13.12.2016 Views

Ambulance

Winter2016

Winter2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Focus on Independent <strong>Ambulance</strong> Provision<br />

The<br />

Coperforma<br />

Lesson:<br />

Below, Joe Sheehan, former MD of Medical Services Ltd (now part of Falck UK), discusses<br />

the importance of the psychological contract that should exist between employers and staff<br />

responsible for the delivery of Patient Transport Services, arguing that the Coperforma<br />

business model operated in Sussex, which failed so spectacularly earlier this year, could have<br />

been avoided if this vital element of service delivery was not omitted<br />

The recent news that NHS Commissioners<br />

in Sussex and Coperforma had agreed<br />

to discontinue with the patient transport<br />

contract has been unsurprising given the<br />

circumstances.<br />

Opinions differ about managed-servicesprovider<br />

contracts and the relative<br />

advantages or disadvantages over a directlyoperated<br />

service. Certainly, the top team<br />

at Coperforma, who I am sure honestly<br />

believed the new model of service was<br />

operable and genuinely aspired to deliver a<br />

quality patient transport service might have<br />

a different viewpoint to mine.<br />

As often happens to pioneers, once you<br />

have a first chance to fully test your new<br />

concept you are just as likely to end up<br />

going back to the drawing board and<br />

coming back later with something better.<br />

I am not arguing that all the component<br />

parts of the Coperforma managed-service<br />

offering are unworkable - but I certainly<br />

believe the strategy toward the staff<br />

delivering the service is structurally flawed,<br />

which is why I maintain that, without the<br />

patient-transport staff’s full support and<br />

emotional commitment, the contract would<br />

never have performed to the required level<br />

anyway.<br />

We are seeing a number of variances of this<br />

new type of organisational model (Uber,<br />

Deliveroo etc…) whereby technology<br />

appears to have the ability to move workers<br />

away from an obligated or responsible<br />

employer (either by degrees of separation<br />

or completely) to affect a risk and a liability<br />

transfer. Both Uber and Coperforma are<br />

using advanced algorithmic transport<br />

management software at the centre of their<br />

business model.<br />

But there is a choice here: patient-transport<br />

providers have the option of deploying this<br />

new technology and choosing to maintain a<br />

Winter 2016 | <strong>Ambulance</strong>today<br />

committed direct workforce as a matter of<br />

business strategy.<br />

On one level, the business strategy of<br />

Coperforma is that they would enjoy some<br />

of the profits for providing software and<br />

some contract-management to the service.<br />

Any subcontractors could also enjoy some<br />

of the profits, but do so by shouldering<br />

nearly all of the risk of employer obligations<br />

to staff as well as the significant vehicle<br />

investment liabilities and attendant contract<br />

running costs.<br />

At least one consequence of a servicedelivery-model<br />

which outsources<br />

workers and divorces the obligations and<br />

responsibilities of organisations for those<br />

workers is that you cannot really expect<br />

the same men and women to have shared<br />

ownership of the problem when the service<br />

runs into operational difficulties.<br />

In this case, the patient-transport staff who<br />

had been comfortably employed inside<br />

the NHS found themselves distanced<br />

by the Tupe transfer process and two<br />

tiers removed from their preferred NHS<br />

employment status. They did not transfer<br />

to Coperforma along with the award<br />

of the new contract, but were “doubleoutsourced”<br />

and parked with third-party<br />

subcontractors. The legal framework is I<br />

suppose, arguably correct but that’s not<br />

my point. My view is that the psychological<br />

contract between the provider of the<br />

patient transport service and the staff<br />

employed to deliver the service was clearly<br />

broken.<br />

I doubt Uber taxi drivers feel any (intrinsic)<br />

emotional reward on top of the cash fare<br />

(an extrinsic reward) the passenger pays. In<br />

sharp contrast to taxi drivers many patient<br />

transport staff choose the job because they<br />

see themselves as part of a socially valuable<br />

service and have an emotional commitment<br />

as well, which is expressed in the quality of<br />

patient care they provide.<br />

I have managed the process of ambulance<br />

staff transferring into the independent sector<br />

in the past. In all instances the transferring<br />

staff worked directly for the new service<br />

provider; and I am not sharing any secrets<br />

when I say that this was challenging. Some<br />

transferring staff needed to see genuine<br />

commitment from the new employer over a<br />

long period before the kind of relationships<br />

were built that support high-performing<br />

teams. It works in the other direction as well:<br />

a year or so ago in Shropshire, a number<br />

of patient transport staff transferred across<br />

on zero-hours contracts from the previous<br />

independent sector provider and were<br />

immediately offered permanent full-time<br />

employment contracts. Consequently,<br />

relationships, emotional commitment and<br />

better performance outcomes were built<br />

more quickly.<br />

When the TV news showed patient<br />

transport staff involved in industrial action,<br />

it was Coperforma and the CCG the<br />

staff were angry with, not the unheard-<br />

Biography:<br />

Joe Sheehan<br />

With back to back, build and sell<br />

successes, most notably as Managing<br />

Director of Medical Services Ltd,<br />

Joe Sheehan is a results-orientated<br />

strategic thinker and a motivated<br />

management professional with<br />

over thirty years’ experience in<br />

the transport management, logistics and healthcare<br />

transport industries.<br />

With a strong operational focus Joe built a successful<br />

career in express logistics and control centre<br />

management. He was part of the entrepreneurial team<br />

behind LDT PLC, which was acquired by Addison Lee<br />

in 2011. Subsequently, he developed and led Medical<br />

Services Ltd into the UK’s largest independent sector<br />

ambulance service, delivering over a million patient<br />

journeys a year for the NHS until sold to a global<br />

healthcare brand in 2014. Joe is currently undertaking<br />

an MBA at the the University of Kent and retains a<br />

strong interest in the development of UK and global<br />

ambulance delivery.<br />

Winter 2014 | <strong>Ambulance</strong>today3 45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!