- Page 1 and 2: www.ipms-ethiopia.orgConcepts and p
- Page 3 and 4: Authors’ affiliationsAnandajayase
- Page 5 and 6: 5.5 Actor analysis 1895.6 Participa
- Page 7 and 8: PrefaceThis source book is a produc
- Page 9 and 10: civil society, farmer organizations
- Page 11 and 12: Table 1.1. Key features of paradigm
- Page 13 and 14: farmers analyse, choose, experiment
- Page 15 and 16: experimentations are conducted with
- Page 17 and 18: Steps/participants Objectives Activ
- Page 19 and 20: Action research not only enables th
- Page 21 and 22: 3. From research findings to tentat
- Page 23 and 24: that governs the way these interact
- Page 25 and 26: improvement to enhance supply chain
- Page 27 and 28: often managing a ‘portfolio’ of
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 1.7. An example from the fur
- Page 31 and 32: go for each value—with added comp
- Page 33 and 34: 1.3.10 Positive devianceThis is a n
- Page 35: Hall A and Nahdy S. 1999. New metho
- Page 39 and 40: they were geared to production and
- Page 41 and 42: the basic premise of T&V was traini
- Page 43 and 44: some reforms, especially in Latin A
- Page 45 and 46: Complexity: Involves the diverse so
- Page 47 and 48: is further aggravated by difficulti
- Page 49 and 50: - Decentralization is the transfer
- Page 51 and 52: • In situations where farming is
- Page 53 and 54: • Coupons to agricultural bank lo
- Page 55 and 56: Privatization has been attempted by
- Page 57 and 58: Thus, inter-connectivity is closely
- Page 59 and 60: departments, foreign and local data
- Page 61 and 62: information on agricultural practic
- Page 63 and 64: among field professionals. Similar
- Page 65 and 66: • Linkages and support—resource
- Page 67 and 68: Outside interventions normally inte
- Page 69 and 70: In many cases potential partners al
- Page 71 and 72: towards sustainability, extension i
- Page 73 and 74: • Taking some risks by including
- Page 75 and 76: communities understand their person
- Page 77 and 78: intensive organization, which is in
- Page 79 and 80: In addition, the competitive intere
- Page 81 and 82: • The extension service’s oppor
- Page 83 and 84: Ameur C. 1994. Agricultural extensi
- Page 85 and 86: Mulhall A and Garforth C. 2000. Equ
- Page 87 and 88:
Zijp W. 1998. Extension: Empowermen
- Page 89 and 90:
MethodsMethods refer to the techniq
- Page 91 and 92:
extension agent responsible for dif
- Page 93 and 94:
deprived and the excluded in terms
- Page 95 and 96:
the community’s own facilitators.
- Page 97 and 98:
underestimation of the great comple
- Page 99 and 100:
International development agenciesa
- Page 101 and 102:
• The performance of researchers'
- Page 103 and 104:
3.3.3 Commodity extension modelThis
- Page 105 and 106:
3.3.5 NGO (international and local)
- Page 107 and 108:
public demand for change, many indi
- Page 109 and 110:
Usually decisions have to be made c
- Page 111 and 112:
• The most important factor is th
- Page 113 and 114:
Bennet C. 1990. Cooperative extensi
- Page 115 and 116:
4 Group formation and management fo
- Page 117 and 118:
• Farmer or producer organization
- Page 119 and 120:
• Research induced FRGs potential
- Page 121 and 122:
• Other activities that are not d
- Page 123 and 124:
a group does not guarantee equal ac
- Page 125 and 126:
4.4.3 Groups as individual enhancem
- Page 127 and 128:
that FGs can be effective mechanism
- Page 129 and 130:
Experience in Tanzania revealed adv
- Page 131 and 132:
organizations are registered under
- Page 133 and 134:
of groups is a process that both gr
- Page 135 and 136:
• set SMART objectives to fulfill
- Page 137 and 138:
Table 4.1. Stages in the group deve
