Making a Livable City The Case of Seattle

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Funding for the Counterbalance Park project (~40% private contributions) Seattle Pro Parks Levy funding $304,000 Lead gift from Shah Safari, Inc. (Local clothing company) $225,000 City of Seattle, 2007 Capital Improvement Fund $200,000 City of Seattle Neighborhood Matching Fund Grant $100,000 Metro/King County Funding $50,000 Grant from the Miller Foundation (used for plant materials) $45,000 The Norcliffe Foundation grant (local private foundation) $20,000 Safeco Insurance Company grant (Seattle-based company) $10,000 Individual contributions $38,000 Business and corporations $35,500 Total received to date $1,027,500 Keys to project success 1) City support through the neighborhood planning process 2) Citizen leadership 3) Support by the Mayor’s Center City Parks Initiative. 56
QUEEN ANNE (cont.) • What makes QA different and livable? – Location – Topography – Socio-economic & demographic composition – Family friendly neighborhood – Strong community organizations, e.g. QA Historic Society – Proximity to downtown • Commercial core, walkable from much of the neighborhood • Entertainment core (ballet company, Opera House, Seattle Center, Experimental Music Center, and proximity to Pike Place Market, restaurants, museums, science park, etc.) • High tech hub (IT, bio tech, etc) 57
Page 1 and 2:
Making a Livable City: The Case of
Page 3 and 4:
Livability Principles
Page 5 and 6: Livability: Historical Context
Page 7 and 8: “LIVABLE CITY” PRINCIPLES (cont
Page 9 and 10: JANE JACOBS’ CONTRIBUTION • Jan
Page 11 and 12: Seattle Background
Page 13 and 14: Growth of the Puget Sound Region, 1
Page 15 and 16: Seattle: Brief Overview • City is
Page 17: Relative Size S. Korea Seoul City U
Page 20 and 21: Projected Future Growth of the Puge
Page 22 and 23: Key ideas of WA GMA • Environment
Page 24 and 25: 워싱톤 주 성장관리법: 14
Page 26 and 27: Regional Planning (지역 광역
Page 28 and 29: 25 Urban Growth Centers in the Puge
Page 30 and 31: Salmon(연어) Endangered Species A
Page 32 and 33: Seattle Comprehensive Plan • Titl
Page 34 and 35: Neighborhood-Focused Planning and C
Page 36: Seattle’s Cheonggyecheon? Existin
Page 39 and 40: SEATTLE • Examples: Queen Anne, B
Page 41 and 42: SEATTLE (cont.) • Pike Place Mark
Page 43 and 44: NEIGHBORHOODS IN SEATTLE • 37 nei
Page 46 and 47: NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING • There is
Page 48 and 49: NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING (cont.) - Mis
Page 50 and 51: QUEEN ANNE STATISTICS • Median Ho
Page 54 and 55: Main street in QA: Many Americans p
Page 58 and 59: QUEEN ANNE (cont.) • Why is Upper
Page 60: Belltown: Efforts to keep its chara
Page 64 and 65: BELLTOWN (cont.) • P-Patch (Cotta
Page 66: BELLTOWN: P-PATCH • 6 years colla
Page 69 and 70: GVS (cont.) • Treated runoff wate
Page 74 and 75: WHAT MAKES BELLTOWN LIVABLE? • Te
Page 77 and 78: COLUMBIA CITY • “Just a short d
Page 79 and 80: FIGHTING BACK FROM DILAPIDATION AND
Page 82 and 83: LANDMARK DISTRICT A few blocks only
Page 84: Pike Place Market 84
Page 88 and 89: Hill & Tower, Los Angeles www.csulb
Page 90 and 91: Olympic Sculpture Park 90
Page 97 and 98: IMPLICATIONS FOR KOREA: SEOUL • R
Page 99 and 100: Ochi Dong, Gwangju BUK-GU (continue
Page 101 and 102: MUNWA-DONG, Gwangju
Page 104 and 105: BUK-GU: CONCLUSIONS • A few micro
Page 106:
Thank you! Please visit me in Seatt
show all

Making a Livable City The Case of Seattle

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?