26.05.2016 Views

SOLUTIONS

1TCpRHv

1TCpRHv

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

72<br />

were delivered late. In the same study, 73 percent<br />

of non-PPP projects were delivered over budget,<br />

whereas only 20 percent of PPP projects were<br />

delivered over-budget (UK Treasury 2006). In<br />

a 2005 evaluation, the European Investment<br />

Bank reported similar findings. However, a 2014<br />

evaluation of World Bank Group support to<br />

PPPs indicated that PPP efficiency was similar<br />

to that of public infrastructure projects - some<br />

performed well, but others demonstrated high<br />

costs and construction delays (EIB 2005).<br />

Improved Access, Quality, and<br />

Maintenance of Public Services<br />

Budget deficits and competing policy priorities<br />

create a political disincentive to devote funds<br />

to the maintenance of existing infrastructure.<br />

The effects of neglecting maintenance are often<br />

only recognized in the long-term, long after<br />

specific political actors have left office. Ongoing<br />

neglect creates a situation where developing<br />

countries not only face challenges developing<br />

much-needed new infrastructure but they are<br />

also increasingly unable to maintain current<br />

levels of service delivery as existing assets<br />

deteriorate (Deloitte 2008; Farlam 2005). In such<br />

a situation, the general public has little recourse<br />

for insufficient service delivery. Moreover, the<br />

scarcity of available public goods may encourage<br />

some officials and public servants to accept bribes<br />

in exchange for access to services (Farlam 2005).<br />

Where a private sector actor is made responsible<br />

for running and maintaining public infrastructure<br />

under a PPP arrangement, maintenance and<br />

service delivery standards may be enforced<br />

through contractual performance standards<br />

(Deloitte 2008). Furthermore, because private<br />

sector operators often depend on the payment<br />

of tariffs and fees to ensure the profitability of<br />

the investment, there is a natural incentive to<br />

deliver services that meet consumers’ needs and<br />

expectations.<br />

Virtually all of the projects that were examined<br />

in an evaluation of World Bank Group support<br />

for PPPs were successful in increasing access to<br />

basic public services (IEG 2014). Moreover, it<br />

is possible to introduce contractual provisions<br />

that can further ensure that subsequent public<br />

service delivery is pro-poor by requiring<br />

partners to service poor areas in exchange for<br />

the right to service wealthier areas. Subsidies<br />

provide another means of mitigating the need<br />

for tariff increases in contexts where it is<br />

unfeasible to operate on a cost-recovery basis<br />

(Farlam 2005).<br />

Why have PPPs Failed to<br />

Address the Infrastructure<br />

gap?<br />

Despite the initial enthusiasm for PPPs,<br />

private sector participation in infrastructure<br />

investment remains below the level required to<br />

address Africa's infrastructure gap. The past<br />

decade has further demonstrated that PPPs<br />

are not a panacea for infrastructure challenges<br />

across the developing world where many<br />

projects either fail or result in unanticipated<br />

development impacts. PPP projects are<br />

complicated to establish and implement even<br />

under optimal conditions (McKinsey 2009);<br />

Deloitte 2008). Their success generally requires<br />

long-term political commitment, agreement<br />

among several groups of stakeholders, public<br />

and political support, and a favorable market<br />

environment (IEG 2014; Araujo and Sutherland<br />

2010; Farlam 2005).<br />

Need for a PPP-enabling Environment<br />

Successful PPP arrangements tend to be<br />

found in more mature economies with stable<br />

governance, supportive legal and regulatory<br />

frameworks, sufficient institutional capacity,<br />

and predictable administration of justice (IEG<br />

2014; ADB 2009; Araujo and Sutherland 2010;<br />

Hammami et al. (1999). Unclear or unsuitable<br />

rules, weak governance and similar challenges<br />

tend to increase costs and risk and make<br />

PPP arrangements commercially unviable.<br />

eVALUatiOn Matters

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!