<strong>ITF</strong> Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion Study, 2010 50Facilit<strong>at</strong>ing Partnerships Between Universities. South African Journal <strong>of</strong> HigherEduc<strong>at</strong>ion, 16(1), 15-21.This article presents the role th<strong>at</strong> intern<strong>at</strong>ionalis<strong>at</strong>ion can play in facilit<strong>at</strong>ingpartnerships between higher educ<strong>at</strong>ion institutions across continents. An example <strong>of</strong> apartnership between a university in South Africa and a university in the United St<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong>America is be provided as authentic evidence th<strong>at</strong>, assuming the notion <strong>of</strong> ―partnering‖,intern<strong>at</strong>ionalis<strong>at</strong>ion could significantly contribute to university educ<strong>at</strong>ion.2. Bonfiglio, O. (1999). <strong>The</strong> difficulties <strong>of</strong> intern<strong>at</strong>ionalizing the undergradu<strong>at</strong>e curriculum.Journal <strong>of</strong> Studies in Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Educ<strong>at</strong>ion, 3(2), 3-18.Five reasons why U.S. colleges and universities <strong>at</strong>tempting to intern<strong>at</strong>ionalize thecurriculum have major difficulties include: (1) competing purposes and directions th<strong>at</strong> shiftwith the political and economic clim<strong>at</strong>e; (2) governmental constraints; (3) institutionalstructures th<strong>at</strong> block change; (4) theoretical assumptions about curriculum th<strong>at</strong> do not m<strong>at</strong>chglobal realities; and (5) lack <strong>of</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a to support curricular change.3. Carter, L. (2005). Globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion and science educ<strong>at</strong>ion: Rethinking science educ<strong>at</strong>ionreforms. Journal <strong>of</strong> Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 561-580.<strong>The</strong> author argues th<strong>at</strong> globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion is implic<strong>at</strong>ed in the discourses <strong>of</strong> scienceeduc<strong>at</strong>ion and research. <strong>The</strong> author further maintains th<strong>at</strong> ―developing globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion as <strong>at</strong>heoretical construct to help formul<strong>at</strong>e new questions and methods to examine thesequestions can provide science educ<strong>at</strong>ion with opportunities to expand the conceptual andanalytical frameworks <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> its present and future scholarship.‖4. Currie, J. (1998). Globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion practices and the pr<strong>of</strong>essori<strong>at</strong>e in Anglo-Pacific and NorthAmerican universities. Compar<strong>at</strong>ive Educ<strong>at</strong>ion Review, 42(1), 15-29.Globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion has brought market and business practices into universities, but withserious neg<strong>at</strong>ive ramific<strong>at</strong>ions. Interviews with 253 U.S. and Australian faculty, plus additionald<strong>at</strong>a drawn from New Zealand and Canadian studies, focused on the rise <strong>of</strong> performancebasedaccountability and corpor<strong>at</strong>e managerialism and their effects on faculty workingconditions, collegiality, and faculty st<strong>at</strong>us in the university power structure.5. De Wit, H. (1995). Str<strong>at</strong>egies for the intern<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> higher educ<strong>at</strong>ion: Acompar<strong>at</strong>ive study <strong>of</strong> Australia, Canada, Europe and the United St<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> America.(Report No. 90-74721-04-4). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED398804).This document reports on a project focusing on the development <strong>of</strong> str<strong>at</strong>egies byinstitutions <strong>of</strong> higher educ<strong>at</strong>ion for gre<strong>at</strong>er intern<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion and reformul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> themissions <strong>of</strong> teaching, research and service.6. Goodwin, C., & Nacht, M. (1991). Missing the bo<strong>at</strong>: <strong>The</strong> failure to intern<strong>at</strong>ionalizeAmerican higher educ<strong>at</strong>ion. Netherlands: Springer.
<strong>ITF</strong> Evalu<strong>at</strong>ion Study, 2010 51This book reports the results <strong>of</strong> an investig<strong>at</strong>ion into the intern<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> U.S. highereduc<strong>at</strong>ion through the experience <strong>of</strong> faculty, using impressions and d<strong>at</strong>a from extensivecampus visits and interviews <strong>at</strong> 37 institutions n<strong>at</strong>ionwide, and d<strong>at</strong>a from 4 previous studies.Chapter 7 provides case studies <strong>of</strong> five institutions with programs <strong>of</strong>fering intern<strong>at</strong>ionalexperiences: Whe<strong>at</strong>on College, Norton, Massachusetts; Bunker Hill Community College,Boston, Massachusetts; Lewis and Clark College, Portland, Oregon; <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Washington,Se<strong>at</strong>tle, Washington; and the Colorado School <strong>of</strong> Mines, Golden, Colorado.7. Kehm, B. M, & Teichler, U. (2007). Research on intern<strong>at</strong>ionalis<strong>at</strong>ion in higher educ<strong>at</strong>ion[Electronic version]. Journal <strong>of</strong> Studies in Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Educ<strong>at</strong>ion, 11(3/4), 260-273.This article address the ―general st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> research characterised by an increase <strong>of</strong>theoretically and methodologically ambitious studies without a dominant disciplinary,conceptual, or methodological ‗home.‘‖ <strong>The</strong> article address, among other ideas, the shift fromintern<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion to globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion and a systems perspective <strong>of</strong> intern<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion.8. McCabe, L. (2001). Globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion and intern<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion: <strong>The</strong> impact on educ<strong>at</strong>ionabroad programs. Journal <strong>of</strong> Studies in Intern<strong>at</strong>ional Educ<strong>at</strong>ion, 5(2), 138-145.This article asserts a need for educ<strong>at</strong>ors to consider the mission and value <strong>of</strong> studyabroad programs and their rel<strong>at</strong>ion to the processes <strong>of</strong> globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion and intern<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion.As educ<strong>at</strong>ional systems increase their emphasis on the need for intern<strong>at</strong>ional educ<strong>at</strong>ion, it willbe necessary to consider wh<strong>at</strong> types <strong>of</strong> study abroad opportunities are relevant to currentworld trends. This article <strong>at</strong>tempts to provide a framework for understanding the distinctionbetween the terms globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion and intern<strong>at</strong>ionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion and their relevance to the future <strong>of</strong>intern<strong>at</strong>ional educ<strong>at</strong>ion and study abroad programs.9. Mestenhauser, J., & Ellingboe, B. (1998). Reforming the higher educ<strong>at</strong>ion curriculum:Internalizing the campus. American Council on Educ<strong>at</strong>ion/Oryx Press Series on HigherEduc<strong>at</strong>ion. Phoenix: American Council on Educ<strong>at</strong>ion.<strong>The</strong> 13 chapters <strong>of</strong> this edited book <strong>at</strong>tempt to challenge assumptions aboutintern<strong>at</strong>ional educ<strong>at</strong>ion and urge comprehensive curricular changes involving integr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong>intern<strong>at</strong>ional and global educ<strong>at</strong>ion into all disciplines. <strong>The</strong> final chapter presents the results,resistance, and recommend<strong>at</strong>ions from a case study <strong>at</strong> a U.S. <strong>University</strong>.10. Modelski, G., Devezas, T., & Thompson, W. R. (2008). Globaliz<strong>at</strong>ion as evolutionaryprocess: Modeling global change. New York: Routeledge.This book brovides critical definitions <strong>of</strong> intern<strong>at</strong>ional and global research along withexamples. In addition, it makes a case for examining intern<strong>at</strong>ional and global research from asystems and collabor<strong>at</strong>ive perspective.
