and the ‘P5+1’ (theUnited States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia and China — the five permanentmembers of the U.N. Security Council — plus Germany). But all should acknowledgethat the beleaguered international system worked as designed in producing anagreement on Iran’s potential nuclear weapons program. Global leaders recognized thethreat that a weaponized Iran posed, and through strict sanctions the P5+1 broughtIran into a multilateral negotiating process that resulted in an accord. So a major globalchallenge was addressed, however imperfectly, without war. Diplomacy producedresults. As Congress considers its response over the next 60 days, it should keep inmind that this isn’t just about Iran, but also about maintaining the capacity of theinternational system to coalesce on critical matters, despite tensions and disagreementson so many other geopolitical issues. Rejecting this kind of engagement will make itmuch more difficult for subsequent presidents to achieve similar results.”– Star Tribune, 7/14/15
MissouriIran Nuclear Deal Is A Path Away From War“We have seen what comes of U.S. involvement in Middle East wars — destabilization,new terrorist threats and more war. The pact with Iran announced Tuesday is aboutdiminishing the chances of the United States going to war to stop Iran from deployinga nuclear weapon. To that end, the U.S. and its negotiating partners forged a sounddeal. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry should be hailedfor a historic achievement. To gain the lifting of international economic sanctions,Iran agreed to surrender 98 percent of its supply of low-enriched uranium and toremove two-thirds of its nuclear centrifuges — technology that spins uranium into theconcentrated form that could produce a nuclear explosion. Iran also agreed not to seekor possess highly enriched uranium for at least 15 years. Significantly, it consented tofull-time monitoring of every aspect of its nuclear program.”– Kansas City Star, 7/14/15NebraskaPerhaps The Most Important Thing To Keep In Mind Is That Without A Deal,Iran Will Be Free To Develop Its Nuclear Program Without Any Restrictions.Iran Has Everything It Needs, Including Skilled Scientists.“The only real question that needs to be answered on the Iran deal is whether the worldis a safer place with it, or without it. Because the world is violent, and things often arenot what they seem, the question is extraordinarily difficult to answer. It’s unfortunatethat too many members of Congress had their minds made up before the details of theagreement were announced, and before the deal could be evaluated… Perhaps the mostimportant thing to keep in mind is that without a deal, Iran will be free to develop itsnuclear program without any restrictions. Iran has everything it needs, including skilledscientists. Informed guesses range from months to years on how quickly Iran couldcreate a nuclear weapon. If the deal is what the Obama administration claims, it willslow that process, for example, with new limits on how many centrifuges the countrycan operate to purify nuclear material.”– Journal Star, 7/16/15
- Page 1 and 2: THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL:WHAT YOU NEED
- Page 3 and 4: THE DETAILSOF THE JCPOA
- Page 5 and 6: Blocking the Pathways toa Nuclear W
- Page 8 and 9: Snapping Back Sanctions on IranIran
- Page 10 and 11: Q:A:Aren’t “anytime, anywhere
- Page 12 and 13: Q:A:Shouldn’t we just go back to
- Page 14 and 15: Q:A:Why didn’t the deal stick to
- Page 18: JCPOA Does Not Simply Delayan Irani
- Page 21 and 22: Multilateral Tools••We will sti
- Page 23 and 24: Designation AuthoritiesMissiles:Aut
- Page 25 and 26: Iran Faces Large and Pressing Domes
- Page 27 and 28: WINEP BenchmarksAdvanced Centrifuge
- Page 29 and 30: √Commitment Satisfied in the JCPO
- Page 31 and 32: √√Commitment Satisfied in the J
- Page 33 and 34: WHAT THEY’RE SAYINGABOUT THE JCPO
- Page 35 and 36: “The nuclear deal advances wester
- Page 37 and 38: Regional Editorials on the Iran Dea
- Page 39 and 40: Implementation Is What Will Determi
- Page 41 and 42: FloridaFor Those Who Accuse Preside
- Page 43 and 44: IdahoNegotiations Produced Nuclear
- Page 45: MarylandIf The Standard Is That No
- Page 49 and 50: New YorkAn Iran Nuclear Deal That R
- Page 51 and 52: The Agreement Reflects A Calculated
- Page 53 and 54: TennesseeIt Is Also A Beginning Tha
- Page 55 and 56: What the World is Saying about the
- Page 57 and 58: China“The achievement of a compre
- Page 59 and 60: Other World Leaders“I warmly welc
- Page 61 and 62: Public statements of support from t
- Page 63 and 64: THE IRAN PROJECTwww.theiranproject.
- Page 65 and 66: THE IRAN PROJECTwww.theiranproject.
- Page 67 and 68: Letter to the President from over 1
- Page 69 and 70: Amb. (ret.) Ulric Haynes, Jr. Ambas
- Page 71 and 72: JULY 17, 2015Atlantic Council Iran
- Page 73 and 74: Russia, whose cooperation in imposi
- Page 75 and 76: Because there is so little trust th
- Page 77 and 78: Committee on International Justice
- Page 79 and 80: THE WHITE HOUSEOffice of the Press
- Page 81 and 82: As Iran takes steps to implement th
- Page 83 and 84: We do not have to accept an inevita
- Page 85 and 86: Key Excerpts of the Joint Comprehen
- Page 87 and 88: • Iran will allow the IAEA to mon
- Page 89 and 90: Press Availability on Nuclear Deal
- Page 91 and 92: purposes. And Iran will not build a
- Page 93 and 94: So let me make a couple of points c
- Page 95 and 96: his team, while tough, always profe
- Page 97 and 98:
WASHINGTON POST OP-EDJohn Kerry and
- Page 99 and 100:
President Obama has said clearly th
- Page 101 and 102:
Remember that, two years ago, when
- Page 103 and 104:
Written Testimony of Jacob J. Lew,
- Page 105 and 106:
The United States will also maintai
- Page 107 and 108:
Secretary Ernest MonizTestimony bef
- Page 109 and 110:
contribute to the development of a
- Page 111 and 112:
DAVID CAMERON, PRIME MINISTER OF GR