31.07.2016 Views

The way of the bird

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dies. <strong>The</strong> relationship is one <strong>of</strong> total dependence. But <strong>the</strong> beauty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Self is that it is<br />

al<strong>way</strong>s already <strong>the</strong>re. He is <strong>the</strong> One who is living in this body, and He is al<strong>way</strong>s free and<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

3.13 "I don't do anything. <strong>The</strong> body does it."<br />

If, in <strong>the</strong> evening, you look back on <strong>the</strong> events <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day, you see how many different<br />

things you appeared to do during those hours. You seemed to be acting consciously,<br />

though sometimes you can distinguish actions that happened completely mechanically,<br />

without thinking, from o<strong>the</strong>r actions that required some thought or preparation. Whatever<br />

<strong>the</strong> actions were, you are still here, remembering <strong>the</strong>m. Although you may not have been<br />

aware <strong>of</strong> it at <strong>the</strong> time, you were also <strong>the</strong>re when any <strong>of</strong> those actions were taking place.<br />

You remain al<strong>way</strong>s, whatever experiences come and go, as <strong>the</strong> witness <strong>of</strong> those events.<br />

<strong>The</strong> body does <strong>the</strong> actions, prompted by <strong>the</strong> mind, but you are not affected by <strong>the</strong>m<br />

because you are unchanging. Identification with <strong>the</strong> body makes you believe that <strong>the</strong><br />

actions are your actions. That freedom from action is already yours, you only have to<br />

realize it.<br />

3.14 "Free will means no bondage."<br />

<strong>The</strong> ego imagines that free will means <strong>the</strong> freedom to do whatever it wants. This seems<br />

desirable because it knows intuitively that it doesn't have that freedom now. <strong>The</strong> seeker<br />

understands that <strong>the</strong>re is bondage, but may not understand that it is because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "I"<br />

concept. He or she imagines that liberation will somehow bring about that freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

action. That concept <strong>of</strong> unconstrained action is still <strong>the</strong>re. But <strong>the</strong> realized person does<br />

not operate on that basis. For him or her free will means harmony with what is, as it is. If<br />

that were not so; that is, if such a person were not able to accept whatever happened, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

he or she would not be free at all. So free will means liberation from <strong>the</strong> bondage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ego, which is based on <strong>the</strong> false concept that "I" am <strong>the</strong> doer. When that concept <strong>of</strong><br />

doership is gone, <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> free will does not arise.<br />

3.15 "`I don't exist.' That is <strong>the</strong> real free will."<br />

<strong>The</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> free will is really something <strong>of</strong> a joke. In <strong>the</strong> West, it is <strong>of</strong>ten regarded as<br />

axiomatic; certainly it is enshrined in Christian dogma. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, in <strong>the</strong> Sanskrit<br />

language, and in <strong>the</strong> Indian languages derived from it, <strong>the</strong>re is no word for free will. <strong>The</strong><br />

concept just doesn't exist. It is taken for granted that everything happens as a<br />

manifestation <strong>of</strong> divine law. Maharaj is <strong>the</strong>refore being ra<strong>the</strong>r playful here, when he says<br />

that <strong>the</strong> real free will comes when <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> understanding "I don't exist." He is<br />

pointing out that in reality, <strong>the</strong>re is nothing like free will. <strong>The</strong> concept only arises in<br />

ignorance, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> notion that "I am <strong>the</strong> doer." Choice exists as long as you<br />

imagine that you are doing something, but if <strong>the</strong>re is no concept <strong>of</strong> doership, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

no concept <strong>of</strong> free will ei<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

3.16 "Tomorrow never comes."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!