Indian Newslink 15th June 2016 Digital Edition

More documents

Recommendations

Info

JUNE 15, 2016 08 FIJILINK - John Key Visit Special Wellington must stand the litmus test of diplomacy Mahendra Sukhdeo New Zealand Prime Minister John Key’s visit to Fiji last week was a defining moment in Kiwi-Fiji relations. The visit is likely to modify and strengthen the ties that had thawed in recent years. Although the visit was more ceremonial, it signified the mutuality of interests of both countries to improve their relations. It came in the wake of the bonhomie ensuing from New Zealand’s prompt and extensive aid to Fiji during Cyclone Winston early this year. New Zealand and Fiji have had long and roller-coaster relations since the colonial days and in Fiji’s independent era, New Zealand’s colonial perceptions and neo-colonial attitudes largely stymied the ties. New Zealand Territory? It is not so well known that in 1919, there was a move to place Fiji as a federated state of New Zealand, whereupon the then leader of the Fiji Indians, Manilal Doctor petitioned that based on its population, Fiji should be part of India! But, a more tangible incident of colonial claptrap was when at the height of Fiji’s first industrial strike in 1920, New Zealand’s then Prime Minister, William Massey sent an expeditionary force, the steamer, ‘Tutanekai’ loaded with soldiers and machine guns for the ‘safety of the white population.’ It gave fillip to the first exodus of Indians and contaminated race relations in Fiji (Please read my book, ‘Aryan Avatars,’ Pages 81 to 83). The upshot of the New Zealand action was that the remnants of arms and ammunitions became the nucleus of Fiji’s military force and Australasians began to stamp their mark on the South Pacific as an arena “reserved for Europeans, not Asian expansion.” Isn’t history repeating itself now? Aggressive paternalism The Western political dominance since the beginning of explorations and colonialism has been entwined with the indulgent value system based on aggressive paternalism and espousal of democracy. There is an intrinsic contradiction between dominance and democracy. The means and ends do not match and therefore the predilection of glorifying democracy while subscribing to direct or indirect exploitation, discrimination and inequity sounds hollow for majority of the developing nations. Australia and New Zealand are part of this socio-political milieu. Sanctions and isolation Downward diplomatic trajectory began with Fiji’s 1987 coups that sent shockwaves in the Pacific region dominated by Australia and New Zealand. However, it was the acquisition of power by Josaia Voreqe (Frank) Bainimarama on Frank Bainimarama receives John Key on arrival at Nausori Airport on June 9 December 5, 2006 that created an avalanche of fissures that continues to haunt the relationship. New Zealand pounced upon the Bainimarama government with sanctions, withdrawal of aid, barring entry of key military/ civil personnel and cessation of seasonal workers and immigration quota schemes. It insidiously worked to isolate Fiji from the United Nations Peace Keeping Force and the British Army. Neither Australia nor NewZealand contemplated such sanctions against the Egyptian military that forcibly removed the democratically elected Morsi regime or the coups in Pakistan and Thailand. This was a hard line approach, a retrograde step by the regional powers. Bainimarama would never forget his denial of entry to New Zealand to attend to a familial need. The wound is still festering. Asia fills the gap Fiji was in a diplomatic limbo. The gap was filled by China, India, and Malaysia and more recently by Russia, Indonesia and the Pacific nations. The Pacific Ocean is no longer the exclusive backyard of Australia and New Zealand. Its sphere of influence has substantially widened. Russia is not regarded as an enemy with a poisonous ideology. The Russian Embassy does not now have to issue a secretive visa as it did for me to visit Moscow on my way to attend Berlin’s 1986 XI World Conference of Labour. With the resumption of diplomatic ties in 2014 after Fiji’s last General Elections and the recent camaraderie developed between the two countries following Tropical Cyclone Winston devastation, there are efforts at fence building. There are however several areas that require a rethink, more particularly on the part of New Zealand in the context of the new alignment of diplomatic forces. Pro-Pacific Policy Firstly, New Zealand has to get out of the coattails of Australia and forge a more pro-Pacific foreign policy. Unlike Australia, New Zealand has a large Pacific Diaspora including that of Indo-Fijians, Samoans, Tongans, Cook and other Islanders, It has a more humane immigration and detention policy. In addition, it has (a) positive schemes for seasonal workers and immigration intakes from Pacific Island nations (b) given formal recognition to the first settlers and (c) a more resilient outlook on environment and welfare. Above all, its geographical location and population mix is more attuned to the Pacific nations. It is the feeling of identity that has to be pursued. Secondly, New Zealand should not be seen to be patronising when dealing with Pacific leaders. The litmus test of diplomacy is both in style and substance. The Pacific Island Forum, a colonial structural anachronism, needs to be reinvented. As part of diplomatic fence-mending, New Zealand must Z has to recognise Fiji’s leadership in the Pacific, its position in the UN Group of 77 and international sugar-producing groups. It is evident that China and India heads scored a diplomatic coup by being the first to be in Fiji after the elections and Fiji seized the opportunity to invite the other heads of Pacific Island Nations to meet with them in Suva. Climate Change New Zealand must align its climate change policies with the sentiments of the Pacific Islanders. Fiji took the Suva Declaration for a cap on carbon emissions at 2deg. C to the 2015 Paris Conference. It provided a benchmark for an agreement to be reached at 1.5 deg. Fiji is aware of the excruciating effect of cyclones and at the World Humanitarian Summit pressed for a permanent home for people displaced from low lying areas. New Zealand can help in this arena. Bainimarama walks with John Key for a ceremonial welcome on June 9 John Key with Bainimarama and others at the State Banquet on June 9 John Key on board HMNZS Otago on June 10 More Reports and pictures on the visit of Prime Minister John Key to Fiji appear in this Special Section. Performers at Naiyala High School on June 10
