08.12.2012 Views

(Nestor notabilis) Husbandry Manual - Kea Conservation Trust

(Nestor notabilis) Husbandry Manual - Kea Conservation Trust

(Nestor notabilis) Husbandry Manual - Kea Conservation Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

43<br />

• Training can also be used as an enrichment tool to increase complexity.<br />

4.3.4 Staff<br />

• A minimum of two committed persons who are confident and competent in<br />

basic kea training methods<br />

• Staff must detail each training session’s objectives and results in a daily<br />

diary (e.g. Crate training – Pluto stepping into crate with more confidence<br />

today. Will look to extend time he spends in the crate over the next week).<br />

NB. Those birds involved in breeding behaviour may not respond to training<br />

between the months of June - January however training must resume once<br />

reproductive activity has finished or if a bird within the pair is expressing<br />

stereotypic behaviours<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

Best Practice 4.3 – Training and Conditioning<br />

4.3.2 Methods<br />

As above with training regime extended to a daily training and inclusive of<br />

behaviours for advocacy and education of the public (utilising birds that show<br />

interest in “throwing “behaviours).<br />

4.3.3 Staff<br />

<strong>Kea</strong> respond well to change and novel items and as such should be provided with<br />

some level of exploratory value in their training through introduction of new<br />

personnel and training objectives introduced by staff. This should be aimed at<br />

increasing stimulation rather than measurable outcomes (i.e. this may be linked to<br />

some cognitive research work).<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

4.4 Social Structure<br />

4.4.1 Introduction<br />

Social enrichment of species is considered to be crucial for maintenance of<br />

normal species specific behaviours (Kreger et al., 1998). It is generally<br />

acknowledged that group housing of any social species is necessary for<br />

psychological health of individuals and as a form of enrichment is one of the most<br />

complex and effective, assuming group structures are appropriate (Young, 2003).<br />

Inappropriate group makeup and size can negatively impact on reproductive<br />

success of some species. However research has concluded that the benefits of<br />

social enrichment far outweighed the benefits of any other forms of enrichment,<br />

hence its importance in captive management (Schapiro et al., 1996).<br />

<strong>Kea</strong> as a social species must be held with other con-specifics (Pullar, 1996). They<br />

are a highly mobile species, forming and dissolving flock groupings depending on<br />

age of individuals and season (Jackson, 1960; Clarke, 1970). Although changing<br />

social groupings seasonally is not logistically possible or necessarily in the best<br />

interests of the birds in captivity, holding of kea in age and reproductive<br />

<strong>Kea</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> Final 25/11/2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!