06.12.2012 Views

soa+d research manual - School of Architecture and Design, KMUTT

soa+d research manual - School of Architecture and Design, KMUTT

soa+d research manual - School of Architecture and Design, KMUTT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3<br />

PARADIGMS, STRATEGIES & TACTICS<br />

(OTHERWISE KNOWN AS METHODOLOGY)<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

At the heart <strong>of</strong> any <strong>research</strong> project is the question <strong>of</strong><br />

methodology. As it usually understood, methodology simply<br />

means the selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate methods (ways <strong>of</strong> gathering<br />

data) <strong>and</strong> means <strong>of</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> the results so gathered.<br />

That is, your methodology comprises the set <strong>of</strong> methods that<br />

you hypothesise will provide you with the means to answer the<br />

questions that drive your <strong>research</strong> inquiry.<br />

Whilst this is a useful way <strong>of</strong> starting to think about questions<br />

<strong>of</strong> methodology—a heuristic if you will—it’s apparent simplicity<br />

veils a set <strong>of</strong> more complex <strong>and</strong> contested ideas. in this brief<br />

note i want to explore these issues in a fairly straightforward<br />

way <strong>and</strong>, in doing so, raise a set <strong>of</strong> questions that you might<br />

consider as you carry out your <strong>research</strong> <strong>and</strong> work out the<br />

thinking behind it.<br />

PUTTING METHOD(OLOGY) IN CONTExT<br />

One way to clarify <strong>and</strong> extend your thinking about methods <strong>and</strong><br />

methodology is to make use <strong>of</strong> a modified version <strong>of</strong> a model<br />

suggested by the architectural <strong>research</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> educators groat<br />

<strong>and</strong> Wang (2002). This model is based on three nested moments<br />

in <strong>research</strong>, each <strong>of</strong> which frames—<strong>and</strong> therefore influences—<br />

the others inside it. by inserting the conventional language <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>research</strong> into the diagram we immediately notice something.<br />

methodology—usually seen as a high level concern—is in fact<br />

presented as a mid-level activity nested in more general field;<br />

the system <strong>of</strong> inquiry or, as lincoln <strong>and</strong> guba put it, the <strong>research</strong><br />

or inquiry ‘paradigm’.<br />

sysTEms Of iNQuiRy (PARADigms)<br />

sTRATEgiEs gROAT AND WANg’s<br />

TERmiNOlOgy (bAsED<br />

ON liNcOlN & gubA ,<br />

AND KAPlAN)<br />

TAcTics<br />

mEThODs<br />

mEThODOlOgiEs<br />

figuRE 1: adapted from groat & Wang (2002)<br />

?<br />

cONVENTiONAl<br />

TERmiNOlOgy<br />

REsEARch NOTEs<br />

let’s look at it in a little more detail by working out from the<br />

middle towards the edges—from the specific to the general, if<br />

you will:<br />

Tactics refer to the specific procedures <strong>and</strong> processes adopted<br />

in a <strong>research</strong> project—a survey say, or a period <strong>of</strong> participant<br />

observation <strong>and</strong> a photo-set (methods in the above terms).<br />

Strategies refer to the overall <strong>research</strong> approach (methodology<br />

in the above terms). i will discuss some major strategies below.<br />

Tactics are chosen that will help meet aims, questions <strong>and</strong><br />

objectives laid out in the strategy;<br />

Paradigms—the missing element in the conventional approach<br />

opposite—are the philosophical assumptions or worldview that<br />

frames an inquiry. Why is this significant? Well, we all operate<br />

in relation to a belief system <strong>and</strong> this determines how we make<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> the world. yet these systems are <strong>of</strong>ten hidden from<br />

us, or simply appear as natural or common sense. similarly,<br />

<strong>research</strong> inquiry operates via a set <strong>of</strong> broad belief systems <strong>and</strong><br />

these guide (perhaps pre-consciously) the <strong>research</strong>er’s choices<br />

<strong>and</strong> perspectives. given that the major paradigms operate<br />

on radically different conceptions <strong>of</strong> ontology—the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

reality—<strong>and</strong> epistemology—how we come to know the real—<br />

it should become clear how important it is to be aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

philosophical dimensions <strong>of</strong> our <strong>research</strong>.<br />

Researchers have identified a range <strong>of</strong> ways <strong>of</strong> classifying the<br />

major inquiry paradigms. in figure Two (overleaf) i provide a<br />

slightly modified version <strong>of</strong> guba <strong>and</strong> lincoln’s (1994) influential<br />

model <strong>of</strong> these for your information. Whilst it is beyond the<br />

scope <strong>of</strong> this brief note to discuss this in detail, suffice to say<br />

that three important points should be born in mind as you design<br />

your inquiries: 1) it is important to articulate your worldview<br />

<strong>and</strong> that adopted in your <strong>research</strong> to avoid prejudice; 2) in your<br />

<strong>research</strong> there should be a coherence between your paradigm,<br />

strategy <strong>and</strong> tactics; 3) however, this is best seen in relational<br />

<strong>and</strong> dialectical rather than causal terms; 4) moreover, the choice<br />

<strong>of</strong> paradigm does not determine strategies or preclude particular<br />

approaches. That is, within each paradigm it is possible<br />

to choreograph multiple <strong>and</strong> various strategies <strong>and</strong> tactics<br />

depending on the particular requirements <strong>of</strong> the inquiry.<br />

RESEARCH STRATEGIES<br />

in Architectural Research methods (2002) groat <strong>and</strong> Wang<br />

outline seven Research strategies. The notes below are loosely<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!