08.12.2012 Views

(Nestor notabilis) Husbandry Manual - Kea Conservation Trust

(Nestor notabilis) Husbandry Manual - Kea Conservation Trust

(Nestor notabilis) Husbandry Manual - Kea Conservation Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70<br />

Trovan pit tags inserted under the skin are a non-visual method of identification<br />

which should be encouraged. These should only be used in addition to a visual<br />

identification method such as banding.<br />

5.3 Sexing Methods<br />

The two most common ways to sex kea are by morphological measurements and<br />

molecular techniques such as feather sexing. An additional method which should<br />

be used in conjunction with morphological sexing is behavioural sexing. As the<br />

sex of captive kea often determines where they are placed within the captive<br />

population, this information is required as soon as possible in a bird’s life,<br />

preferably before birds are transferred for the first time.<br />

Wild caught birds that are brought into captivity and are incorporated into the<br />

captive management programme (e.g. injured birds that cannot be released after<br />

treatment) must be sexed within 4 months using molecular techniques. Wild<br />

caught birds that have been injured and are being treated for release in captivity<br />

may be sexed by morphological and/or behavioural methods only and details<br />

recorded and sent to DoC.<br />

Chicks that hatch in captivity as part of the management programme must be<br />

sexed by both morphological/behavioural and<br />

molecular techniques.<br />

5.3.1 Morphological Sexing Method<br />

Morphological sexing is possible on all age<br />

groups with bill and skull length in most cases<br />

determining the gender (Elliott & Kemp, 2004)<br />

in combination with weights. Sexing can usually<br />

be achieved from 9 weeks by the size and<br />

shape of the beak (the upper mandible of the<br />

male is 12-14% longer than the female; Juniper<br />

and Parr, 1998 referenced in Woolcock, 2000).<br />

However, sexing by this method alone has<br />

been known to result in errors. Confirmation is<br />

either by laparoscopy (although this is invasive)<br />

or more commonly DNA feather sexing.<br />

Gender Weight Length Beak Skull<br />

length length<br />

Males 850 -1000g 46cm >45mm >65mm<br />

Females 750-950g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!