USING A DIFFERENT LENS FOR HIV and AIDS EDUCATION ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Knoblauch, H., Baer, A., Laurier, E., Petschke, S. & Schnettler, B. (2008). Visual analysis. New developments in the interpretative analysis of video and photography [30 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. Available from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803148. Knowles, G.J. & Cole, A.L. (2008). (Eds.). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research. London: Sage. MacEntee, K., Labacher, L. & Murray, J. (2011). Girls use digital photography to speak out about sexuality and HIV. Girlhood Studies, 4 (1), 156-167. Martin, M. (2004. HIV/AIDS in South Africa: Can the visual arts make a difference? In K. Kauffman & D. L. Lindauer (Eds.) AIDS and South Africa: The Social expression of a pandemic. Basinstoke: Palgrave. Mccluskey, G., Lloyd, G. & Stead, J. (2004). „It was better than sitting in a group and talking‟. An evaluation of a film-making project with young people in trouble or „at risk‟ in school. Pastoral Care. Michaels, E. (1985). How video has helped a group of aborigines in Australia. Media Development, 1, 16-18. Mitchell. C. (2011). Doing visual research. London: Sage. Mitchell, C. (2008). Taking the picture, changing the picture. Visual methodologies in educational research in South Africa. South African Journal of Educational Research, 28 (3), 365-383. Mitchell, C. & De Lange, N. (2001). Community-based participatory video and social action in rural South Africa. In E. Margolis, & L. Pauwels (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. London: Sage. Mitchell, C., De Lange, N. & Moletsane, R. (2011). Before the cameras roll: Drawing storyboards to address gendered poverty. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, & J. Stuart, (Eds.). Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology. Rotterdam/New York/Taipei: Sense Publishers. Mitchell, C., De Lange, N., Moletsane, R., Stuart, J. & Buthelezi T. (2005). Giving a face to HIV and AIDS: On the uses of photo-voice by teachers and community health care workers working with youth in rural South Africa. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 257-270. Mitchell, C. & De Lange, N. (2008). Through our eyes: Using photovoice to address stigma in the age of AIDS. Girlhood Studies, 1(1), 138–142. Mitchell, C. Stuart, J., De Lange, N., Moletsane, R., Buthelezi, T., Larkin, J. & Flicker, S. (2010). What difference does this make? Studying Southern African youth as knowledge producers within a new literacy of HIV and AIDS. In C. Higgins & B. Norton, (Eds.). Language and HIV/AIDS. Multilingual Matters: Toronto, pp. 214-232. 54
Mitchell, C., Pascarella, J., De Lange, N. & Stuart, J. (2010). “We wanted other people to learn from us”: Girls blogging in rural South Africa in the age of AIDS. In S. Mazzarella, (Ed.). Girl wide web 2.0: Revising girls, the internet and the negotiation of identity. New York: Peter Lang. pp. 161-182. Mitchell, C., Walsh, S. & Weber, S. (2007). „Behind the lens: Reflexivity and video documentary.‟ In G. Knowles and A. Cole (Eds.). The art of visual inquiry. Halifax: Backalong Press. pp. 97-108. Mnisi, T. (2009). Beyond visual data: How educators use metadata to help learners understand issues on HIV and AIDS stigma. Unpublished M Ed Dissertation. Durban: University KwaZulu-Natal. Moletsane, R., De Lange, N., Mitchell, C., Stuart, J. & Buthelezi, T. (2007). Photovoice as an analytical and activist tool in the fight against HIV and AIDS stigma in a rural KwaZulu-Natal school. South African Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 19, 19-28. Moletsane, R. (2009). What can a woman do with a camera? Turning the female gaze on poverty and HIV/AIDS in rural South Africa. International journal of qualitative studies in Education, 22(3), 315-331. Moletsane, R., Mitchell, C., Smith, A. & Chisholm, L. (2008). Methodologies for mapping a Southern African girlhood. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Olivier, M.A.J., Wood, L. & De Lange, N. (2008). Picturing hope. Cape Town: Juta. Pink, S. (2001). More visualising, more methodologies: on video, reflexivity and qualitative research. The Sociological Review, 49, 586-99. Pink, S. (2001). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage. Pridmore, P. & Bendelow, G. (1995). Images of health: Exploring beliefs of children using the „draw and write‟ technique. Health Education Journal, 54, 473-88. Prosser, J. (Ed.). (1998). Image based research. London: Falmer Press. Raht, D., Smith, J. & MacEntee, K. (2009). Engaging youth in addressing HIV&AIDS. In C. Mitchell and K. Pithouse (Eds.). Teaching and HIV&AIDS. Johannesburg: Macmillan. pp. 219-236. Rivard, L., Gervais, M., Mitchell, C., De Lange, N., MacEntee, K., & Murray, J. (2009). Participatory visual methodologies, photovoice and drawing. Quebec, Canada: Femstep Research Programme, McGill University. pp. 6-11. Ruby, J. (2000). Picturing culture: Explorations of film and anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Shaw, J. & Robertson, C. (1997). Participatory video. A practical guide to using video creatively in group development work. London: Routledge. 55
Page 2 and 3:
USING A DIFFERENT LENS FOR HIV and
Page 4 and 5:
This publication draws on a two day
Page 6 and 7: PARTICIPATORY VISUAL METHODOLOGIES
Page 8 and 9: I DRAWING: HOW CAN IT BE USED? n th
Page 10 and 11: The following was used to generate
Page 12 and 13: PAYING THE PRICE TO MAKE THE DIFFER
Page 14 and 15: This poster showcases the viewpoint
Page 16 and 17: I PHOTOVOICE: HOW CAN IT BE USED? n
Page 18 and 19: No person should be photographed wi
Page 20 and 21: The following was used to generate
Page 22 and 23: ADOLESCENT SEXUALITY: CHALLENGES AN
Page 24 and 25: This photo-narrative shows teachers
Page 26 and 27: SILENCE PLEASE… RESERVED FOR TOMO
Page 28 and 29: This photo-narrative depicts the
Page 30 and 31: What was most striking for me, with
Page 32 and 33: 4. Prompt them to individually choo
Page 34 and 35: 2. Explain that each frame should b
Page 36 and 37: THE STORYBOARDS 34
Page 38 and 39: across the various learning areas,
Page 40 and 41: there to transfer information but t
Page 42 and 43: AIDS education, higher authority ta
Page 44 and 45: ADDRESSING HIV AND AIDS FATIGUE THR
Page 46 and 47: CONTENT - WHAT AND WHAT NOT TO TEAC
Page 48 and 49: students asked him such a question
Page 50 and 51: VISUAL ETHICS Adapted from Mitchell
Page 52 and 53: Ownership The photos, drawings and
Page 54 and 55: Other points Ask permission to take
Page 58 and 59: Schratz, M. & Walker, R. (1995). Re
show all

USING A DIFFERENT LENS FOR HIV and AIDS EDUCATION ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?