Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, November 2016 important to use graphical representations and the sensitivity analysis (that is, using S-Gini indexes with different values for the normative parameter of weighting instead of the conventional Gini) in the context of the inequality (and poverty) analysis. These tools help to determine how much the results of an analysis using a specific index hinges on the underlying normative choice of using that specific indicator. 52
Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, November 2016 References Alam, Shamma A., Gabriela Inchauste, and Umar Serajuddin. Forthcoming. “The Distributional Impact of Fiscal Policy in Jordan,” in: Inchauste, G., Lustig, N. (Eds.), The Distributional Impact of Fiscal Policy: Experience from Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Afkar, Rythia, Jon Jellema, and Mathew Wai-Poi. Forthcoming. “The Distributional Impact of Fiscal Policy in Indonesia,” in: Inchauste, Gabriela and Nora Lustig (Eds.), The Distributional Impact of Fiscal Policy: Experience from Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Araar, Abdelkrim. 2006. “On the Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient: An Exact Approach, with an Illustration Using Cameroonian Data,” CIRPEE Working Paper 06-02 (SSRN Working Paper Series). Arunatilake, Nisha, Gabriela Inchauste and Nora Lustig. Forthcoming. “The Incidence of Taxes and Spending in Sri Lanka,” in: Inchauste, G., Lustig, N. (Eds.), The Distributional Impact of Fiscal Policy: Experience from Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Bibi, Sami, and Jean‐Yves Duclos. 2010. “A Comparison of the Poverty Impact of Transfers, Taxes and Market Income across Five OECD Countries.” Bulletin of Economic Research 62, no. 4, pp. 387-406. Cancho, Cesar and Elena Bondarenko. Forthcoming. “The Distributional Impact of Fiscal Policy in Georgia," in: Inchauste, G., Lustig, N. (Eds.), The Distributional Impact of Fiscal Policy: Experience from Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington, D.C. Dardanoni, Valentino and Peter Lambert. 2000. “Progressivity Comparisons.” Journal of Public Economics 86, no. 1, pp. 99–122 53
- Page 1 and 2: ANALYTIC FOUNDATIONS: MEASURING THE
- Page 3 and 4: ANALYTIC FOUNDATIONS: MEASURING THE
- Page 5 and 6: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 7 and 8: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 9 and 10: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 11 and 12: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 13 and 14: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 15 and 16: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 17 and 18: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 19 and 20: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 21 and 22: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 23 and 24: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 25 and 26: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 27 and 28: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 29 and 30: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 31 and 32: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 33 and 34: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 35 and 36: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 37 and 38: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 39 and 40: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 41 and 42: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 43 and 44: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 45 and 46: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 47 and 48: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 49 and 50: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 51: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 55 and 56: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 57 and 58: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 59 and 60: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 61 and 62: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 63 and 64: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 65 and 66: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 67 and 68: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 69 and 70: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
- Page 71 and 72: Enami, Lustig, Aranda, No. 25, Nove
Change language