VOTER

Recommendations

Info

14 <strong>VOTER</strong> INFORMATION BULLETIN | Special Advertising Section | SUNDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2015 ■ and Health Education Majors; Doctorate in Philosophy in Science - University of Toledo- Physiology and Statistics Majors Qualifications for Office: Previous experience as:- High school science teacher; Higher Education Medical Science Faculty; VP Education Programs/Operations Director COSI Toledo; ODE Associate Director of Curriculum/ Instruction and State Ed Tech Director; President of international education software association Question 1: School boards should serve as advocates of the school community and effective stewards of the community's resources supporting an agreed upon set of expectations between the two groups. Being in essence the superintendent's "boss", school boards should play that advocate role but also should be empowered to collect other data points on the progress/status of the school community - not just depend on the superintendent's reporting. As any good leader, school boards should get the right people in place, get an agreed upon set of expectations and then provide resources for them to be successful Question 2: There are other options possible before going to the "cut only" mentality that currently exists in the District. There are different ways of thinking "outside the box" to resource current activities differently. This could be applied to everything from the major expenses such as staff/benefits all the way to partnerships with other schools and regional agencies to provide joint services. There are also numerous efforts undertaken by other districts to address the revenue side of the equation as well. Business partnerships, national foundations, and other revenue streams do exist. Derrow, Phil Candidate did not respond. Maletz, Andrew 4075 Chelsea Green West, New Albany, OH 43054 Email: Andrew.maletz@gmail. com Website: facebook.com/ maletzforschoolboard Education: Bachelor of Environmental Design, Miami University, Oxford Ohio (1994) Master of Architecture, Miami University, Oxford Ohio (1999) Occupation: Architect, Executive Vice President at WD Qualifications for Office: As an Architect with 20+ years of experience, I have spent most of my career working with dozens of school districts throughout Ohio and have attended hundreds of school board meetings. During that time I provided consulting services pertaining to district operations, finances and facilities. Question 1: The school board is an advisory body that works with the district leadership to ensure accountability, facilitate strong community partnerships and help deliver academic excellence. Board members do not manage the day-to-day operations, but focus instead on establishing educational and financial goals that reflect the voice of the community. The superintendent is tasked with executing on these goals. A successful school board member will work closely with community members, parents and district leadership to create a strong link between the community and school district. Question 2: New Albany’s financial challenges are not unique, or simple to resolve. The good news is that the long-term financial outlook can be strong if we take the necessary steps today to ensure that future, particularly as we expect a leveling off of district growth in the coming years. However, this burden cannot rest solely on the teachers, community, or taxpayers to solve the current challenges. Ideally, increases in revenue (taxes) should be matched by containing the growth of expenses. We should not take punitive measures that polarize the community or unfairly burden one over another. Naumoff, Paul Candidate did not respond. Ryan, Mark C. 3700 Prestwould Close, New Albany, OH 43054 Email: markryan@insight. rr.com Website: Education: 1984 Columbus Academy; 1988 University of Notre Dame BA Economics Occupation: self employed Qualifications for Office: Served since 2007 on Board of Education and served on Facilities, Finance, Benchmark Committees. Chaired the Search Committee for Superintendent and Treasurer and served as Board President for four years. Our record as a board shows a focus on student achievement and consistent cost containment. Question 1: The board is a conduit to the community sharing expectations, establishing goals, and providing accountability. They are to help the Superintendent keep the focus on student achievement while being mindful of our limited resources and their allocations. The board is part of a governance team with the Superintendent and Treasurer, while also their direct supervisor and responsible for oversight, evaluation, and guidance. Question 2: Continued focus on cost containment paired with effective investment and secure a funding source that can grow with enrollment. Valley, Dana Candidate did not respond. McCloskey, Karen Candidate did not respond. Unexpired Term Ending 12-31-17 (vote for no more than one) Kalinosky, Debra L. Candidate did not respond. Wentz, Elizabeth 7800 Ackerly Loop, New Albany, OH 43054 Email: wentz4schools@gmail. com Website: Education: Ohio Wesleyan University B.A. in Education; Marygrove College, Masters in Education Occupation: stay-at-home mom Qualifications for Office: Former New Albany-Plain Local School District Teacher, 2000-2006 Operating Board for The Childhood League Center 2012- 2015; Leadership Columbus graduate 2004; Parent of two children in New