17.12.2015 Views

Today

KCW-dec_jan-2015_6-amended-final

KCW-dec_jan-2015_6-amended-final

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 December/January April/May 2011 2015/16 Kensington, Chelsea & Westminster <strong>Today</strong> www.KCW<strong>Today</strong>.co.uk 020 7738 2348<br />

December/January 2015/16<br />

Kensington, Chelsea & Westminster <strong>Today</strong><br />

13<br />

International<br />

International<br />

online: www.KCW<strong>Today</strong>.co.uk<br />

Boris goes abroad<br />

By Jade Parker<br />

Boris Johnson’s recent high profile<br />

trip to Israel and the Occupied<br />

Palestinian territories aimed to<br />

strengthen trade ties with the capital.<br />

However, the Mayor of London’s time in<br />

Palestine was cut short after he angered<br />

Palestinian groups by making comments<br />

deemed to be pro-Israeli.<br />

The Mayor’s bumbling way with<br />

words once again landed him in an<br />

awkward situation, after saying that<br />

a trade boycott of Israel would be<br />

“completely crazy” at an event in Tel<br />

Aviv, just days before he was due to visit<br />

the Occupied Palestinian territories.<br />

Describing supporters of the trade<br />

boycott as “snaggle-toothed, corduroywearing<br />

lefty academics” and Israel<br />

as the only democracy in the region,<br />

Boris’s comments were well received in<br />

Israel, but resulted in the cancellation of<br />

several of his scheduled engagements in<br />

Palestine.<br />

The Sharek Youth Forum, who<br />

were due to meet Mr. Johnson,<br />

said in a statement: “Following<br />

Johnson’s inaccurate, misinformed<br />

and disrespectful statement, it is our<br />

conclusion that he consciously denies the<br />

reality of the occupation that continues<br />

to oppress them and all Palestinians.”<br />

They went further to say: "As<br />

Palestinians and supporters of boycott,<br />

divestment and sanctions (BDS),<br />

we cannot in good conscience host<br />

Johnson, as a person who denounces<br />

the international BDS movement<br />

and prioritises the feelings of wearers<br />

of 'corduroy jackets' over an entire<br />

nation under occupation. In Johnson’s<br />

own words, the “only democracy<br />

in the region” is one that oppresses<br />

citizens, confiscates land, demolished<br />

homes, detains children and violates<br />

international humanitarian and human<br />

rights on a daily basis.”<br />

Speaking to local reporters in<br />

Ramallah, Boris said it was a shame that<br />

he could not go ahead with the majority<br />

of scheduled meetings and acknowledged<br />

that his comments had caused offence<br />

to some people but said they had been<br />

“whipped up on social media”.<br />

One of the few meetings that did go<br />

ahead was with the prime minister of<br />

the Palestinian Authority. Speaking to<br />

reporters after the meeting, Boris refused<br />

to retract his comments saying that what<br />

he had said was a: “simple repetition of<br />

what is not only British government<br />

policy but is a policy supported by<br />

the prime minister of the Palestinian<br />

Authority.” He also said: “It is very clear<br />

from the conversation I have just had<br />

with the prime minister that he does not<br />

support a boycott and does think that is<br />

the way forward.”<br />

The Mayor’s official spokesperson<br />

said that the comments had been taken<br />

out of context and citied by organisers<br />

of events as a reason for cancellation. In<br />

recent years, several councils throughout<br />

the UK have boycotted goods from<br />

Israeli settlements. Supporters of the<br />

boycott claim that a boycott exerts<br />

pressure on the Israeli government which<br />

may in turn help hinder the construction<br />

of settlements in occupied Palestinian<br />

territories, which have been condemned<br />

by the UN.<br />

Brazil dam bursts<br />

leading to toxic mud slide<br />

By Jade Parker<br />

On the 5th of November, a wave of<br />

toxic mud released from a burst dam in<br />

southern Brazil resulted in the death<br />

of 17 people and has been dubbed as<br />

Brazil’s worst ever natural disaster.<br />

The collapse of the dam, belonging to<br />

mining companies Vale and BHP Biliton<br />

(Samarco Mining S.A), involved the<br />

leakage of 50 million tons of iron ore<br />

waste into the Atlantic Ocean.<br />

Owners of the mining companies<br />

claim that the sludge is simply a mix<br />

of mud and water. However United<br />

Nations (UN) Human Rights experts on<br />

the environment and toxic waste, John<br />

Knox and Baskut Tuncak, have found<br />

new evidence that shows that the waste<br />

does contain high levels of toxic heavy<br />

metals and other toxic chemicals.<br />

In a statement released by the UN<br />

Human Rights Office of the High<br />

Commissioner, Special Rapporteur<br />

Knox, said: “The scale of the<br />

