248aggressiveness given lr,t thenations of tire Old Continent isafforded by a comparison oftire division of internationaltlade between the clifferent continentalgrorps and Ure LrnitedStates, which Lirings out thefact that Hurope's share, afterthe decline notetl cluring anclimmediatell' after the war, hasgrown from 49.6% in 1926 to52.2% in 1929, and that notwithstandingtho fact that 1929was, with the exception of1920, the record-breaking 1.ear'for American foreign tracle.In 1930 foreign tracle declinedfor all countries, Jrut thesirrinkage was less marhed inthe leadirrg European countrie-qthan in the United States.illhese data shoulil certainl,vnot be ilterpreted as indicatingEnropean prosperity 2n4'\merican ilepression; thatrvoulcl be ridiculous. lllhe-1' o11-1;' point to the economic vitalityo1 the O1d O'ontinent.Some Aspects of BusinessOrganization in Europe andAmericaf I is llo easv ruattet' to cotrrflror'" -\mericart arrrl Ilttropeanindustrial systems. If anopinion is to be formed on thebasis of concrete data weshoulc'l rather speak of theBritish, German, Hungarian.Russian, etc., inclustrial s)-stems,than of the Buropean.The tlilTelence betu-een intlustrialorganization in one Ettr"opeancountrY as compareclto anothcr"is often rnuch grerrterthan Jretween one of tltosecountries and Americzr.It is safe to say that ever)'Amcrican is b,orn thrice as richas every European I nor neetlthis cause surprise. Granteclthat some European cotrntriespossess important raw inatcrialsantl fue1s, ancl that thcUnitcct States lack some rar'materials, yet, generally speaking,natural resources are moreabundant, more varied andmorc acce-qsible in the llnitedATLANTICA. JUNE, i931States than in Europe. But itis not onl,v a clnestion of naturalresource-q. Even if thenatulal resorlrces of Europerrnd the LTrritecl States wereequal, the latter woulcl still enjo1'a priviiegecl position clue tothe lesser dcrrsitS. of their popuIation.N{ONt} dilTerentiating factorsin the situation rvehar-e lilst and foremost tiregreat size ancl remarkableuniforrnity of the Americanmarket, factors whose cumulativeeffects react on the wholeorganizzrtion of production, allowingthe reduction of c0-qts.Of the size of the Amcricanmarket we neerl on11' say thatthe numl-rol of consurners isrlouLrle that of the largest Europc,anmarket.As legartls its uniformitr- rvcshali not be far florn the truthin stating that the 120 rnillioninhabitants of the llniteclStaters are more urriform irrtheir tastes than thc ferv rniliioninhal:ritants of the smallestEuropc'an countr1..'Ihe size and uniforrnitr oftire market afTord the indispen--sable conditiorrs f or enablingint-1ustr'1- to olganize on themost eflicierLt lines. This accountscluite largely for thesllccess of rnass productiorirnethocls in the llnitecl Statos.based on iarge scale output andstandarclization. Onlv whenthese trvo conclitioris are fairly-*tzrbie is it possible for massprocluction to reduce costs. Ifstanclardization is to effect asar.ing'rnen mnst be replacecl brmachiner-v,ancl this is onl,v ecunomicallyaclvantageous rvhenthe chalges entailecl b). thelarger capital investments lequiredcan be distriJruted overa largel quantit--v of goods.Serious rniscalculations resultfrom &n-y attempt to escapefrorn this closed circle. Theprevailing clepression has madeit clearer than ever that massprocluction i-s not alwavs anunmixed blessing, and it is notsurprising that many Europeanindristrial leaders havecome to the conclusion thatmass production methodsshoulcl he aclopted in Europewith rnuch greatel caution thanin America. 