Guitérrez-Alamo, A., P. Pérez de Ayala, M. W. A. Verstegen, L. A. Den Hartog, and M. J.Villamide. 2008. Variability in wheat: factors affecting its nutritional value. World‟sPoult. Sci. J. 64:20-39.Harms, R. H., and C. F. Simpson. 1975. Biotin deficiency as a possible cause of swelling andulceration of foot pads. Poult. Sci. 54:1711–1713.Harms, R. H., R. A. Voitle, D. M. Janky, and H. R. Wilson. 1979. The influence of biotinsupplementation of broiler hens and foot pad dermatitis in the progeny. Nutr. Rep. Int.19:603–606.Hayes, S. H., G. L. Cromwell, T. S. Stahly, and T. H. Johnson. 1979. Availability ofphosphorus in corn, wheat, and barley for the chick. J. Anim. Sci. 49:992-999.Herenda, D. C., and D. A. Franco. 1996. Musculoskeletal system. Pages 145-146 in PoultryDiseases and Meat Hygiene, a Color Atlas. 1st ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Herting, D. C., and E. J. E. Drury. 1969. Alpha-tocopherol content of cereal grains andprocessed cereals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 17(4):785-790.Hick, A. F., and Lerner I. M. 1949. Heritability crooked toes in chickens. Poult. Sci. 28:625-626.Hicks, A. F. 1949. Crooked toes: Poultry defect may be hereditary nutritional ormanagemental in type. Calif. Agric. 3(10):14-15.Hughes, B. O., N. L. Carmichael, A. W. Walker, and P. N. Grigor. 1997. Low incidence ofaggression in large flocks if laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:215-234.Hulet, R. M. 2007. Managing incubation: Where are we and why? Poult. Sci. 86:1017–1019.Hutchison, S., E. B. Kegley, J. K. Apple, T. J. Wistuba, and D. C. Rule. 2004. Poultry fataddition to finishing rations influences the fatty acid composition of muscle tissue andadipose tissue. Arkansas Animal Science Deparment Report 2004.http://arkansasagnews.uark.<strong>edu</strong>/522-30.pdf. Accessed Mar. 2010.International grains council. 2004. World grain statistics. London. http://www.igc.org.ukJensen, P. 2000. The welfare of chicken kept for meat production (broilers). Report of theScientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission,Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General: Brussels, Belgium.27
Johansson, K., J. Örberg, A. B. Carlgren, and M. Wilhelmson. 1996. Selection for eggshellstrength in laying hens using shell membrane characteristics. Br. Poult. Sci.37:757–763.Johnston, P. M., and C. L. Comar. 1955. Distribution and contribution of calcium from thealbumen, yolk, and shell to the developing chick embryo. Am. J. Phys. 183:365-370.Jongbloed, A. W., Z. Mroz, and P. A. Kemme. 1992. The effect of supplementary Aspergillusniger phytase in diets for pigs on concentration and apparent digestibility of dry matter,total phosphorus, and phytic acid in different sections of the alimentary tract. J. AnimalSci. 70:1159-1168.Jortner, B. S., J. Cherry, T. I. Lidsky, C. Manetto, and L. Shell. 1987. Peripheral neuropathyof dietary riboflavin deficiency in chickens. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 46:544-555.Julian, R. 1998. Rapid growth problems: Ascites and skeletal deformities in broilers. Poult.Sci. 77:1773-1780.Julian, R. J. 1984. Valgus-varus deformity of the intertarsal joint in broiler chickens. Can.Vet. J. 25(6):254-258.Julian, R. J. 2004. Evaluating the impact of metabolic disorders on the welfare of broilers.Pages 51–59 in Measuring and Auditing Broiler Welfare. C. Weeks, and A. Butterworth,eds. CAB Int., Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.Kestin, S. C., G. Su, and P. Sørensen. 