29.08.2015 Views

Pre Bid response for supply of Laptops for ... - DOITC Rajasthan

Pre Bid response for supply of Laptops for ... - DOITC Rajasthan

Pre Bid response for supply of Laptops for ... - DOITC Rajasthan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> Vendor <strong>for</strong> <strong>supply</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Laptops</strong> throughout the State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong><br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

1 12 3) i Space <strong>for</strong> Help Desk We are expecting that Space provided will at free <strong>of</strong> cost, Please confirm. RISl shall provide necessary working<br />

space, furniture, electricity, internet<br />

connectivity at Free <strong>of</strong> Cost to<br />

facilitate the bidder in setting-up the<br />

Helpdesk<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

2 12 We are expecting that Electricity charges, Internet charges will be borne by<br />

RISL, Please confirm.<br />

3 12 We assume that the security <strong>for</strong> the Help Desk Setup will be provided by RISL,<br />

Please confirm.<br />

4 12 We are expecting that Other than Bench, RISL would also Provide the<br />

Working Bench, Chairs, AC, Furnishings etc. Please confirm.<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

RISL will provide the working<br />

environment<br />

5 12 3) ii INR 10000 Per Seat Please clarify the basis <strong>of</strong> this calculation. To maintain 02 seats <strong>for</strong> 10 hrs. a<br />

day & 6 days a week, we require minimum 04 Persons considering the<br />

recommended Working hours/ week <strong>for</strong> an employee and Leave<br />

entitlements.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

6 13 4) A Phase-Delivery Schedule<br />

1, B Phase-<br />

2<br />

Whether the delivery <strong>of</strong> lots is planned district wise? If It is so, please share<br />

the details and schedule.<br />

Yes. Schedule is provided in the<br />

section "Delivery Schedule". Other<br />

relevant details shall be provided to<br />

the selected bidder.


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

7 41 35.<br />

Payment<br />

Terms and<br />

Schedule<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

2-Quarterly Helpdesk Reports<br />

(except <strong>for</strong> the last quarter) and 3-<br />

Final Quarter Helpdesk<br />

We have understood from this clause that<br />

First, 0.6% <strong>of</strong> our order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot) shall be paid in advance<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the start <strong>of</strong> first quarter.<br />

Second, 0.6% <strong>of</strong> our order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot) shall be paid in advance<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the start <strong>of</strong> second quarter.<br />

Third, 0.6% <strong>of</strong> our order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot) shall be paid in advance<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the start <strong>of</strong> third quarter.<br />

Fourth, 0.6% <strong>of</strong> our order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot) shall be paid in advance<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the start <strong>of</strong> fourth quarter.<br />

Remaining payment equivalent to 2.6% <strong>of</strong> the order value (<strong>for</strong> any single lot)<br />

shall be released after the completion <strong>of</strong> fourth quarter.<br />

We also understand that we shall be paid INR 20K <strong>for</strong> two persons required<br />

<strong>for</strong> helpdesk along with quarterly payment.<br />

Kindly confirm / advise.<br />

No advance payment shall be made.<br />

Read carefully point 35 (h) <strong>of</strong><br />

Payment Terms and Schedule.<br />

0.6% <strong>of</strong> the order value, subject to<br />

the sum <strong>of</strong> this amount already paid<br />

not exceeding 5% <strong>of</strong> the Order Value<br />

+ actual cost <strong>of</strong> helpdesk <strong>for</strong> the<br />

quarter shall be paid after each<br />

quarter<br />

Remaining payment <strong>of</strong> the order<br />

value (not exceeding 5% <strong>of</strong> the order<br />

value) and actual cost <strong>of</strong> the helpdesk<br />

<strong>for</strong> the final quarter shall be made<br />

after completion <strong>of</strong> final quarter<br />

8 58 Annexure<br />

10<br />

Price bid<br />

HCL requests RajCOMP to kindly elaborate on how the cost <strong>for</strong> helpdesk will<br />

be taken into consideration or accounted <strong>for</strong>, as there is no separate section<br />

to mention the helpdesk prices but as per payment terms mentioned on page<br />

35 & 36 <strong>of</strong> the RFP, helpdesk payment to be released separately.<br />

As per amended RFP Please read<br />

Section 2. A. (ii) carefully<br />

9 New Proposed Clause <strong>for</strong> Tax<br />

Change<br />

The basic rates shall REMAIN FIRM during the tenure <strong>of</strong> the contract / As per RFP<br />

extended period <strong>of</strong> contract and NO ESCALATIONS, whatsoever shall either be<br />

claimed or considered. However In case any national or state statute or any<br />

local law or regulation or by-law <strong>of</strong> any duly constituted authority is changed<br />

or comes into <strong>for</strong>ce which results in extra costs/tax in relation to the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> the goods/ Services, the consequential effect shall be to the<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the Purchaser and the same shall be borne by the Purchaser


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

10 New Proposed Clause <strong>for</strong> Deemed<br />

Acceptance<br />

The basic rates shall REMAIN FIRM during the tenure <strong>of</strong> the contract / As per RFP<br />

extended period <strong>of</strong> contract and NO ESCALATIONS, whatsoever shall either be<br />

claimed or considered. However In case any national or state statute or any<br />

local law or regulation or by-law <strong>of</strong> any duly constituted authority is changed<br />

or comes into <strong>for</strong>ce which results in extra costs/tax in relation to the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> the goods/ Services, the consequential effect shall be to the<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the Purchaser and the same shall be borne by the Purchaser<br />

11 22 24 Negotiations Sir, we understand the importance and urgency on this project and to<br />

increase the probability <strong>of</strong> successful implementation, may we propose to<br />

allow the interested bidders to quote <strong>for</strong> one or two lots so that chances <strong>of</strong><br />

timely implementation <strong>of</strong> this scheme can be ensured.<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

12 38 29 29) Limitation <strong>of</strong> Liability:<br />

b) the aggregate liability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Supplier to the Purchaser, whether<br />

under the Contract, in tort, or<br />

otherwise, shall not exceed the<br />

amount specified in the Contract,<br />

provided that this limitation shall<br />

not apply to the cost <strong>of</strong> repairing or<br />

replacing defective equipment, or<br />

to any obligation <strong>of</strong> the Supplier to<br />

indemnify the Purchaser with<br />

respect to patent infringement.<br />

We request the clause to be amended. Amended clause is as follows:<br />

29) Limitation <strong>of</strong> Liability:<br />

b) the aggregate liability <strong>of</strong> the Supplier to the Purchaser, whether under the<br />

Contract, in tort, or otherwise, shall be limited to the amount actually paid by<br />

the Purchaser to the <strong>Bid</strong>der in respect <strong>of</strong> the Hardware/ Network Equipment/<br />

Services that are subject matter <strong>of</strong> a claim subject to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong><br />

the contract value , provided that this limitation shall not apply to the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

repairing or replacing defective equipment, or to any obligation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Supplier to indemnify the Purchaser with respect to patent infringement.<br />

As per RFP<br />

13 40 33 c) Termination <strong>for</strong> Convenience:<br />

i. RISL, by a written Notice <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least 30 days sent to the Supplier,<br />

may terminate the Contract, in<br />

whole or in part, at any time <strong>for</strong> its<br />

convenience.<br />

We request the clause to be amended. Amended clause is as follows:<br />

c) Termination <strong>for</strong> Convenience:<br />

i. RISL, by Ninety days (90) written notice sent to the Supplier, may terminate<br />

the Contract, in whole or in part, at any time <strong>for</strong> its convenience.<br />

As per RFP<br />

14 40 33 iii. The Goods that are complete<br />

and ready <strong>for</strong> shipment within<br />

twenty-eight (28) days after the<br />

Supplier's receipt <strong>of</strong> the Notice <strong>of</strong><br />

termination shall be accepted by<br />

the Purchaser at the Contract terms<br />

and prices. For the remaining<br />

Goods, the Purchaser may elect:<br />

We request the clause to be amended. Amended clause is as follows:<br />

iii. The Goods that are complete and ready <strong>for</strong> shipment within sixty (60) days<br />

after the Supplier's receipt <strong>of</strong> the Notice <strong>of</strong> termination shall be accepted by<br />

the Purchaser at the Contract terms and prices. For the remaining Goods, the<br />

Purchaser may elect:<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

15 40 34) b Standing Committee <strong>for</strong> Settlement<br />

<strong>of</strong> Disputes<br />

We recommend the clause to be deleted as we prefer arbitration proceedings<br />

to be conducted as per Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Proposed<br />

clause is as follows:<br />

RISL and the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der shall make every ef<strong>for</strong>t to resolve amicably by<br />

direct negotiations any disagreement or dispute between them on any matter<br />

connected with the contract or in regard to the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the context<br />

there<strong>of</strong>. If, after seven (7) days from the commencement <strong>of</strong> negotiations,<br />

RISL and the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der have not been able to resolve amicably a<br />

contract dispute, such differences and disputes shall be referred, at the<br />

option <strong>of</strong> either party, to the arbitration <strong>of</strong> one single arbitrator to be<br />

mutually agreed upon and in the event <strong>of</strong> no consensus, the arbitration shall<br />

be done by three arbitrators, one to be nominated by RISL, one to be<br />

nominated by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der and the third arbitrator shall be nominated<br />

by the two arbitrators nominated as above. The arbitration proceedings shall<br />

be in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.<br />

As per RFP<br />

16 36 26 d) Liquidated damages:<br />

b) Liquidated damages:<br />

Delay up to one fourth period <strong>of</strong> the Delay up to one fourth period <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery period, successful<br />

prescribed delivery period, installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 2.5 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/<br />

successful installation & completion uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

<strong>of</strong> work: 2.5 %<br />

Delay exceeding one fourth but not<br />

exceeding half <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />

delivery period, successful<br />

installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work:<br />

5.0 %<br />

Delay exceeding half but not<br />

exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescribed delivery period,<br />

Delay exceeding one fourth but not exceeding half <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery<br />

period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 5.0 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong><br />

undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

Delay exceeding half but not exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />

delivery period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 7.5 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

Delay exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery period, successful<br />

installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 10.0 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/<br />

uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

successful installation & completion Kindly amend the LD item wise <strong>for</strong> the items only not delivered in time.<br />

<strong>of</strong> work: 7.5 %<br />

Delay exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescribed delivery period,<br />

successful installation & completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> work: 10.0 %<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

17 18 10. e . V To adjust any dues against the firm<br />

from any other contract with RISL<br />

Kindly amend it to the "same contract only" and not from any other project<br />

as it goes against Contract Law <strong>of</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> India.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

18 17 9 Validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>: 120 days Kindly amend the validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s to at least 60/90 days. As per RFP<br />

19 41 35 Payment Terms & Schedule As vendor will give PSD <strong>of</strong> 5% amount <strong>for</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> warranty, We request<br />

you to make the payment terms as 100% on Supply & installation in place <strong>of</strong><br />