0n the other hanclthere can be no doubt that whenmass prochLction can be resortedto under far.'orable eonclitions,it allows expenditureon resealch. testing, and erperirnentingwhich promotehigirer qualit1- production.A combination of all the factorsabove mentioned has securedfor the Amelican people,and more especially forthe workers, the highest standarclof living that the worldlras vet krrown.iravc increasecl alW.\GES ' v so in Erirope, trut on arnuch smaller scale. Is thi"cclue to social narrow-rnindeclnessof the clirecting classes irrIlurope? I think this ean safel;.be clenied.The rvage problem is one ofproduction rather tharr of distlibutionofl wealth. Productivityis the main determiningfactor of wage levels and productivity,generally speaking,has increasecl in the UnitedStates at a much higher ratethan in Europe, also becauseof the natural antl rnarket conriitionsrnentioned above (naturalresources, large rnarketarea, mechanisation, standardization,mass production, etc.)The rate of increase has beenremarkable especiall;' of recentYears. From 1919 to 1927 thevolume of manufactures increasedin the tlnitecl Stateslry more than 3074c, while therrumber of workels declinecl by-!)c/,. This means that the yieldper worker rose l-rv nearly 50/..In compaling real wages in,\merica ancl in l)urnpe weshoulcl not forget the safeguardsafforded the Europeanu.orker by the widespread useof collective wage aEreements
EUROPE AND THE LTNITED STATES249l'"nr-:i soclal insur'ance. As ai-rr'?e lrercentage of the cost of:,'c'ial insnlirnce is paid by the':1trlrlo\-ers thev amount tcl aleal aclclitiori to wag'es, risingrl ser.eral European countr,iesi-' o\-el' i5% of the m,one.r' wzggi,r.id,Distribution Problems-f- H I'l gror-tlr irnt'l irrrlrrove-I nrent of means ol eomruunicationancl the spr:ezrc-l ofmole refined tastes cl-en amongtire less developed social clas-q-,:,r, dLre partiy to impror.ed puhiicit;'-anci aclr'ertising methotls,uzrle cleprir,'ed many categories,tf producers ancl traclers, bothiarge and small, of the pr.ivilegeclposition the,v used to occu1tr.in relation to consumers.Salesmanship, in the best sense,rf the worcl, has become an essentialfeature in the make-upof the business man, and in arricler sense the problem of clistril-rutionis one claiming the attentionof all rvho desire topromote social prosperit,v.This fundamental evolutionin lhe relations between con-,rumels and producers has beenaccompanied b"v nerv aspects irrthe competition of produccr.sas among theniselves, rnore especiallyin ihe Unitecl States.where it woultl seem for irrstancethat competition is nolonger limited to procluccrs ofsimilar goods but exists alsobetrveen proclucers of difterentkinds of goocls representing alternativeclaims for a share oftlie consumer's c1olla,r-As a rnatter of fact the rnainconclition gor.erning the marketfor: consumers' goods isthe econornic status or purchasingpo\r-er of the population.Hnl substantial ililTerencebetween European anclAmerican purchasing power,along rn'ith the different size oftlie two markets, goes a longl,'a,\' to erplain the difference-qin the deveiopment of their. r.e-:pecli\'e tli:tIilrrrtiVr, s1-stcmsantl of the studies concerningthem in Europe and in thcLrnitecl States. The progressmac'le in this fie1d by the New,as conlpareci to the 01d Contin-Dr. Alberto Pirelli\ .