19.09.2012 Views

Governance - Xstrata

Governance - Xstrata

Governance - Xstrata

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

124 | <strong>Governance</strong><br />

Remuneration report continued<br />

Summary of performance conditions<br />

During 2008, 2009 and 2010, executive directors were granted<br />

market value options and Free Share awards under the LTIP. The<br />

vesting of both the options and Free Share awards is subject to the<br />

satisfaction of stretching performance conditions over a three-year<br />

performance period. Half of the options and Free Share awards are<br />

conditional on <strong>Xstrata</strong>’s TSR relative to a peer group and half are<br />

conditional on the Group’s real cost savings relative to targets set<br />

on a stretching scale over the three-year period, as set out below.<br />

For the awards conditional on TSR, 25% of the combined award will<br />

vest if TSR growth is at the median of the specified peer group, the<br />

full 50% of the combined award will vest for TSR growth at or above<br />

the second decile, with straight-line vesting between these points.<br />

No vesting will occur for TSR growth below median performance.<br />

For the remaining award, vesting is conditional on the Group’s real<br />

cost savings relative to targets set on a stretching scale: 5% of the<br />

combined award will vest for 1% cost savings, 35% for 2% cost<br />

savings and 50% for 3% or more cost savings, with straight-line<br />

vesting between these points. No vesting will occur for cost savings<br />

that are less than 1%. Real cost savings will be measured in relation<br />

to operating costs after adjusting for the effects of inflation,<br />

exceptional events/items such as natural disasters, excluding<br />

depreciation, commodity price-linked costs, effects of currencies on<br />

translation of local currency costs and planned life of mine adjustments.<br />

Since the Group’s share price and those of its peers are significantly<br />

influenced by the cycle in commodity prices, the Remuneration<br />

Committee considers TSR relative to a peer group to be an<br />

appropriate performance measure as it rewards relative success in<br />

growing shareholder value through the development and execution<br />

of the corporate strategy. The Remuneration Committee is also<br />

satisfied that TSR will be a genuine reflection of the Group’s<br />

underlying financial performance. The use of the second measure,<br />

Group real cost savings relative to targets, reflects the Group’s<br />

strategic initiative to add shareholder value through productivity and<br />

cost efficiencies. The Remuneration Committee is also mindful of the<br />

Group’s commitment to ethical and sustainable practices and that a<br />

positive approach in this area should support solid TSR performance.<br />

The performance targets are not capable of being retested at the<br />

end of the performance period, so that any proportion of a Free<br />

Share award or option that does not vest after three years will lapse,<br />

although vested options will remain exercisable for a maximum of<br />

seven years or such shorter period as the Remuneration Committee<br />

may specify (after which they will lapse).<br />

In the event of a change of control, all Free Share awards and<br />

options will vest in full or (in certain circumstances) may be<br />

exchanged for equivalent options or LTIP awards over shares in<br />

the acquiring company.<br />

The peer group of global mining companies used to determine the<br />

vesting of the options and Free Share awards conditional on TSR<br />

under the LTIP, comprises the same comparator group used to form<br />

the <strong>Xstrata</strong> Share Indices for the Chief Executive’s AVP for the<br />

relevant year, as detailed above. The Remuneration Committee may,<br />

at its absolute discretion, vary, add, remove or alter the companies<br />

making up the peer group when events happen that cause the<br />

Remuneration Committee to consider that such a change is<br />

appropriate to ensure that the performance condition continues to<br />

represent a fair measure of performance. This is with the provision<br />

or on the condition that the Remuneration Committee reasonably<br />

considers such a varied or amended performance condition is not<br />

materially easier or more difficult to satisfy.<br />

In calculating the TSR, the common currency of US dollars will be<br />

used and the share price of a notional parcel of shares of the Group<br />

and the companies in the specified peer group will be averaged over<br />

a period preceding both the start and end of the relevant<br />

performance period. The Remuneration Committee has resolved that<br />

averaging over a three-month period eliminates the volatility in spot<br />

share prices that could otherwise distort the assessment of whether<br />

the target has been met.<br />

The TSR of the Group and each member of the peer group over<br />

any performance period is calculated by taking the growth between<br />

the closing value and the base value of 100 shares expressed as a<br />

percentage of the base value, on the assumption that any net<br />

dividend per share paid by any company during the relevant<br />

performance period is reinvested in shares on the last day of the<br />

month during which the relevant shares go ex-dividend. This<br />

calculation is subject to such adjustments to closing value and base<br />

value as the Remuneration Committee considers appropriate to<br />

reflect any variation of share capital or any merger, takeover,<br />

reconstruction, demerger or change in listing status by any member<br />

of the peer group or upon any other events that the Remuneration<br />

Committee considers may materially distort the calculation.<br />

2008 LTIP award<br />

At 31 December 2010, the Group was ranked 13th out of the peer<br />

group of 15 companies (including <strong>Xstrata</strong>) in terms of TSR for the<br />

2008 award. If this is the outcome at the end of the three-year<br />

performance period on 4 April 2011 then no part of the 2008 award<br />

linked to TSR will vest (although up to 50% of the overall combined<br />

award could vest depending on the extent to which the cost saving<br />

targets are met).<br />

2009 LTIP award<br />

As at 31 December 2010, the Group was ranked sixth out of the<br />

peer group of 17 companies (including <strong>Xstrata</strong>) in terms of TSR for<br />

the 2009 award. If this is the outcome at the end of the three-year<br />

performance period on 12 March 2012 then 77.78% of each<br />

executive director’s 2009 award linked to TSR will vest (i.e. 38.89%<br />

of the overall combined award, and a further 50% of the overall<br />

combined award could vest depending on the extent to which the<br />

cost saving targets are met).<br />

2010 LTIP award<br />

As at 31 December 2010, the Group was ranked 10th out of the<br />

peer group of 17 companies (including <strong>Xstrata</strong>) in terms of TSR for<br />

the 2010 award. If this is the outcome at the end of the three-year<br />

performance period on 18 February 2013 then no part of the 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!