Hams in Space!
Hams in Space! - Free and Open Source Software
Hams in Space! - Free and Open Source Software
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I<br />
<strong>in</strong> a favorable sky position, Activity peak s<br />
when the moon is with<strong>in</strong> common view of<br />
both Europe and North America. Random<br />
activity can be found from 144,(0) MHz to<br />
144 .020 MHz . Schedules are ru n bet .....een<br />
144.020 MH z and 144. 100 MH z. S<strong>in</strong>gfc<br />
sideband voice is so meti mes heard o n<br />
144 .105 MHz. I usuall y operate CW on<br />
144 .008 MHz dur<strong>in</strong>g such times, and abo on<br />
wcckdays a fter work. Many CQs are ca lled<br />
by myself, W5UN, and others du r<strong>in</strong>g these<br />
times.<br />
Schedule :\I ak<strong>in</strong>~<br />
EME operation is either random (call<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and answer<strong>in</strong>g CQs), or scheduled. Let 's discuss<br />
schedule operat<strong>in</strong>g procedures first.<br />
Schedules are made <strong>in</strong> several ways. The<br />
best way is to check <strong>in</strong>to the 2 meter EM E<br />
net beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g around 1730 UTC every Sat <br />
urday and Sunday on 14.345 MHz. Direct<br />
telephone ca lls to the statio n you want to<br />
make a schedule with is another way , I've<br />
set up many schedules .....ith small stations<br />
this way. A third way is to request a schedule<br />
by mail.<br />
Schedules usually last for one hour, but<br />
may be longer or shorter as agreed to by the<br />
participants. Smaller sta tions usually run<br />
schedules for one hou r . Du r<strong>in</strong>g schedule<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g, a frequency and time arc agreed on,<br />
und the two ru nn<strong>in</strong>g stat ions are designated as<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g either cast or w est. depend<strong>in</strong>g on their<br />
relative locat ion to one another. When a<br />
schedule beg<strong>in</strong>s, the eastern station transmits<br />
for the first two m<strong>in</strong>u tes beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g at the top<br />
of the hour. If the schedule starts at a time<br />
other than the top of the hour, the same twom<strong>in</strong>ute<br />
periods are used as ifthe schedule had<br />
sta rted on the hour. If you are ru nn<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
schedule with a station to the east ofyou, that<br />
station would be the eastern statio n, and you<br />
would be the weste rn station. The two-m<strong>in</strong>ute<br />
transm it/rece ive sequenc<strong>in</strong>g will co nt<strong>in</strong>ue<br />
until the schedule is completed or until time<br />
runs out.<br />
For successful 2 meter EME QSOs. you're<br />
required to exchange call signs, O's, RO ' s,<br />
and R's. This data must be received and acknowledged<br />
by both stations. 73s are usually<br />
sent also, but th is is optional <strong>in</strong>fonnat ion.<br />
Let's consider a schedule example.<br />
The table illustrates ho w a schedule between<br />
W4ZD <strong>in</strong> Florida and ZD8MB on Asce<br />
nsion b land might progress, and sho ws<br />
how the <strong>in</strong>formatio n discussed above is hand<br />
led. Let's say they have a one-hour schedule<br />
start<strong>in</strong>g at 1(0) G MT. ZD8M B is east o f<br />
W4ZD. so he is designated as the eastern<br />
station, and will transmit the first two m<strong>in</strong><br />
will send calls over and over<br />
utes. ZD8 ~1B<br />
for the full two m<strong>in</strong>utes (W4ZD de ZD8MB).<br />
W4ZD beg<strong>in</strong>s sendi ng at 1002 GMT. If<br />
W4ZD heard the calls, he will send ZD8MB<br />
de W4ZD for the first m<strong>in</strong>ute and a half, and<br />
O's for Ihe last half a m<strong>in</strong>ute. If W4ZD<br />
doesn't hear both calls, he calls only for the<br />
full two m <strong>in</strong>utes. This co nt<strong>in</strong>ues until eithe r<br />
station has heard both calls and O. Once an 0<br />
is heard, the station hear<strong>in</strong>g it responds with<br />