Albany-Plain Local School District; School District Taxpayer Question 1: The school board establishes the goals and direction for the district; the superintendent executes the goals with the leadership of the school board. There should be a strong working relationship that is based on mutual respect, the ability to collaborate, and mutual understanding of the commitment to the students of the district being well educated and taxpayers being well respected. Question 2: I would work to implement the recommendations of the NA Community Task Force. The Task Force, representing all parts of the district and bringing diverse backgrounds to the table, has offered well thought-out ways to reduce the rate of budget growth without impacting the quality of education. Despite the recent $7.5 million in cuts, expenses are growing 2 times faster than revenue and almost twice the rate of inflation. We cannot continue this way. Just increasing property taxes every two years is not the answer. I believe the recommendations provide a blue print for long-term stability through a combination of reducing the rate budget growth and then working to secure additional revenues. Reynoldsburg City School District BOARD OF EDUCATION Full Term (vote for no more than two) Dunlap, Debbie Candidate did not respond. Long, Sandy 1675 Haft Dr., Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 Email: LongForBOEd@gmail. com Website: Education: Graduate of Pickerington High School and Eastland Career Center, Bachelor of Science, Chemistry, Otterbein University Occupation: Business Owner Qualifications for Office: President of a 20-year-old small business with an international clientele composed of mostly State, Provincial and National government agencies. Board of Education, Reynoldsburg City and Eastland-Fairfield Career Technical School Districts, Mother of 3 Reynoldsburg Graduates, Resident since 1984 Question 1: The Board is responsible for hiring a Superintendent, and evaluating their performance on an annual basis. This includes consideration of the terms of the contract and performance in general, as well as evaluating the goals set by and for the Superintendent. The Board votes for or against the Superintendent’s recommendations regarding staffing and curriculum, among other things. Board members should have regular communications with the Superintendent. This is important to each board member’s ability to respond quickly and accurately to inquiries made by District Shareholders. Question 2: The District’s finances are in good shape at this time and, barring unforeseen circumstances, should remain so for awhile longer. Retaining the employment of a highly effective Treasury is critical. Partnerships with post-secondary schools and businesses contribute to our ongoing financial stability. Hiring and retaining staff who are very budget conscious, with proven track records of reducing and controlling expenses, also serves to build and maintain financial stability. An example is the annual inspection of all building roofs to catch minor problems before expensive repairs are required. Whitman, Neal 7916 Windrift Pl, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 Email: nealwhitmanboe@gmail. com Website: www.nealwhitman. com Education: BA classics, secondary teaching certification, University of Texas PhD linguistics, Ohio State University. Occupation: I teach English composition to international students at Ohio State University, and do independent linguistic consulting and freelance writing. Qualifications for Office: I bring my experience as a teacher, parent of two children in the district, and longtime school volunteer. Question 1: The school board’s job is to establish district policy, and hire a treasurer and superintendent to execute it. It took me a while to realize this, because in this district, things work in the opposite direction: The superintendent presents plans, and the board approves them. Questioning is deemed “micromanagement.” But there is a medium between micromanagement and complete hands-off; it’s called accountability. It is also the board’s job to listen to stakeholders community in setting school policy. Therefore, the board should welcome any opportunity to hear the views of its community. Question 2: One success that the district has touted is its financial stability. However, its frugality borders on “pound-foolish penny-wisdom.” For example, with the highest turnover rate in central Ohio, money must be spent to fill positions that experienced teachers have left. Also, with a lower pay rate for substitute teachers than in area districts, classes are at times left with no teacher for a day as substitutes take better offers. For longer-term stability as a district where families want to send their children, we need to look beyond money savings in making staffing and curriculum decisions. Unexpired Term Ending 12-31-17 (vote for no more than one) Truex, Rob Candidate did not respond. Tyus, John 346 Cheyenne Way, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 Email: drjohnforschoolboard@ gmail.com Website: www.tyusforboard. com Education: United Theological Seminary, Doctorate- Ministry, Dissertation Title: Designing a Mentoring Program for Fatherless Black Males in a Post- Modern Generation ; Liberty University M.A. -Pastoral Counseling; Franklin University, B.S. - Business Administration dual minor in Marketing & Management Occupation: Associate Director Career