JOURNAL
3twmGXuyn
3twmGXuyn
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MENDENHALL ET AL.<br />
science teacher at Fuji taught a fairly short lesson on mineral salts to the 149<br />
pupils. The lesson consisted entirely of a lecture; there were no varied activities,<br />
no guided or independent practice. The teacher copied content from the textbook<br />
onto the chalkboard, including the following table:<br />
Minerals Sources Use in the Body<br />
Calcium<br />
Milk, millet, matumbo<br />
(offal), and small fish eaten<br />
whole, for example omena<br />
For making strong bones and teeth.<br />
Helps in the clotting of blood to<br />
stop bleeding when one is injured.<br />
Phosphorous Milk, beans, egg Works together with calcium and<br />
vitamin D in the formation of<br />
strong bones and teeth<br />
Iron Meat, eggs, kale, spinach Helps to make the blood healthy<br />
The teacher then lectured about the material on the board, interspersing his lecture<br />
with closed questions—that is, only one correct answer is presumed, such as,<br />
“What have I said are some sources of minerals?” The pupils answered in unison<br />
by reading from the table. The mathematics classes were most likely to combine<br />
lecture with pupil activity. Math teachers regularly explained a principle or an<br />
idea and then put a series of problems on the board for the pupils to solve, giving<br />
them guided practice. Such classes were highly interactive, though repetitive, and<br />
they focused on factual information and “correct” answers. Thus it could not be<br />
said that the students experienced active individual involvement or meaningful<br />
engagement.<br />
Teacher Reliance on Factual Questions to Check<br />
Literal Comprehension<br />
The majority of the teachers we observed relied extensively on factual<br />
questions, which they posed to check students’ literal comprehension. Even when<br />
a lesson was highly interactive, the focus was on “correct” answers. The questions<br />
we heard were primarily closed, including in all four lessons we observed at New<br />
Eastleigh. For example, a social studies teacher asked, “What is trade?” to which<br />
the pupils repeated, in unison, the predefined term. The teacher then asked,<br />
“We have two forms of trade, which ones are they? Who can tell me?” The only<br />
accepted answers in this case were “domestic” and “international.” In a science<br />
class at New Eastleigh, the teacher asked, “Who has an idea about friction?” This<br />
question seemed to be more open, but it was in fact intended to elicit a specific<br />
definition of friction—again, the only accepted response.<br />
106<br />
Journal on Education in Emergencies