m / Magnetic interactions involvingonly two particles at atime. In these figures, unlikefigure l/1, there are electricalforces as well as magnetic ones.The electrical forces are notshown here. Don’t memorizethese rules!there is zero overall electrical force on the lone particle. Each “car”that attracts the lone particle is paired with a partner on the otherside of the road that repels it. If we didn’t know about magnetism,we’d think this was the whole story: the lone particle feels no forceat all from the wire.Figure l/2 shows what we’d see if we were observing all this froma frame of reference moving along with the lone charge. Here’s wherethe relativity comes in. Relativity tells us that moving objects appearcontracted to an observer who is not moving along with them.Both lines of charge are in motion in both frames of reference, butin frame 1 they were moving at equal speeds, so their contractionswere equal. In frame 2, however, their speeds are unequal. Thedark charges are moving more slowly than in frame 1, so in frame 2they are less contracted. The light-colored charges are moving morequickly, so their contraction is greater now. The “cars” on the twosides of the “road” are no longer paired off, so the electrical forceson the lone particle no longer cancel out as they did in l/1. Thelone particle is attracted to the wire, because the particles attractingit are more dense than the ones repelling it. Furthermore, theattraction felt by the lone charge must be purely electrical, since thelone charge is at rest in this frame of reference, and magnetic effectsoccur only between moving charges and other moving charges.Now observers in frames 1 and 2 disagree about many things,but they do agree on concrete events. Observer 2 is going to seethe lone particle drift toward the wire due to the wire’s electricalattraction, gradually speeding up, and eventually hit the wire. If 2sees this collision, then 1 must as well. But 1 knows that the totalelectrical force on the lone particle is exactly zero. There must besome new type of force. She invents a name for this new type offorce: magnetism. This was a particularly simple example, becausethe force was purely magnetic in one frame of reference, and purelyelectrical in another. In general, an observer in a certain frameof reference will measure a mixture of electric and magnetic fields,while an observer in another frame, in motion with respect to thefirst, says that the same volume of space contains a different mixture.We therefore arrive at the conclusion that electric and magneticphenomena aren’t separate. They’re different sides of the same coin.We refer to electric and magnetic interactions collectively as electromagneticinteractions. Our list of the fundamental interactionsof nature now has two items on it instead of three: gravity andelectromagnetism.The basic rules for magnetic attractions and repulsions, shown infigure m, aren’t quite as simple as the ones for gravity and electricity.Rules m/1 and m/2 follow directly from our previous analysisof figure l. Rules 3 and 4 are obtained by flipping the type of chargethat the bottom particle has. For instance, rule 3 is like rule 1,120 Chapter 6 Fields
except that the bottom charge is now the opposite type. This turnsthe attraction into a repulsion. (We know that flipping the chargereverses the interaction, because that’s the way it works for electricforces, and magnetic forces are just electric forces viewed in adifferent frame of reference.)A magnetic weathervane placed near a current. example 1Figure n shows a magnetic weathervane, consisting of two chargesthat spin in circles around the axis of the arrow. (The magneticfield doesn’t cause them to spin; a motor is needed to get them tospin in the first place.) Just like the magnetic compass in figure h,the weathervane’s arrow tends to align itself in the direction perpendicularto the wire. This is its preferred orientation becausethe charge close to the wire is attracted to the wire, while thecharge far from the wire is repelled by it.Magnetic fieldsHow should we define the magnetic field? When two objects attracteach other gravitationally, their gravitational energy dependsonly on the distance between them, and it seems intuitively reasonablethat we define the gravitational field arrows like a street signthat says “this way to lower gravitational energy.” The same ideaworks fine for the electric field. But what if two charged particlesare interacting magnetically? Their interaction doesn’t just dependon the distance, but also on their motions.We need some way to pick out some direction in space, so wecan say, “this is the direction of the magnetic field around here.” Anatural and simple method is to define the magnetic field’s directionaccording to the direction a compass points. Starting from thisdefinition we can, for example, do experiments to show that themagnetic field of a current-carrying wire forms a circular pattern, o.But is this the right definition? Unlike the definitions of thegravitational and electric fields’ directions, it involves a particularhuman-constructed tool. However, compare figure h on page 117with figure n on page 121. Note that both of these tools line themselvesup along a line that’s perpendicular to the wire. In fact, nomatter how hard you try, you will never be able to invent any otherelectromagnetic device that will align itself with any other line. Allyou can do is make one that points in exactly the opposite direction,but along the same line. For instance, you could use paint to reversethe colors that label the ends of the magnetic compass needle, oryou could build a weathervane just like figure n, but spinning like aleft-handed screw instead of a right-handed one. The weathervaneand the compass aren’t even as different as they appear. Figure pshows their hidden similarities.n / Example 1o / The magnetic field curlsaround the wire in circles. Ateach point in space, the magneticcompass shows the direction ofthe field.Nature is trying to tell us something: there really is somethingSection 6.2 Electromagnetism 121
- Page 2 and 3:
copyright 2006 Benjamin Crowellrev.
