21.08.2015 Views

ESRD NETWORK 6 2011 ANNUAL REPORT

ESRD NETWORK 6 2011 ANNUAL REPORT

ESRD NETWORK 6 2011 ANNUAL REPORT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contents of Figures and TablesFIGURE 1: GEOGRAPHICAL MAP OF THE <strong>ESRD</strong> RENAL DISEASE <strong>NETWORK</strong>S .......................................................................................... 11FIGURE 2. PREVALENT <strong>ESRD</strong> PATIENTS PER <strong>NETWORK</strong> AS OF 12/31/<strong>2011</strong>. .......................................................................................... 12FIGURE 3. NUMBER OF <strong>ESRD</strong> FACILITIES PER <strong>NETWORK</strong> AS OF 12/31/<strong>2011</strong>. ........................................................................................ 13TABLE 1. US CENSUS QUICK FACTS DATA ON RACIAL AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF THE US COMPARED TO <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 ................. 14FIGURE 4. US CENSUS AND <strong>NETWORK</strong> RACIAL DISTRIBUTION COMPARISON ....................................................................................... 14TABLE 2. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 <strong>ESRD</strong> PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE AS OF 12/31/<strong>2011</strong>...................................................................................... 15FIGURE 5. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 PATIENT POPULATION 5-YEAR GROWTH .......................................................................................................... 15TABLE 3. DEMOGRAPHICS OF <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 INCIDENT <strong>ESRD</strong> PATIENTS .................................................................................................. 16FIGURE 6. NUMBER OF NEW <strong>ESRD</strong> PATIENTS BY AGE GROUP CALENDAR YEAR <strong>2011</strong> ........................................................................... 16FIGURE 7. NUMBER OF NEW <strong>ESRD</strong> PATIENTS BY RACE CALENDAR YEAR <strong>2011</strong> ...................................................................................... 16FIGURE 8. NUMBER OF NEW <strong>ESRD</strong> PATIENTS BY PRIMARY DIAGNOSIS CALENDAR YEAR <strong>2011</strong> ............................................................. 16FIGURE 9. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 NUMBER OF FACILITIES BY YEAR ...................................................................................................................... 17FIGURE 10. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 PERCENT OF FACILITIES BY OWNERSHIP ......................................................................................................... 17FIGURE 11. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 AV FISTULA RATE INTERVENTION PROGRESSION CHART ................................................................................ 34FIGURE 12. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 <strong>2011</strong> NUMBER OF AV FISTULAS IN USE BY MONTH ........................................................................................ 35FIGURE 13. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 <strong>2011</strong> NUMBER OF AV FISTULAS PLACED BY MONTH ...................................................................................... 35FIGURE 14. PERCENT OF <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 FACILITIES THAT HAVE REACHED CMS AVF RATE OF 66% OR MORE BY MONTH ........................ 36FIGURE 15. AV FISTULA INTERVENTION FACILITY SELECTION FLOW CHART .......................................................................................... 37FIGURE 16. <strong>REPORT</strong> 101- <strong>ESRD</strong> <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 VASCULAR ACCESS FEEDBACK <strong>REPORT</strong>. ........................................................................... 38FIGURE 17. <strong>REPORT</strong> 102- VASCULAR ACCESS RANKING <strong>REPORT</strong> ........................................................................................................... 39FIGURE 18. <strong>REPORT</strong>S 105 AND 105B ..................................................................................................................................................... 39FIGURE 19. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 <strong>2011</strong> CATHETER USE DISTRIBUTION BY MONTH ............................................................................................. 41FIGURE 20. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 <strong>2011</strong> LONG-TERM (>90 DAYS) CATHETER USE DISTRIBUTION BY MONTH ...................................................... 42FIGURE 21. DISTRIBUTION OF LONG-TERM CATHETER USE DURING THE <strong>2011</strong> FOCUSED INTERVENTION ............................................. 42FIGURE 22. CATHETER USE REDUCTION FACILITY-SPECIFIC FEEDBACK <strong>REPORT</strong> .................................................................................... 43FIGURE 24. DISTRIBUTION OF THE % OF <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 PATIENTS WITH URR> 65 ................................................................................... 45FIGURE 23. PROGRESSION OF <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 ADEQUACY FOCUS FACILITIES............................................................................................ 45FIGURE 25. DISTRIBUTION OF <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 URR RATES BY FACILITY ..................................................................................................... 46FIGURE 26. HEMODIALYSIS ADEQUACY PROGRESSION <strong>REPORT</strong> ........................................................................................................... 47FIGURE 27. <strong>NETWORK</strong> 6 IMMUNIZATION RATES (2009-2012) .............................................................................................................. 48P a g e | 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!