RO's dur<strong>in</strong>g his next transmission for the full<br />
two m<strong>in</strong>utes. The station copy<strong>in</strong>g RO 's has<br />
52 73 Amaleur Radio Today. March,1991<br />
received sufficient <strong>in</strong>fonnation for his part of<br />
the QSO . When the station transmitt<strong>in</strong>g RO's<br />
hears an R, that station has received sufficient<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation for his part, and the QSO is essentially<br />
complete. Most stations, upo n hear<strong>in</strong>g<br />
R's. will respond with R's and 73s to let<br />
the other station know that R's have been<br />
received.<br />
RandomQSOs<br />
Hav<strong>in</strong>g read all that about two- m<strong>in</strong>ute sequences,<br />
you will f<strong>in</strong>d thai a lot of random<br />
activity is conducted with one-m<strong>in</strong>ute sequences.<br />
In fact , nearly all my random QSOs<br />
are of the latter type . If stations are hear<strong>in</strong>g<br />
each other well enough to copy random calls<br />
<strong>in</strong> one m<strong>in</strong>ute , add itional time is not necessary,<br />
Random activity is quite a challenge for the<br />
less equipped, smalle r station. However, by<br />
an swer<strong>in</strong>g the CQs of larger stations transmitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
on the bottom 20 kHz of2 meters, it is<br />
possible to make QSOs, It is well-known that<br />
the signal level of a scheduled station ean be<br />
several dB less than that ofthe weakest identifiable<br />
random call<strong>in</strong>g station. A listen<strong>in</strong>g operator<br />
can mentally fill <strong>in</strong> the miss<strong>in</strong>g parts of<br />
a very weak station's call when he already<br />
knows what the call will be. Also, when the<br />
ope ra to r knows a certai n station will be<br />
call<strong>in</strong>g on schedule, he shifts his ears (and<br />
bra<strong>in</strong>) <strong>in</strong>to a more focused , selective mode <strong>in</strong><br />
order to dig thai station out of the noise . For<br />
these reasons, small stations are urged to<br />
make advanced schedules whenever possible.<br />
However, don't give up on answer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
random CQs, because you never know ifsuccess<br />
is possible until you try ,<br />
I must tell you one more thi ng about schedules<br />
and the pre- knowledge of callsign <strong>in</strong>formation:<br />
It takes discipl<strong>in</strong>e to assure yourself<br />
that you 're hear<strong>in</strong>g what you th <strong>in</strong>k you're<br />
hear<strong>in</strong>g when you dig deep <strong>in</strong>to the noise for<br />
long periods. Some operators ca n manage<br />
this sel f-d iscipl<strong>in</strong>e better tha n others. Remember,<br />
you will only shortchange yourself<br />
and the station you are schedul<strong>in</strong>g if you<br />
acknowledge QSO <strong>in</strong>formation that you have<br />
not truly heard, but only thought you heard<br />
or, worse, have guessed at. This is another<br />
reason why I enjoy random operation: I don't<br />
have to be as discipl<strong>in</strong>ed about what I thought<br />
I heard, s<strong>in</strong>ce I actually must hear the full call<br />
to know who is call<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The Effects of Conditions<br />
A sig nal of constant strength transmitted<br />
from Earth and then reflected back never<br />
yields the same signal level <strong>in</strong> a receiver from<br />
one moment to the next. There are many<br />
factors which cause this phenomenon. Some<br />
of these factors are well understood and predictable<br />
. Some are only pa rtially understood<br />
and are not so predictable , There are probebly<br />
a few factors that haven 't even been<br />
thought of yet. Some of the sig nal variations<br />
are short-te rm (such as those caused by<br />
moon/Earth libation), and some are longterm.<br />
such as those caused by Eanhfmoon<br />
distance separation. Libation effects are very<br />
short-term (milliseconds) and are of little <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