95%.<br />

As per RFP<br />

20 Nil Nil New Proposed Clause: ERV Clause<br />

(Exchange Rate variation)<br />

We request you to please add Exchange Rate variation Clause or please make<br />

it a international bid where we can quote in Dollar & payment will also be<br />

made in dollar. These is very essential <strong>for</strong> meeting the challenges <strong>of</strong><br />

fluctuating dollar in the current market scenario.<br />

As per RFP<br />

21 48 Annexure<br />

: 2 A<br />

New Proposed Clause: Item No.-A<br />

Laptop : Green Peace rating 3.0 or<br />

Higher<br />

Request you to please add the Green Peace rating certificate <strong>of</strong> 3.0 or higher<br />

in the tender so as to create a healthy competition among the vendors.<br />

As per RFP<br />

22 48 Annexure<br />

: 2 A<br />

Optical Drive : DVD R/W (16X<br />

higher)<br />

This is a non standard item <strong>for</strong> Laptop as generally 8x DVD Writer comes with<br />

Laptop. Kindly amend the same.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

23 43 37 Exit Management Vendor should not bear any cost or penalty or charge w.r.t Exit management.<br />

Buyer should bear all cost and charges. Also as per the clause number 37 B<br />

(iii) B page number 43, assets will get transferred after 3 years, which means<br />

the revenue will not get recognized <strong>for</strong> bidder <strong>for</strong> 3 years. Request you to<br />

kindly delete this clause. This is very important clause <strong>for</strong> deletion. Request<br />

you to kindly delete.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

24 43 37 -(b) - iii Title and Risk Transfer Vendor assumes that the title <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the goods supplied under this<br />

contract is passed on the customer on delivering the material to the<br />

customer. Request your confirmation on this. Without this, revenue will not<br />

get recognized<br />

25 47 Annexure-<br />

1<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> sale (in months) &<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> service & Period <strong>of</strong><br />

back to back support, updates and<br />

patches (in months)<br />

We appreciate this clause and would request you to specifically ask <strong>for</strong><br />

Manufacturer Authorization Form (MAF) from the supplier <strong>of</strong> critical<br />

components such as CPU, Mother board, Operating System, Office and<br />

antivirus application. This MAF would be submitted by all OEM.<br />

26 18 EMD Form <strong>of</strong> EMD Please provide the bid bond (BG) <strong>for</strong>mat as bid document only has PBG<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

27 48 Operating System (Latest) Please define your requirement. As per amended RFP<br />

28 22 24 (d) Negotiations In our opinion, this clause is not as per industry practices and can put a<br />

question mark on entire tender process.<br />

As per RFP<br />

Kindly reconsider your position on the same and delete the option <strong>of</strong> giving<br />

"written counter <strong>of</strong>fer" to lowest and /or other bidders.<br />

We also request department to specify the basis <strong>of</strong> this "Written Counter<br />

Offer".<br />

29 22 24 (d) Best Value <strong>Bid</strong>der Please provide the definition <strong>of</strong> "best value bidder". "best value bidder" shall be<br />

considered as the responsive and<br />

eligible <strong>Bid</strong>der who has quoted the<br />

lowest price <strong>for</strong> and selected through<br />

this tendering process.<br />

30 Per<strong>for</strong>mance Security Deposit- f(iii)<br />

to adjust any dues against the firm<br />

from any other contract with RISL.<br />

i) …. Such as severing future<br />

business relation or black listing etc.<br />

Please reconsider your position and we propose that black listing should be<br />

purely on corrupt and fraudulent practices as GF&AR.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

31 30 (b) Right to<br />

Vary<br />

Changes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> Quantity- If the<br />

work order is placed up to 100% in<br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der should be assigned single PO <strong>for</strong> the Final quantity with decreased or<br />

Increased <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> quantity. And additional PO <strong>for</strong> additional quantity shall be<br />

Quantities excess <strong>of</strong> the quantities mentioned supplied subject to prevailing price quoted by the bidder.<br />

: in the bidding document, the bidder<br />

shall be bound to meet the required<br />

<strong>supply</strong><br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

32 23 26 (d) If the issuance <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal Work<br />

Order is likely to take time, a Letter<br />

<strong>of</strong> Intent (LOI) may be sent<br />

Pursuant to this clause, please specify the start <strong>of</strong> delivery date. Would it be The start <strong>of</strong> the delivery date shall be<br />

from the date <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> LoI or Work Order (WO) or acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal WO from the Date <strong>of</strong> Issue <strong>of</strong> Work<br />

by vendor?<br />

Order.<br />

33 30 9 (d) Delivery - Shifting the place <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery destination:<br />

RISL/Department <strong>of</strong> Education shall<br />

be free to shift the place <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />

within the same district. The<br />

successful/ selected bidder shall<br />

provide all assistance including<br />

transportation in shifting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

delivered Items.<br />

34 33 20 ( c) ii Packing and Documents - The above<br />

<strong>Laptops</strong> shall be packed in cartons<br />

as per requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

"distribution to individual District<br />

locations / Institutions / District<br />

Education Officer’s (DEO) <strong>of</strong>fice"<br />

Please specify the number <strong>of</strong> such instances as same would affect the pricing.<br />

In-case it is difficult to specify the same at this stage, we would request<br />

department to reimburse the vendor with actual cost.<br />

Please specify the number <strong>of</strong> locations or institutions / DEO <strong>of</strong>fice be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

hand that is be<strong>for</strong>e submission <strong>of</strong> financial bid.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

Final locations shall be provided to<br />

successful bidder.<br />

35 47 Annexure-<br />

1<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> exact location <strong>for</strong> delivery<br />

at the District Headquarter shall be<br />

provided by RISL/ Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education, GoR to the successful<br />

bidder be<strong>for</strong>e the time <strong>of</strong> final<br />

delivery.<br />

Please specify the exact location <strong>for</strong> deliveries as this has financial<br />

implications<br />

Final locations shall be provided to<br />

successful bidder.


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

36 48 Operating<br />

System/M<br />

S Office<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Related to bid estimated price<br />

We understand from bid document that department have provisioned a<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> INR 246.00 Crores <strong>for</strong> 56000 numbers <strong>of</strong> laptops. Based on this<br />

fact, budgeted per unit price stands at INR 21964.00 including all taxes.<br />

Further, we have understood from pre-bid meeting dated 9-Jan, that<br />

Micros<strong>of</strong>t component would be costing INR 2200.00 minimum.<br />

This takes the budgeted prices <strong>for</strong> hardware to INR 19764.00 and it is not in<br />

sync. with prevalent market environment.<br />

We hereby propose department to buy MS component separately directly<br />

from MS.<br />

As per RFP<br />

37 48 Annexure<br />

: 2 A<br />

OS: MS Windows 2007 Home Basic<br />

or Windows 8, whichever is latest<br />

launched and available in India at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> delivery (National<br />

Academic) on Shape the Future SKU<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by Micros<strong>of</strong>t to<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong> under<br />

MoU<br />

Please amend the OS as MS Win 7 Home Basic. Secondly please specify exact<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the OS as per the MOU signed between MS & Govt. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong>.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

38 48 Annexure<br />

: 2 A<br />

……..SKU with MS Visio , <strong>of</strong>fered by<br />

Micros<strong>of</strong>t to Government <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong> under MoU<br />

We are opinion that MS Visio is a s<strong>of</strong>tware application meant <strong>for</strong> engineering<br />

students and we do not see any utility <strong>for</strong> students in Class VIII, X & XII.<br />

Further, there is no eco-system existing <strong>for</strong> getting training on this s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Can you reconsider your position on this requirement and do the needful to<br />

modify technical specifications accordingly.<br />

As per RFP<br />

39 61 Annexure-<br />

12<br />

COMPONENTS OFFERED – BoM Please elaborate what is expected out <strong>of</strong> this Annexure-12 from us. Detail as required in the Annexure<br />

indicating make and mode <strong>of</strong> the<br />

laptop and reference and page<br />

number in the datasheet <strong>for</strong><br />

complying the technical<br />

specifications as specified in<br />

Annexure-2.<br />

40 9 CHAPTER<br />

3:<br />

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA<br />

We are assuming that this as per GF&AR and Government's procurement<br />

policy. Kindly confirm.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

41 16 5 (d) The submitted Laptop Test Report<br />

shall not be dated more than two<br />

months prior to the last date <strong>of</strong><br />

submission <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s.<br />

As discussed during pre-bid meeting, we are expecting that test report dated<br />

four to six months prior to the last date <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> bids can also be<br />

accepted. Please confirm.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

42 48, 50 Processor<br />

& Qualify<br />

Bench<br />

mark<br />

In today's scenario, it is becoming difficult to specify the CPU requirement as<br />

is evident <strong>for</strong>m the discussion at pre-bid meeting.<br />

But we appreciate the ef<strong>for</strong>ts put-in by department to mention the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance bench marking with a score <strong>of</strong> 115 and latest generation X86<br />

dual core architecture processor. We, being one <strong>of</strong> the leading manufacturer<br />

<strong>of</strong> laptops and having India centric focus, are also <strong>of</strong> opinion that this rating is<br />

more than suitable. Your ask <strong>of</strong> ETDC / STQC certificate <strong>for</strong> the same would<br />

give all bidders a level playing field.<br />

As per RFP<br />

43 48, 50 Processor Further, as discussed during pre-bid meeting, we request you to allow each<br />

bidder to <strong>of</strong>fer two different models with these major CPU manufacturers'<br />

products with a instruction to bidders to quote only one price <strong>for</strong> both<br />

models. Please note that same would help the bidder to <strong>of</strong>fer better pricing<br />

and would also increase the competition and participation. Also note that<br />

many state government / organization / PSUs are allowing the same.<br />

As per RFP<br />

44 50 Education<br />

content<br />

*- The Education content on CD<br />

shall be provided by Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education to RISL and the same<br />

shall be…<br />

Such educational content have to be loaded be<strong>for</strong>e pre-dispatch inspection.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> delay by RISL / DoE <strong>of</strong> give the content to the bidder, the bidder<br />

shall not be liable <strong>for</strong> delay. Please confirm.<br />

Agreed.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

45 41 CHAPTER<br />

6: TERMS<br />

AND<br />

CONDITIO<br />

NS OF<br />

TENDER &<br />

CONTRAC<br />

T<br />

35. c. Due Payments shall be made<br />

promptly by the purchaser,<br />

generally within sixty (60) days after<br />

submission <strong>of</strong> an invoice or request<br />

<strong>for</strong> payment by the supplier/<br />

selected bidder, and the purchaser<br />

has accepted it.<br />

35. c. Due Payments shall be made promptly by the purchaser, generally<br />

within thirty (30) days after submission <strong>of</strong> an invoice or request <strong>for</strong> payment<br />

by the supplier/ selected bidder, and the purchaser has accepted it.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

46 44 CHAPTER<br />

6: TERMS<br />

AND<br />

CONDITIO<br />

NS OF<br />

TENDER &<br />

CONTRAC<br />

T<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

37. b. iii. That the products and<br />

technology delivered to<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education or RISL<br />

during the contract term or on<br />

expiry <strong>of</strong> the contract duration<br />

should not be sold or re-used or<br />

copied or transferred by bidder to<br />

other locations apart from the<br />

locations mentioned in the this bid<br />

document without prior written<br />

notice and approval <strong>of</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education or RISL. Supplied<br />

hardware, s<strong>of</strong>tware & documents<br />

etc., used by bidder <strong>for</strong> Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Education or RISL shall be the<br />

legal properties <strong>of</strong> Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education or RISL.<br />

We are not able to understand the context. Pls. clarify?<br />

Refers to educational content, other<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware and documents submitted<br />

to RISL/ Department <strong>of</strong> Education as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> this contract.<br />