Development at Per Scholas, Assistant Pastor World Conquerors through Jesus Christ, Founder & Director The I.D. Movement Qualifications for Office: I'm an Assistant Pastor, Director of Career Development of a non profit organization that provides Free IT training to under-served and unemployed people in the community and I run a mentoring program for fatherless males in our community teaching professional and personal developmental skills. Question 1: The role of any school board member is to hold the superintendent responsible to all things education in the district. It is the board's responsibility to make sure that plans are being followed through, we are financially stable, and our kids are receiving the best educational experience. Our superintendent's goals is to provide safety and security for our children and staff, to improve student achievement and progress, while maintaining our commitment to fiscal responsibility. We must hold our superintendent to these promises while supporting her goals and leadership in attaining them. Question 2: Currently Reynoldsburg school's financials are solid and in great shape, it is important we maintain that in our district. Being fiscally disciplined is one of the main responsibilities of board members. The people of Reynoldsburg are paying their tax dollars and are entrusting us to be responsible for that. I believe we should continue to look for other ways in raising funds for our district such as grant money. There is money out their that has not been tapped into yet, I will make sure we seek those opportunities out and take advantage of that and try to refrain from raising taxes. Southerwestern City School District BOARD OF EDUCATION (uncontested race) Gaverick, Melinda Reisling, Randy Upper Arlington School District BOARD OF EDUCATION (vote for no more than three) Comfort, Robin H. Candidate did not respond. Drees, Nancy Candidate did not respond. Lambert, Mindy Candidate did not respond. Royer, Stacey B. Candidate did not respond. Swartz, Christopher A. 2896 Pickwick Dr, Upper Arlington, OH 43221 Email: christopherswartz1955@ gmail.com Website: Education: Marietta College 1973-1976, BA, Social Studies/ Education; Capital Law School 1977-1978; The Ohio State University 1978-1981,MA, Educational Media Occupation: Retired Teacher Qualifications for Office: 30-year professional educator (20 years at Upper Arlington HS); 22-year high school rowing coach (all at UAHS); 20-year resident of UA Question 1: The Board should act in a role similar to that of the Board of Directors of any corporation setting overall policies with the broad objectives of the district and its residents in mind, ensuring, through oversight, that the policies are enforced effectively. The superintendent and the administration personnel enforce these policies. Also, the Board should require that the administration acts in accordance with the district philosophy (the essential values that the district emphasizes regarding relationships with certified and classified staff members and the community at large). Question 2: Upper Arlington has a history of well-funded schools with tremendous academic opportunities for its students. Most of that funding comes from local property taxes. But in today’s society, taxes have become an affront to many community residents. Money is tight and critical decisions must be made. As I advocated in my years of teaching U.S. Government, the most effective taxes any citizen can pay are local taxes. We see the direct result of our money spent in our community. That money benefits present and future residents, helping our neighbors and children live better, more productive lives. Westerville City School District BOARD OF EDUCATION (vote for no more than two) Bird, Richard 6961 Whitetail Lane Westerville, Ohio 43082 Email: rb@birdtheword.com Website: www.birdtheword.com Education: Bachelor of Arts, The Ohio State University - Political Science Graduate Studies - George Washington University Occupation: Cybersecurity Executive Qualifications for Office: Only candidate with on-thejob training on a public school board. Have served 15 months on the board leading several key initiatives, including the rebuilding and expansion of Pointview Elementary. Question 1: The superintendent runs the day-to-day operation of the school system through staff and faculty while the board serves as the elected advocates for the students, families and the electorate of the school district. The board works with the superintendent to develop the strategic vision for the district. I believe that a board and superintendent’s most important role is to work together for the benefit of the students, faculty and broader community. A healthy board and district comes directly from a healthy, constructive and transparent relationship between the board and the superintendent. Question 2: I believe that the course of action that I and my fellow board members have already taken to establish an operating reserve as well as questioning every expense and potential revenue stream against our 5 year financial plan is our best offensive and defensive position. Prior boards put the district, our students and our teachers in a difficult “no fail” position by not running an operating reserve. I believe we are in a good place financially and we will have greater options in the future by staying 100% focused on sustaining our operating reserve and controlling expenses to our 5 year plan.