to EME operators. Longer-term factors<br />
are of great <strong>in</strong>terest because EME<br />
schedul<strong>in</strong>g and operation times are chosen<br />
based on a set of such predictable factors. I<br />
will expla<strong>in</strong> these factors shortly, There are<br />
also some factors which ca nnot be predicted<br />
<strong>in</strong> advance, but which ca n greatly affect EM E<br />
communications, I will briefly discuss these<br />
also.<br />
The distance of the moon fro m Earth, the<br />
position of the moon <strong>in</strong> the sky (that is, the<br />
background sky when look<strong>in</strong>g at the moon),<br />
and the phase of the moon dur<strong>in</strong>g its 29-day<br />
cycle all have well-known effects on reflected<br />
echo strength, relative to system noise. Du r<br />
<strong>in</strong>g the 29-day cycle the moon ranges from<br />
apogee (furthest from Earth) to perigee<br />
(nearest to Earth). At apogee, the strength of<br />
a return<strong>in</strong>g ec ho will be about 2 dB less than it<br />
will be at perigee, all other thi ngs be<strong>in</strong>g eq ual<br />
(which they seldom are). Also, dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
29-day cycle ofthe moon the background sky<br />
noise levels at 2 meters will vary fro m 175<br />
degrees to over 5000 degrees Kelv<strong>in</strong>. (The<br />
higher noise occurs when the moon is positioned<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st the galactic plane, which happens<br />
near the moon's most southerly dect<strong>in</strong>ation.)<br />
This noise equates to dB read<strong>in</strong>gs from<br />
1.75 dB to over 10 dB . Sky noise and path<br />
loss are the key data elements used by EME<br />
operators to determ<strong>in</strong>e the best operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
times du r<strong>in</strong>g the moon cycle.<br />
Factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the moon which are not so<br />
easily predictable are the effects caused by<br />
the Ea rth's geomagnetic field as the signals<br />
pass through it on the way to and from the<br />
moon. One such effect is Faraday rotation.<br />
This causes the polarity of signals to rotate<br />
from horizontal to vertical and back. Faraday<br />
rotation can cause a signal to null-out (or<br />
peak) depend<strong>in</strong>g upon what type of polarity<br />
your antenna has. Polarity see ms to rotate<br />
quite natu rally at about 1.5 m<strong>in</strong>ute <strong>in</strong>tervals<br />
when the geomagnetic field is normal. However,<br />
th<strong>in</strong>gs are seldom "normal" with the<br />
geomagnctic field (despite what WWV says),<br />
and sometimes rotation loc ks up for long periods<br />
of time. Another situation caused by<br />
geomagnetic activities is where signals .seem<br />
to be dispersed or absorbed, rather than rotated.<br />
At such times, it doesn't seem to make<br />
any difference what your antenna polarity is.<br />
Even if you could rotate polarity (as some<br />
stations can) it wouldn't help. I have also<br />
heard sig nals greatly enhanced <strong>in</strong> stre ngth<br />
when the geomagnetic lield was disturbed,<br />
although many times when this happens,<br />
communications is one-way, and stations at<br />
more northern latitudes will hear noth<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
long periods of time. Then the situation reverses,<br />
and the southern stations are locked<br />
out, So, it is difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> advance<br />
just what the effects will be for a given time<br />
and.condition. There is still a lot to be understood<br />
about suc h effects on EME communications<br />
before predict<strong>in</strong>g methods ca n take<br />
them <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />
There are are a few other rules of thumb<br />
about EME operat<strong>in</strong>g conditions. Overall,<br />
nighttime seems to be better than daytime for<br />
EME operation (perhaps because ionization<br />
and consequent absorption is less of a proolem).<br />
Butl have heard some very good cordi-