As per RFP<br />

47 New Proposed clause: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, in the<br />

event <strong>of</strong> termination <strong>of</strong> the Agreement by RISL <strong>for</strong> any reason whatsoever,<br />

RISL shall pay the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der the following amounts:<br />

As per RFP<br />

48 Consequences <strong>of</strong> Termination (a) The Agreement Price, attributable to the parts <strong>of</strong> the work(s) executed<br />

including Goods / <strong>Laptops</strong> and Related Services delivered (including also the<br />

Work in Progress) by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der up to the date <strong>of</strong> termination. In<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> capital items deployed in the project, RISL must purchase at the<br />

Written Down Value (WDV) from the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der all IT & non-IT<br />

infrastructure and the s<strong>of</strong>tware deployed. Written Down Value (WDV) shall<br />

be computed at depreciated value by applying ten per cent (10%)<br />

depreciation per annum on written down value basis, on the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

infrastructure deployed hereunder. VAT and other taxes as applicable shall be<br />

payable by RISL on such WDV. In case RISL is unable to purchase as<br />

mentioned above, RISL must pay as Liquidated Damages on written down<br />

value <strong>of</strong> all IT & non-IT infrastructure and the s<strong>of</strong>tware deployed by applying<br />

depreciation @ fifteen per cent (15%) per annum.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

49 (b) The costs reasonably incurred by the Vendor in the ramp down /<br />

disengagement <strong>of</strong> selected <strong>Bid</strong>der’s personnel;<br />

As per RFP<br />

50 (c) Any amount to be paid by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der to its sub-vendor’s in<br />

connection with the termination <strong>of</strong> any sub-vendor’s, including any<br />

cancellation charges;<br />

As per RFP<br />

51 (d) Costs incurred by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der in protecting the work(s) and leaving<br />

the site in a clean and safe condition pursuant to this clause; and<br />

As per RFP<br />

52 (e) The cost <strong>of</strong> satisfying all other obligations, commitments, and claims that<br />

the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der may in good faith have undertaken with third parties in<br />

connection with the Agreement Work in progress.<br />

As per RFP<br />

53 The term “work in progress” shall include but not limited to the value <strong>of</strong><br />

Goods / <strong>Laptops</strong> meant <strong>for</strong> delivery to RISL (i) <strong>for</strong> which manufacturing<br />

process was initiated by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der; or (ii) order was placed by the<br />

selected <strong>Bid</strong>der on its sub-vendor’s, prior to the date <strong>of</strong> termination.<br />

As per RFP<br />

54 New Proposed clause: The selected<br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der’s right to Termination<br />

By the Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der:<br />

As per RFP<br />

55 The Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der may terminate this Agreement, by not less than thirty<br />

(30) days‟ written notice to RISL, in case <strong>of</strong> the occurrence <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

events specified in paragraphs (i) through (iv) <strong>of</strong> this Clause:<br />

As per RFP<br />

56 i. If RISL fails to pay any money due to the Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der pursuant to this<br />

Agreement within thirty (30) days after receiving written notice from the<br />

Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der that such payment is overdue.<br />

57 iii. If RSIL fails to comply with any final decision reached as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

arbitration pursuant to this Agreement.<br />

58 iv. If RSIL is in material breach <strong>of</strong> its obligations pursuant to this Agreement<br />

and has not remedied the same within <strong>for</strong>ty-five (45) days (or such longer<br />

period as the Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der may have subsequently approved in writing)<br />

following the receipt by RSIL <strong>of</strong> the Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der’s notice specifying such<br />

breach.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

59 New Proposed Clause: Pro-rata<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank<br />

Guarantee<br />

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Agreement, the<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank Guarantee shall be reduced pro rata by the portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Agreement value payable <strong>for</strong> any Good(s) that have been delivered by the<br />

selected <strong>Bid</strong>der and achieved Acceptance / Deemed Acceptance.<br />

PBG shall be 5% <strong>of</strong> the Order value<br />

60 New Proposed Clause: Change in<br />

tax<br />

61 New Proposed Clause: Interest on<br />

Delayed payment and right to<br />

suspend and terminate<br />

In case any national or state statute or any local law or regulation or by-law <strong>of</strong><br />

any duly constituted authority is changed or comes into <strong>for</strong>ce which results in<br />

extra costs/tax in relation to the provision <strong>of</strong> the Goods / Related Services,<br />

the consequential effect shall be to the account <strong>of</strong> RSIL and the same shall be<br />

borne by RSIL.<br />

RSIL shall release the payment due to the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der on or be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

due date. Late payments shall automatically bear interest at an annual rate<br />

equal to 18% per annum compounded quarterly <strong>for</strong> the relevant delayed<br />

period, calculated from the date due until date <strong>of</strong> full payment.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

62 In the event RSIL fails to pay any amount to the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der on the due<br />

date, then and without prejudice to the exercise <strong>of</strong> any other rights or<br />

remedies which may be available to it and without incurring any penalties or<br />

liabilities, the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der shall be entitled to suspend per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> its<br />

obligations under the Agreement, following written notification to RSIL, until<br />

realization <strong>of</strong> full outstanding amount in respect <strong>of</strong> the Goods/ Related<br />

Services actually delivered and rendered and not paid <strong>for</strong>. In the event <strong>of</strong><br />

suspension by the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der <strong>of</strong> the Agreement, the time schedule shall<br />

be automatically extended <strong>for</strong> the actual duration <strong>of</strong> the suspension and the<br />

selected <strong>Bid</strong>der shall be reimbursed by RSIL <strong>for</strong> any damage or additional cost<br />

incurred as a result <strong>of</strong> such suspension. If suspension period exceeds two<br />

months, the selected <strong>Bid</strong>der shall have the right to terminate the Agreement.<br />

As per RFP<br />

63 24 30 Right to Vary Quantities: Right to Vary Quantities: As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

64 a.At the time the Contract is<br />

awarded, the quantity <strong>of</strong> Goods and<br />

Related Services originally specified<br />

in the bidding document may be<br />

increased or decreased but without<br />

any change in the unit prices or<br />

other terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bid and the bidding document.<br />

a.At the time the Contract is awarded, the quantity <strong>of</strong> Goods and Related<br />

Services originally specified in the bidding document may be increased or<br />

decreased but without any change in the unit prices or other terms and<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> the bid and the bidding document. However, such decrease<br />

cannot exceed more than ten percent <strong>of</strong> the Contract value.<br />

As per RFP<br />

65 30 CHAPTER<br />

6: TERMS<br />

AND<br />

CONDITIO<br />

NS OF<br />

TENDER &<br />

CONTRAC<br />

T<br />

9 d.Shifting the place <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />

destination: RISL/Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education shall be free to shift the<br />

place <strong>of</strong> delivery within the same<br />

district. The successful/ selected<br />

bidder shall provide all assistance<br />

including transportation in shifting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the delivered Items.<br />

9 d.Shifting the place <strong>of</strong> delivery destination: RISL/Department <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

shall be free to shift the place <strong>of</strong> delivery within the same district. The<br />

successful/ selected bidder shall provide all assistance including<br />

transportation in shifting <strong>of</strong> the delivered Items. The selected bidder shall be<br />

allowed to cost additionally in case RISL / Dept. <strong>of</strong> Education exercises the<br />

option to shift the place <strong>of</strong> delivery within the same district.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

66 34 CHAPTER<br />

6: TERMS<br />

AND<br />

CONDITIO<br />

NS OF<br />

TENDER &<br />

CONTRAC<br />

T<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

23. c. RISL may conduct inspection<br />

<strong>for</strong> which the cost shall be borne by<br />

the RISL. RISL shall undertake the<br />

pre-delivery inspection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Laptops</strong> in accordance to the<br />

standard procedures being followed<br />

by RISL in Quality Inspection. The<br />

inspection team shall prepare a<br />

Report specifying satisfactory<br />

operational condition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inspected laptops, gaps identified<br />

and necessary corrective<br />

measurements required by the<br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der. If RISL takes more than 3<br />

days to conduct the <strong>Pre</strong>- Delivery<br />

Inspection, the delay beyond 3 days<br />

shall not be taken into account <strong>for</strong><br />

the purposes <strong>of</strong> imposing liquidated<br />

damages.<br />

23. c. RISL may conduct inspection <strong>for</strong> which the cost shall be borne by the<br />

RISL. RISL shall undertake the pre-delivery inspection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Laptops</strong> in<br />

accordance to the standard procedures being followed by RISL in Quality<br />

Inspection. The inspection team shall prepare a Report specifying satisfactory<br />

operational condition <strong>of</strong> the inspected laptops, gaps identified and necessary<br />

corrective measurements required by the <strong>Bid</strong>der. If RISL takes more than 3<br />

days to conduct the <strong>Pre</strong>- Delivery Inspection, the delay beyond 3 days shall<br />

not be taken into account <strong>for</strong> the purposes <strong>of</strong> imposing liquidated damages<br />

and the lot <strong>of</strong> Goods will be considered as deemed accepted and ready <strong>for</strong><br />

delivery.<br />

As per RFP<br />

67 48 Memory Memory Please specify whether you need DDR-3 or DDR-4 RAM. Is the frequency<br />

asked is working frequency <strong>for</strong> the RAM. Kindly confirm<br />

As per RFP<br />

68 24 28 -<br />

Conflict <strong>of</strong><br />

interest<br />

Conflict <strong>of</strong> Interest<br />

We are assuming that definition <strong>of</strong> "party' is the bidding company (bidder)<br />

itself and all its subsidiaries. Kindly confirm.<br />

As per RFP<br />

69 9 Point 1 Eligibility Criteria We request you to please allow channel partner with one <strong>Bid</strong>der one OEM<br />

policy.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

70<br />

9<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Chapter 3:<br />

Eligibility<br />

Criteria:<br />

Laptop<br />

Sales in<br />

India<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

The <strong>Bid</strong>der should have sold<br />

minimum 50000 (Fifty Thousand<br />

only) <strong>Laptops</strong> in India each year<br />

during the last three financial year<br />

i.e. 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and<br />

2011-2012<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> change the clause to total <strong>of</strong> 1.5 Lakhs unit in last 3 calendar<br />

years instead f existing clause “The <strong>Bid</strong>der should have sold minimum <strong>of</strong> 1.5<br />

Lakh notebooks in India in last 3 calendar years i.e. from 1st January 2010 to<br />

31st December 2012”<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

71<br />

11<br />

Comprehe<br />

nsive<br />

OEM<br />

Warranty<br />

and<br />

support<br />

services<br />

Provide comprehensive OEM<br />

warranty and support services<br />

through the designated Support<br />

Service Centres available at all the<br />

33 Districts<br />

Since the warranty has to be provided onsite, request you to remove clause As per amended RFP<br />

<strong>of</strong> having service centres at all 33 districts. Vendors cannot have 33 service<br />

centres / franchisees <strong>for</strong> services, since it is impossible to manage these many<br />

franchisees in the state and their are certain criteria <strong>for</strong> selecting a service<br />

franchisee. Vendors can have maximum <strong>of</strong> 2-3 service centres whose<br />

engineers are spread across the state <strong>for</strong> manage services <strong>of</strong> machines. These<br />

engineers does not have <strong>of</strong>fices, but they operate out <strong>of</strong> these regions. Hence<br />

request you to kindly change the clause to have engineers at all locations with<br />

engineer contact details. Vendors can be monitored on SLA, as per RFP.<br />

Current clause is not practically possible. Request honorable committee<br />

members to consider this suggestion.<br />

72<br />

12<br />

Help Desk<br />

Setup:<br />

Pay Rs. 10000/- per seat per month<br />

and the cost <strong>of</strong> taking connection<br />

<strong>for</strong> Toll-Free number as well as the<br />

recurring rent and call charges <strong>for</strong><br />

the Toll-Free numbers<br />

The working hours specified cannot be maintained by 2 help desk executives.<br />

