Responsesassignment

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 1 Glossary BOXI CASE CSE DTC EPSRC EUCLID HoGS IAD IDCORE ISLI NARIC PGR PGT PI SACS SPEC SPPC TPR UKERC Business Objects XI Council for Advancement and Support of Education College of Science and Engineering Doctoral Training Centre Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Edinburgh University Complete Lifecycle Integrated Development Head of Graduate School Institute of Academic Development Industrial Doctoral Centre in Offshore Renewable Energy Institute for System Level Integration National Academic Recognition Information Centre Postgraduate Research Postgraduate Taught Primary Investigator Student, Admissions and Curricula Systems School Postgraduate Experience Committee School Postgraduate Progression Committee Teaching Programme Review United Kingdom Energy Research Centre 28
Appendix 2 Additional information considered by the review team The Review Panel considered the following documents: Overview: Reflective Review of PG provision in the School of Engineering Committee Structure and Graduate School Structures and Procedures QQR2005 Report QQR2006 Response Research programmes: Statistics: Research programme PhD Handbook Academic October 2011 Quality Assurance: School of Engineering QA PGR reports 29
Page 1 and 2: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 The Univer
Page 3 and 4: elevant, and not discussed further
Page 5 and 6: to the Employability Strategy Group
Page 7 and 8: Action: The convener to discuss fur
Page 9 and 10: Action: Committee Secretary to invi
Page 11 and 12: our current policies and procedures
Page 13 and 14: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 QAC 12/13
Page 15 and 16: Exam Board minutes; External examin
Page 17 and 18: Course Evaluations are needed for t
Page 21 and 22: The International Office ensure goo
Page 23 and 24: Task Group supersedes an earlier ac
Page 25 and 26: College of Science and Engineering
Page 27 and 28: Introduction: Review structure and
Page 29 and 30: 1. Management of the student learni
Page 31 and 32: The panel detected a certain level
Page 33 and 34: The Panel noted that the UK PhD res
Page 35 and 36: The Panel also recommends that furt
Page 37 and 38: The School also has a good record i
Page 39 and 40: for Women in Science). It was ackno
Page 41 and 42: 2. Management of quality and standa
Page 43 and 44: employment over a career in academi
Page 45 and 46: The Panel recommended that the Scho
Page 47 and 48: 3. Management of enhancement and sh
Page 49 and 50: Recommendations The panel makes the
Page 51: A more formal review procedure shou
Page 55 and 56: 1.1 The review area’s approach to
Page 57 and 58: Taught provision: including develop
Page 59 and 60: Taught provision: including learnin
Page 61 and 62: The University of Edinburgh Senate
Page 63 and 64: practice or discipline reference po
Page 65 and 66: Widening Participation programmes,
Page 67 and 68: http://www.docs.sasg.ed.ac.uk/Acade
Page 71 and 72: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 QAC 12/13
Page 73 and 74: APPENDIX 1 Number of Students Subje
Page 75 and 76: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 QAC 12/13
Page 77 and 78: The Code of Practice for Supervisor
Page 79 and 80: 11 Higher education providers ensur
Page 81 and 82: The University of Edinburgh: Guidel
Page 85 and 86: Senatus Quality Assurance Committee
Page 89 and 90: If you intend to give full answers
Page 91 and 92: The above sentence could be disprop
Page 93 and 94: Indicators of sound practice: Strat
Page 95 and 96: 18. Do you have any suggestions for
Page 97 and 98: 24. Do you have any suggestions for
Page 99 and 100: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 QAC 12/13
Page 101 and 102: Date of meeting Business Author Com
Page 103:
12.10.12
show all

Responsesassignment

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?