■ <strong>VOTER</strong> INFORMATION BULLETIN | Special Advertising Section | SUNDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2015 15 Burgess, Jim 4930 Honeysuckle Blvd, Columbus, OH 43230 Email: jim@jimb3.com Website: Education: Business Management and Broadcast Operations degrees with Accounting Certificate. Graduated Cum Laude. Occupation: Manager Qualifications for Office: Management experience at Ashland, AT&T, IBM and Sterling Commerce. Created and implemented international multi-million dollar projects. Responsible for protecting over $250M in revenue. Global experience spanning Accounting, Customer Service, Information Technology, Sales and Marketing departments. Question 1: Voters choose BOE members to put in place the educational and budgetary direction they want their schools to pursue. The Board looks to the Superintendent and staff for advice, and for the professional and operational skills necessary to carry out its policies. The Board has the responsibility to pursue excellence in operational and educational performance. Should results fall short, the Board must recognize the shortcomings and challenge the Superintendent to bring achievement levels up to expectations quickly. We can't bring students back to reeducate them; we only get one chance. Question 2: Financial stability will improve significantly with the implementation of the "Students First" management model. This method calls for the district to prioritize the classroom, where education ultimately succeeds or fails. At times when funds are limited, the education process experienced by the student, teacher and parent will be untouchable. Only secondary functions will be affected. If elected, I will protect educational integrity and work to end past spending practices which have disrupted programs and services. I will work to put our schools on a path to financial sustainability. Cotter, Geraldine Candidate did not respond. Lawson, Greg R. 161 Fawn Ct, Westerville, Oh. 43081 Email: gregrlawson78@yahoo. com Website: www.facebook.com/ Lawson4WestervilleSchools Education: Bachelor's of Arts in Communication, Minor in Econ. Graduated Summa cum Laude from The Ohio State University. Qualifications for Office: Extensive experience working with a wide range of public policy issues, including legislation concerning state funding for K-12 education. Served for over 5 years on the boards of two Columbus area charter schools, one of which was one of the highest academic performing schools in the state. Developed policies to enhance student achievement while maintaining fiscal sustainability. 3 children either currently or soon to be in the district. Question 1: The BOE should set all academic and budgetary goals. The BOE should not micromanage the Superintendent, who should be given a wide degree of latitude in achieving those goals. However, it will always remain the BOE's responsibility to evaluate if those goals are being achieved. If they are not, the BOE cannot shirk its responsibility to assure that appropriate staff are held to account. Question 2: Westerville City Schools are currently in a strong position financially. I think it is prudent to consider further increases to the BOE designated budget reserve fund in order to assure that unforeseen economic downturns do not force the district into immediately having to either hike taxes at a difficult time for local residents or make draconian cuts that could have real impacts in the classroom. Additionally, I think it is necessary to examine nonclassroom oriented expenses and consider additional cost savings there that can be re-directed to the classroom and/or towards the reserve fund that stretches current levy dollars further. Whitehall City School District BOARD OF EDUCATION (uncontested race) Adkins, Mike Bivens, Joy L. Worthington City School District BOARD OF EDUCATION (uncontested race) Keegan, Julie D. Wilson, Charlie Statewide ballot Issues Issue 1: Creates a bipartisan, public process for drawing legislative districts (Proposed by Joint Resolution of the General Assembly) Proposing to enact new Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of Article XI and to repeal Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of Ohio. A YES vote means approval of the constitutional amendment. A NO vote means disapproval of the constitutional amendment. A majority YES vote is required for the amendment to be adopted. If approved, the proposed amendment will take effect immediately after Election Day. League Explanation of Issue 1: Issue 1 would amend the Ohio Constitution to change the way state legislative districts (but not U.S. Congressional districts) are determined. Every 10 years, Ohio draws new legislative district lines based on changes in population as reported in U.S. Census data. Issue 1 replaces the Apportionment Board with a bipartisan Ohio Redistricting Commission. If Issue 1 passes, members of the Commission will include: - The Governor - Auditor of State - Ohio Secretary of State - Appointee by the Speaker of the Ohio House - Appointee by the President of the Ohio Senate - Appointee by the Minority Leader of Ohio House - Appointee by the Minority Leader of Ohio Senate The Ohio Redistricting Commission will be responsible for creating district maps for the Ohio House and the Ohio Senate. Issue 1 establishes rules for map-making. It ensures