environmental damage is the equivalent<br />

of 20,000 Olympic swimming pools<br />

of toxic mud waste contaminating the<br />

soil, rivers, and water system of an area<br />

covering over 850 kilometres.”<br />

Mr. Knox went further to warn that<br />

the Doce River, one of Brazil’s greatest<br />

water sheds is “now considered by<br />

scientists to be dead and the toxic sludge<br />

is slowly working its way downstream<br />

towards the Abrolhos National Marine<br />

Park, where it threatens protected forest<br />

and habitat. Sadly the mud has already<br />

entered the sea at Regencia beach, a<br />

sanctuary for endangered turtles and a<br />

rich source of nutrients that the local<br />

fishing community relies upon”.<br />

Experts have said that the saturation<br />

of waterways with the dense orange<br />

sediment will not only wreck the<br />

ecosystem for years but has already<br />

killed thousands of fish and has cut off<br />

drinking water supplies to a quarter of a<br />

million people.<br />

The Brazilian government is fining<br />

the two mining companies with a<br />

preliminary £43.6 million, as Brazilian<br />

President Dilma Rousseff put the blame<br />

for the rupture of the dam on them.<br />

John Knox and Baskut Tuncak spoke<br />

about the lack of action taken in the<br />

midst of the disaster: “The steps taken<br />

by the Brazilian government, Vale, and<br />

BHP Billiton to prevent harm were<br />

clearly insufficient. It is not acceptable<br />

that it has taken three weeks for<br />

information about the toxic risks of the<br />

mining disaster to surface”.<br />

They went further to say: “There<br />

may never be an effective remedy for<br />

victims whose loved ones and livelihoods<br />

may now lie beneath the remains of a<br />

tidal wave of toxic tailing waste, nor<br />

for the environment which has suffered<br />

irreparable harm”.<br />

Indonesia’s<br />

forest fires:<br />

Damaging the planet and the<br />

lungs of its people<br />

By May Bulman<br />

Forest fires in Indonesia have reached<br />

unprecedented levels, causing the country's<br />

CO2 emissions to soar and affecting the<br />

livelihoods of millions of people.<br />

The fires, created annually to clear the<br />

land for palm oil production, have been<br />

exacerbated this year due to the unusually<br />

warm temperatures brought on by the El<br />

Nino effect, causing the country's largest<br />

blazes in nearly 20 years.<br />

This has resulted in a thick blanket<br />

of haze covering many towns and cities,<br />

which has caused respiratory infections<br />

affecting over 500,000 people and led to<br />

nineteen recorded deaths.<br />

Rahmi Carolina, a university student<br />

from Riau, has suffered from the annual<br />

haze since she was a child, and is now<br />

taking action. She said: "Each year I am<br />

affected by the fires - they give me a tight<br />

chest and dizziness. I've had to be rushed<br />

to hospital before.<br />

"A year ago the president promised<br />

us that the smoke would be drastically<br />

reduced in 2015, but it's even worse this<br />

year. We're really angry.<br />

"I've started campaigning for more<br />

action. I'm writing a personal blog and<br />

using social media to spread the word.”<br />

As well as affecting Indonesia's people,<br />

this year’s forest fires pose a severe threat to<br />

global warming, with the country emitting<br />

10 times more CO2 than normal, and the<br />

daily emission rate exceeding that of the<br />

entire U.S economy.<br />

Annisa Rahmawati, forest campaigner<br />

for Greenpeace, said: "As a globe, we<br />

cannot tackle climate change if we don't<br />

tackle deforestation in Indonesia.<br />

“The problem must be solved from the<br />

root. It is happening due to deforestation<br />

and peatland damage.”<br />

With the Climate Change Conference,<br />

which took place in December 2015,<br />

in Paris, Annisa explained that the<br />

Indonesian government and more<br />

developed countries must act together to<br />

solve the issue.<br />

“There needs to be law enforcement<br />

put in place by our government; the<br />

companies illegally burning the forest must<br />

be stopped.<br />

"But developed countries also have a<br />

power- they are consumers of palm oil.<br />

Unless there is a global, industry-wide<br />

rejection of the brands using palm oil, this<br />

problem will be very difficult to solve."<br />

Photograph © UN Photograph © Ardiles Rante. Greenpeace<br />

World’s biggest<br />

animal cloning<br />

centre in China<br />

By Jade Parker<br />

Whilst the rest of the world<br />

makes up its mind on the<br />

ethics of cloning, China<br />

is steaming ahead with its plans to<br />

construct the largest animal cloning<br />

factory. Set to open in 2016, the £20.5<br />

million centre will commercially recreate<br />

dogs, horses, and cattle.<br />

