belarus executive summary - US Department of State

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BELARUS 6 nationwide average. In the Mahilyou region, local prosecutors reported in April that while 80 percent of prisons were overcrowded, prison administrations failed to provide adequate medical assistance to inmates only in isolated instances. In August authorities reported that of the 50,000 inmates held nationwide, approximately 38,000 persons were in prisons and 7,380 were in pretrial detention facilities. Approximately 4,500 other persons were held in a form of internal exile known as “khimiya.” Persons sentenced to khimiya were allowed to work outside of detention facilities but were required to return to prison barracks where they lived under strict conditions and supervision. According to NGOs and former prisoners, authorities routinely abused prisoners. Former prisoners credibly reported that their complaints to higher authorities were often censored or not forwarded by prison officials, and that prison administrators either ignored or selectively considered requests for investigation of alleged abuses. Complaints could result in retaliation against prisoners who spoke out, including humiliation, death threats, or other forms of punishment. For example, in August a former prisoner at the Hlybokae high security prison stated that guards beat and abused inmates after prisoners complained about their conditions and sought a meeting with the prosecutor general. Two prisoners began a hunger strike. The Internal Affairs Ministry dismissed as false the reports of disturbances at Hlybokae prison. On October 20, the Vitsyebsk regional prosecutor reported that a probe into the beatings established that use of force against inmates was justified “to restore order” in jail after inmates put forward “illegitimate demands” and injured themselves. Prisoners and detainees had limited access to visitors, and denial of meetings with families was a common punishment for disciplinary violations. Political prisoners were often denied meetings with families as a means of pressure and intimidation. For example, political prisoner and former presidential candidate Dzmitry Uss’ scheduled three-day visit with his wife in September was unexpectedly shortened to one day. Credible sources maintained that prison administrations turned other inmates against political prisoners for purposes of intimidation and to compel confessions. They also reported that authorities neither explained nor protected their legal rights and penalized inmates for any minor violation of the “internal regime.” For example, on June 17, Mikita Likhavid, convicted of participating in postelection demonstrations, was placed in solitary confinement for the fourth time in 40 days. The harsh conditions in solitary confinement reportedly included denial of Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor
BELARUS 7 bedding, lack of time outdoors, and sleep deprivation. Authorities refused to provide warm clothing, despite the frequently low temperatures in the cells. On September 16, independent media reported that the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women upheld a complaint by opposition activist Inha Abramava regarding conditions at a detention center in Brest. She filed an individual complaint in 2008 after local courts rejected her complaints regarding discriminatory conditions at the detention center that had only men on its staff. She claimed that she was subject to sexual harassment by guards who also attempted to incite violent inmates against her. Although the law provides for freedom of religion, and there were no reports of egregious infringements, prisoners generally were prevented from holding religious services and performing rituals that did not comply with prison regulations. Zmitser Dashkevich, a Malady Front leader preemptively detained a day before the December 19, 2010 elections and later convicted on politically motivated charges, told his lawyer that prison administration officials forbade him to have the Bible and forced him to speak Russian instead of Belarusian in response to commands from prison guards. Corruption in prisons was a serious problem, and observers noted that the outcome of parole applications often depended on bribes to prison personnel. While authorities claimed to conduct periodic investigations and monitoring of prison and detention center conditions, human rights groups asserted that such inspections--even if they did occur--lacked any credibility. There was no ombudsman who could serve on behalf of prisoners and detainees; human rights advocates who were not members of state-controlled bar associations had no access to prisoners and detainees, and could not provide them with legal counsel. Authorities did not permit independent monitoring of penal institutions. Despite numerous requests to the Ministries of Internal Affairs and Justice, government officials continued to refuse to meet with human rights advocates or approve requests to visit detention facilities. There were no reports during the year of independent monitoring of prison conditions by domestic or international human rights groups, independent media, or the International Committee of the Red Cross. d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011 United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor
Page 1 and 2: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BELARUS Belarus i
Page 3 and 4: BELARUS 3 security or police office
Page 5: BELARUS 5 and bedding and inadequat
Page 9 and 10: BELARUS 9 to the Minsk diplomatic c
Page 11 and 12: BELARUS 11 The law provides for the
Page 13 and 14: BELARUS 13 The prosecution overtly
Page 15 and 16: BELARUS 15 order to compel their te
Page 17 and 18: BELARUS 17 The law prohibits author
Page 19 and 20: BELARUS 19 Although authorities con
Page 21 and 22: BELARUS 21 welcomed the prosecutor
Page 23 and 24: BELARUS 23 Journalists reporting fo
Page 25 and 26: BELARUS 25 to include government op
Page 27 and 28: BELARUS 27 as a presidential electi
Page 29 and 30: BELARUS 29 Freedom of Assembly: The
Page 31 and 32: BELARUS 31 prodemocracy activists f
Page 33 and 34: BELARUS 33 During the year the Mini
Page 35 and 36: BELARUS 35 In practice the governme
Page 37 and 38: BELARUS 37 at local polling places
Page 39 and 40: BELARUS 39 pressuring a suspect to
Page 41 and 42: BELARUS 41 disrupted a news confere
Page 43 and 44: BELARUS 43 between ages 18 and 60 c
Page 45 and 46: BELARUS 45 five years in jail. Acco
Page 47 and 48: BELARUS 47 Wheelchair Users estimat
Page 49 and 50: BELARUS 49 17. However, authorities
Page 51 and 52: BELARUS 51 Tight government control
Page 53 and 54: BELARUS 53 year, which gave the gov
Page 55: BELARUS 55 provide workers the righ

belarus executive summary - US Department of State

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?