1999. Different commercial broiler crosses havedifferent susceptibilities to leg weakness. Poult. Sci. 78:1085–1090.Kestin, S. C., S. Gorden, G. Su, and P. Sørensen. 2001. Relationships in broiler chickensbetween lameness, live weight, growth rate and age. Vet. Rec. 148:195–197.Kestin, S. C., T. G. Knowles, A. E. Tinch, and N. G. Gregory, 1992. Prevalence of leg weaknessin broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Vet. Rec. 131:190-194.Kidd, M. T., N. B. Anthony, and S. R. Lee. 1992. Progeny performance when dams andchicks are fed supplemental zinc. Poult. Sci. 71:1201-1206.Kjaer, J. B., G. Su, B. L. Nielsen, and P. Sørensen. 2006. Foot pad dermatitis and hock burnin broiler chickens and degree of inheritance. Poult. Sci. 85:1342–1348.Knowles T. G., S. C. Kestin, S. M. Haslam, S. N. Brown, and L. E. Green. 2008. Legdisorders in broiler chickens: Prevalence, risk factors and Prevention. PLoS ONE28
- Page 1 and 2: ABSTRACTEUSEBIO BALCAZAR, PAMELA EL
- Page 3 and 4: Effect of Breeder Nutrition and Fee
- Page 5 and 6: BIBLIOGRAPHYPamela Eliana Eusebio B
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF TABLES …
- Page 9 and 10: Broiler Experiment 2 ..............
- Page 11 and 12: LIST OF TABLESCHAPTER ITable I-1. N
- Page 13 and 14: experiment 2 …………………
- Page 15 and 16: eeder feeder space change for the p
- Page 17 and 18: INTRODUCTIONThere is a worldwide co
- Page 19 and 20: importance according to reports fro
- Page 21 and 22: (Berry et al., 1996), ascorbic acid
- Page 23 and 24: Rotated TibiaRotated tibia is descr
- Page 25 and 26: Yolk and its lipid content also aff
- Page 27 and 28: Australia, Canada (Bird, 1997; Inte
- Page 29 and 30: except for copper that is mostly pr
- Page 31 and 32: Table I-3. Total phosphorus, phytat
- Page 33 and 34: vitamin E, and the water-soluble an
- Page 35 and 36: 2007). For instance, a sigmoid feed
- Page 37 and 38: REFERENCESAbdel-Salam, Z. A., A. M.
- Page 39 and 40: Choct, M. 1997. Feed Non-Starch Pol
- Page 41: Febrer, K., T. A. Jones, C. A. Donn
- Page 45 and 46: Leksrisompong, N., M. Argüelles-Ra
- Page 47 and 48: Nelson, T. S. 1967. The utilization
- Page 49 and 50: Reddi, A. H. 2000. Initiation and p
- Page 51 and 52: Starcher, B. C., C. H. Hill, and J.
- Page 53 and 54: Weiss, R. E., and A. H. Reddi. 1980
- Page 55 and 56: INTRODUCTIONThe nutrition and feedi
- Page 57 and 58: second objective was to determine t
- Page 59 and 60: feathers. Fertility was calculated
- Page 61 and 62: Table II-1. Composition of broiler
- Page 63 and 64: heavier (P < 0.05) compared with th
- Page 65 and 66: ABCFigure II-2. Effects of diet typ
- Page 67 and 68: Cumulative mortality (%)LevelsMain
- Page 69 and 70: Table II-3. Effects of diet type, f
- Page 71 and 72: Figure II-7. Effects of diet type (
- Page 73 and 74: Table II-4. P-values for the effect
- Page 75 and 76: Table II-6. P-values for the effect
- Page 77 and 78: DISCUSSIONBody Weights and Cumulati
- Page 79 and 80: Reproductive PerformanceReproductiv
- Page 81 and 82: Y:A ratio due to higher yolk percen
- Page 83 and 84: REFERENCESAltuntaş, E., and A. Şe
- Page 85 and 86: Jong, I. C., V. S. Voorst, D. A. Eh
- Page 87 and 88: Peebles E. D., C. D. Zumwalt, S. M.