The centre is a joint venture between<br />

Chinese biotechnology firm Boyalife and<br />

Sooam Biotech, a South Korean research<br />

company, and is being constructed in a<br />

bid to meet the country's ever increasing<br />

demand for meat.<br />

Xu Xiaochun, board chairman of<br />

Boyalife, explained: “Chinese farmers are<br />

struggling to produce enough beef cattle<br />

to meet market demand. We will produce<br />

100,000 cattle embryos a year initially,<br />

eventually increasing to 1 million.” By<br />

churning out cloned embryos on such an<br />

epic scale the factory plans to provide 5<br />

percent of the meat eaten in China.<br />

In addition to the thousands of<br />

animals which will be recreated for<br />

consumption, the plant plans to clone<br />

champion racehorses, police sniffer dogs,<br />

and critically endangered species. The<br />

centre, which will be located in the same<br />

area where at least 165 people were killed<br />

in a chemical explosion last year, will also<br />

contain a museum and a gene bank.<br />

The companies backing the factory<br />

are attempting to ease worries about the<br />

safety and quality of meat. However, the<br />

reputation of the Sooam Biotech founder<br />

Hwang Woo-suk precedes him. In 2009<br />

he was convicted of illegally buying<br />

human embryos for his research, which<br />

many considered to be a gross ethical<br />

lapse.<br />

China’s sketchy food safety record<br />

has included fake rice made of plastic<br />

pellets and on a more serious level infant<br />

formula tarnished with melamine, an<br />

industrial chemical which killed six<br />

infants and hospitalised 300,000 others.<br />

If plans go ahead, the plant will be<br />

fully operational by next year.<br />

In the UK, cloned meats and milk<br />

products are classified as ‘novel foods’<br />

and therefore vendors have to obtain a<br />

special permission to be sell them.<br />

#SueMeSaudi<br />

takes off<br />

as SA Justice Ministry says it<br />

will sue Twitter user for ‘ISISlike’<br />

death sentence<br />

By Fergus Coltsmann<br />

The Saudi Arabian (SA) Justice Ministry<br />

will sue an unidentified Twitter user for<br />

comparing the sentencing of a poet to<br />

death as ‘ISIS-like’, the SA government<br />

aligned Al-Riyadh newspaper has<br />

reported.<br />

Palestinian poet and refugee Ashraf<br />

Fayadh, whom The Guardian reported<br />

was born in SA, was sentenced to death<br />

for blasphemy and apostasy on the 17th<br />

November.<br />

This prompted an outcry from senior<br />

cultural figures, including the director<br />

of Tate Modern Chris Dercon, British<br />

poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy, historian<br />

Simon Schama, playwright David Hare,<br />

and Egyptian novelist and commentator<br />

Ahdaf Soueif. The Justice Ministry’s<br />

latest action has seen the twitter hostage<br />

‘Sue Me Saudi’ trend on the social media<br />

platform, as users criticise the Kingdom.<br />

Fayadh denied the charges in court,<br />

and stated that the poetry book in which<br />

some of the alleged comments were<br />

made, Instruction Within, was published<br />

a decade ago and consists of love poems,<br />

as opposed to any political or religious<br />

content. He was originally sentenced<br />

on 26th May 2014 to four years in<br />

prison and 800 lashes. This sentence<br />

was reversed following an appeal by the<br />

prosecutor.<br />

SA’s justice system is based upon<br />

the Wahhabi ultra-conservative<br />

interpretation of Islamic Sharia Law,<br />

which allows for corporal and capital<br />

punishments for certain crimes,<br />

including religious crimes. Many of the<br />

punishments and executions are carried<br />

out in public by the religious police,<br />

known as the Mutaween.<br />

Commenting on the suit, Al-<br />

Riyadh’s justice ministry source said:<br />

“Questioning the fairness of the courts<br />

is to question the justice of the Kingdom<br />

and its judicial system based on Islamic<br />

law, which guarantees rights and ensures<br />

human dignity”, and went on to add that<br />

the ministry would not hesitate to put<br />

on trial “any media that slandered the<br />

religious judiciary of the Kingdom”.<br />

Erdogan gets<br />

Precious<br />

over Gollum comparison<br />

By Max Feldman<br />

Fantasy fiction has turned into a nightmare<br />

for Turkish doctor, Bilgin Ciftci, who lost<br />

his job with the Public Health Institute<br />

of Turkey and might be sent to prison for<br />

allegedly posting pictures illustrating the<br />

uncanny resemblance of Turkish president<br />

Recep Tayyip Erdogan to Gollum, the<br />

emaciated, ring obsessed ghoul who plays<br />

a major part in both The Hobbit and The<br />

Lord Of The Rings. Considering that we<br />

live in a society where jokes about our<br />

illustrious leader’s rumoured dalliances<br />

