Barefoot Vegan Mag Jan_Feb 2017
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
“We must<br />
communicate the<br />
very real and<br />
urgent need for<br />
change, rather<br />
than pretend that<br />
baby steps are<br />
enough.”<br />
carrying out our actual activism. Some of these people<br />
actually sound like a vegan Miss Manners, extolling pop<br />
psychology or self-help tropes which I don’t see advancing<br />
our cause. My work is instead focused on exploring the<br />
culture that perpetuates “non-veganism.”<br />
As for our vegan community, I think it would help us<br />
immensely to develop a platform that conveys more<br />
dignity, confidence and storytelling savvy. I’d like to see<br />
more honesty and conviction about our goals for animal<br />
liberation and the kind of radical activism achieving those<br />
goals will require. I’d like to see a greater reverence for<br />
truth as the most powerful tool we have against the<br />
exploitation industries that are built upon fictions and lies.<br />
This means that animals never become our “bargaining<br />
tools” to broker deals with their exploiters or with the<br />
public. After all, who are we, as their supposed advocates,<br />
to negotiate the use — any use — of their bodies, or to<br />
negotiate the level of their suffering or victimisation? What<br />
other victim advocates would find this even remotely<br />
ethical? I can’t think of any. I’d like to see more of us<br />
abandon the myth that we have the luxury of time to<br />
advocate transition in steps. If we listen to the urgent calls<br />
from leading climate and environmental experts, then we<br />
must honestly face the fact that time is most certainly not<br />
on our side. We must communicate the very real and<br />
urgent need for change, rather than pretend that baby steps<br />
are enough. They aren’t. As Noam Chomsky famously said,<br />
“Just tell the truth.”<br />
As you quite rightfully point out, it can<br />
be quite a popularity contest between<br />
the various animal advocacy<br />
organisations vying for financial<br />
contributions and public attention. For<br />
those that can’t afford to be so physically<br />
active with their advocacy due to<br />
whatever reason, what advice would you<br />
give in terms of how to choose an<br />
organisation to support? Are there any<br />
criteria for an effective organisation?<br />
In the process of writing my book, I came to question<br />
many more assumptions than I had anticipated. And<br />
one of them is this belief that non-profit organisations<br />
are at the forefront of change and progress for our<br />
movement. I think we just assume that they are — some<br />
appear so polished, professional and convincing — but<br />
maybe that’s just wishful thinking. As much as I<br />
appreciate the Free from Harm donors who have helped<br />
us advance our mission in so many ways, I can’t help<br />
but wonder if larger organisations that become heavily<br />
dependent on and therefore influenced by donors do<br />
not risk losing their focus and impetus for meaningful<br />
change. Maybe instead it will be certain visionaries who<br />
are driven by nothing more than a passion for their<br />
cause who people will rally around, like they rallied<br />
around Cesar Chavez. Other movements have not<br />
BAREFOOT<strong>Vegan</strong> | 64