Snapping Back Sanctions on IranIran will not receive any new sanctions relief until it verifiably completes important steps torollback its program, and we can snap sanctions back into place if Iran violates the deal.••Reports of a “signing bonus” were false. Iran mustcomplete its key nuclear steps before it begins toreceive sanctions relief beyond the limited reliefprovided for under the JPOA. We anticipate that it willtake Iran from 6 months to a year to complete thesekey steps.Taken in its entirety, this is the impact thehistoric <strong>JCPOA</strong> will have on Iran’s ability toobtain a nuclear weapon:••The <strong>JCPOA</strong> allows us to snap sanctions back into placeif Iran violates the deal.••Meanwhile, we will be keeping in place other unilateralsanctions that relate to non-nuclear issues, such assupport for terrorism and human rights abuses.••The UN Security Council resolutions that imposedsanctions on Iran will be replaced by a new UN SecurityCouncil resolution that will last for a decade. Forthe first decade of the deal, we can snap back thesemultilateral sanctions if Iran violates the deal — asnapback that cannot be vetoed by Russia or China.In addition, for years 11-15, the P5+1 has agreed topreserve this snapback mechanism if Iran violatesthe deal.••This new UN Security Council resolution willre-establish important sanctions restricting thetransfer of sensitive nuclear technologies and keepin place sanctions on ballistic missiles for 8 years andconventional arms for 5 years.
FAQs: All the Answers on the <strong>JCPOA</strong>Q:A:Is this a “bad deal”?No. This is a good deal — the <strong>JCPOA</strong> is strong, verifiable, and long-term.No other approach ensures the strict limits andYou don’t have to take our word for it — ask our allies in theunprecedented inspections we were able to negotiate. The United Kingdom, Germany, and France, who have been with<strong>JCPOA</strong> cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a nuclear weapon. us every step of the way at the negotiating table. Ask theAnd it ensures the vigorous inspections and transparency dozens of countries that have already come out in support ofnecessary to verify that Iran cannot cheat and pursue athis deal, the UN, and the Vatican. Ask the numerous formernuclear weapon without us knowing and having time to act. Israeli military, intelligence, and security officials, who are allIt ensures that sanctions can snap back into place if Iran saying that this deal makes Israel safer. The world supportsviolates the deal. And it is long-term, including significant this deal.elements that will be permanent.Q:A:Shouldn’t we have just walked away from the table and kept the interim deal in place?The final Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (<strong>JCPOA</strong>) goes leaps andbounds beyond the interim JPOA in terms of restrictions on Iran’s nuclearprogram and far-reaching transparency measures.It doesn’t just halt the progress and roll back key aspects ofIran’s program, as the JPOA did, it requires permanent stepsbe taken to verifiably ensure that Iran cannot get a nuclearweapon. The Arak heavy water reactor is just one example:Under the JPOA, Iran could not do further work on Arak;under the <strong>JCPOA</strong>, Iran has to physically remove the core, fillit with concrete, and fundamentally change the design so itwon’t be producing plutonium that could be used in a bomb.The critics were wrong once before. Many who opposed theinterim deal have now come around to acknowledging thatour negotiators got a good deal. We held out for a deal thatmet all of our key objectives, and we got it. The deal alsoincludes the most comprehensive verification regime evernegotiated, as well as a means to “snap back” multilateral anddomestic sanctions in the event Iran decides to cheat.Q:A:Did we just take whatever deal we could get, because we wanted this deal too much?If we wanted a bad deal, we could have had one a long time ago. But thePresident and our negotiators insisted on waiting until Iran made the toughdecisions that were needed to get the good deal that we got.Hundreds of dedicated professionals from the Departmentsof State, Energy (including our leading national labs),Treasury, the Intelligence Community, and other agenciesworked tirelessly over the past few years and more to testevery part of this deal and make sure that it did exactly whatthe President demanded — that it effectively cut off all Iran’spathways to enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon.And we made clear to the Iranians — both publicly andprivately — that we would walk away if we could not get a dealthat met our objectives.
- Page 1 and 2: THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL:WHAT YOU NEED
- Page 3 and 4: THE DETAILSOF THE JCPOA
- Page 5 and 6: Blocking the Pathways toa Nuclear W
- Page 10 and 11: Q:A:Aren’t “anytime, anywhere
- Page 12 and 13: Q:A:Shouldn’t we just go back to
- Page 14 and 15: Q:A:Why didn’t the deal stick to
- Page 18: JCPOA Does Not Simply Delayan Irani
- Page 21 and 22: Multilateral Tools••We will sti
- Page 23 and 24: Designation AuthoritiesMissiles:Aut
- Page 25 and 26: Iran Faces Large and Pressing Domes
- Page 27 and 28: WINEP BenchmarksAdvanced Centrifuge
- Page 29 and 30: √Commitment Satisfied in the JCPO
- Page 31 and 32: √√Commitment Satisfied in the J
- Page 33 and 34: WHAT THEY’RE SAYINGABOUT THE JCPO
- Page 35 and 36: “The nuclear deal advances wester
- Page 37 and 38: Regional Editorials on the Iran Dea
- Page 39 and 40: Implementation Is What Will Determi
- Page 41 and 42: FloridaFor Those Who Accuse Preside
- Page 43 and 44: IdahoNegotiations Produced Nuclear
- Page 45 and 46: MarylandIf The Standard Is That No
- Page 47 and 48: MissouriIran Nuclear Deal Is A Path
- Page 49 and 50: New YorkAn Iran Nuclear Deal That R
- Page 51 and 52: The Agreement Reflects A Calculated
- Page 53 and 54: TennesseeIt Is Also A Beginning Tha
- Page 55 and 56: What the World is Saying about the
- Page 57 and 58:
China“The achievement of a compre
- Page 59 and 60:
Other World Leaders“I warmly welc
- Page 61 and 62:
Public statements of support from t
- Page 63 and 64:
THE IRAN PROJECTwww.theiranproject.
- Page 65 and 66:
THE IRAN PROJECTwww.theiranproject.
- Page 67 and 68:
Letter to the President from over 1
- Page 69 and 70:
Amb. (ret.) Ulric Haynes, Jr. Ambas
- Page 71 and 72:
JULY 17, 2015Atlantic Council Iran
- Page 73 and 74:
Russia, whose cooperation in imposi
- Page 75 and 76:
Because there is so little trust th
- Page 77 and 78:
Committee on International Justice
- Page 79 and 80:
THE WHITE HOUSEOffice of the Press
- Page 81 and 82:
As Iran takes steps to implement th
- Page 83 and 84:
We do not have to accept an inevita
- Page 85 and 86:
Key Excerpts of the Joint Comprehen
- Page 87 and 88:
• Iran will allow the IAEA to mon
- Page 89 and 90:
Press Availability on Nuclear Deal
- Page 91 and 92:
purposes. And Iran will not build a
- Page 93 and 94:
So let me make a couple of points c
- Page 95 and 96:
his team, while tough, always profe
- Page 97 and 98:
WASHINGTON POST OP-EDJohn Kerry and
- Page 99 and 100:
President Obama has said clearly th
- Page 101 and 102:
Remember that, two years ago, when
- Page 103 and 104:
Written Testimony of Jacob J. Lew,
- Page 105 and 106:
The United States will also maintai
- Page 107 and 108:
Secretary Ernest MonizTestimony bef
- Page 109 and 110:
contribute to the development of a
- Page 111 and 112:
DAVID CAMERON, PRIME MINISTER OF GR