compactness and keeps communities together by prohibiting splitting governmental units, like counties or cities, unless necessary. Issue 1 prohibits partisan gerrymandering. No General Assembly map shall be drawn primarily to favor or disfavor a political party. Issue 1 creates more transparent map-making by requiring public hearings. If the amendment is passed, it will become part of the constitution immediately; however, the new rules for drawing districts will not be applied until the next time districts are redrawn beginning January 1, 2021, after the next U.S. Census. Issue 1 encourages bipartisan map-making. For the maps to last ten years, at least two members of the minority party will have to vote in favor of it. If only one party supports a particular map, the district lines will only last four years. Map-making will be subjected to stricter criteria, including the requirement that the districts reflect the statewide partisan preferences of voters, sometimes called representational fairness. PRO: 1. Prohibits partisan gerrymandering-- “No General Assembly district plan shall be drawn primarily to favor or disfavor a party” will be written into the rules in the Ohio Constitution. 2. Requires transparency and public hearings, encouraging accountability to the electorate. 3. Districts will better protect community cohesiveness by limiting government units such as counties and cities from being split. 4. Eliminates the continuation of previous gerrymandering by removing language from the current Ohio Constitution that requires new maps to be “reasonably consistent” with old maps. CON: 1. Many Ohioans are not Republican or Democrat. Third parties and Independents are not represented on the Commission. 2. Issue 1 does not address the process for determining U.S. Congressional districts. 3. The Ohio Redistricting Commission is not independent from legislators; legislative members can still influence the process. 4. Bipartisan Commission members can make “sweetheart deals” that can result in districts that are not representative of the state’s overall partisan preferences. Issue 2: Anti-monopoly amendment; protects the initiative process from being used for personal economic benefit (Proposed by Joint Resolution of the General Assembly) Proposing to amend Section 1e of Article II of the Constitution of the State of Ohio. A YES vote means approval of the constitutional amendment. A NO vote means disapproval of the constitutional amendment. A majority YES vote is required for the amendment to be adopted. If approved, the proposed amendment will take effect immediately after Election Day. League Explanation of Issue 2: Issue 2 would prohibit an initiative petition amendment to the Ohio Constitution that would give special business rights to a certain person or entity. Specifically, Issue 2 would prohibit an initiative that creates a monopoly, cartel, or oligopoly; specifies or determines a tax rate; or confers a commercial interest, commercial right, or commercial license to any person or entity for the purpose of exclusively enriching its members and prohibiting others from engaging in similar enterprises. If Issue 2 passes, the Ohio Ballot Board will be required to evaluate any proposed initiative petition to determine if it violates the prohibition above by creating a limited commercial interest. If such an initiative is proposed, the Ballot Board will be required to separate the proposed initiative into two parts – one part asking voters to override the limited business interest rule, and the second part describing the proposed new initiative – with both parts needing a majority vote for the initiative to pass. If both Issue 2 and Issue 3 are approved by the voters, it is unclear what will happen, because they would create conflicting sections within the state constitution. The Ohio Supreme Court will likely have to resolve the matter if both issues pass. PRO: 1. Exclusive financial deals for special interests should not be enshrined in our state constitution. 2. The state constitution should be used to protect fundamental rights for all individuals, not cluttered with special interests. 3. Nineteen states have constitutional provisions banning monopolies and protecting free and fair commerce; Ohio should too. CON: 1. The constitution should not be amended to interfere with the constitutional initiative process and block a measure approved by the voters. 2. The language is too vague and may unintentionally preclude future policy or tax issues from being brought forward as an initiative. 3. Issue 2 gives the Ballot Board too much discretion to declare a proposed initiative to be a monopoly and force it to jump through two hurdles instead of one. Issue 3: Grants a monopoly for the commercial production and sale of marijuana for recreational and medicinal purposes (Proposed by Initiative Petition) Proposing to add Section 12 of Article XV of the Constitution of the State of Ohio. A YES vote means approval of the constitutional amendment. A NO vote means disapproval of the constitutional amendment. A majority YES vote is required for the amendment to be adopted. If approved, the proposed amendment will take effect 30 days after Election Day. League Explanation of Issue 3: Issue 3 has a two-fold objective: (1) to legalize marijuana for personal and medical use and (2) to establish rules