15.06.2016 Views

Caribbean Times 28th Issue

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monday 13th June 2016 c a r i b b e a n t i m e s . a g 21<br />

Hundred eludes Hales, wickets elude England<br />

LORD’S - England<br />

would have had two main<br />

ambitions on a bedraggled<br />

fourth day at Lord’s. The first<br />

would have been to make<br />

incursions into Sri Lanka’s<br />

second innings to prepare<br />

a route to victory and a 3-0<br />

clean sweep in the series; the<br />

second, a maiden Test hundred<br />

for Alex Hales. Neither<br />

eventuated as Sri Lanka continued<br />

to resist gamely in the<br />

final Test.<br />

Left with 12 overs to see<br />

out at the end of the day, Sri<br />

Lanka’s openers clipped 32<br />

from the 362 needed for victory.<br />

Alastair Cook’s declaration<br />

at 233 for 7 was well<br />

judged, a touch more generous<br />

perhaps than if the series<br />

had been level.<br />

The pitch is a little uneven,<br />

but nothing excessive<br />

and, judging by the sober<br />

way Dimuth Karunaratne<br />

and Kaushal Silva went<br />

about their work, Sri Lanka<br />

look in the mood to scrap every<br />

inch of the way.<br />

Hales is getting closer<br />

to a treasured first Test hundred,<br />

but he will have to wait<br />

a while yet. He was on 94,<br />

only six runs short, when<br />

he fell lbw only 10 minutes<br />

before tea, trying to turn Angelo<br />

Mathews quietly on the<br />

leg side.<br />

He reviewed umpire Rod<br />

Tucker’s decision, but it was<br />

with a wan expression from<br />

a man fearing the worst.<br />

Ball-tracking technology<br />

held that the ball would have<br />

struck the top of leg stump.<br />

Alex Hales played a solid innings for England.<br />

With two 80s to his name<br />

in the series, Hales could at<br />

least console himself that he<br />

had done much to implant<br />

himself at the top of the order,<br />

his composed, if occasionally<br />

fortunate, innings<br />

providing more evidence<br />

that he can successfully adjust<br />

to the demands of the<br />

he suffered a replica of Joe<br />

Root’s dismissal the previous<br />

day - his off stump hit<br />

by a shooter from Nuwan<br />

Pradeep - only for umpire<br />

Tucker to call no-ball.<br />

TV replays suggested<br />

that Pradeep’s heel was behind<br />

the line on first impact,<br />

the umpire perhaps being<br />

five-day game. Without fooled by the bowler’s foot<br />

repeated self-destruction<br />

against Sri Lanka’s spinners<br />

earlier in the series, he could<br />

have been basking in something<br />

even better.<br />

Rain had prevented a<br />

start until 2.40pm, but England<br />

held an overnight lead<br />

of 237 and, despite several<br />

more pesky showers, the day<br />

yielded 45 overs, enough to<br />

keep the Test meaningful.<br />

Hales’ composure held<br />

England’s second innings<br />

together, even if he was<br />

not without fortune. On 58,<br />

slipping forward on landing.<br />

Understandable complaints<br />

that international<br />

umpires were ignoring repeated<br />

no-balls so that they<br />

could concentrate on events<br />

at the business end of the<br />

pitch seem to have caused a<br />

recent reassessment of that<br />

approach, but Tucker’s noball<br />

call for such a borderline<br />

delivery - a wrong call<br />

as it turned out - will not allay<br />

concerns.<br />

With no chance under<br />

current regulations to use<br />

TV evidence to reverse the<br />

decision, Sri Lanka were<br />

understandably aggrieved.<br />

Those regulations were already<br />

due to be examined at<br />

the ICC annual meeting in<br />

Edinburgh later this month.<br />

Undiplomatically, Sri<br />

Lanka responded by hanging<br />

the national flag from<br />

the Lord’s balcony, which<br />

could either be regarded as<br />

a plucky statement to their<br />

players that they would fight<br />

on regardless of their mounting<br />

ill luck or, conversely, as<br />

an infantile gesture carrying<br />

the implication of umpiring<br />

bias.<br />

The request soon came<br />

through for them to take it<br />

down: Lord’s does not allow<br />

flags of any description,<br />

certainly not from dressing<br />

room balconies.<br />

Thilanga Sumathipala,<br />

cont’d on pg 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!