\thrtr: ::'Sxd'r,.,1.1.;l'i$t'ent, is truly remar.kable antlclaims our adnrirzrtion.I n'ill only point to :r factrvhich perhaps lrns counter tocurrerit opinion but to rvhichzrvailaltle dzrta clearll' point;given the purchasing power,ancl allowing for a certain timelagclue to slon'cr acl.justmerrtsto norrelt)', the European consumerdoes clesire and doesbuy the sarne comforts, conveniences,and lururics as havecreated "the new competition"rvhich, a-q I har.e zrlreadv said,is prevalent irr the tiniterlStates. This justi{ies the forecastthat methods of tlistributionn4rich have provecl theirr-alue in the far more sparsely1;opulatecl areas of Aurericashould establish tiremseh,'es inclue course throughout Europc.fn the Lrnited States the feelingof living in a countr-l,' exceptionall5.privileged in itsriatural resources, utilized Jtr. acomparatively small population,the consequent certaintrthatthere is an opportunity athand for everybody, that thereis "ahvays roorn at the top,"ancl the joy of success, havc'createcl a rvide-spread optirnism, a _-r'outhful con{idence, astrivirrg for progress, a clogma,of higJr productior] even alnousthc x.orking classes, iill ofwhich are trcmenclous arssetsin the economic trnd sor:ialfield-s.The pi'oblern of the procluctionof new r.ealth has been anrlstill is paramount in the LilileclStatcs, whereas that of tlistribution of existing rvealth appearsto be pa,ramount inBurope.Trade Developments tsetweenthe United States andEurope] \. errrrnirrins tr.a,lc r.elalionrI hetweerr Eur.opc arrd -\rncr.icawe are at once str.uch by tlrrrirlportance of the -lmerica,rrmarket for Europe. FromI910-1.1 to 1926-29 Eur.opearrexports to the {Initetl Statesincreasecl bv an annual average of nearlv 500 rnillion rlollars.We mr:rst bear in mirrd thzli,it is dilfrcult to speakof l{uropeas a Continental exporting unitfor the total is constructed orrthe basis of national trarle statistics n hich inr:lurle the ex,changes ltetn'ccn the sevcralErropean countries as well asthose betrveen them and ul'el.-seas markets. This retluces the1:rercentage ratio of Europeanexports directed to ovLrrsea,scountric.s, ernci arnong theut l.lreUnited States. Yet if we wereto exclucle from our consiclerationinter-European exports afalse impression would begiven, for each of these colrntriesis an independent rnarket.ff we bear this in mincl rveshall not ).re sur.prisecl to frndthat the European nationsplace in the tlnited States onlv(Continued on parlc 278)
- Page 1 and 2: NTI LTHE ITALIAII I}IOITTIILY ISEYI
- Page 3 and 4: AI-I-ANTIC.\, ILrNE, 1931 241TeleBl
- Page 5 and 6: ATLANTICA'S OBStrRVATORY243rest. es
- Page 7 and 8: ATT,ANTIT,AThe ltalian Monthly Re.r
- Page 9: EuPCpe .nJ thn untteJ St.tesbe D".
- Page 13 and 14: of being a creature of theearth, th
- Page 15 and 16: SALANDRA'S PART IN THE WORI,D \\IAR
- Page 17 and 18: It. li.n EJucc ttn,in E.nlu Amepico
- Page 19 and 20: \)(/huN eql n.tDon tn?A Do"onin Dno
- Page 21 and 22: WHY NEGI-ECT DANTE?' ri " poets. lt
- Page 23 and 24: .,''..:lqtiArlir:tilitilt:TorboleL"
- Page 25 and 26: Dces DepPessicn Afft.t A nt?D".iJ"J
- Page 27 and 28: Th" E.l.nce rf Tn.Jn Ent neenIt. l,
- Page 29 and 30: Tl," lQreolIt"honLJ n ivensitgfon F
- Page 31 and 32: Exhibition of lourisln in 1911.:,nd
- Page 33 and 34: AiJinq thn C"lr-bu, l-i cspit. l,Th
- Page 35 and 36: B ooks In ReviewTHE MODERN ITALIAN
- Page 37 and 38: llroclamation of the German Empirea
- Page 39 and 40: tion is not la f olle d,u logis,lh.
- Page 41 and 42: EUROPE AND THE UNITED ST:\TES279mat
- Page 43 and 44: to the exceptional ciirnate ofthe r
- Page 45 and 46: irclLrcle Charles IIacl
- Page 47 and 48: THE ITAI-IANS IN THtr UNITED STATES
- Page 49 and 50: A Mlnlaturc Anthology,,IL BAON VENT
- Page 51 and 52: SPBCIAL OF'FER TO OUR PAID SUBSCRIB