Responsesassignment

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2.4 The effectiveness of the review area’s approach to setting and maintaining academic standards Taught provision: including admissions policy and recruitment, conversion of offers, programme design, procedures for validation and approval of courses and programmes, operation of Boards of Studies. Research provision: including admissions policy and recruitment, programme design including addressing stakeholder requirements e.g. research councils, operation of industrial boards, Research Training committees/Graduate School committees. 2.5 The effectiveness of the review area’s approach to the management of assessment, progression and achievement Taught provision: including appropriateness of assessment methods, rates and trends in student progression and completion, operation of Exam Boards. Research provision: including progression of research students, assessment of doctoral students, completion rates. 3. Management of enhancement and sharing of good practice 3.1 The extent to which the review area takes deliberate steps to manage quality enhancement Taught provision: including quality enhancement strategies, articulation with College and University strategies, responsibility for management and implementation. Research provision: including quality enhancement strategies, articulation with College and University strategies, responsibility for management and implementation within Graduate School/research centre. 3.2 The extent to which the review area engages with Quality Assurance Agency enhancement themes and other sector themes as appropriate (e.g. Higher Education Academy) Taught provision: including involvement in external events, internal developments arising from engagement in external activities and their impact on enhancing the student learning experience. The Enhancement Themes can be found at h tt p:/ /www.e nh an ce men tthe me s.a c.u k/ Research provision: including engagement with Research Councils benchmarking, research skills training, engagement with professional competencies for research. 3.3 The extent to which the review area identifies and shares good practice 34
Taught provision: including learning from annual monitoring, mechanisms in place for promoting and disseminating good practice. Research provision: including learning from annual monitoring of postgraduate research provision, mechanisms in place for promoting and disseminating good practice October 2011 35
Page 1 and 2:
QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 The Univer
Page 3 and 4:
elevant, and not discussed further
Page 5 and 6:
to the Employability Strategy Group
Page 7 and 8: Action: The convener to discuss fur
Page 9 and 10: Action: Committee Secretary to invi
Page 11 and 12: our current policies and procedures
Page 13 and 14: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 QAC 12/13
Page 15 and 16: Exam Board minutes; External examin
Page 17 and 18: Course Evaluations are needed for t
Page 19 and 20: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 The Univer
Page 21 and 22: The International Office ensure goo
Page 23 and 24: Task Group supersedes an earlier ac
Page 25 and 26: College of Science and Engineering
Page 27 and 28: Introduction: Review structure and
Page 29 and 30: 1. Management of the student learni
Page 31 and 32: The panel detected a certain level
Page 33 and 34: The Panel noted that the UK PhD res
Page 35 and 36: The Panel also recommends that furt
Page 37 and 38: The School also has a good record i
Page 39 and 40: for Women in Science). It was ackno
Page 41 and 42: 2. Management of quality and standa
Page 43 and 44: employment over a career in academi
Page 45 and 46: The Panel recommended that the Scho
Page 47 and 48: 3. Management of enhancement and sh
Page 49 and 50: Recommendations The panel makes the
Page 51 and 52: A more formal review procedure shou
Page 53 and 54: Appendix 2 Additional information c
Page 55 and 56: 1.1 The review area’s approach to
Page 57: Taught provision: including develop
Page 61 and 62: The University of Edinburgh Senate
Page 63 and 64: practice or discipline reference po
Page 65 and 66: Widening Participation programmes,
Page 67 and 68: http://www.docs.sasg.ed.ac.uk/Acade
Page 69 and 70: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 The Univer
Page 71 and 72: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 QAC 12/13
Page 73 and 74: APPENDIX 1 Number of Students Subje
Page 75 and 76: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 QAC 12/13
Page 77 and 78: The Code of Practice for Supervisor
Page 79 and 80: 11 Higher education providers ensur
Page 81 and 82: The University of Edinburgh: Guidel
Page 85 and 86: Senatus Quality Assurance Committee
Page 89 and 90: If you intend to give full answers
Page 91 and 92: The above sentence could be disprop
Page 93 and 94: Indicators of sound practice: Strat
Page 95 and 96: 18. Do you have any suggestions for
Page 97 and 98: 24. Do you have any suggestions for
Page 99 and 100: QAC: 25.10.12 H/02/28/02 QAC 12/13
Page 101 and 102: Date of meeting Business Author Com
Page 103: 12.10.12
show all

Responsesassignment

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?