for growth and sales. Growth and cultivation of marijuana will be limited to ten pre-determined, specific “grow sites” situated throughout the state. The ten sites already have designated investors. There will also be a number of predetermined “quality control” sites throughout the state to test the product being cultivated. About 1,100 retail outlets will be allowed to sell marijuana, but they must buy it only from the ten specified sites and cannot develop their own supplies. Individuals may grow up to four plants and possess up to eight ounces of actual product at one time. The four plants must also be bought from the ten specified wholesale grow sites. Under this initiative, individuals possessing or cultivating over 100 grams of marijuana would be committing a felony. Selling marijuana outside of the sanctioned outlets would also be a felony, with a possible sentence of up to one year in prison. PRO: 1. Marijuana will, within the strict limits specified in the initiative, become legal to cultivate, use, and sell in Ohio for medicinal and personal use. 2. Issue 3 creates rules for a tightly controlled industry. The system of designated grow sites and quality control testing areas will ensure that the marijuana grown at these sites will address standards of public safety. 3. Issue 3 will create tens of thousands of jobs in Ohio and will eventually generate millions of dollars in tax revenue to support local government services. CON: 1. The state constitution should be used to protect the fundamental rights of all individuals, not to enshrine an extremely detailed plan creating exclusive financial deals for a group of special interest investors. 2. The initiative sets up an exclusive business scheme that eliminates competition to such an extent that independent business owners could be permanently locked out of what is projected to be a billion-dollar market and individual users who do not abide by the strict restrictions will still be subject to criminal penalties. 3. Issue 3 will flood Ohio with marijuana and marijuanainfused products, like candy and cookies, that put the public health and safety of Ohio’s adults and children in danger. Franklin County Issues Issue 14 – ADAMH Renewal Levy Issue 14, if approved, will renew a 2.2 mill property tax levy providing funds for the Franklin County Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health (ADAMH) Board. It renews the current 10 year levy for 5 additional years commencing in 2016. It does not increase a homeowner’s property taxes. The proposed levy would cost a homeowner $67.18/$100,000 of home property value. The current levy, which is expiring, provides 71% of the $78 million budget of the ADAMH Board. The Board’s mission is to improve the well-being of our community by reducing the incidence of mental health problems and eliminating the abuse of alcohol and other drugs in Franklin County. In the next few years, ADAMH wants to expand access for care for uninsured people, and make their system more efficient. They also want to provide intervention services in 14 suburban school districts. PRO • Passage of this renewal levy will permit ADAMH to come closer to achieving the goals stated in its mission statement. • The renewal levy will not cost homeowners additional money above their current payments, and the rate will remain the same (a little more than $67 per $100,000 of home valuation). CON • Renewal of this levy will burden Franklin County homeowners and businesses at a time when the area economy has not fully recovered from the recent recession, and unneeded government programs must be reduced or eliminated. • A better approach would be to fund alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health services with an increase in state funding. Issue 15 – Columbus Zoo Renewal Levy The levy request is for a 10-year renewal of the existing Zoo levy and will not increase real property taxes above the amount currently paid. Homeowners of a home valued at $100,000 will continue to pay approximately $21 a year (less than $2 a month). There are no plans for a downtown zoo. Continuing this levy will permit the Zoo to expand services. During the 10- year period of the renewal levy the Zoo will: • Renovate and replace the outdated North American exhibit with the goal of strengthening wildlife conservation. • Renovate and expand the Animal Health Center to show advances in medicine, technology, nutrition, and quality medical care. o Modify the Islands region to show seals and sea lions. PRO • The national ranking of the Columbus Zoo and Aquarium promotes tourism and a positive image of Columbus and is an educational asset to the community. • Levy funds do not support the Wilds, the Safari Golf Course, or Zoombezi Bay. Global wildlife and conservation work is funded with private grants, donations, and events, not levy dollars. CON • Real property tax revenues should be spent on more important projects than a Zoo, which does not deliver services to humans in need. • The Zoo is located in Delaware County, but Delaware County residents do not and have not supported it through real property taxes. For answers to more questions from the candidates, see our website at www.lwvcols.org
Page 1 and 2: ■ VOTER INFORMATION BULLETIN | Sp
Page 13: ■ VOTER INFORMATION BULLETIN | Sp

VOTER

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?