As per working hours, atleast 4 resources has to be deployed to meet. Hence<br />

request to confirm the same.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

73<br />

18<br />

EMD<br />

To adjust any dues against the firm<br />

from any other contract with RISL.<br />

1. We request honorable committee members <strong>for</strong> deleting this clause. Due<br />

adjustment should be specific to the project, but not to be from some other<br />

security deposit or dues. One project should not be linked to other one.<br />

2. Also pls allow us to submit EMD in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> Boud BG. PBG is<br />

specifically <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance. Also allow us to submit the bid bound BG in<br />

bank <strong>for</strong>mat.<br />

1. As per RFP<br />

2. As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

74<br />

18<br />

75<br />

21<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

EMD Refer RFP In case <strong>of</strong> any <strong>for</strong>tfieght, we request you to kindly give atleast 30 days notice<br />

to the vendor.<br />

Taxes<br />

The evaluation shall include all<br />

costs and all taxes and duties<br />

applicable to the bidder as per law<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

the Central/ State Government/<br />

Local Authorities<br />

We request you to allow us to quote the prices, <strong>for</strong> statutory levies, at extra.<br />

Any increase or decrease in price due to changes in statutory levies like<br />

excise, VAT, customs etc, will be duly passed on to the customer<br />

Request to Insert the below clauses :<br />

Any new levy <strong>of</strong> any tax, duty or cess etc will be passed over to the<br />

department.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

Please refer clause "<strong>Bid</strong> Prices" and<br />

"Taxes and duties" as menioned in<br />

the RFP<br />

76<br />

24<br />

Changes<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong><br />

Quantity<br />

Refer RFP<br />

Prices are quoted with respect to the quantity, hence request to cap<br />

increase/ decrease <strong>of</strong> qty ordered, max upto 10% and only after the<br />

concurrence <strong>of</strong> the seller. This clause badly impacts the overall commercials.<br />

As per RFP<br />

77<br />

78<br />

79<br />

25<br />

25<br />

29<br />

Reservatio<br />

n <strong>of</strong><br />

Rights<br />

Monitorin<br />

g <strong>of</strong><br />

Contract<br />

Delivery<br />

and<br />

Installatio<br />

n<br />

Refer RFP Pls delete As per RFP<br />

Refer RFP Pls delete As per RFP<br />

The contract <strong>for</strong> the <strong>supply</strong> can be<br />

repudiated at any time by the<br />

purchase <strong>of</strong>ficer, if the supplies<br />

are not made to his satisfaction<br />

after giving an opportunity to the<br />

bidder <strong>of</strong> being heard and<br />

recording the reasons <strong>for</strong><br />

repudiation.<br />

We request honorable committee members <strong>for</strong> change in this clause. Any<br />

repudiation should be done only after providing <strong>for</strong> a notice period <strong>of</strong> 30 days<br />

to cure the default<br />

As per RFP<br />

80<br />

30<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>ma<br />

nce<br />

Security<br />

Deposit<br />

f(iii) to adjust any dues against the<br />

firm from any other contract with<br />

RISL.<br />

i) …. Such as severing future<br />

business relation or black listing etc.<br />

Blacklisting should be purely on corrupt and fraudulent practices, as asked in<br />

this bid. In case <strong>of</strong> default, department can <strong>for</strong>feited the EMD specific to this<br />

project, but not blacklist. Blacklisting impacts the overall company throughout<br />

nationally.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

81<br />

30<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

PSD Refer RFP We request honorable committee members <strong>for</strong> change <strong>for</strong>1: Pls delete - "To<br />

adjust any dues against the firm from any other contract with RISL."<br />

2: Any <strong>for</strong>feiture should be done only after providing <strong>for</strong> a notice period <strong>of</strong> 30<br />

days to cure the default.<br />

3: Pls delete - "Forfeiture <strong>of</strong> EMD/PSD shall be without prejudice to any other<br />

right <strong>of</strong> RISL to claim any damages as admissible under the law as well as to<br />

take such action against the Supplier/ Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der such as severing future<br />

business relation or black listing, etc".<br />

As per RFP<br />

82<br />

32<br />

Subcontra<br />

ct<br />

Refer RFP<br />

Maintenance <strong>of</strong> services through service franchisee or authorized partner<br />

should not be considered as sub contracting. Please confirm, if our<br />

understanding is correct.<br />

As per RFP<br />

83<br />

32<br />

Insurance a.The Goods supplied under the<br />

Contract shall be fully insured<br />

against loss by theft, destruction or<br />

damage incidental to manufacture<br />

or acquisition, transportation,<br />

storage, fire, flood, under exposure<br />

to weather and delivery at the<br />

designates project locations, in<br />

accordance with the applicable<br />

terms. The insurance charges will<br />

be borne by the supplier and<br />

Purchaser will not be required to<br />

pay such charges if incurred.<br />

Insurance required till when? Pls clarify. We understand that it is till delivery.<br />

Pls confirm.<br />

As per RFP<br />

84<br />

34<br />

Insurance Refer RFP<br />

Pls confirm <strong>for</strong> transit insurance upto delivery. Once the delivery challan is<br />

signed insurance will end and ownership will get transferred to department.<br />

As per RFP<br />

Please read the clause 21 (Insurance )<br />

carefully.


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

85<br />

86<br />

35<br />

38<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

LD Refer RFP 1. We would request the customer to modify this as "LD/ penalty <strong>for</strong> delay<br />

shall be levied at 0.5% per week <strong>for</strong> the late delivery/ undelivered portion <strong>of</strong><br />

the equipment with a maximum <strong>of</strong> 5% <strong>of</strong> the late delivery / undelivered<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the equipment value.<br />

2. Not withstanding anything contained in this tender the maximum LD/<br />

Penalty should be capped @ 5 % cost <strong>of</strong> the undelivered/delayed delivered<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the material.<br />

Limitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Liability<br />

AS per draft<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> change in language to "Vendor shall not be liable <strong>for</strong> any<br />

indirect, punitive, consequential or incidental loss, damage, claims, liabilities,<br />

charges, costs, expense or injury, including, without limitation, loss <strong>of</strong> use,<br />

data, revenue, pr<strong>of</strong>its, business interruption, and loss <strong>of</strong> income or pr<strong>of</strong>its,<br />

that may arise out <strong>of</strong> or result from this Agreement, irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether it<br />

had an advance notice <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> any such damages. The aggregate<br />

liability <strong>of</strong> Vendor under this Agreement, regardless <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the claim,<br />

shall not exceed the: (i) order value in case <strong>of</strong> products; (ii) fees received by<br />

Vendor under this Agreement during the six months preceding the date <strong>of</strong><br />

such claim, in case <strong>of</strong> services.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

Vendor’s failure to per<strong>for</strong>m its contractual responsibilities, to per<strong>for</strong>m the<br />

services, or to meet agreed service levels shall be excused if and to the extent<br />

Vendor’s non-per<strong>for</strong>mance is caused by Customer’s omission to act, delay,<br />

wrongful action, failure to provide inputs, or failure to per<strong>for</strong>m its obligations<br />

under this Agreement."<br />

87<br />

39<br />

Terminati<br />

on <strong>for</strong><br />

Default<br />

AS per draft<br />

The Purchaser, without prejudice to any other remedy <strong>for</strong> breach <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Agreement, by written notice <strong>of</strong> 30 days <strong>of</strong> default sent to the Supplier, may<br />

terminate this Agreement in whole or in part:<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

88<br />

39<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Change<br />

Orders<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Refer RFP<br />

We request <strong>for</strong> change in clause to 1: Any change order and amendment can<br />

be done only on mutual basis. Further vendor should have the right <strong>of</strong> refusal<br />

without incurring any liability <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>feiture <strong>of</strong> EMD/PBG or incurring any<br />

penalty/charge.<br />

2: Price <strong>for</strong> any change order to be mutually agreed on equitable basis.<br />

3: pls delete - "Prices to be charged by the supplier/ selected bidder <strong>for</strong> any<br />

related services that might be needed<br />

but which were not included in the Contract shall be agreed upon in advance<br />

by the parties and shall not exceed the prevailing rates charged to other<br />

parties by the supplier/ selected bidder <strong>for</strong> similar services."<br />

As per RFP<br />

89<br />

40<br />

Settlemen<br />

t <strong>of</strong><br />

Disputes<br />

AS per draft<br />

Any disputes shall be first resolved amicably by discussion between the As per RFP<br />

Vendor and Customer, failing which the same shall be referred to and shall be<br />

settled by binding arbitration conducted by a sole arbitrator jointly appointed<br />

by both parties and governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.<br />

90<br />

41<br />

Payment<br />

Term<br />

Refer RFP<br />

We request <strong>for</strong> change in payment term. We are anyway submitting security<br />

<strong>for</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong> SLA monitoring. Pls change the clause to - 90% on delivery<br />

and 10% on installation and submission <strong>of</strong> bank guarantee <strong>for</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong><br />

contract value.<br />

In case where site is not ready or any default because <strong>of</strong> buyer, full 100%<br />

payment has to be released within 30 days <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> goods to site.<br />

Full payment has to be made within 30 days <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> invoice., Else<br />

penal charges <strong>of</strong> 1% pm or part there<strong>of</strong> will be levied.<br />

As per RFP<br />

91<br />

SLA and<br />

Penalty<br />

Please confirm that the penalty will be caped to maximum <strong>of</strong> 5% <strong>of</strong> total<br />

contract value.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

42


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

92<br />

43<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Title and<br />

Risk<br />

Transfer<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

All title <strong>of</strong> the assets to be<br />

transferred to Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education or RISL or its<br />

nominated agencies pursuant to<br />

clause(s) above shall be transferred<br />

on the last day <strong>of</strong><br />

the exit management period<br />

Vendor assumes that the title <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the goods supplied under this<br />

contract is passed on the customer on delivering the material to the<br />

customer. Request your confirmation on this. Without this, revenue will not<br />

get recognized.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

93<br />

43<br />

Exit<br />

Managem<br />

ent<br />

Refer RFP<br />

Vendor should not bear any cost or penalty or charge w.r.t Exit management.<br />

Buyer should bear all cost and charges. Also as per the clause number 37 B<br />

(iii) B page number 43, assets will get transferred after 3 years, which means<br />

the revenue will not get recognized <strong>for</strong> bidder <strong>for</strong> 3 years. Request you to<br />

kindly delete this clause. This is very important clause <strong>for</strong> deletion. Request<br />

you to kindly delete.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

94<br />

48<br />

Laptop<br />

Processor<br />

Latest generation X86, Dual Core<br />

(Intel Pentium/AMD Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or<br />

higher with 2MB cache)<br />

Request you to kindly remove Pentium as a sub brand from the processor<br />

required from Intel, as the per<strong>for</strong>mance is being bench marked by the<br />