- Page 89 and 90: concluded that maternal diet type a
- Page 91 and 92: The feeding program of female broil
- Page 93 and 94:
Hatching ExperimentAll the egg prod
- Page 95 and 96:
ijk : Effect of the second order in
- Page 97 and 98:
program, and the same feeder space
- Page 99 and 100:
Table III-2. Effect of breeder diet
- Page 101 and 102:
Table III-4. Effect of breeder/broi
- Page 103 and 104:
DISCUSSIONEgg Weight, Eggshell Prop
- Page 105 and 106:
eproductive tract. Melnychuk et al.
- Page 107 and 108:
CONCLUSIONSIt was concluded that br
- Page 109 and 110:
Cruickshank, E. M. 1934. Studies in
- Page 111 and 112:
Oviedo-Rondón, E. O., J. Small, M.
- Page 113 and 114:
Van der Eerden, B. C. J., M. Karper
- Page 115 and 116:
INTRODUCTIONBone development starts
- Page 117 and 118:
MATERIAL AND METHODSBroiler Breeder
- Page 119 and 120:
Chickens were group weighed at plac
- Page 121 and 122:
Pens were included as random effect
- Page 123 and 124:
Table IV-2. Composition of broiler
- Page 125 and 126:
corn-based diets produced progeny t
- Page 127 and 128:
Feed Conversion Ratio Adjusted for
- Page 129 and 130:
Table IV-4. Effects of diet type, m
- Page 131 and 132:
Maternal feeding programs alone aff
- Page 133 and 134:
Table IV-7. Effects of diet type, m
- Page 135 and 136:
Progeny Mortality. No significant (
- Page 137 and 138:
Six-wk-old male chickens from 32 an
- Page 139 and 140:
Table IV-11. Effects of diet type,
- Page 141 and 142:
Probability of observing crooked to
- Page 143 and 144:
At both breeder ages evaluated, pro
- Page 145 and 146:
progeny with more locomotion proble
- Page 147 and 148:
Hocking, P. M., and R. Bernard. 199
- Page 149 and 150:
CHAPTER V: EFFECT OF BREEDER FEEDIN
- Page 151 and 152:
Several previous investigations hav
- Page 153 and 154:
starter diet was fed from 0 to 4 wk
- Page 155 and 156:
At 46 wk, all eggs produced during
- Page 157 and 158:
Leg Health EvaluationAt 4 and 6 wk
- Page 159 and 160:
correct for variable number of broi
- Page 161 and 162:
RESULTSEgg CharacteristicsAt 31 wk,
- Page 163 and 164:
were smaller (P < 0.05) than chicke
- Page 165 and 166:
progeny compared to A strain broile
- Page 167 and 168:
Bone Traits and Bone Mineral Densit
- Page 169 and 170:
49-d body weight (g) of the progeny
- Page 171 and 172:
Probability of observing progenycro
- Page 173 and 174:
Probability of observing progenywal
- Page 175 and 176:
Progeny bone mineral density (g/cm
- Page 177 and 178:
Progeny bone mineral content (g)Pro
- Page 179 and 180:
eared under the same conditions dur
- Page 181 and 182:
Brake et al., 1997). Therefore, the
- Page 183 and 184:
that discard physical egg effects o
- Page 185 and 186:
practices and environmental conditi
- Page 187 and 188:
compared to the provision of less f
- Page 189 and 190:
Broilers that had greater prevalenc
- Page 191 and 192:
Brake, J., T. J. Walsh, and S. V. V
- Page 193 and 194:
Hayes, S. H., G. L. Cromwell, T. S.
- Page 195 and 196:
Meuer, H. J., and R. Baumann. 1988.
- Page 197 and 198:
Roberts, J. R., and M. Choct. 2006.
- Page 199 and 200:
Watkins, B. A. 1991. Importance of
- Page 201 and 202:
eeders restricted to the LS feeding