09.10.2015 Views

JOURNAL

3twmGXuyn

3twmGXuyn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MENDENHALL ET AL.<br />

science teacher at Fuji taught a fairly short lesson on mineral salts to the 149<br />

pupils. The lesson consisted entirely of a lecture; there were no varied activities,<br />

no guided or independent practice. The teacher copied content from the textbook<br />

onto the chalkboard, including the following table:<br />

Minerals Sources Use in the Body<br />

Calcium<br />

Milk, millet, matumbo<br />

(offal), and small fish eaten<br />

whole, for example omena<br />

For making strong bones and teeth.<br />

Helps in the clotting of blood to<br />

stop bleeding when one is injured.<br />

Phosphorous Milk, beans, egg Works together with calcium and<br />

vitamin D in the formation of<br />

strong bones and teeth<br />

Iron Meat, eggs, kale, spinach Helps to make the blood healthy<br />

The teacher then lectured about the material on the board, interspersing his lecture<br />

with closed questions—that is, only one correct answer is presumed, such as,<br />

“What have I said are some sources of minerals?” The pupils answered in unison<br />

by reading from the table. The mathematics classes were most likely to combine<br />

lecture with pupil activity. Math teachers regularly explained a principle or an<br />

idea and then put a series of problems on the board for the pupils to solve, giving<br />

them guided practice. Such classes were highly interactive, though repetitive, and<br />

they focused on factual information and “correct” answers. Thus it could not be<br />

said that the students experienced active individual involvement or meaningful<br />

engagement.<br />

Teacher Reliance on Factual Questions to Check<br />

Literal Comprehension<br />

The majority of the teachers we observed relied extensively on factual<br />

questions, which they posed to check students’ literal comprehension. Even when<br />

a lesson was highly interactive, the focus was on “correct” answers. The questions<br />

we heard were primarily closed, including in all four lessons we observed at New<br />

Eastleigh. For example, a social studies teacher asked, “What is trade?” to which<br />

the pupils repeated, in unison, the predefined term. The teacher then asked,<br />

“We have two forms of trade, which ones are they? Who can tell me?” The only<br />

accepted answers in this case were “domestic” and “international.” In a science<br />

class at New Eastleigh, the teacher asked, “Who has an idea about friction?” This<br />

question seemed to be more open, but it was in fact intended to elicit a specific<br />

definition of friction—again, the only accepted response.<br />

106<br />

Journal on Education in Emergencies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!