SYSmark rating mentioned in the tender document. Hence pls change the<br />

processor to "X86 dual core architecture " to avoid any confusion in plat<strong>for</strong>m<br />

available."<br />

As per RFP<br />

95<br />

Bill <strong>of</strong><br />

Material<br />

We request department to please clarify what is meant the Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong><br />

Service as it is mentioned to be 24 months where as the warranty is 12<br />

months<br />

End <strong>of</strong> service is the period <strong>for</strong> which<br />

the OEM supports the product in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> repair, spare parts etc.<br />

47<br />

Warranty shall be provided by the<br />

bidder <strong>for</strong> 1 year however OEM shall<br />

support the product <strong>for</strong> next 24<br />

months<br />

96<br />

49<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Optical Drive<br />

Please change the speed <strong>of</strong> the DVRW to 8x as that is the speed that we get in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> Slim DVDRW which are used in notebooks<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

97<br />

49<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

AC Power Adapter<br />

Request you to change the same to 110-240V as that is the industry standard,<br />

however the same would be tested to operate within the given range <strong>of</strong> 110-<br />

250V<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

98<br />

49<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Battery Type<br />

Request you to change the battery back-up required to 3 hours as that a<br />

47Whr battery given in standard test conditions.<br />

As per RFP<br />

99<br />

50<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Qualifying Benchmark Please confirm whether the test score has to be given with Windows 7<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional which is generally the case or Windows 7 Home Basic which is<br />

the OS been given along with the machine, this is currently not clear as the<br />

requirement mentions that the score should be <strong>of</strong> the machine been<br />

supplied.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

100<br />

24-25<br />

Signing <strong>of</strong><br />

Contract<br />

We request committee member to consider that Contract to be on mutually<br />

accepted terms and conditions. Wipro needs to have an option to accept/<br />

reject applicable T&Cs.<br />

As per RFP<br />

101<br />

31-32<br />

Confidenti<br />

al<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mati<br />

on<br />

Notwithstanding anything contained to the contrary herein, Wipro may share<br />

Contract/engagement/ project details and relevant documentation to its<br />

customers/ prospective customers solely <strong>for</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong> and with the<br />

intent to evidence and support its experience earned under this Contract.<br />

Confidentiality obligations to survive <strong>for</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> 3 years post disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />

any confidential in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

As per RFP<br />

102 Risk<br />

Purchase<br />

If Wipro, having been notified, fails to remedy the defect(s)/delays within<br />

thirty (30) days from date <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> notice <strong>of</strong> breach by Client and the<br />

defect becomes irremediable at Wipro's end, the Client may procure<br />

substitute goods/services from any third party and require Wipro to<br />

reimburse the Client <strong>for</strong> any additional costs incurred in procuring such<br />

goods/services from a third party up to a maximum incremental charges not<br />

exceeding 10% (Ten Percent) <strong>of</strong> the amount paid or payable if the<br />

goods/services are procured from Wipro. Risk Purchase only in case <strong>of</strong> full<br />

partial termination. This claim shall be payable if the Parties have failed to<br />

reach a resolution as per the dispute resolution process as agreed upon.<br />

As per RFP<br />

103 Sample Do we need to submit a sample <strong>of</strong> the machine been supplied to RISL or not,<br />

also clarify if a sample is required then what is the no. to be submitted.<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

104 Site Not<br />

Ready<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Wipro assumes that the sites shall be kept ready <strong>for</strong> installations and<br />

acceptance well be<strong>for</strong>e deliveries. However, in case the installation/<br />

acceptance gets delayed beyond 15 days <strong>of</strong> delivery, due to sites not ready or<br />

any other reason attributable to the customer, the equipment shall be<br />

deemed to have been installed and commissioned <strong>for</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

payment, warranty, title transfer or any other related clause.<br />

As per RFP<br />

105 Deemed<br />

Acceptanc<br />

e<br />

Deliverables will be deemed to be fully and finally accepted by Client in the<br />

event Client has not submitted a Acceptance certificate within 15 days from<br />

the date <strong>of</strong> installation/commissioning or when Client uses the Deliverable in<br />

its business, whichever occurs first<br />

As per RFP<br />

106 Pass<br />

Through<br />

Warranty<br />

Since Wipro is acting as a reseller <strong>of</strong> completed goods, Wipro shall “passthrough”<br />

any warranties and indemnities received from the manufacturer or<br />

licensor <strong>of</strong> such goods and, to the extent, granted by such manufacturer or<br />

licensor, Customer shall be the beneficiary <strong>of</strong> such manufacturer’s or<br />

licensor’s warranties and indemnities with respect to the products. Further, it<br />

is clarified that Wipro shall not provide any additional warranties and<br />

indemnities with respect to the products.<br />

As per RFP<br />

107 Saving<br />

clause<br />

Wipro may terminate this Agreement and/or any work order immediately As per RFP<br />

upon written notice to the other party, in the event the other Party commits<br />

a material breach <strong>of</strong> the Agreement and/or Purchase Order and fails to cure<br />

such default within thirty (30) days after receipt <strong>of</strong> such notice. Customer<br />

shall be responsible <strong>for</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> Services, Equipment and S<strong>of</strong>tware already<br />

provided by Wipro but not yet invoiced. There shall be no charges <strong>for</strong><br />

termination <strong>of</strong> orders or <strong>for</strong> Services not yet provided and Wipro shall not be<br />

held liable <strong>for</strong> the same.<br />

108 Dispute<br />

Resolutio<br />

n<br />

This Agreement shall be governed by laws in <strong>for</strong>ce in India. In the event <strong>of</strong><br />

any dispute arising out <strong>of</strong> this Agreement the same shall be settled by binding<br />

arbitration conducted by a sole arbitrator jointly appointed by both parties<br />

and governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The language <strong>of</strong><br />

the arbitration proceedings shall be English.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

109 Splitting<br />

<strong>of</strong> order<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> addition<br />

We highly recommend that the deal should be splitted between 3 bidders i.e.<br />

L1 / L2 and L3 at the ratio 40% to L1, 30 % to L2 and 30% to L3, who ever<br />

matches the L1 prices. Since the quantity is large, this will be beneficial to<br />

department / Government and vendor. In case L2 bidder does not agrees to<br />

match the price, deal can be splitted between L1 & L3 (in case L3 agrees). In<br />

case L2 and L3 does not agree, L1 alone has to <strong>supply</strong>. Request to consider<br />

this clause.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

110 End <strong>of</strong><br />

Sale / End<br />

<strong>of</strong> Life<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> addition<br />

Similarly as asked by SI to quote <strong>for</strong> models, which are not EOS and EOL, we<br />

request you to kindly specify in bid that the Processor and Motherboard <strong>for</strong><br />

the supplied items also should not be declared EOS / EOL. Since the model<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> any machine are governed by these 2 items, this will help in<br />

bringing clarity.<br />

As per RFP<br />

111<br />

112<br />

16<br />

16<br />

STQC /<br />

ETDC /<br />

ERTL<br />

testing<br />

Request <strong>for</strong> clarify Request you to kindly confirm the testing to be undertake by ETDC / STQC /<br />

ERTL? Please clarify in detail to avoid ambiguity<br />

It shall be in accordance with the As per our understanding the said ISO certification is not <strong>for</strong> IT. Request you<br />

Indian Standards - 14896:2001 as to kindly look in to the same and confirm.<br />

amended from time to time and<br />

also with the Technical Specification<br />

as specified in Annexure-2 and be<br />

done by any one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the below mentioned Testing<br />

Agencies<br />

Yes. As per RFP<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

113 Page No<br />

9<br />

Laptop<br />

Sales in<br />

India<br />

Certification <strong>of</strong> IDC / Gartner<br />

Laptop OEM will be in Top 5 IDC/Gartner list in the Calendar Year 2012 / last<br />

four quarter put together<br />

As per RFP<br />

114 Page No<br />

14<br />

B) Payments to the bidder, after<br />

Payment successful completion <strong>of</strong> the target<br />

Terms and milestones<br />

Schedule<br />

Payment should be centralized & from RajCOMP on submission <strong>of</strong> complete<br />

documents asked in RFP<br />

As per RFP.<br />

The payments after completing the<br />

required <strong>for</strong>malities shall be made by<br />

RISL.


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

115 Page No<br />

16, point<br />

d<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

ERTL/ETD<br />

C/STQC<br />

Test<br />

Report<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

The <strong>Bid</strong>ders shall submit Laptop test<br />

report <strong>for</strong> the proposed Laptop<br />

model<br />

We request RajCOMP to allow bidders to submit ERTL/ETDC/STQC test report<br />

obtained in last 5 months . This is to avoid duplication <strong>of</strong> work as<br />

ERTL/ETDC/STQC testing is time consuming and takes almost a month to<br />

complete the entire activity.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

116 Page No<br />

19<br />

15.Selecti<br />

on<br />

method:<br />

The selection method is Least Cost<br />

Based Selection (LCBS or L1).<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> tight delivery schedule we request RajCOMP to allow bidder to<br />

quote <strong>for</strong> one or two slots .This will help RajCOMP <strong>for</strong> smooth execution &<br />

fast delivery <strong>of</strong> entire One lakh twelve thousand laptops required by<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong>. To ensure smooth and timely execution the order<br />

may be shared among L1,L2, L3 bidder at 40%,30%,30% ratio respectively.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

117 Page No<br />

48<br />

Operating<br />

System<br />

Win 7 Flavour <strong>of</strong> Windows7/Windows 8 should be allowed <strong>for</strong> <strong>supply</strong> with <strong>Laptops</strong> As per amended RFP<br />

118 Page No<br />

50<br />

Qualifying<br />

benchmar<br />

k with<br />

score<br />

BAPCO SysMark 2007 overall score<br />

<strong>of</strong> 115 or Higher <strong>for</strong> the supplied<br />

system. The bidder has to provide<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance certificate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

system from ETDC / STQC.<br />

Kindly specify Win 7 / Win 8 <strong>for</strong> testing Report<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

119 Annexur<br />

e-2<br />

120 Annexur<br />

e-2<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

on<br />

Qualifying Benchmark with Score<br />

Graphics Card<br />

We would like to request if BAPCO SysMark 2007 score can be replaced by<br />

other third party benchmark like Passmark (64 Bit) CPU score as AMD ceases<br />

to be a part <strong>of</strong> BAPCO Consortium<br />

AMD would like to emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> graphics in today's era <strong>of</strong><br />

visual computing and processor must support direct X11 or higher<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

121 57<br />

55<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Annexure- We agree to all the terms &<br />

9 conditions as mentioned in the<br />

Annexure- bidding document and submit that<br />

7 we have not submitted any<br />

deviations in this regard.<br />

1) HP requests that deviations to the tender terms & conditions be allowed.<br />

Upon down selection <strong>of</strong> vendor, both parties can enter into a definitive and<br />

mutually agreed contract.<br />

As per RFP<br />

Also, I/ we have thoroughly read<br />

the tender/ bidding document and<br />

by signing this certificate, we<br />

hereby submit our token <strong>of</strong><br />

acceptance to all the tender terms<br />

& conditions without any<br />

deviations.<br />

122 10 4 * Testing by STQC / ETDC / ERTL (by<br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der)<br />