JUNE 15, 2016 FIJILINK - John Key Visit Special 09 Labour MP condemns visit as lost opportunity David Shearer When Prime Minister John Key described the aftermath of the 2006 military coup in Fiji as “ancient history,” it became obvious that his diplomatic visit to Fiji (from June 9 to June 10, 2016) might not go according to plan. It just did not sound honest when only two years ago Fiji finally had democratic elections following the 2006 military coup. No one should write off eight years of military rule endured by the people of Fiji so glibly, and as though they never happened. An embarrassment The result has been an embarrassment for our Prime Minister and New Zealand as a whole. Instead of playing the gracious host, and playing to Key’s naive offer of putting the past behind us, Fijian Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama used the opportunity to harangue New Zealand in front of the assembled media. Bainimarama refused, as is usual at the joint PM media briefing to answer questions from the New Zealand media - and our media meekly obliged by not asking any. Frank Bainimarama and John Key at the Press Meet held at the Office of Fijian Prime Minister in Suva on Friday, June 10, 2016. Picture by Sanjesh Narayan of Radio Tarana. Either he was scared of having to face journalists that have not been bullied into submission as the Fiji media has been; or he felt answering questions was beneath him. Either way, accountability to the public is clearly not part of the lexicon of Fiji’s democracy under Bainimarama. Serious concern Media freedom is a serious concern. New Zealand journalists Michael Field and Barbara Dreaver were banned from visiting Fiji as part of the media delegation from New Zealand - both are experienced specialist Pacific affairs correspondents who should have been there. There have also been issues with the functioning of Fiji’s Parliament. Only two weeks ago, a prominent opposition MP was banned from Parliament for two years by the Privileges Committee dominated by the governing Party for simply calling a minister a ’fool’, a disproportionate penalty. Democracy undermined It was a reminder to us all that despite its general election, Fiji still lacks some of the basic tenets of a democracy. They are the very issues that should be discussed during a top-level diplomatic visit - but our Prime Minister seemed determined to ignore them on last week’s trip - or laugh them off. In fact, allowing himself to be manipulated as he did, Mr Key’s visit did a huge disservice to all the people working to bring a free media, democracy and human rights to Fiji. New Zealand has always stood side by side with Fiji and we have a warm, close friendship with its people - and we always will. We sent flights, an aid ship and our service people to Fiji in response to the devastation caused by Cyclone Winston. In times of emergency it is important to stand by our friends. But it is just as important to speak up when things are not right rather than looking the other way. Retrograde step At a government-to-government level, this trip has taken our relationship backwards rather than forwards. Last week’s visit was a chance for John Key to put democracy and human rights on the agenda, but he did not take the opportunity. Predictably, it backfired. Instead of newspaper headlines and photos covering Prime Ministerial meetings with Fiji’s human rights organisations, media representatives and opposition parties, the defining images of Key’s Fiji visit were of Frank Bainimarama defending the 2006 coup, criticising New Zealand journalists and standing by his media restrictions - while our Prime Minister looked on. David Shearer is an elected Member of Parliament from Mt Albert in Auckland and Labour Party’s spokesman for Foreign Affairs. Please read our response to the above article, ‘Journalists aware of Questions ban’ and other related stuff in this Special Report. There’s a new food law. It helps you keep your food and customers safe. FIND OUT WHERE YOU FIT UNDER THE NEW LAW www.mpi.govt.nz/foodact
Page 1 and 2: HOMELINK The bursting bubble can ex
Page 3 and 4: JUNE 15, 2016 Let us be constructiv
Page 5 and 6: JUNE 15, 2016 Lawyer suspended for
Page 7: JUNE 15, 2016 New Zealand must rega
Page 11 and 12: JUNE 15, 2016 BUSINESSLINK 11 Boots
Page 13 and 14: JUNE 15, 2016 Budget 2016 leaves Au
Page 15 and 16: JUNE 15, 2016 BUSINESSLINK Relianz
Page 17 and 18: JUNE 15, 2016 BUSINESSLINK 17 BNZAd
Page 19 and 20: JUNE 15, 2016 COMMUNITYLINK 19 Yoga
Page 21 and 22: JUNE 15, 2016 Hindus prominent amon
Page 23 and 24: JUNE 15, 2016 COMMUNITYLINK Human q
Page 25 and 26: JUNE 15, 2016 COMMUNITYLINK 25 Gras
Page 27 and 28: JUNE 15, 2016 ARTLINK-Ratna Venkat
Page 29 and 30: JUNE 15, 2016 ENTERTAINMENTLINK Div
Page 31 and 32: JUNE 15, 2016 ENTERTAINMENTLINK 31

Indian Newslink 15th June 2016 Digital Edition

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?