- Page 139 and 140:
Stage Purpose Behavioural patterns
- Page 141 and 142:
2. Formulation of group goals and o
- Page 143 and 144:
positions, members need to understa
- Page 145 and 146:
It is very important that all those
- Page 147 and 148:
Leadership style Characteristics of
- Page 149 and 150:
In discussing bad leadership with g
- Page 151 and 152:
iv. Withdrawing: acting bored and i
- Page 153 and 154:
• be a good listener and monitor
- Page 155 and 156:
A template for work plan is provide
- Page 157 and 158:
Logical Framework (Project Planning
- Page 159 and 160:
All groups want to succeed in their
- Page 161 and 162:
MotivationMotivation can simply be
- Page 163 and 164:
eflections on the life of the group
- Page 165 and 166:
At point A both conflict and perfor
- Page 167 and 168:
List all problem areas• Prioritiz
- Page 169 and 170:
2. Mapping of group structureOne vi
- Page 171 and 172:
Asgelil D and Tekalign M. 2001. Cli
- Page 173 and 174:
Rural Development Committee monogra
- Page 175 and 176:
Participatory Learning and Action (
- Page 177 and 178:
Box 5.1. Tools and techniques used
- Page 179 and 180:
5.2.3 Formal/verification surveyAlt
- Page 181 and 182:
3. Define and understand the local
- Page 183 and 184:
problems and opportunities. A trans
- Page 185 and 186:
5.2.11 Venn diagram/’chapati’ d
- Page 187 and 188:
This may also yield valuable inform
- Page 189 and 190:
Key questions on benefits• What b
- Page 191 and 192:
Table 5.5. Format for the Stakehold
- Page 193 and 194:
Co-operativeFarmerResearchExtension
- Page 195 and 196:
5.5.3 Actor determinant diagramThis
- Page 197 and 198:
NAR S to developc apac ity in P R A
- Page 199 and 200:
The tools discussed in this section
- Page 201 and 202:
• Specify what, when, who, how et
- Page 203 and 204:
eflection;• Action: the process a
- Page 205 and 206:
2. Ranking. A method of ranking can
- Page 207 and 208:
are out of the control of farmers m
- Page 209 and 210:
Figure 5.19. Example of participato
- Page 211 and 212:
Figure 5.21. Example of a resource
- Page 213 and 214:
5.9.2 Implementing PRCAPRCA uses PR
- Page 215 and 216:
• Idioms, and existing/new images
- Page 217 and 218:
• Systems thinkingSituations are
- Page 219 and 220:
5.11 Participatory Extension Approa
- Page 221 and 222:
During implementation, new question
- Page 223 and 224:
Purpose of community mobilizationCo
- Page 225 and 226:
Step 2: Identifying potential leade
- Page 227 and 228:
Step 9: Implementing selected proje
- Page 229 and 230:
• Aim for a comprehensive respons
- Page 231 and 232:
Bianchi RR and Kossoudji SA. 2001.
- Page 233 and 234:
4. Information storage, whether man
- Page 235 and 236:
Evaluation in general addresses fou
- Page 237 and 238:
6.1.4 ImpactThe term ‘impact’ m
- Page 239 and 240:
Box 6.2. Types of research outputTh
- Page 241 and 242:
quantitative methods. Retrospective
- Page 243 and 244:
Table 6.1. Impact types, techniques
- Page 245 and 246:
However, the ARR measure is not alw
- Page 247 and 248:
2. It can contribute to the develop
- Page 249 and 250:
evaluation. The evaluators collect
- Page 251 and 252:
In order to make this step particip
- Page 253 and 254:
• The third style is when the eva
- Page 255 and 256:
attributes, traits or characteristi
- Page 257 and 258:
• Experience suggests that it is
- Page 259 and 260:
This means that:- Inaccurate observ
- Page 261 and 262:
is appropriate, such as tables, gra
- Page 263 and 264:
• Looks at both internal and exte
- Page 265 and 266:
• It is useful for process monito
- Page 267 and 268:
• What information do we need and
- Page 269 and 270:
Who? Which provides the partners, s
- Page 271:
www.ilri.orgISBN 92-9146-234-9