* 100% Quality inspection and<br />

testing (Internal by Vendor)<br />

* <strong>Pre</strong>-dispatch Inspection by RSIL - 3<br />

days<br />

* Sample inspection by Third Party<br />

Agency (TPA) - 7 days<br />

* <strong>Pre</strong>loaded educational content -<br />

The s<strong>of</strong>t copy <strong>of</strong> the educational<br />

content shall be provided by RISL /<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

signing <strong>of</strong> the Agreement.<br />

* Delivery 1,12,000 <strong>Laptops</strong> in 33<br />

Districts in 2 phases<br />

* Post-delivery Inspection - by RISL<br />

with DoIT&C and Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education<br />

* Warranty - 12 months (including<br />

service center and helpdesk)<br />

1) Will the orders <strong>for</strong> the different lots be released separately or entire<br />

quantity will be released in a single order?<br />

2) Kindly confirm if the Billing will be done to "Govt <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong>" or to<br />

"RajCOMP Info Services Limited"?<br />

3) The tender specifies three type <strong>of</strong> inspections - a) <strong>Pre</strong>-dispatch inspection<br />

by RSIL, b) <strong>Pre</strong>-dispatch Inspection by Third Party Agency, and c) Post<br />

Dispatch Inspection by RSIL & DOE. Please clarify if all the three inspections<br />

will be applicable to this order.<br />

4) Kindly confirm that the scope <strong>of</strong> vendor will be limited to only delivery and<br />

will not include installation/commissioning.<br />

5) Kindly confirm that the delivery will be done at District Headquarter level<br />

only. Who will be the authority to sign the Delivery Challan at all locations?<br />

6) We assume that signing <strong>of</strong> the "Delivery Challan" (Annexure-14), will<br />

constitute the final acceptance <strong>of</strong> the product. Kindly confirm!<br />

7) The document requirement <strong>for</strong> 95% payments includes the "Post Delivery<br />

Inspection report". Please clarify where and when this inspection will be<br />

done. Who will the the authority to conduct the Inspection? What will be the<br />

report <strong>for</strong>mat? What will be the maximum timelines to complete inspection?<br />

8) Kindly confirm that 'Help Desk' requirement will be <strong>for</strong> Warranty period<br />

only.<br />

9) Also, a Statement <strong>of</strong> Work to be mutually discussed and agreed needs to<br />

be drawn up and executed between the parties which will supersede the RFP.<br />

1. As per amended RFP.<br />

2. Yes billing will be done to RISL<br />

3. Yes . All 3 types <strong>of</strong> inspection shall<br />

be applicable<br />

4. Scope includes installation <strong>of</strong><br />

preloaded S<strong>of</strong>tware including<br />

Operating System, Office Suite,<br />

Antivirus, Education Content given by<br />

RISL/ Department <strong>of</strong> Education and<br />

Other s<strong>of</strong>tware as directed by RISL/<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> education<br />

5. Delivery Location shall be at the 33<br />

District headquarters in the State <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong><br />

6. Final acceptance shall be subject to<br />

Delivery <strong>of</strong> laptop, completion <strong>of</strong> post<br />

delivery inspection and submission <strong>of</strong><br />

documents given in Payment terms<br />

and schedule<br />

7. Post Delivery inspection may be<br />

conducted at district headquarter or<br />

at Jaipur.<br />

8.Yes helpdesk shall be <strong>for</strong> warranty<br />

period.<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

123 13 4 * Consignee will be concerned<br />

District Education Officer or<br />

Authorized Representative from<br />

DoE, GoR or RISL at District<br />

location. Delivery challan in<br />

customer <strong>for</strong>mat (ANNEXURE-14).<br />

* Details <strong>of</strong> exact location <strong>for</strong><br />

delivery at the District Headquarter<br />

shall be provided by RISL/<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Education, GoR to<br />

the successful bidder be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> final delivery.<br />

* Phase - 1 (scheme <strong>for</strong> 2012-13):<br />

- Lot 1: 28000 within 45 Days from<br />

the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order<br />

- Lot 2: 28000 within 60 Days from<br />

the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order<br />

* Phase - 1 (scheme <strong>for</strong> 2013-14):<br />

- Lot 3: 36000 within 90 Days from<br />

the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order<br />

- Lot 4: 20000 within 120 Days from<br />

the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order<br />

1) Considering the large volume <strong>of</strong> materials involved, we request <strong>for</strong> an<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> delivery period, as mentioned below:<br />

* Phase - 1 (scheme <strong>for</strong> 2012-13):<br />

- Lot 1: 28000 within 75 Days from the Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order acceptance<br />

- Lot 2: 28000 within 105 Days from the Date <strong>of</strong> WO acceptance<br />

* Phase - 1 (scheme <strong>for</strong> 2013-14):<br />

- Lot 3: 36000 within 120 Days from the Date <strong>of</strong> WO acceptance<br />

- Lot 4: 20000 within 150 Days from the Date <strong>of</strong> WO acceptance<br />

2) HP requests that the entire period required <strong>for</strong> pre-dispatch inspections<br />

(7+10 days) should be excluded from Delivery TAT, <strong>for</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> any LD.<br />

Delivery period will be applicable from date <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> consignee details,<br />

road permit where applicable, and date <strong>of</strong> acceptance <strong>of</strong> Work Order by<br />

Vendor.<br />

5) Customer will need to provide the road permit required <strong>for</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

materials. If road permit is not provided, customer will need to provide<br />

required declaration and the Entry tax applicable will be charged at actual to<br />

customer on submission <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> payment. Kindly help to give your<br />

acceptance on the same.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

124 56 Annexure-<br />

8<br />

UNDERTAKING ON AUTHENTICITY<br />

OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENTS<br />

1) Suitable changes to the Undertaking <strong>of</strong> Authenticity is requested to be<br />

made at the time <strong>of</strong> bid submission<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

125 11 Chapter 4 * 12 Months from the date <strong>of</strong><br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> the delivery<br />

* Comprehensive and Carrying<br />

warranty including battery and<br />

adaptor.<br />

* SLA: T+7 - no penalty; > T+7 - Rs<br />

100/- per day; > T+90 - Remedial<br />

action by RSIL.<br />

* Applicable penalties shall be<br />

calculated on Quarterly basis. The<br />

total Penalty in each phase shall not<br />

exceed 5% <strong>of</strong> the total value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Order. Default beyond 5% will be<br />

deemed to be an event <strong>for</strong><br />

termination on default.<br />

* Warranty on supplied s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

media should be atleast 90 days.<br />

* Service centre in 33 Districts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong> - run by <strong>Bid</strong>der /<br />

Franchise / authorized distributors /<br />

dealers / authorized local partner <strong>of</strong><br />

bidder OR undertaking to establish<br />

in all 33 Districts within 30 days<br />

from Date <strong>of</strong> Work Order and<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e signing <strong>of</strong> Agreement.<br />

Details to be provided as per<br />

ANNEXURE-13.<br />

* Helpdesk - to facilitate and<br />

monitor warranty services provided<br />

by the service centres. 2 seater help<br />

desk with toll free number at RSIL<br />

1) We also request you to remove the mandatory requirement <strong>of</strong> a service<br />

center in each District, which will have a significant impact on the cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project. HP will ensure to meet the required SLA, through its existing service<br />

setup in the state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong>.<br />

2) Warranty shall start from date <strong>of</strong> installation, or 1 month from the date <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery, whichever is earlier.<br />

3) The Warranty will be <strong>for</strong> hardware. For all s<strong>of</strong>tware only L1 diagnosis will<br />

be done by Vendor. HP provides third-party products, s<strong>of</strong>tware, and services<br />

that are not HP Branded “AS IS” without warranties <strong>of</strong> any kind, although the<br />

original manufacturers or third party suppliers <strong>of</strong> such products, s<strong>of</strong>tware and<br />

services may provide their own warranties. Eg. S<strong>of</strong>tware from Micros<strong>of</strong>t etc<br />

will be supported during warranty as per Micros<strong>of</strong>t warranty.<br />

1. As per amended RFP<br />

2. As per RFP<br />

3. As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

126 36 26, d Delivery Default:<br />

Penalty as % <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> goods and/<br />

or service which supplier has failed<br />

to <strong>supply</strong>:<br />

* Delay up to 1/4th <strong>of</strong> period <strong>of</strong><br />

delivery, completion <strong>of</strong> work - 2.5%<br />

* Delay exceeding 1/4th but not<br />

exceeding 1/2lf - 5%<br />

* Delay exceeding 1/2lf but not<br />

exceeding 3/4th - 7.5%<br />

* Delay exceeding 3/4th - 10%<br />

The maximum amount <strong>of</strong> liquidated<br />

damages shall be 10% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

desired Lot. The percentage refers<br />

to the payment due <strong>for</strong> the<br />

associated milestone/lot.<br />

Warranty Default:<br />

* SLA: T+7 - no penalty; > T+7 - Rs<br />

100/- per day; > T+90 - Remedial<br />

action by RSIL.<br />

* Applicable penalties shall be<br />

calculated on Quarterly basis. The<br />

total Penalty in each phase shall not<br />

exceed 5% <strong>of</strong> the total value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Order. Default beyond 5% will be<br />

deemed to be an event <strong>for</strong><br />

termination on default.<br />

1) Kindly confirm that the aggregate Penalty <strong>for</strong> default in Warranty terms,<br />

during the complete Warranty period, shall not exceed 5% <strong>of</strong> the total value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Order.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

127 18 10 * Rs. 4.92 Crore - Bankers<br />

Chq/DD/BG <strong>of</strong> Scheduled<br />

Commercial Bank, valid <strong>for</strong> <strong>Bid</strong><br />

Validity.<br />

* The EMD taken from the bidder<br />

shall be <strong>for</strong>feited in the following<br />

cases:- To adjust any dues against<br />

the firm from any other contract<br />

with RISL.<br />

1) Kindly confirm that Bank Guarantee from a scheduled bank will be<br />

acceptable. Also as per the RBI's norms, Bank may make suitable changes to<br />

the <strong>for</strong>mat <strong>of</strong> the Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank Guarantee.<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

128 31 15 * 20% <strong>of</strong> order value in <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> BG<br />

* Within 15 days <strong>of</strong> notification <strong>of</strong><br />

contract award<br />

* Refund after 3 months <strong>of</strong> the<br />

successful completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

contract period i.e. 01 months after<br />

expiry <strong>of</strong> “Warranty and Support<br />

Services” <strong>of</strong> all the <strong>Laptops</strong>.<br />

1) Please specify the validity period (months) <strong>for</strong> the PSD.<br />

2) Also as per the RBI's norms, Bank may make suitable changes to the <strong>for</strong>mat<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank Guarantee.<br />

1. As per amended RFP<br />

2. <strong>Bid</strong>ders shall submit PBG as per<br />

the Template provided in Annexure -<br />

11 <strong>of</strong> the RFP Document<br />

129 41 35 Milestone:<br />

1) We understand that the bill submission to RISL and payment release will be<br />

* Complete Lot-1/2/3/4 <strong>of</strong> <strong>Laptops</strong> - done from a single centralized location. Kindly confirm the details where the<br />

95% (Docs - Inv, Post-DI Report,<br />

Delivery Challan)<br />

* Quarterly Helpdesk Reports -<br />

0.6% + Actual cost <strong>for</strong> Helpdesk<br />

* Final Quarter Helpdesk Report -<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> PO + Actual cost <strong>for</strong><br />

