10.04.2016 Views

Theology Of Paul

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THEOLOGY OF PAUL<br />

M.M.NINAN<br />

___________________________________________________________<br />

keep silence, or were not to engage in them. These pertained solely to the male portion of the congregation. These<br />

things constituted the business of the public teaching; and in this the female part of the congregation were to be<br />

silent. “They were not to teach the people, nor were they to interrupt those who were speaking” - Rosen Muller. It<br />

is probable that, on pretence of being inspired, the women had assumed the office of public teachers.” Barnes<br />

• Since there is a real contradiction in action and statement in <strong>Paul</strong>, is it likely that it is<br />

not really from <strong>Paul</strong> but a later interpolation? Probably this is a side note of a scribe<br />

which got caught in the text.<br />

The only documentary evidence for this is that in some manuscripts, verses 34 and 35 comes after the<br />

verse 40. Again, “First, verses 34-35 impede the flow of <strong>Paul</strong>'s guidelines concerning tongues and<br />

prophecy. Second, these verses stand in obvious contradiction to <strong>Paul</strong>'s teaching in 11:5 where women<br />

are permitted not only to speak but to prophesy. Third, the usage of certain terms "seem quite foreign<br />

to <strong>Paul</strong>." Gordon Fee, Professor Emeritus of New Testament Studies, Regent College,<br />

Vancouver,B.C.Canada. The New International Commentary on the New Testament, the First Epistle to<br />

the Corinthians (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989), 699-700.<br />

• Is it likely that these are a rulings based on the context of the particular church and<br />

not binding as a general doctrinal principle.<br />

"The question of women's role in the church as a teacher or proclaimer of the Word basically focuses on two texts:<br />

1 Corinthians 14:34-35 and 1 Timothy 2:11-12. In both cases 'silence' and 'submission' are enjoined - although in<br />

neither case is the submission necessarily to her husband - and in 1 Timothy 2 she is not permitted to teach or to<br />

'have authority over' a man. Full compliance with this text in the twentieth century would seem to rule out not only<br />

woman's preaching and teaching in the local church, but it also would seem to forbid her writing books on biblical<br />

subjects that men might read, teaching Bible or related subjects (including religious education) in Christian<br />

colleges or Bible institutes where men are in her classes, and teaching men in missionary situations. But those who<br />

argue against women teaching in the contemporary church seldom carry the interpretation this far. And almost<br />

always they make the matters about clothing in the preceeding verse (1 Timothy 2:9) to be culturally relative.<br />

On the other hand, that 1 Timothy 2:11-12 might be culturally relative can be supported first of all by exegesis of<br />

all three of the Pastoral Epistles. Certain women were troublesome in the church at Ephesus (1 Tim. 5:11-15; 2<br />

Tim. 3:6-9) and they appear to have been a major part of the cause of the false teachers' making headway there.<br />

Since women are found teaching (Acts 18:26) and prophesying (Acts 21:8; 1 Cor. 11:5) elsewhere in the New<br />

Testament, it is altogether likely that 1 Timothy 2:11-12 speaks to a local problem. In any case, the guidelines<br />

above support the possibility that the prohibition in 1 Timothy 2:11-12 is culturally relative." Gordon Fee<br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!