- Page 4 and 5:
ContentsMomentum compared to kineti
- Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 1Conservation of Mass andEn
- Page 9 and 10:
1.2 Conservation of MassWe intuitiv
- Page 11 and 12:
masses on the spring, and they both
- Page 13 and 14:
A common source of confusion is the
- Page 15 and 16:
Discussion questionA Each of the fo
- Page 17 and 18:
l / Galileo Galilei was the first p
- Page 19 and 20:
that this wasn’t really an argume
- Page 21 and 22:
the girl on the left goes up a cert
- Page 23 and 24:
1. kinetic energy2. gravitational e
- Page 25 and 26:
In fact, your body uses up even mor
- Page 27 and 28:
kinetic energy is twice as much. Bu
- Page 29 and 30:
ather than flying off straight. New
- Page 31 and 32:
of mass?Actually they’re not even
- Page 33 and 34:
ecause the square of the speed of l
- Page 35 and 36:
ProblemsKey√∫⋆A computerized
- Page 37 and 38:
13 How high above the surface of th
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 2Conservation ofMomentumFan
- Page 41 and 42:
win the Martian version of the Nobe
- Page 43 and 44:
a / How can we prove that this coll
- Page 45 and 46:
all.This is exactly like the rules
- Page 47 and 48:
Unequal masses example 4⊲ Suppose
- Page 49 and 50:
ForceDefinition of forceWhen moment
- Page 51 and 52:
ent relationship:(fingers on scale)
- Page 53 and 54:
pressed in modern units). If the ea
- Page 55 and 56:
p / A bowling ball is in the back o
- Page 57 and 58:
Kepler’s law of periodsLet T , ca
- Page 59 and 60:
2.5 WorkImagine a black box 8 , con
- Page 61 and 62:
ProblemsKey√∫⋆A computerized
- Page 63 and 64:
A tornado touches down in Spring Hi
- Page 65 and 66:
pensated for by an overall increase
- Page 67 and 68:
Kepler’s equal-area law example 4
- Page 69 and 70: Torque distinguished from forceOf c
- Page 71 and 72: ProblemsKey√∫⋆A computerized
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 4RelativityComplaining abou
- Page 75 and 76: motion of the apparatus. For instan
- Page 77 and 78: fore Einstein. In fact, George Fitz
- Page 79 and 80: We are used to thinking of time as
- Page 81 and 82: j / In the garage’s frame of refe
- Page 83 and 84: is now sufficiently advanced to all
- Page 85 and 86: astronauts had twin siblings back o
- Page 87 and 88: The derivation of the correct relat
- Page 89 and 90: efore the collision0 1.60.9 0.7afte
- Page 91 and 92: e the same as they always were. The
- Page 93 and 94: (b) Show that your result is approx
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 5ElectricityWhere the teles
- Page 97 and 98: to the egg.Luckily, we now know eno
- Page 99 and 100: “A” as negative, but it really
- Page 101 and 102: The main subtlety involved in this
- Page 103 and 104: Note that an example like g/3 does
- Page 105 and 106: ⊲ An ampere-hour is a unit of cur
- Page 107 and 108: portional to the voltage difference
- Page 109 and 110: ing your feet on a carpet, and then
- Page 111 and 112: ProblemsKey√∫⋆A computerized
- Page 113 and 114: This sunspot is a product of the su
- Page 115 and 116: directions strongly evokes wave met
- Page 117 and 118: The electric fieldThe definition of
- Page 119: trical interaction. This seems like
- Page 123 and 124: q / The force on a charged particle
- Page 125 and 126: time it took for the black coil’s
- Page 127 and 128: charge, there will be magnetic fiel
- Page 129 and 130: z / Panel 1 shows the electromagnet
- Page 131 and 132: used to make images of individual a
- Page 133 and 134: Chapter 7The Ray Model of Light7.1
- Page 135 and 136: Today, photography provides the sim
- Page 137 and 138: Interaction of light with matterAbs
- Page 139 and 140: g / Examples of ray diagrams.h / Th
- Page 141 and 142: in their passing out of one medium
- Page 143 and 144: Figure k shows what happens if you
- Page 145 and 146: m / At double the distance, the par
- Page 147 and 148: infrared, you don’t emit visible
- Page 149 and 150: infinitesimally from it. In figure
- Page 151 and 152: physical shape of the mirror’s su
- Page 153 and 154: Sketch another copy of the face in
- Page 155 and 156: Discussion questionsA The figure sh
- Page 157 and 158: DLocate the images formed by the pe
- Page 159 and 160: Problem 2.4 In this chapter we’ve
- Page 161 and 162: signals to travel between you and t
- Page 163 and 164: “The Great Wave Off Kanagawa,”
- Page 165 and 166: amplitude, A. The definition of amp
- Page 167 and 168: a single hump or trough. If you hit
- Page 169 and 170: Surfing example 3The incorrect beli
- Page 171 and 172:
Sound wavesThe phenomenon of sound
- Page 173 and 174:
do they signify in the case of a wa
- Page 175 and 176:
⊲ Solving for wavelength, we have
- Page 177 and 178:
ProblemsKey√∫⋆A computerized
- Page 179 and 180:
Appendix 1: Photo CreditsExcept as
- Page 181 and 182:
Appendix 2: Hints and SolutionsAnsw
- Page 183 and 184:
cm, and the distance from the axis
- Page 185 and 186:
Foucault, Léon, 17frame of referen
- Page 187:
twin paradox, 83units, conversion o