ITF - UTSA Provost Home - The University of Texas at San Antonio

ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 18that is in the beginning process of fully understanding its cultural values and beliefs and howthese areas fit in with a broader campus community. They are in a learning mode and as such,are willing to learn about themselves from the experts on campus. Two functions ofadministration/staff involve the creation and implementation of the policies and procedures ofthe university. There may be a tendency here to look to one another, or use their moreextensive professional networks for official answers when the area of personal and otherculture is highlighted. A review of the data by class (undergraduate) and institutional type(public) reveals that the total sample of freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors scoredslightly lower means than the norm group indicating a lesser degree of institutional globalperspective in this domain.Concomitantly, the lowest mean scores, or least global perspective area for faculty, fellinto the Community domain. This suggests that faculty may not have strong linkages withstudents and administration/staff on campus. In essence, faculty may be more prone tooperate from a “silo” approach, whereby relationships are emphasized with other faculty,rather than with broader campus constituencies. Moreover, this domain speaks to therelationships developed by higher education institutions with outside entities such as localbusinesses and agencies. Given the relatively recent focus on campus internationalization atUTSA, this finding appears consistent with an area in need of further exploration by faculty.Limitations of the StudyTwo potential limitations existed regarding this study. The first involved the assessmentinstrument used for the research. The GPI is a relatively new inventory that is gaining increasedattention by universities in the United States. Given its newer status, reliability and validity arelargely self-reported by its authors. While normed scales consist for undergraduates students,scales for broader university constituencies are either not available, or in the process of beingcollected, therefore limiting fuller and more complete comparison and contrast data. Thesecond limitation involved the generalization of the results. Less than 5% of the constituents onthe campus participated in the study. An increased sample population size may have yieldedmore representative results.ImplicationsA cross-cultural worldview rests on one’s ability to examine self, understand others, anddemonstrate proficient and inclusive relationship skills. Students, faculty, andadministration/staff in this study demonstrated increased global perspectives in terms of theirvalues and beliefs and the manner in which these areas impact others. Additionally, thesegroups hold positive global views with regard to their cultural identities.The intrapersonal considerations of students, faculty, and administration/staff arecontinually cultivated in a UTSA campus milieu that stresses its status as a Hispanic andminority serving institution. Varied programmatic opportunities are also available to thesegroups that further bolster their personal sense of selves. This finding is consistent with theemphasis that UTSA places on its identity as a Hispanic serving institution. Continuing tomaintain and build upon this these positive interpersonal interactions is warranted.While all the groups evidence culturally aware global perspectives, this does not appearto extend to more complex ways of thinking about others. Students and administration/staffdemonstrated their lowest global perspectives in the Cognitive domain. It is important thatthese groups be encouraged to examine more fully the ways in which they view others.