11.08.2015 Views

THE HOLOCAUST IS OVER WE MUST RISE FROM ITS ASHES

the holocaust is over; we must rise from its ashes - Welcome to ...

the holocaust is over; we must rise from its ashes - Welcome to ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and outlooks. It was not just a difference of opinion on text interpretation, but apolitical argument between the Shammai zealots and isolationists and the Hillelmoderates and pragmatists. This is how the dispute is described:Rabbi Abba said that Shmuel said: for three years the house ofShammai and the House of Hillel were divided. These were saying thelaw is according to us and those were saying the law is according tous. A divine voice came out and said: Both these and those are livingwords of God and the law is according to Hillel. If both were livingwords of God, why did the House of Hillel deserve that law beaccording to them? Because they were agreeable and meek, and theystudied their words together with the words of Shammai. And not justthat, they cited the words of the House of Shammai prior to their ownwords. 11The dispute between the two schools was so bitter it caused bloodshed betweentheir followers. There followed three years of total disagreement that tore apartIsraeli society. The religious dispute is understood, at least on its face: God said hisword, and the scholars of the two schools of thought argued as to the meaning of the“one and only,” as God is one and his truth is one with no alternatives. At the end ofthree years, a “divine voice” decided: “Both these and the others are living words ofGod and the law is according to Hillel.” It is not clear what that “divine voice” was. Itcould be an echo of the public sentiment that became the divine voice, vox populivox dei. It may be what we call today public opinion, yet the voice altered the debateculture in Israel unrecognizably.If the only God said his word, how could such fundamentally differentinterpretations exist and still be described as “living words of God”? It is either onethat is God’s word, or the other, but both? What kind of monotheism allowsmultiplicity of opinions and truths? It turns out, according to this Talmudic legend,which has become an asset of Judaism, that there could be more than one truth withinthe oneness of God. This revolutionary idea can provide great support to thereinvention and renovation of Jewish religious and interpretive pluralism. I hope thatChristianity and Islam also have such tools that enable a quantum leap forward intothe next evolutionary stage of theology. Without such tools and breakthroughs we arebound to go backward. We may have to resort to the dark ages of spiritual darkness

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!