with pork products are fair game, it’s hard<br />

to see what the fuss is about, but Turkish<br />

law makes it illegal to insult their president,<br />

with sentences of up to four years possible<br />

for those convicted.<br />

Cifci legal team has taken the<br />

unusual tactic of trying to prove in court<br />

that Gollum, played by a computer<br />

generated Andy Serkis in the films, isn’t<br />

an evil character, thus meaning that the<br />

comparison is not necessarily insulting.<br />

In what amounts to the most high stakes<br />

nerdy debate in legal history, the courts<br />

have assembled a “panel of psychologists<br />

and film experts” to once and for all<br />

conclude if one of literature’s most<br />

famous cases of split personality is truly<br />

a bad guy or not. Even Peter Jackson,<br />

director of The Lord Of The Rings trilogy,<br />

has weighed in on the case. In a joint<br />

statement with his co-writers Fran Walsh<br />

and Philippa Boyens, Jackson claimed that<br />

the Turkish Courts have made an error<br />

as the character in Ciftci’s pictures isn’t<br />

Gollum at all, via one of the few positive<br />

cases of obsessive pedantry in history:<br />

“If the images shown are in fact the ones<br />

forming the basis of this Turkish lawsuit,<br />

we can state categorically: None of them<br />

feature the character known as Gollum.<br />

All of them are images of the character<br />

called Smeagol.” Smeagol is the child-like<br />

and friendly original personality which is<br />

twisted by the malign powers of the One<br />

Ring into the malicious Gollum persona,<br />

only to resurface during The Two Towers.<br />

Jackson describes Smeagol as “joyful<br />

and sweet”, which admittedly are rarely<br />

adjectives used to describe Erdogan, and<br />

says he should never be confused as the<br />

same as the vicious Gollum, even if they<br />

share the same body.<br />

Jackson’s argument does actually<br />

seem to have some weight behind it<br />

considering that the pictures Cifci used<br />

show the character smiling, and largeeyed,<br />

which was used in Jackson’s films<br />

to distinguish Smeagol from the darker<br />

Gollum persona. Tolkien also distinguished<br />

the two characters as separate with<br />

significant changes in his speech patterns<br />

and mannerisms when his good self was<br />

in control. It is not known yet whether<br />

Cifci’s legal team intends to use Jackson’s<br />

clarification in court, but considering<br />

the severity of the sentence hanging over<br />

Cifici it seems that they’ll take any help<br />

they can get. Perhaps this is a good way to<br />

settle long standing schisms in fan culture,<br />

perhaps placing a picture of Erdogan next<br />

to pictures of Kirk and Picard could finally<br />

establish which is the defining version of<br />

Star Trek.<br />

Japan continues<br />

lethal whaling<br />

By Emily Eaton<br />

Japan has defended its plans to carry<br />

out lethal whaling research, despite<br />

international opposition which has been<br />

largely spearheaded by the Australian<br />

government. The plans will see up to 330<br />

Minke whales harvested in coming months<br />

to “find out how the marine ecosystem of<br />

the Antarctic Ocean is actually shifting<br />

or changing”, according to Japan’s<br />

representative to the International Whaling<br />

Commission (IWC), Joji Morishita.<br />

Morishita added that the research will not<br />

just examine the whale population but also,<br />

“krill and the oceanographic situation.”<br />

In response the Australian Liberal<br />

government, led by Malcolm Turnbull,<br />

publicly criticised the plans and is now<br />

exploring the possibility of sending<br />

surveillance aircraft to monitor Japan’s<br />

whaling fleet, which set sail in early<br />

December 2015. The New Zealand<br />

government also released a statement,<br />

with the backing of 33 other countries,<br />

including the USA and Australia, saying;<br />

“We consider that there is no scientific<br />

basis for the slaughter of whales and<br />

strongly urge the government of Japan not<br />

to allow it to go ahead.”<br />

It is not the first time the Japanese<br />

and Australian governments have butted<br />

heads over the issue. The International<br />

Court of Justice (ICJ) last year ruled that<br />

Japan’s ‘scientific’ whaling programme was<br />

illegal, after Australia brought the case.<br />

Japan’s government has since attempted<br />

to circumvent the ruling, drawing up new<br />

rationale for the hunting.<br />

Japan also announced in a shock<br />

declaration to Ban Ki Moon, Secretary<br />

General of the United Nations, that it was<br />

removing itself from the jurisdiction of<br />

the ICJ in dispute over “living resources of<br />

the sea”, making further legal challenges<br />

difficult to pursue.<br />

©Bilgin Ciftci

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!