- Page 1 and 2: 2010ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1UTS
- Page 3 and 4: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 3Bio: Dr
- Page 5 and 6: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 5TABLE O
- Page 7 and 8: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 7The ans
- Page 9 and 10: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 9Accordi
- Page 11 and 12: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 11DATA C
- Page 13 and 14: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 13(aware
- Page 15 and 16: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 15Rivzi
- Page 17 and 18: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 17After
- Page 19 and 20: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 19Facult
- Page 21 and 22: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 21and or
- Page 23 and 24: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 23THEME
- Page 25 and 26: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 25One-pa
- Page 27 and 28: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 27Mainta
- Page 29 and 30: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 29Instit
- Page 31 and 32: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 31THEME
- Page 33 and 34: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 33THEME
- Page 35 and 36: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 35REFERE
- Page 37 and 38: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 37Ruther
- Page 39 and 40: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 39Append
- Page 41 and 42: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 41interv
- Page 43 and 44: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 43academ
- Page 45 and 46: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 45Englis
- Page 47 and 48: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 47issue
- Page 49: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 49"Zeszo
- Page 53 and 54: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 5317. Ti
- Page 55 and 56: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 555. Bar
- Page 57 and 58: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 57This s
- Page 59 and 60: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 59This a
- Page 61 and 62: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 61Study
- Page 63 and 64: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 63The ai
- Page 65 and 66: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 65from s
- Page 67 and 68: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 67Purpos
- Page 69 and 70: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 69studen
- Page 71 and 72: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 71This s
- Page 73 and 74: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 7389.The
- Page 75 and 76: Appendix D: Undergraduate Internati
- Page 77 and 78: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 773433 T
- Page 79 and 80: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 79planni
- Page 81 and 82: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 813013 B
- Page 83 and 84: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 832023 L
- Page 85 and 86: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 85Certif
- Page 87 and 88: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 873063 S
- Page 89 and 90: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 89regard
- Page 91 and 92: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 91the in
- Page 93 and 94: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 934996 S
- Page 95 and 96: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 95(3-0)
- Page 97 and 98: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 97teachi
- Page 99 and 100: ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 99variab
- Page 101 and 102:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 101dying
- Page 103 and 104:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 103and c
- Page 105 and 106:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1053243
- Page 107 and 108:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 107of th
- Page 109 and 110:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 109build
- Page 111 and 112:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1113543
- Page 113 and 114:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1133923
- Page 115 and 116:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1152023
- Page 117 and 118:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1171024
- Page 119 and 120:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1193613
- Page 121 and 122:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1213633
- Page 123 and 124:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1231203
- Page 125 and 126:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1252693
- Page 127 and 128:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1271214
- Page 129 and 130:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 129PHILO
- Page 131 and 132:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1313443
- Page 133 and 134:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1333103
- Page 135 and 136:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 135Mexic
- Page 137 and 138:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 137analy
- Page 139 and 140:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 139actor
- Page 141 and 142:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 141borde
- Page 143 and 144:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 143marin
- Page 145 and 146:
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (CRJ)COLLEGE OF PU
- Page 147 and 148:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 147Inter
- Page 149 and 150:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1495653
- Page 151 and 152:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 151Depar
- Page 153 and 154:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1535333
- Page 155 and 156:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1557073
- Page 157 and 158:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 157commu
- Page 159 and 160:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1595053
- Page 161 and 162:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1616633
- Page 163 and 164:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1635483
- Page 165 and 166:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 165devel
- Page 167 and 168:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 167atten
- Page 169 and 170:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 169major
- Page 171 and 172:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1715043
- Page 173 and 174:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1735043
- Page 175 and 176:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1755723
- Page 177 and 178:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 177Depar
- Page 179 and 180:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 179creat
- Page 181:
ITF Evaluation Study, 2010 1816813