Documentation
09_02_16_NICE_Doku_WEB
09_02_16_NICE_Doku_WEB
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The history<br />
of N.I.C.E.<br />
Developing a European<br />
network based on<br />
local interests<br />
2013: Project “Shaking Hans“ — Winner of the pilot of the<br />
N.I.C.E. Award.<br />
In September 2012, ecce turned to the European<br />
Commission’s Directorate-General for Enterprise<br />
and Industry with a simple question: What is innovation?<br />
Which definition is at the heart of the recently announced<br />
Europe 2020 strategy and its Innovation Union?<br />
In 2012 – barely a year after its foundation – ecce was<br />
preoccupied with the setup of sustainable structures to<br />
promote change through culture in the Ruhr region. From<br />
the very beginning, this included the continuation of the<br />
European networks that had been established during the<br />
European Capital of Culture RUHR.2010, and the future<br />
use of European potentials and forces in order to support<br />
structural change in the Ruhr region. These goals adopted<br />
by the state government of North Rhine-Westphalia<br />
and the Regionalverband Ruhr (Ruhr Regional Association)<br />
– and laid down in the RUHR.2010 sustainability<br />
agreement – had to be made fit for the future and put<br />
into practise. Many questions had to be answered: Which<br />
networks are suitable to this end? Which structure does<br />
a network require? And which sectors, trends or topics<br />
in the Ruhr region are suitable or ready to be supported<br />
through European potentials?<br />
During this stage of finding a sustainable European dimension<br />
of the Ruhr region, the European Union presented<br />
its new perennial programme for the years 2014–2020:<br />
the Europe 2020 strategy and the Innovation Union. This<br />
was one cornerstone in view of European potentials: if the<br />
Ruhr region intended to tap the potentials offered by the<br />
European Commission, this had to take place within the<br />
scope of the Europe 2020 strategy, at least for the years<br />
2014 to 2020. In retrospect, the simple question “What<br />
is innovation?” asked in September 2012 can be seen as<br />
a strategic marker. The European Directorate-General<br />
answered as follows:<br />
“Pursuing a broad concept of innovation, both research-driven<br />
innovation and innovation in business<br />
models, design, branding and services that add value for<br />
users and where Europe has unique talents. The creativity<br />
and diversity of our people and the strength of European<br />
creative industries, offer huge potential for new growth<br />
and jobs through innovation, especially for SMEs.” 2<br />
This definition of innovation was surprising since it seemed<br />
inherently inconsistent: on the one hand, it drafted<br />
a comprehensive concept of innovation but gave a list<br />
of examples, which seemed restrictive on the other. The<br />
creativity of citizens and the potentials of the creative<br />
industries were mentioned in the same breath – did that<br />
mean that different worlds were thrown together without<br />
any visible underlying concept? Not least since the potential<br />
of innovation seemed to be focused on – not to say<br />
limited to – growth and employment: Would that mean<br />
that innovation potentials in education, social development,<br />
urban development and integration are not subject<br />
to the Europe 2020 strategy? Should they not be promoted?<br />
And what about cultural innovations? How does the<br />
European Union intend to promote these as of 2014?<br />
What are cultural innovations? This question directly related<br />
to the European potentials for RUHR.2010. Depending on<br />
the European Union’s understanding and definition, this<br />
might open – or close – a window of European opportunity<br />
for the Ruhr region. The crucial question was whether the<br />
top-down definition of the European Union would include<br />
the regional and urban institutions, the makers and activists<br />
to be producers of innovative culture – projects such as<br />
“2-3 streets” by Jochen Gerz, the Games Factory in Mülheim<br />
an der Ruhr, Urbanatix in Bochum, or many other examples<br />
of innovative impetus given by RUHR.2010 during the year<br />
of European Capital of Culture and retained afterwards.<br />
The clarification of this question did not<br />
2<br />
become any easier since the European<br />
Source: Communication<br />
definition of creative industries differed<br />
from the Commission to the<br />
from the German usage: on the one<br />
European Parliament, the<br />
hand, it included public institutions such<br />
Council, the Economic and<br />
as museums, theatres and libraries but<br />
Social Committee and the<br />
seemed to be much more geared at the<br />
Committee of the Regions,<br />
industry on the other. Would this mean<br />
Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative<br />
that sole proprietors and self-employed<br />
artists – who did have commercial<br />
Innovation Union (Brussels,<br />
6 Oct 2010).<br />
intentions yet often only managed to<br />
8