DENIZENS OF ALIEN WORLDS
danizen1
danizen1
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16<br />
quarters with the sole object of discrediting it in the eyes of the world‘, was not<br />
acceptable to him (GOP 1947: 6). He then went on to equate Islam with democracy,<br />
freedom, civil rights and rights of property. Ever since then Pakistan‘s ruling elite have<br />
used the name of Islam to combat ethnicity; to foster an ideologically based identity<br />
opposed to the Indian conception of area based, secular, identity; and to legitimize their<br />
rule. Simultaneously they have also interpreted Islam widely to mean democracy, the<br />
welfare state, socialism and authoritarian rule from time to time. Both the ethnic leaders<br />
and the religious leaders have opposed these uses and interpretation of Islam which, in<br />
their view, only they can interpret correctly.<br />
Whatever the interpretation of the rulers, the member of the committee had to lay<br />
down exact instructions. Among the things they decided was to teach Islamic studies;<br />
declare that syllabi would be in conformity with Islam; and make Urdu compulsory for<br />
everybody. Urdu was a symbol of unity for the ruling elite. After all, they had used it<br />
during the Hindi-Urdu controversy, to mobilize the Indian Muslims into a unified<br />
community to oppose the Hindus (Rahman 1996: 65-78). And now Urdu, like Islam,<br />
could also be useful to create a unified Pakistani nation out of Punjabis, Sindhis, Pathans,<br />
Mahajirs, Baloch and, above all, Bengalis. Moreover, that was the time when the<br />
European nation-state was the model. In those days out of the model European states that<br />
influenced South Asia all, except Switzerland, had one national language. Indeed, as<br />
Benedict Anderson had pointed out, the great European print languages, along with the<br />
national flag, the museum, the census etc, had created the ‗imagined communities‘ called<br />
nations (Anderson 1983). What the leaders did not realize was that theirs were multiethnic,<br />
multi-lingual and multi-cultural states---states which had been carved out by<br />
colonial masters.<br />
Moreover, it would cost less if everybody operated in one language. The costs of<br />
operations would increase astronomically if many languages were used. For all these<br />
reasons, political, ideological, pragmatic and economic, they emphasized the use of Urdu<br />
as a lingua franca---something which sowed the seeds of the eventual separation of East<br />
Pakistan; exactly the thing the rulers had hoped to avoid.<br />
But the rulers only created policies which, according to their lights, aimed at<br />
countering ethnic and religious divisions. They did not create educational policies to