Helpdesk<br />

Period:<br />

bills need to be submitted and payment will be released.<br />

2) HP requests <strong>for</strong> release <strong>of</strong> balance 5% payment, against submission <strong>of</strong><br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank Guarantee <strong>of</strong> 5% by the Vendor, valid till Warranty period.<br />

3) Kindly confirm that the vendor can raise bills and receive payments<br />

partially. Can vendor submit bills <strong>for</strong> locations where obligation is complete?<br />

4) For SNR (site not ready) cases, we request <strong>for</strong> release <strong>of</strong> 95% payments,<br />

against bidders undertaking to complete the installation when the site is<br />

ready. Balance 5% can be released against submission <strong>of</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance Bank<br />

* Payment period - Within sixty (60) Guarantee <strong>of</strong> 5% by the Vendor, valid till completion <strong>of</strong> Warranty period.<br />

days after submission and<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> an invoice.<br />

5) We propose that Bank will pay all invoiced amounts within thirty (30) days<br />

<strong>of</strong> HP's invoice date.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

130 24 30 * At the time the Contract is<br />

awarded, the quantity <strong>of</strong> Goods and<br />

Related Services originally specified<br />

in the bidding document may be<br />

increased or decreased but without<br />

any change in the unit prices or<br />

other terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bid and the bidding document.<br />

* If the work order is placed up to<br />

100% in excess <strong>of</strong> the quantities<br />

mentioned in the bidding<br />

document, the bidder shall be<br />

bound to meet the required <strong>supply</strong>.<br />

* If the tendering authority does<br />

not purchase any <strong>of</strong> the tendered<br />

articles or purchases less than the<br />

quantity indicated in the bidding<br />

document, the bidder shall not be<br />

entitled to claim any compensation.<br />

1) HP proposes to limit any quantity variation to 15% to 20%, <strong>of</strong> the quantity<br />

specified in RFP. Any increase <strong>of</strong> decrease greater than 15% to 20%, will need<br />

to be discussed and agreed with vendor.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

131 30 13 Recovery <strong>of</strong> liquidated damages,<br />

short <strong>supply</strong>, breakage, rejected<br />

articles shall be made ordinarily<br />

from bills. The Purchase Officer<br />

shall withhold amount to the extent<br />

<strong>of</strong> short <strong>supply</strong>, broken/ damaged<br />

or <strong>for</strong> rejected articles unless these<br />

are replaced satisfactorily. In case<br />

<strong>of</strong> failure to withhold the amount, it<br />

shall be recovered from his dues<br />

and per<strong>for</strong>mance security deposit<br />

available with RISL. The balance, if<br />

any, shall be demanded from the<br />

Supplier/ Selected <strong>Bid</strong>der and when<br />

recovery is not possible, the<br />

Purchase Officer shall take recourse<br />

to law in <strong>for</strong>ce.<br />

1) HP proposes <strong>for</strong> customer to claim any penalty amount separately and HP<br />

will pay any due amount separately. This is proposed in view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

accounting complicacy resulting from any deduction <strong>of</strong> due invoices.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

132 29<br />

47<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

8, c<br />

Annexure-<br />

1<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

* The bidder shall not quote and<br />

<strong>supply</strong> any hardware/ s<strong>of</strong>tware that<br />

is likely to be declared as End <strong>of</strong><br />

Sale <strong>for</strong> twelve months and End <strong>of</strong><br />

Service/ Support <strong>for</strong> twenty four<br />

months from the date <strong>of</strong> bid<br />

submission. If any <strong>of</strong> the hardware/<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware is found to be declared as<br />

End <strong>of</strong> Sale/ Service/ Support in the<br />

period mentioned above, then the<br />

bidder shall replace all such<br />

hardware/ s<strong>of</strong>tware with the latest<br />

ones having equivalent or higher<br />

specifications without any financial<br />

obligation to the purchaser.<br />

* Period <strong>of</strong> back to back support,<br />

updates and patches - 12 months.<br />

* Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> sale - 12 months.<br />

* Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> service - 24<br />

months.<br />

1) As IT industry is very dynamic, there may be possibility <strong>of</strong> roll over models<br />

within 12 months. In cases <strong>of</strong> any such roll overs, vendor will make this<br />

available at no additional cost. Request to kindly remove the requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

"replacement" <strong>for</strong> any such product roll overs.<br />

As per RFP<br />

133 30 9, d Shifting the place <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />

destination: RISL/Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Education shall be free to shift the<br />

place <strong>of</strong> delivery within the same<br />

district. The successful/ selected<br />

bidder shall provide all assistance<br />

including transportation in shifting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the delivered Items.<br />

1) We can support <strong>for</strong> any reinstallation, but the cost <strong>of</strong> shifting, freight and<br />

transit documents will be responsibility <strong>of</strong> the customer.<br />

No.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

134 17 8, b * While tabulating the bids <strong>of</strong> those<br />

firms which are not entitled to price<br />

preference, the element <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong> VAT shall be excluded<br />

from the rates quoted by the firms<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong> and the element <strong>of</strong><br />

Central VAT shall be included in the<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> firms outside <strong>Rajasthan</strong>. In<br />

such case, if the price <strong>of</strong> any<br />

commodity being <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>for</strong> sale<br />

by firms in <strong>Rajasthan</strong> is the same or<br />

lower (excluding element <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rajasthan</strong> Sales Tax) than the price<br />

<strong>of</strong> firm outside <strong>Rajasthan</strong> (including<br />

element <strong>of</strong> Central Sales Tax), the<br />

commodity shall be purchased from<br />

the firm in <strong>Rajasthan</strong>.<br />

1) Please help to explain the reason (benefit to customer) <strong>of</strong> different tax<br />

treatment <strong>for</strong> local billing and billing from outside <strong>Rajasthan</strong>.<br />

As per State Policy / law<br />

As per RFP<br />

135 17<br />

30<br />

136 18<br />

31<br />

8, b<br />

14<br />

10<br />

15<br />

Taxes & Duties<br />

Forfeiture terms <strong>of</strong> EMD/PBG also<br />

includes: To adjust any dues against<br />

the firm from any other contract<br />

with RISL.<br />

1) Request your confirmation on below assumptions:<br />

- Taxes (VAT/CST/Service Tax) and Govt levies will be exclusive and to<br />

customers account.<br />

- Taxes and Govt levies will be at actual. Any changes in taxes/got levies will<br />

be to account <strong>of</strong> Customer.<br />

- Any road permit required <strong>for</strong> delivery will be provided by customer.<br />

Alternatively customer will provide the required declaration and the Entry tax<br />

applicable will be charged at actual to customer on submission <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

payment.<br />

1) We request that the adjustment <strong>of</strong> the EMD or PBG is limited to any dues<br />

<strong>of</strong> this contract only.<br />

As per RFP<br />

Regarding road permit and entry tax,<br />

please read the clause "Purchaser’s<br />

Responsibilities" and "Taxes &<br />

Duties" <strong>of</strong> Chapter 6 carefully<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

137 29 8 Unless otherwise stipulated in the<br />

Contract, the scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>supply</strong> shall<br />

include all such items not<br />

specifically mentioned in the<br />

Contract but that can be reasonably<br />

inferred from the Contract as being<br />

required <strong>for</strong> attaining delivery and<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> the goods and<br />

related services as if such items<br />

were expressly mentioned in the<br />

Contract.<br />

1) Scope to be limited to items quoted by Vendor, as per RFP requirement. As per RFP<br />

138 32 18 The bidder shall not assign or sublet<br />

his contract or any substantial<br />

part there<strong>of</strong> to any other agency<br />

without the permission <strong>of</strong><br />

Purchaser/ Tendering Authority,<br />

except <strong>for</strong> the following:<br />

· Setting-up a helpdesk<br />

· Establishment <strong>of</strong> Service Support<br />

Centres<br />

· Transportation <strong>of</strong> the Items<br />

mentioned in the annexure-1 to the<br />

destinations<br />

1) The <strong>Bid</strong>der will have the right to use subcontractors (also referred to as<br />

`<strong>Bid</strong>der's - authorized service providers` herein) to deliver products / provide<br />

services described in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the <strong>for</strong>egoing, the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subcontractors will not release HP from per<strong>for</strong>ming its obligations<br />

under this Agreement.<br />

As per RFP<br />

139 NA NA New Query 1) Kindly confirm if the OEM, can authorize its partner in <strong>Rajasthan</strong> <strong>for</strong> the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> orders. The OEM will do the biding, negotiation and<br />

conclude the contract with customer directly. However, OEM will authorize<br />

its local partner to carry out all commercial activities with Customer - Order<br />

release, Billing, Payment collection etc. OEM will remain responsible to the<br />

customer directly <strong>for</strong> its obligations under the agreement.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

140 38 29 The aggregate liability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Supplier shall not exceed the<br />

amount specified in the Contract<br />

HP requests that the aggregate liability <strong>of</strong> Supplier shall be limited to<br />

purchase order value.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

141 40 34 The existing clause provides <strong>for</strong> a<br />

Committee within the Customer's<br />

organization to decide on the<br />

dispute that arises between the<br />

parties.<br />

HP requests that after exhausting the option <strong>of</strong> settlement <strong>of</strong> disputes be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

the standing committee, it requests <strong>for</strong> an appointment <strong>of</strong> a Sole Arbitrator<br />

to decide the same. In this regard, it proposes the following:- In the event <strong>of</strong><br />

any dispute or differences arising under these conditions or any special<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> the contract in connection with this contract, or the<br />

construction, meaning, scope or operation or effect there<strong>of</strong>, or the rights,<br />

duties or liabilities or the validity <strong>of</strong> the breach there<strong>of</strong>, such dispute shall be<br />

referred to a sole arbitrator appointed by mutual consent <strong>of</strong> the both the<br />

parties and in the event <strong>of</strong> disagreement between the 2 parties, the<br />

appointment <strong>of</strong> the Arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the<br />

Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.<br />

As per RFP<br />

142 49 Annexure - DVD Writer ( 16X or higher) Standard speed is 8X or higher , request you to pls amend the same As per amended RFP<br />

2<br />

143 49 Annexure - Office Suite<br />

HP requests that Acrobat Pr<strong>of</strong>essional XI shall also be pre-installed in the As per amended RFP<br />

2<br />

laptop to allow the Students to collaborate with Teachers and create<br />

documents in PDF <strong>for</strong>mat, copy textual data from other PDF documents etc.<br />

144 16 STQC testing report validity is <strong>for</strong> 2<br />

months<br />

STQC testing Report validity to be relaxed from 2 months to 4 months<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

145<br />

48 and<br />

50<br />

ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Processor (Minimum): Latest<br />

generation X86, Dual Core (Intel<br />

Pentium / AMD Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or<br />

higher with 2MB cache) .<br />

Qualifying benchmark<br />

with Score: BAPCO SysMark 2007<br />

overall score<br />

<strong>of</strong> 115 or Higher <strong>for</strong> the supplied<br />

system. The bidder has to provide<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance certificate <strong>of</strong> the<br />

system from ETDC / STQC.<br />

BAPCO SYSMark2007 overall score <strong>of</strong> 115 is not the correct per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

score <strong>for</strong> latest generation Intel Pentium processor (at 2.0 GHz/2MB ) based<br />

laptops. This score is so low that it is met by other Intel Dual Core Processors.<br />

