Research Journal of Social Science & Management - RJSSM - The ...

FACTOR 1
Six items like good vacation and leave policy , satisfactory salary package, satisfactory incidental
leave, good welfare facilities, institution respect for professional knowledge and paid study leave were
loaded under factor one for retention with loading ranging from .82 to .52. The alpha value for first
factor is .819 and the mean value is 2.62 which indicate that there is a strong level of agreement among
the respondents for factor one. The items loaded under factor one empathize the need for having the
pay and leave facility for faculties in the institution. Hence the factor one is named as compensation
and leave facilities.
FACTOR 2
Four items like participate in various social works, values norms and culture of the institution,
knowledge updates through various resources and mutual respect among faculty members were
loaded under factor two with loading ranging from .63 to .79. The alpha value for factor two is .782
and the mean value is 3.355 which indicate that there is a strong level of agreement among the
respondents for factor two. The items loaded under factor two empathize the need for having the
institution responsibility. Hence factor two is named as corporate social responsibility.
FACTOR 3
Three items like communication among faculty members is good, working relationships are good and
differences of opinion are respected were loaded under factor three with loading ranging from .86 to
.67. The alpha value for factor three is .848 and the mean value is 3.379 which indicate that there is a
strong level of agreement among the respondents for factor three. The items loaded under factor three
empathize the need for having the good relationship with colleagues. Hence the factor five is named as
cordial relationship.
FACTOR 4
Four items like rewards and glorification for outstanding performance, provision of achievement
rewards, supports for the results of teaching and research and competitive of festival bonus were
loaded under factor four with loading ranging from .83 to .50. The alpha value for factor four is .758
and the mean value is 2.45 which indicate that there is a strong level of agreement among the
respondents for factor four. The items loaded under factor five empathize the need for having the
motivation for faculties. Hence the factor five is named as rewards and motivation.
FACTOR 5
Four items like departmental heads provides suggestions for work environment, departmental heads
are co-operative, duties and responsibilities are assigned fairly and provides safe and supportive
teamwork environment were loaded under factor Five with loading ranging from .909 to .569. The
alpha value is .86 and the mean value is 3.38 which indicate that there is a strong level of agreement
among the respondents for factor five. The items loaded under factor five empathize the importance for
head of the department. Hence the factor five is named as support from department head.
FACTOR 6
Three items like equal chances to be promoted the top position, transparent performance evaluation
policy and no one dominates over others were loaded under factor six with loading ranging from .823
to .609. The alpha value is.778 and the mean value is 2.789 which indicate that there is a strong level
of agreement among the respondents for factor six. The items loaded under factor six empathize the
importance for promotion. Hence the factor five is named as promotion policy.
FACTOR 7
Three factors like evaluates individual job efforts, provides just-in-time promotion and encourages
ethical behavior were loaded under factor seven with loading ranging from 0.81 to 0 .62. The alpha
values is 0 .56 and the mean value is 3.055 which indicate that there is a strong level of agreement
www.theinternationaljournal.org > RJSSM: Volume: 03, Number: 03, July-2013 Page 37