14.10.2016 Views

Understanding patient flow in hospitals

understanding_patient_flow_in_hospitals_web_0

understanding_patient_flow_in_hospitals_web_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24 <strong>Understand<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>patient</strong> <strong>flow</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>hospitals</strong><br />

Figure 9: Patients wait<strong>in</strong>g longer than four hours from decision to admit to<br />

admission, 2010–2015<br />

20%<br />

80<br />

Percentage of <strong>patient</strong>s<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

Figure 9 shows how the number of <strong>patient</strong>s wait<strong>in</strong>g longer than four hours has risen<br />

as space has become more scarce. It also demonstrates a seasonal pattern with supply<br />

and demand not appropriately matched throughout the year, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the muchdiscussed<br />

w<strong>in</strong>ter pressures.<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g admission rates and bed use<br />

Due to the tendency for activity to <strong>in</strong>crease with age, the overall admission rate is<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g nationally. An additional 2.5 million spells per year are possible by 2030<br />

(see Table 7). The average admission rate is likely to <strong>in</strong>crease by 6% but, because of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g population, total activity could <strong>in</strong>crease by 17%.<br />

Table 7: Increas<strong>in</strong>g admission rates and bed use<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

Aug 2010<br />

Nov 2010<br />

W<strong>in</strong>ter months<br />

Number of <strong>patient</strong>s spend<strong>in</strong>g more than 4 hours from decision to admit to admission (1,000s)<br />

Percentage of <strong>patient</strong>s spend<strong>in</strong>g more than 4 hours from decision to admit to admission<br />

Source: QualityWatch (2016)<br />

Feb 2011<br />

May 2011<br />

Aug 2011<br />

Nov 2011<br />

Feb 2012<br />

May 2012<br />

Aug 2012<br />

Nov 2012<br />

Feb 2013<br />

May 2013<br />

Aug 2013<br />

Nov 2013<br />

Feb 2014<br />

May 2014<br />

Aug 2014<br />

Nov 2014<br />

Feb 2015<br />

May 2015<br />

Aug 2015<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Number of <strong>patient</strong>s (1,000s)<br />

Year Spells<br />

Adm.<br />

per<br />

1,000*<br />

Rate<br />

change<br />

Volume<br />

change<br />

Beds<br />

per<br />

1,000**<br />

Beds per<br />

1,000 %<br />

change<br />

No.<br />

of<br />

beds<br />

No. of<br />

beds %<br />

change<br />

Weighted<br />

average<br />

length<br />

of stay<br />

2015 14,903,382 273 – – 2.0 – 109,897 – 2.7<br />

2020 15,653,407 277 101.4% 105.4% 2.1 104% 118,976 108% 2.8<br />

2030 17,450,227 290 106.4% 117.1% 2.4 119% 143,568 131% 3.0<br />

* There is a trend of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervention rates beyond 65 so rates are likely to be higher<br />

** There are reductions <strong>in</strong> length of stay so bed use may be less, but this will be countered by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervention rates<br />

Source: HES (2016)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!