Any <strong>of</strong> below Options can be chosen by deptt. to match the processor<br />

specifications with qualifying benchmark score:<br />

a. For latest Pentium based laptop, the desired score with qualifying<br />

benchmark BAPCO SYSmark2007 overall needs to be 140 or higher<br />

OR<br />

b. Processor specifications should be changed to: "Latest Generation, x86,<br />

Dual Core Processor". Since the specifications have already asked <strong>for</strong><br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance ratings <strong>of</strong> 115, it will enable the bidders to select the optimal<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>m meeting the requirement.<br />

OR<br />

c. Latest Generation x86, Dual Core (Intel Pentium 2.0GHz / 2MB processor or<br />

equivalent AMD A6 processor as certified by STQC per<strong>for</strong>mance test report.<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

146<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

In the event <strong>of</strong> you considering processor Brand & model number approach<br />

below are the options:<br />

As per RFP<br />

48<br />

ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Processor (Minimum): Latest<br />

generation X86, Dual Core (Intel<br />

Pentium / AMD Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or<br />

higher with 2MB cache)<br />

AMD Dual core A4-3320M Processor OR Intel Dual Core B840 or higher.<br />

OR<br />

Intel Pentium B950 or AMD A6-4400M Processor or higher (where both are<br />

Dual Core Processors).<br />

OR<br />

Latest generation X86, Dual Core (Intel Pentium / AMD A6 Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or higher)<br />

147<br />

48<br />

ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Processor (Minimum): Latest<br />

generation X86, Dual Core (Intel<br />

Pentium / AMD Processor with<br />

processor Speed <strong>of</strong> 2.0 GHZ or<br />

higher with 2MB cache)<br />

Since none <strong>of</strong> the clause mentioned in the RFP gives the state got<br />

protection against obsolete products,<br />

<strong>Pre</strong>sent specifications can be qualified by laptop based on even processor<br />

released in 2009.<br />

we suggest to add below in the CPU specifications:<br />

“Processor should not be launched be<strong>for</strong>e year 2012 “<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Old & New Intel Pentium & AMD processors which qualifies the<br />

present specification” enclosed as appendix A<br />

As per RFP<br />

148<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

1<br />

Annexure<br />

II-<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

ons (OS)<br />

MS Windows 2007 Home Basic or<br />

Windows 8<br />

Request to modify the same to - Micros<strong>of</strong>t Windows 7 Home Basic or<br />

Windows 8<br />

149<br />

2<br />

Annexure<br />

II-<br />

Technical<br />

Specificati<br />

ons<br />

(Antivirus)<br />

MS Security Essentials covers under<br />

MS PIL scheme which exist with<br />

GoR and MS MoU<br />

Request to modify the “MS Security Essentials” with “Micros<strong>of</strong>t Security<br />

Essentials/ Windows Defender”.<br />

As per RFP<br />

150 Legibility<br />

Criteria<br />

151 9<br />

Legibility<br />

Criteria<br />

The <strong>Bid</strong>der shall be an OEM and<br />

Registered in India on or be<strong>for</strong>e 1st<br />

April 2008<br />

Please allow consortium partner<br />

A Laptop OEM or his one authorized Partner are eligible to participate in the<br />

Tender who is registered in India on or be<strong>for</strong>e 1st April 2008.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

152 41 35.<br />

Payment<br />

Terms and<br />

Schedule<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

Payment Terms and Schedule<br />

Lenovo requests RajCOMP to kindly elaborate the payment terms as it is not<br />

Transparent in the RFP<br />

As per RFP<br />

153 New Proposed Clause <strong>for</strong> Tax<br />

Change<br />

The basic rates shall REMAIN FIRM during the tenure <strong>of</strong> the contract / As per RFP<br />

extended period <strong>of</strong> contract and NO ESCALATIONS, whatsoever shall either be<br />

claimed or considered. However In case any national or state statute or any<br />

local law or regulation or by-law <strong>of</strong> any duly constituted authority is changed<br />

or comes into <strong>for</strong>ce which results in extra costs/tax in relation to the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> the goods/ Services, the consequential effect shall be to the<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the Purchaser and the same shall be borne by the Purchaser<br />

154 22 24 Negotiations We also propose to put clause <strong>of</strong> dividing the total quantities between<br />

L1:L2:L3 at 40:30:30 Incase L2 and L3 Matches the L1 Commercials Also<br />

incase L2 and L3 doesn’t match the commercials <strong>of</strong> L1 This has to be Re-<br />

Tendered. Below are some key Advantage to Government and Department<br />

Incase the Splitting is agreed:-<br />

Incase the entire Quantity is awarded to L1 and considering the execution<br />

timelines is 120 Days but Incase this Quantity gets splitted in L1:L2:L3 then<br />

the entire project will be executed in much less time as mentioned the RFP.<br />

Incase the entire Quantity is awarded to L1 and L1 delays the delivery<br />

timeline because <strong>of</strong> any reason then Government's <strong>Pre</strong>stigious project is<br />

impacted badly and Incase this is divided in L1:L2:L3 there is high probability<br />

that out <strong>of</strong> 3 <strong>Bid</strong>ders if 2 has completed the execution then the Project is 70%<br />

Completely executed.<br />

Increases participation thus will Increase Healthy competition and best<br />

competitive commercials will be <strong>of</strong>fered to the Government/Department<br />

Also Please note that Central Government/state governments and State<br />

Nodal Agencies Like ELCOT/UPLC/MPSEDC/AMTRON has implemented the<br />

same clause and are highly benefitted<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

155 16 D ERTL/STQC/ETDC Test Reports Please elaborate the parameters <strong>of</strong> the Testing to be done through<br />

ERTL/STQC/ETDC<br />

Laptop Test Report shall include the<br />

test results <strong>for</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance Testing<br />

in complaince to the Technical<br />

Specifications and as per SYSmark<br />

rating mentioned in the RFP<br />

document


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

156 16 D The submitted Laptop Test Report<br />

shall not be dated more than two<br />

months prior to the last date <strong>of</strong><br />

submission <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s.<br />

Request to please amend the same as :-The submitted Laptop Test Report<br />

shall not be dated more than Six months prior to the last date <strong>of</strong> submission<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s.<br />

As per RFP<br />

157 36 26 LD b) Liquidated damages: Delay up to one fourth period <strong>of</strong> the prescribed<br />

delivery period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 2.5 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services. Delay<br />

exceeding one fourth but not exceeding half <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery<br />

period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 5.0 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong><br />

undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services. Delay exceeding half<br />

but not exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the prescribed delivery period, successful<br />

installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 7.5 % <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/<br />

uninstalled work/ delayed services. Delay exceeding three fourth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prescribed delivery period, successful installation & completion <strong>of</strong> work: 10.0<br />

% <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> undelivered Goods/ uninstalled work/ delayed services.<br />

Kindly amend the LD item wise <strong>for</strong> the items only not delivered in time<br />

As per RFP<br />

158 17 9 Validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>: 120 days Kindly amend the validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong>s to at least 90 days. As per RFP<br />

159 New Proposed Clause: ERV Clause<br />

(Exchange Rate variation)<br />

160 48 ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Optical Drive : DVD R/W (16X<br />

higher)<br />

We request you to please add Exchange Rate variation Clause or please make<br />

it a international bid where we can quote in Dollar & payment will also be<br />

made in dollar. NISCI has recently released an RFP which has ERV Clause and<br />

slowly Government Department has understood <strong>of</strong> having the same clause in<br />

the RFP<br />

This is a non standard item <strong>for</strong> Laptop as generally 8x DVD Writer comes with<br />

Laptop. Kindly amend the same.<br />

As per RFP<br />

As per amended RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

161 48 ANNEXUR<br />

E-2:<br />

TECHNICA<br />

L<br />

SPECIFICA<br />

TIONS<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

OS: MS Windows 2007 Home Basic<br />

or Windows 8, whichever is latest<br />

launched and available in India at<br />

the time <strong>of</strong> delivery (National<br />

Academic) on Shape the Future SKU<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered by Micros<strong>of</strong>t to<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong> under<br />

MoU<br />

Please amend the OS as MS Win 7 Home Basic. Secondly please specify exact<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the OS as per the MOU signed between MS & Govt. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rajasthan</strong><br />

As per amended RFP<br />

162 47 Annexure-<br />

1<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> sale (in months) &<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> end <strong>of</strong> service & Period <strong>of</strong><br />

back to back support, updates and<br />

patches (in months)<br />

We appreciate this clause and would request you to specifically ask <strong>for</strong><br />

Manufacturer Authorization Form (MAF) from the supplier <strong>of</strong> critical<br />

components such as CPU, Mother board, Operating System, Office and<br />

antivirus application. This MAF would be submitted by all bidders.<br />

As per RFP<br />

163 Operating System (Latest) Please note that Windows 8 operating system is now available but the<br />

statement mentioned can lead to the confusion at a later stage and<br />

department may not be getting the maximum value, hence and would<br />

request department to be specific on the same.<br />

As per amended RFP<br />

164 14 24d Negotiations In our opinion, this clause is not as per industry practices and can put a<br />

question mark on whole tender process. Kindly reconsider your position on<br />

the same and delete the option <strong>of</strong> giving "written counter <strong>of</strong>fer" to lowest<br />

and /or other bidders.<br />

As per RFP<br />

165 14 24d Best Value <strong>Bid</strong>der Please provide the definition <strong>of</strong> "best value bidder". As per RFP<br />

166 16 30 b Changes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> Quantity- If the<br />

work order is placed up to 100% in<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> the quantities mentioned<br />

in the bidding document, the bidder<br />

shall be bound to meet the required<br />

<strong>supply</strong><br />

<strong>Bid</strong>der should be assigned single PO <strong>for</strong> the Final quantity with decreased or<br />

Increased <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> quantity. An additional PO <strong>for</strong> additional quantity shall be<br />

supplied subject to prevailing price quoted by the bidder.<br />

As per RFP<br />

167 17 26 d If the issuance <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal Work<br />

Order is likely to take time, a Letter<br />

<strong>of</strong> Intent (LOI) may be sent<br />

Pursuant to this clause, please specify the delivery date<br />

As per RFP


S. No RFP<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

RFP Rule<br />

no.<br />

Rule details Query/Suggestion/clarification Response<br />

168 18 48 Related to bid estimated price We understand from your bid document that department have provisioned a<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> INR 246.00 Crores <strong>for</strong> 112000 numbers <strong>of</strong> laptops. Based on this<br />

fact, per unit price stands at INR 21964.00 including all taxes exactly. Further,<br />

we have understood from today's pre-bid meeting that Micros<strong>of</strong>t component<br />

would be costing INR 2200.00 minimum, taking bare hardware price to INR<br />

19764.00 and this seems to be out <strong>of</strong> sync. with market conditions. We<br />

hereby propose department to buy MS component separately directly from<br />

MS and to provide the same to<br />

As per RFP<br />

169 61 Annexure<br />

12<br />

COMPONENTS OFFERED – BoM Please elaborate what is expected out <strong>of</strong> this Annexure-12 from us. Detail as required in the Annexure<br />

indicating make and mode <strong>of</strong> the<br />

laptop and reference and page<br />

number in the datasheet <strong>for</strong><br />

complying to technical specifications.<br />

170 Additional Points Companies or his subsidiaries who are providing any kind <strong>of</strong> consultancy to<br />

Government/Department on this project may not be allowed to participate<br />

either Directly or Indirectly<br />

As per RFP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!