27.01.2016 Views

THE CITY

h6c7p5d

h6c7p5d

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The City<br />

surprised if our world is not designed for our happiness, and is full of<br />

suffering. If God is not good, we have little reason to be confident in<br />

our judgments about what ought, or ought not, to happen.<br />

Let us turn now to Nietzsche, whose response to the problem<br />

is radically different from Hume’s. Here it is worth noting that<br />

Nietzsche is not a figure commonly associated with the theodicy<br />

debate. Nevertheless, Nietzsche had telling things to say about<br />

the problem, albeit very atypical things in keeping with the radical<br />

nature of his philosophy. In particular, he disdainfully dismissed the<br />

whole problem as an embarrassing symptom of the sickly weakness<br />

of modern man.<br />

For Nietzsche, the problem is not that the world is hostile to human<br />

happiness. Rather, it is Christian morality that is hostile to happiness<br />

because it requires us to exercise moral restraints on the expression of<br />

our instincts in ways that Nietzsche found unnatural and stifling. “To<br />

have to combat one’s instincts—that is the formula for decadence: as<br />

long as life is ascending, happiness and instinct are one.” 7<br />

Nietzsche is zealous not only to celebrate this world in its entirety<br />

just as it is, but also ready to pour scorn on any invidious comparisons<br />

between this world and some other world purported to be more real,<br />

whether that world is an ideal Platonic realm or the Kingdom of<br />

God that Christians pray to come. To affirm this world just as it is<br />

represents Nietzsche’s ideal of the Dionysian spirit as portrayed in<br />

classic Greek tragedy.<br />

Affirmation of life even in its strangest and sternest problems,<br />

the will to life rejoicing in its own inexhaustibility through<br />

the sacrifice of its highest types—that is what I call Dionysian,<br />

that is what I recognize as the bridge to the psychology of<br />

the tragic poet. Not so as to get rid of pity and terror, not<br />

so as to purify oneself of a dangerous emotion through its<br />

vehement discharge—it was thus Aristotle understood it—:<br />

but, beyond pity and terror, to realize in oneself the eternal<br />

joy of becoming—that joy which also encompasses joy in<br />

destruction…. 8<br />

To affirm “joy in destruction” as a component of “the eternal joy<br />

7<br />

Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols and The Antichrist, trans. R. J. Hollingdale<br />

(London: Penguin, 1990), 44<br />

8<br />

Ibid., 121.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!